Do you ever wonder if this shit even works?

Do you ever wonder if this shit even works?

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It absorbs really quickly and it convenient if you are in a pinch. What do you expect it to do make up for your lack of discipline?

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No because I've trained with and without it, and I know the difference.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      And that is...?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Not the same guy, but the difference is huge if you dont get enough proteine in with your regulair diet. I trained a year on a vegan diet that was too low in protein. Once i figured out that an extra portion of beans isnt enough to make gains, i supplemented (pea)protein while my training routine stayed the same. And in 2 months i gained a lot more strength and muscle than the half year before.

        If you can get enough protein in your diet its obviously better, but if you cant or are lazy supplements are smart.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It’s also about time saving though, most people work. I can wake up in the morning and have two scoops with some milk and oats which takes seconds to make

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Basedmilk for cuttan and bulkannn! ^_^

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Mean basedmilk uwu

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >vegan diet
          why would you do that?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Not for health reasons, but i get pretty emotional about sad cows and pigs in big factoryfarms. I figured we as humans are also animals and if you go down the family tree far enough we are the same. So i tried to be vegan for a week and kept feeling good, so no reason to change. But everyone may do what he thinks is good.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              do you get sad when a lion eats a deer? Those animals suffer mightily as they are slowly eaten alive, pummeled, and slashed. In fact nature is often worse, as animals partake in cannibalism and play with or torture small animals for sport. You need to reevaluate your sense of morality and become more emotionally mature if it makes you sad to do the things every carnivore and omnivore has done for billions of years. You will never be natural or healthy if you do not eat at least a small portion of meat every day.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Factory farming is far worse for the animals than whatever death they would get in a natural environment or being hunted with a gun.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >than whatever death they would get in a natural environment
                lol, lmao

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Sensationalist media and biased documentaries make it seem much worse than it is. If you've ever visited a farm you'll see that it's not ideal, but it is certainly not as bad as portrayed. If it still bothers you, you can pay a few extra dollars for free range/grass fed/organic/whatever and still be able to eat like a normal human. If that still isn't good enough, just eat fish and that is almost as good.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Our relationship with animals as it is in our society today is flawed. They arent there only for our use. And the mayority of pigs live on 1 square meter and never see the sunlight. Even those who will be labeld as bio bacon.
                But i must be a brainwashed skinny malnourished hippy for thinking that.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Life in the wild ain't exactly pleasant either.
                Just because you get to live a comfortable life as a modern human doesn't mean that life in general is or should be comfortable.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >And the mayority of pigs live on 1 square meter and never see the sunlight. Even those who will be labeld as bio bacon.
                Life is suffering. If you want to make the argument that we have a moral duty to prevent suffering by extinguishing life then just say so.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Not a vegetarian but just because it's just as bad or worse in nature than a factory farm doesn't prove anything about the morality of factory farming. The alternative for the billions of animals bred and slaughtered in factory farming isn't getting mauled by a lion, it's simply never existing in the first place.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                but if you think the natural process of life that have existed for billions of years are fundamentally wrong, then you are mentally ill. You need to reevaluate your perspective if you think most things would be better off never having existed

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >The alternative for the billions of animals bred and slaughtered in factory farming isn't getting mauled by a lion, it's simply never existing in the first place.
                It's pretty fucking extreme of you to decide that its morally preferable to never exist in the first place than to exist and suffer.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >but i get pretty emotional about sad cows and pigs in big factoryfarms
              I get pretty emotional about field animals being crushed and mangled by harvesting machinery, if they haven't been exterminated to make way for vast monocrop grain fields in the first instance.
              I still eat my oats though. It is a sad reality that in order for us to live, other creatures have to die.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                intense webm

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                "Vegan is cruelty free" is a disgusting lie.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                nice file name

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              other predators kill them anyway. don't give a fuck gay.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >i get pretty emotional
              sounds like you already get too much onions in your diet tbqh

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              You sound utterly pathetic. We were never like pigs or cows. There is something spiritually wrong with people like you - vegtards - like you don't even understand what a food chain is, you think all animals are equal, all friends in the state of nature and that we are on the same strata as them. We are not. Humans are the highest lifeform on earth and we should eat appropriately. We aren't middling prey animals like chickens. This is why I hate vegtards so much, the disgusting slave morality of your ideology. You promote degeneracy, weakness, disconnection from nature, transhumanism, modernism, corporatism, and dependency. I wish we could just round up vegans and shove them all into ovens I am fucking sick of them.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Your philosophy is nonsensical. Why should prey animals be less worth of moral consideration than predators?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                because they are weaker you midwit

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Still nonsensical. Your stance isn't as simple as might makes right because you apply it to species holistically rather than individually. There are weak members of even the strongest species. I'm assuming you wouldn't be fine with someone killing a child just because they're weak?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Why should prey animals be less worth of moral consideration than predators?
                because that's the way the world works you absolute fool. It doesn't matter if you think it is fair or even if it makes sense, it simply is the way it is. You are trying to apply a system of morality to something that has existed for billions of years and predates any kind of thought. Thousands and thousands of billions of organisms have existed and been killed in horrible ways throughout the existence of the earth. Death and pain are a part of reality, and you are seriously naive and weak if you can't accept reality. Making it your goal to minimize suffering just shows how pathetic and ignorant you are. The killing and consumption of other organisms is necessary for the existence of life, particularly intelligent life. It is fundamentally illogical to suggest that this is a bad thing when it is integral to reality and morality is derived from reality. Fuck you. (this goes for you too

                Based.
                [...]
                Reality is already a whirlwind of predation and consumption, but that's no reason for us to add to it. Granted though I'm not a vegan either. Though if there comes a day when lab meat is somehow 100% as good as natural meat then I'll switch over.

                you also sound like a major pussy)

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That's not the way it works in nature because there are no morals in nature. Like you said it simply is the way it is. Death and pain are part of reality but they can be mitigated. Do you oppose the existence of painkillers? Or laws against murder? Death and suffering will always exist but it is possible to reduce them in (admittedly meager) ways. You can either be the guy who says that things simply "are the way they are" and that people who have a problem with that should just accept reality, or you can be the guy who discovers penicillin.
                Also I'm the other anon too.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >You can either be the guy who says that things simply "are the way they are" and that people who have a problem with that should just accept reality, or you can be the guy who discovers penicillin.
                What a ridiculous false dichotomy. There is a UNIVERSE of middle ground between "nature red in tooth and claw BITCH suck it up fuck you animals I got mine" and "GAS THE LIVESTOCK, PLANT FOODS NOW"

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You are suggesting that the entirety of reality for billions of years is fundamentally wrong because the survival of life predicates on the destruction and suffering of others and it is only now that modern humans have existed for a few thousand years that we can "right the wrongs"? That is an incredibly foolish way of thinking. If your moral system relies on rejecting reality, then it is fundamentally flawed and it is your system that must be changed, not the world. You are incredibly arrogant if you think you know better than whatever force or being created life. Seriously I want you to think about what I am saying because you seem to be really out of touch with reality from prolonged exposure to modern society. Your other mistake is applying morality to animals that do not possess the capability to to understand or apply these morals themselves. Humans are worthy of moral behavior because they can comprehend morality and act reciprocally towards others to build a functioning society. Animals are so far away from that it is not even close. It seems that you think because something makes you "feel good" it is right or moral. pathetic weak minded fool, I pity you and all others like you.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >You are suggesting that the entirety of reality for billions of years is fundamentally wrong because the survival of life predicates on the destruction and suffering of others and it is only now that modern humans have existed for a few thousand years that we can "right the wrongs"?
                Damn bro did you just close your eyes when reading my post? I said right at the start that there are no morals in nature. The suffering nature inflicts on itself is neither right nor wrong, it simply is. Humans are in a unique position in that we have the ability to comprehend nature and their place in it. That’s why it’s different for us. Not gonna bother responding to the rest of what you said because literally all of it is contingent on your incorrect conclusion that I think nature is somehow wrong.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You are are being dishonest. Why would you advocated changing something if you do not believe it to be wrong? Why should humans seek to reduce pain and suffering of animals if it is not morally wrong?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                If a toddler is about to shoot someone with a gun I will actively try to prevent that from happening but it would not be morally wrong for him to pull the trigger because he lacks the awareness that would give him moral responsibility. Nature is the same way. I’d like humans to try and do things differently than the way they’ve always worked but that doesn’t mean I think the old ways are morally wrong because they can’t be. They can’t be morally right either, they just are.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I already told you to stop doing this. Humans and animals are not the same so you cannot compare them in your gay analogies. Make a real argument or I'm gonna start basedjacking you

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I don’t understand where you think the issue lies. Humans and animals aren’t the same but I still generally don’t think it’s great to inflict pain on animals. Animals always have and always will inflict pain on each other because that’s simply the way nature works and they literally don’t know any better. Humans don’t have to be the same way.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                why is not morally wrong for animals to inflict pain on other animals to ensure their fitness but it is morally wrong for humans to inflict pain on animals to ensure their own fitness? The act and end result are exactly the same, something that has already happened billions of times before. When you say animals don't know any better, you are implying that what they are doing is wrong, but they just do not know it. You need to accept that their actions are not wrong at all because they are a fundamental aspect of life and reality.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I could dice this out some more but you're mostly correct here so I'll just concede.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                NTA but it is a bit dicey to hinge on "nature isn't wrong per se BUT we should still oppose it and try to eliminate suffering". The end result of "eliminate suffering" is always "eliminate life".

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You're right but there must necessarily be a middle ground, otherwise anyone who takes steps to reduce the suffering in their own lives should "logically" just kill themselves.

                I engaged it you illiterate buffoon I also offered my own to reinforce my point.

                You didn't engage with it at all because the point of the hypothetical is the idea of a life of unimaginable suffering where you have no other choice. If I changed it from aliens to demons or an evil god would that make it easier?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >You didn't engage with it at all because the point of the hypothetical is the idea of a life of unimaginable suffering where you have no other choice.
                I engaged it alright, I'm just not conceding the axiomatic conclusion you're trying to build out of it. I would choose an existence of suffering over non-existence.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                As much as i appreciate a concession, I hope that you concretely apply the ideas and reincorporate meat into your diet.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not a vegan, I just respect their resolve and reasons.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Based.

              do you get sad when a lion eats a deer? Those animals suffer mightily as they are slowly eaten alive, pummeled, and slashed. In fact nature is often worse, as animals partake in cannibalism and play with or torture small animals for sport. You need to reevaluate your sense of morality and become more emotionally mature if it makes you sad to do the things every carnivore and omnivore has done for billions of years. You will never be natural or healthy if you do not eat at least a small portion of meat every day.

              Reality is already a whirlwind of predation and consumption, but that's no reason for us to add to it. Granted though I'm not a vegan either. Though if there comes a day when lab meat is somehow 100% as good as natural meat then I'll switch over.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >but that's no reason for us to add to it.
                What reason is there to minimise it? Who are you to decide which lives are worth living and which ones arent?
                95% chance you support abortions because "they were most likely going to have a hard underprivileged life with unprepared parents".
                Who made you arbiter of worthy existence?
                I would pick a life of suffering and hardship over never existing at all. If you say otherwise and you're not willing to kill humans whose lives you have deemed unworthy because of their suffering, then you're a cowardly hypocrite when you say that the chicken or the pig should not live because its life is hard.
                I'm in favour of efforts to reduce suffering in food production, but not where it is contrary to human interests. I believe it is in our interest to try and make sure our food cycle produces untainted animals that have a similar or better health profile than a typical wild animal and that live some kind of life that is less cruel even if less free than nature. I believe the food we get from these animals will typically be better for us and better for the planet.
                Your argument essentially boils down to "Genocide the farm animals because they suffer. Eat a plant-based diet because there is less suffering".

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I said above I wasn’t a vegan either so I agree with you that we should keep factory farming as long as it’s in human interests, but you should really stop pretending that there’s also reason to do it for the animals too. The position that absolutely any life worth living is better than never having lived is just insanity if you take it to it’s logical conclusions. If aliens came down to earth that innately enjoyed inflicting pain and decided to farm humans for the purpose of inflicting hellraiser style torture on us and no other reason, you’d really prefer that over simply not being born?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >If aliens came down to earth that innately enjoyed inflicting pain and decided to farm humans for the purpose of inflicting hellraiser style torture on us and no other reason, you’d really prefer that over simply not being born?
                I'd like the chance to try and resist, because resistance to entropy and everything that goes along with it is the purpose of life. I'd like the chance to try and fight back, no matter what fairy tale hypothetical you try and think up. I'd rather have been born a garden gnome that ended up dead in a concentration camp than to have never been born at all, if only for the chance to die opposing my oppression by any means.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Being unable to engage with hypotheticals properly is a sign of low iq anon.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I engaged it you illiterate buffoon I also offered my own to reinforce my point.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah it's great especially during the morning when you don't really feel like eating meat.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What kind of moron doesnt eat meat for breakfast? I have a pan of bacon and 4 eggs (over easy) every day, plus maybe some sosig if I'm extra hungery

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              you're a disgusting pig tbh

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                No I am eating the pig. I thought that much was clear.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >if you dont get enough proteine in with your regular diet
          Then fix your diet, retard.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Water or milk lads? For me, it's water when cuttan and milk when bulkan.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Mostly in my smoothies but always water if not. It's too rich with milk, if I'm using whey it's because I want to get a lot of protein down quickly.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Milk because water is absolutely revolting

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Water is fine if you choose a decent flavour

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Water with just a a couple tablespoons of cream.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Skim

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      2 cups of coffee and a little bit of water

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >do you know if food works
    how fucking stupid are you? why do some people think protein powder is steroids or something

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    IT doesn't work at all
    ONLY unpasturised raw milk works, pasturisation and whey extraction destroys the protons

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >pasturisation and whey extraction destroys the protons
      That's not how amino acids work anon.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Shut up garden gnome
        You want us to be weak by outlawing GODS RAW MILK

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          This. If you're not eating raw or fermented dairy, you are ngmi

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    if there's a Will

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It does for me, my mom didn't buy meat when I was a teen and I could only have so much egg/milk. Once I got protein powder I started making strength gains much quicker as well as feeling much better after workouts

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It didn't do much for me when I was bulking. But when cutting and not getting enough protein (<100g) I noticed better recovery, hair and nails growing faster, being less cold, and clearer skin.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I think it does, I have seen the results in my body and in my strength. I think it is important to fully understand how the body absorbs protein, however. The body can absorb roughly 10g of protein in an hour and you must have amino acids with that protein in order for it to be considered complete (a complete protein). Digestion takes about 4 to 5 hours so you don't want to consume more than 40-50g of protein in your food, otherwise you are going to expel most of it and only absorb a small amount.
    For this reason I divide my intake into 4 hour segments throughout the day to maximise my protein absorption with my digestive cycle. The end result is I eat a lot of small meals with meat and milk, using protein powder to fortify it if I think the meat is lacking.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I seem to notice a difference in performance/gains when I have a shake every day vs when I feel like I got enough protein from food/drink alone. Maybe it's the variety of AAs in it, idk

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Dunno. Stopped buying from MyProtein when they doubled their prices and starting refusing to fulfill orders.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You will piss most of it out. Doesn't get digested the same as food. But hey keep believing in it if you enjoy making some garden gnome rich instead of supporting your local farmer.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >You will piss most of it out. Doesn't get digested the same as food.
      That's not how amino acids work anon.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        don't respond to retards who make incorrect bold statements for attention, it encourages them to keep posting

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >does food work

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There's nothing to wonder. Eat real food. It's always the best option. If you get enough protein from real food, whey will literally have zero impact, maybe even negative if something. If you don't for whatever retarded reason eat enough real food, then whey is one of the easiest and cheapest ways to get enough protein in your diet.

Your email address will not be published.