>places a lot of pressure on the spine if the form is wrong
You can literally die on bench if your technique is wrong
You can shred your knees on squats if your technique is wrong
You can frick up your elbows on nearly every triceps exercise in existence if your technique is wrong
You can frick up your shoulders on lateral raises if your form is wrong
Hell, if you're a complete moron it is actually possible to tear your front delt from pullups
None of these exercises are bad at all however, you just need to have more than two braincells so that you can actually perform them correctly. Same goes for deadlifts.
>bigger and stronger glutes, hamstrings, erectors, forearms, grip, and traps/rhomboids along with other peripheral muscles is not a benefit >general core strength and teaching good bracing and hinging mechanics is not a benefit
have a nice day
try just holding 300kgs from a rack pull position. your whole body feels like it's gonna tear apart and there's people lifting this up from the floor. the weight literally goes through your whole body from the arms to the toes. there's no other exercise like this
Im not the biggest DL enjoyer, but for what it's worth, I feel like they improve my posture. As someone who stretches often, sits much and doesn't do those wall presses and shit (to fix posture) DLs fit that slot pretty well.
Oh, and I don't do them super heavy at all.
>>High risk of injury
daily dyel/dont know how to lift/have 0 body awarness/dont know how to brace-thread
you dont know how to lift op, you feel injury prone every time you attempt this like your body is about to break because you dont know how to lift or stabilize your body
you are a literal dyel non body aware non athlethic never in your life lifted ass mothafricka, literally 0 iq
quite literally you never even learned the basics of lifting, never read a book, never got coaching, never ever done anything
and stronger glutes, hamstrings, erectors, forearms, grip, and traps/rhomboids along with other peripheral muscles is not a benefit
core strength and teaching good bracing and hinging mechanics is not a benefit >have a nice day
stiff-legged deadlifts are nice for hamstrings, adductors, glutes, traps, and forearms.
and if you don't ego lift and keep your back rigid, the risk of injury is very low.
roids (+insulin+hgh) are great for muscle mass, but not so great for strength if you're already close to your natty max.
https://www.strongerbyscience.com/steroids-for-strength-sports/
11 months ago
Anonymous
im not close. but don't tell me you believe the guys deadlifting 500kgs are only 10% stronger than their "natty max". nobody is toching 400kg natty. probably not even 350kg
11 months ago
Anonymous
the 10% figure is for competitiveness in a sport with weight classes. so roids can make you (way) stronger than 10%, but you'll also be heavier and have to compete in a higher weight class. so your competitiveness only increases by ~10%.
also there are many factors to consider for muscle, strength, and roids. elite athletes have top tier genetics for all three, but you may be a low responder to roids regarding muscle or strength (or both), or you get bad side effects, etc.
240 kg to 280 kg seems reasonably feasible to me, and 300 kg doesn't seem that unlikely. but adding another 40 kg on top of that would be pretty hard and I doubt the majority of natty 240 kg guys could do much over 300 kg if they were to start roiding.
11 months ago
Anonymous
i think im fast twitch dominant because i recover easier from intensity than volume i feel like
It's the easiest lift ever lmao. How do people get injured from this?
places a lot of pressure on the spine if the form is wrong, which is easier to do if your posture is bad like many modern office ghouls
Yeah you can pop a disk if you round excessively. But an office fatso has already destroyed their spine from years of unnatural posture
>places a lot of pressure on the spine if the form is wrong
You can literally die on bench if your technique is wrong
You can shred your knees on squats if your technique is wrong
You can frick up your elbows on nearly every triceps exercise in existence if your technique is wrong
You can frick up your shoulders on lateral raises if your form is wrong
Hell, if you're a complete moron it is actually possible to tear your front delt from pullups
None of these exercises are bad at all however, you just need to have more than two braincells so that you can actually perform them correctly. Same goes for deadlifts.
All those exercises you mentioned have benefits. Deadlift does not.
>bigger and stronger glutes, hamstrings, erectors, forearms, grip, and traps/rhomboids along with other peripheral muscles is not a benefit
>general core strength and teaching good bracing and hinging mechanics is not a benefit
have a nice day
Deadlifts do not build muscle
>source: dude trust me
Post body
You do not squat 800 pounds.
You do not deadlift 800 pounds.
You did not immediately go into heavy squats after a spinal surgery.
You are not Ronnie Coleman you nerdy fricking dork
Cope leglet, he got that from a botched surgery.
he got that from destroying his disks while deadlifting way too heavy and never seeing a doctor.
bone density
oh my gosh
try just holding 300kgs from a rack pull position. your whole body feels like it's gonna tear apart and there's people lifting this up from the floor. the weight literally goes through your whole body from the arms to the toes. there's no other exercise like this
Dumb Black person
>reposts
>useless as information
>high risk of boring mundane annoying shit posting
Im not the biggest DL enjoyer, but for what it's worth, I feel like they improve my posture. As someone who stretches often, sits much and doesn't do those wall presses and shit (to fix posture) DLs fit that slot pretty well.
Oh, and I don't do them super heavy at all.
What is the difference between the left and right images? They look the same to me minus his facial expression and plates on the bar
The left one isn't egolifting. You should only deadlift 4 plates or more. Otherwise, what's the point of the deadlift?
how do you build up to 4 plates without deadlifting kek
>build up
You double scoop and fricking pick it up. Form is immaterial, all that matters is your ego.
>>High risk of injury
daily dyel/dont know how to lift/have 0 body awarness/dont know how to brace-thread
you dont know how to lift op, you feel injury prone every time you attempt this like your body is about to break because you dont know how to lift or stabilize your body
you are a literal dyel non body aware non athlethic never in your life lifted ass mothafricka, literally 0 iq
quite literally you never even learned the basics of lifting, never read a book, never got coaching, never ever done anything
quite literally, moronic as frick
in summary, you dont know how to lift
Skill issue.
I haven't injured my self yet and I'm pulling LMAO5PL8 for reps
They feel amazing to do.
and stronger glutes, hamstrings, erectors, forearms, grip, and traps/rhomboids along with other peripheral muscles is not a benefit
core strength and teaching good bracing and hinging mechanics is not a benefit
>have a nice day
could you articulate your point exactly?
>deadlifting a little over 100kg
>dares to have the word strength in his name
Why do both pictures look the same, besides the guy looking sideways which is moronic?
>could you articulate your point exactly?
cope & seethe
>cope & seethe
it's honestly a good question
stiff-legged deadlifts are nice for hamstrings, adductors, glutes, traps, and forearms.
and if you don't ego lift and keep your back rigid, the risk of injury is very low.
Frick me this guy is moronicly strong man.
it's only 220kg
that's 100kg over my max. i could get to that with roids easy probably
kek no
why not?
roids (+insulin+hgh) are great for muscle mass, but not so great for strength if you're already close to your natty max.
https://www.strongerbyscience.com/steroids-for-strength-sports/
im not close. but don't tell me you believe the guys deadlifting 500kgs are only 10% stronger than their "natty max". nobody is toching 400kg natty. probably not even 350kg
the 10% figure is for competitiveness in a sport with weight classes. so roids can make you (way) stronger than 10%, but you'll also be heavier and have to compete in a higher weight class. so your competitiveness only increases by ~10%.
also there are many factors to consider for muscle, strength, and roids. elite athletes have top tier genetics for all three, but you may be a low responder to roids regarding muscle or strength (or both), or you get bad side effects, etc.
240 kg to 280 kg seems reasonably feasible to me, and 300 kg doesn't seem that unlikely. but adding another 40 kg on top of that would be pretty hard and I doubt the majority of natty 240 kg guys could do much over 300 kg if they were to start roiding.
i think im fast twitch dominant because i recover easier from intensity than volume i feel like
>lifting in old worn out oly shoes
sovl
big bacc