Lol no, anyone who isn't moronic knows that exercise is just an aide to loose weight. You can't make up for eating 1k calories over maintenance every day with exercise. Your body is very efficient at energy conversion.
>oh no exercising speeds up cell replication and degradation >this means you will shave off 1~3 years of your life when you exercise for a whole lifetime
Fit btfo, now lets see the life expectancy projections for the sedentary people. This isn't even taking into account the quality of the years in question. Why would you want to be a dyel your entire life only so you can prolong your worst years (+60) by a small margin?
>take some random study that you misconstrue to agree with you >jump to conclusions based on the data >don’t check the methodology >write moronic clickbaity headlines for your article knowing most people aren’t even going to read the entire article, let alone the cited study
I fricking love journalists
Yea, no shit. Your cells have an upper limit on how many times they can replicate. Younger cells are better. So you can trade longevity for performance.
Fatties not applicable
Donald Trump was right again.
Also see pic related. Exercise doesn't burn any calories. CICO BTFO.
>CiCo is only exercise
Lol no, anyone who isn't moronic knows that exercise is just an aide to loose weight. You can't make up for eating 1k calories over maintenance every day with exercise. Your body is very efficient at energy conversion.
>loose weight
lose weight. "Loose" is the opposite of "tight".
T. Your English teacher.
I'll losen up you're butthole
>You can't make up for eating 1k calories over maintenance every day with exercise
be quiet thats not how cico works
calories OUT includes exercise
All this says obese people are very energy inefficient. It doesn't disprove CICO
>the body of starving skinny people don't behave like bodies of amerifats
Woah, what a surprise, surely CICO BTFO pal.
>trendline from a single data point
lol
lmao even
Im a brown europoor incel
Fuuuuck my bad this thread wasn’t directed at you you already have it rough /:
I'd rather live a shorter, stronger life than many years of mediocrity
>oh no exercising speeds up cell replication and degradation
>this means you will shave off 1~3 years of your life when you exercise for a whole lifetime
Fit btfo, now lets see the life expectancy projections for the sedentary people. This isn't even taking into account the quality of the years in question. Why would you want to be a dyel your entire life only so you can prolong your worst years (+60) by a small margin?
Exercise also allows cell life cycle to expand
There is a middle ground for longevity and it involves moderate lifelong exercise.
Period.
What does historical data say?
>a 90 lbs stick Black person running around all day burns the same calories as a 90lbs 12 year boy running around all day
shocking
>may not
>might
I love how this "study" doesn't give a 100% certainty on the issue they're trying to push.
When they're putting weird shit like this in the headlines then you know you're on the right side
Keep lifting.
>take some random study that you misconstrue to agree with you
>jump to conclusions based on the data
>don’t check the methodology
>write moronic clickbaity headlines for your article knowing most people aren’t even going to read the entire article, let alone the cited study
I fricking love journalists
There used to be a really good comic on how the results of health research entered and was misunderstood by the media and people.
Journalists need to go in the chambers
>t. Fatty McFatterson.
Yea, no shit. Your cells have an upper limit on how many times they can replicate. Younger cells are better. So you can trade longevity for performance.
Fatties not applicable
REMINDER TO EVERYONE NEVER TO TAKE A POP-SCI HEADLINE SERIOUSLY!
>Adriana Diaz