>caloric surplus
Basically you mean get fat.
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
>caloric surplus
Basically you mean get fat.
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
only if youre a lazy frick eating slop
If you become more active then you need to eat even more to reach surplus.
youre not understanding this at all
What’s CO in CICO?
^
That study is absolute shit. Kys.
wheres your proof midwit
The proof is when you exercise more you burn more calories. “Midwit” is the term used by fricking morons such as yourself, so again, kys guy.
>when you exercise more you burn more calories.
that isnt proof Black
You’re an actual moron if you’re on the internet in 2023 saying more exercise doesn’t mean more calories burned. I’d say go back to school but this is such basic knowledge you probably need meds or to go to some type of special institute for braindead morons tbh.
theres a study proving it, saying nu uh wont get you anywhere homosexual
>there’s a study
No there isn’t. Btw I saw a study that told you to kys, so go and do that.
show me that study dipshit, if you can even read
Leave my thread pls and take your stupid homosexual graph with you.
not my graph, it belongs to everyone
just like your prostitute ass thread, kys if youre this moronic genuinely
Yeah I literally told you to frick off already, don’t know why you’re in here posting very cringey retorts.
because youre so dumb you think you know better than actual measurements in the real world
>Hello?
oh its the Dunning kruger department, they want to speak with you
Nta but I agree with the kys suggestion.
not in this lifetime
because number go up = more sales, otherwise no one would buy that shit
I will get put of your thread when you stop being such an obtuse homosexual and consider you may be wrong
You’re talking to yourself at this point. Take your shitty graph and frick off. No one is going to consider anything you say.
not my fricking graph
the thread was shit until someone dropped some actual info here
kys moron
A stupid graph isn’t a measurement of anything. If you weren’t a moron you’d know this, but carry on believing random shit you see on the internet that defies all common sense and logic. You’re actually an embarrassment, gtfo my thread.
Based angry anons.
why does my treadmill say calories when I run on it? checkmate chud.
Nooooo your treadmill is wrong! You see my graph here says otherwise! Even if you keep running your body will stop spending energy to run! Graph!!!11!1!
Exercise does not increase energy expenditure.
on paper to a complete moron this would make sense but what exactly the frick could our bodies be doing that's so fricking expandable?
like yeah, your sedentary bmr is 2000 kcals? okay now you spent 600 extra jogging, what exactly the frick sort of function could our body cut back by a third, fricking brain function?
The measurement and paper is wrong. That’s what, you stupid fricking moron.
>makes a claim with zero further explanation
>calls me the stupid fricking moron
Yes because I told you to gtfo of my thread hours ago you fricking idiot. As said in this thread already, it’s highly basic stuff so if you can’t understand it there’s nothing anyone will tell you on IST that will make sense to you.
All this is saying is that when you do more exercise you unconsciously move around less when you’re not exercising. This is quite easy to work around, if you’re not a lazy sack of shit
More precisely - your body eventually prioritises exercise for burning calories, and decides to burn less calories when not exercising. Which makes sense as the body moves toward efficiency.
Ultimately, the more you exercise the more calories you burn will always remain a constant.
Yes ultimately if you chronically repeats the same amount of exercise your body will adapt but its not accurate to say that doing more activity will not burn more calories, because technically what you are saying is that you will not be doing more activity, not that the activity will somehow burn less energy while you are doing it
By definition it does
>muh calories
>pencil-necked science based geek thinks the human body can create mass out of nothing
>he thinks exercise doesn't require calories
Holy shit I'd say study basic fricking thermophysics energy in a system etc but you're most likely too low IQ to actually understand them. This is why science should unironically be gatekept from average IQ normoids, you don't understand the context or implications or studies finding correlational results. Shut the frick up and stop eating fat c**t and you will lose weight, it's that simple, there's no need to start denying reality just because you're an obese pencil-dicked science based fatass nerd. Kys.
Reminder that CICO undermining is propaganda to get you to eat more zogslop, you will eat fat goyslop today and then you will eat sugary zogslop the day after. Trust the science
I dunno what CICO is and never read any of their posts but the way you guys shill it I know it's just some type of fatty cope miracle shit
Imagine using a IST screencap as a source
Post body
Notice how every time someone who says you don't need a caloric surplus to build muscle, they never post body because they have no gains because their body has nothing to build muscle with.
Look at all the fat morons saying they "bullet" this winter. Bro you have been "bulking" your whole life
Bodybuilding is fricking stupid simple and you Black folk always miss the big picture
>be skinny
>start lifting weights
>muscles develop
>eventually reach a point where growth of your musculature is capped by the weight/size of your body
>begin eating at a surplus with an emphasis on protein consumption
>excess protein and overall energy availability allows for musculature to continue growing
>bodyfat increases as a consequence of this
>reach a point of satisfaction
>eat at a caloric deficit while continuing to lift weights to try to keep as much muscle as possible
Repeat