If you don't give a shit about strength or performance and are only interested in hypertrophy, the answer is no. You don't need freeweights of any kind for that goal
No. But they're often more efficient than hitting each muscle in isolation, so unless you want to spend 2+ hours lifting every day, do your fricking squats, homosexual
if you're asking this question it's because you don't want to do barbell compounds, and if you don't want to do barbell compounds it's probably because they're fricking hard, and if this is the case then you should 100% do barbell compounds.
1. We don't even know if actual hypertrophy exists
2. If it does, no it doesn't matter, ther eis nothing magical about barbells - in fact, they didn't even exist 200 years ago
Rape is a strange phenomenon now that its been done you carry that label for life even if it was literally 10 minutes of your life one act can outweigh decades of other actions
people's lives are always reduced to a best of/worst of album of sorts. In all likelihood you're going to spend most of your life being over 40 but all most are known for what they did when they were 20-30
No. But, it's recommended. In fact, you don't need any free weights, or compounds to build muscle. You could just isolate all the muscles on machines and still build them up.
dubs and OPs uncle rapes him
As a professional rapist uncle i will help you out
Shut your fricking face, uncle fricker
Roll
HNNNG
Right looks like Katy Perry when you stretch out her head
Go watch literally any fricking bodybuilder work out on youtube.
Maybe they do, but the question is actually if it is absolutely necessary
If you don't give a shit about strength or performance and are only interested in hypertrophy, the answer is no. You don't need freeweights of any kind for that goal
booba
cross necklace
No. But they're often more efficient than hitting each muscle in isolation, so unless you want to spend 2+ hours lifting every day, do your fricking squats, homosexual
If you actually want to be big, yes
You can't just piss around with easy stuff and expect your body to change
This is why so many people waste sooooo much time
if you're asking this question it's because you don't want to do barbell compounds, and if you don't want to do barbell compounds it's probably because they're fricking hard, and if this is the case then you should 100% do barbell compounds.
>need
no. Is it more reliable to get the necessary volume to grow in less than an hour a day? You betcha
No, you don't.
You can get a big upperbody with the basic weighted calisthenics (dips, pullups, leg raises).
1. We don't even know if actual hypertrophy exists
2. If it does, no it doesn't matter, ther eis nothing magical about barbells - in fact, they didn't even exist 200 years ago
No.
Rape is a strange phenomenon now that its been done you carry that label for life even if it was literally 10 minutes of your life one act can outweigh decades of other actions
people's lives are always reduced to a best of/worst of album of sorts. In all likelihood you're going to spend most of your life being over 40 but all most are known for what they did when they were 20-30
Damn
No. But, it's recommended. In fact, you don't need any free weights, or compounds to build muscle. You could just isolate all the muscles on machines and still build them up.
No you don't
Ive been doing calisthenics for 2 weeks and i already mog at least 90% of IST
>inb4 post body
i wont
I think u want 1 hip hinge movement, but u dont need it
I used to think so, but since I moved to machines and dumbbells for some exercises I have been getting better results especially on the chest