>Vegetarian is the way.
Vegetarianism makes no sense morally or healthwise.
>Morally
You either think meat and animal products are fine morally, and will eat both.
Or you go vegan and eat either neither. Enslaving cows for their milk is not any better than killing them for meat after all
>Health
So somehow in a vegetarian's head meat is unhealthy, but eggs and milk are magically good? Get some consistensy bro
>So either go vegan or stfu
That's the thing, being a vegan is Hell on Earth and not sustainable for very long outside of people with a 600lb Life level of mental illness. Being a vegetarian is a whole lot easier and it's a way to have your cake and eat it, too- you can act like you're morally superior to people who eat meat while not ending up emaciated and insane by completely foregoing any animal products at all.
>gives you cancer
wrong >makes you fat
wrong >gives you diabetes
wrong >gives you heart disease
wrong >gives you negative karma
wrong >you're gay
correct
I'm debulking (I wouldn't call it a cut) and just had a delicious, anabolic, and reasonably sized meal of >8oz sirloin >2 steamed eggs >half bunch asparagus >10oz whole milk >1 Apple
didn't have the appetite for starch but I'll have oatmeal in the morning
there are more than enough for the current population in your country. if they keep importing people, and the imports outbreeding the huwhites, then yeah
I dont understand the karma thing, animals whole goal is to survive and procreate and our use for cows has made them excel beyond almost any other animal, theyre the equivalent of an actress who had to suck harveys dick then got to become a famous millionaire who never had to work another day in her life
Its unnatural what we're doing but its benefitting the cows as much as us
What is there to disprove, the meat industry, dairy industry and fish industry together are a trillionaire business too so what, and pufa(seed oils) is healthier than saturated fat(red meat) that's just a fact
What enjoyment do you get out of lying on the Internet
12 months ago
Anonymous
I'm being paid by big seed oil corp obviously
12 months ago
Anonymous
makes his tiny wiener hard
What is there to disprove, the meat industry, dairy industry and fish industry together are a trillionaire business too so what, and pufa(seed oils) is healthier than saturated fat(red meat) that's just a fact
>what is there to disprove
maybe this one >grains, sugar, seed oils, are all much more profitable than any animal food
protip, you cant you lying Black person homosexual
snort my shit then have a nice day holy shit
12 months ago
Anonymous
Are you mad, are you the same moron that got BTFO in the other thread
1) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on total mortality.
2) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on CVD mortality.
3) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on CHD mortality.
4) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on fatal heart attacks.
5) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on non-fatal heart attacks.
6) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on CHD events.
7) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on strokes.
The one significant finding, again, was for CVD events where it was claimed that the risk ratio (RR) for CVD events from meta-analysis was 0.79 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.93). Analysis 1.38 (of a number of analyses), on Page 159, ran a sensitivity analysis for RCTs that did actually reduce saturated fat – excluding studies that aimed to reduce saturated fat but didn’t – and the one finding for CVD events ceased to be significant.
12 months ago
Anonymous
Analysis 1.44, showed a 21% statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular events when you replace saturated fat with pufa, pic related the forest plot of the analysis >When we subgrouped according to replacement for SFA, the PUFA replacement group suggested a 21% reduction in cardiovascular events,
>t. didn't even read the synopsis of the study, just read some random ass webpage that misinterpreted the study
12 months ago
Anonymous
see
https://i.imgur.com/kfjHx50.png
Analysis 1.44, showed a 21% statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular events when you replace saturated fat with pufa, pic related the forest plot of the analysis >When we subgrouped according to replacement for SFA, the PUFA replacement group suggested a 21% reduction in cardiovascular events,
I readed the study and pufa reduced heart disease
12 months ago
Anonymous
see
1) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on total mortality.
2) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on CVD mortality.
3) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on CHD mortality.
4) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on fatal heart attacks.
5) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on non-fatal heart attacks.
6) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on CHD events.
7) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on strokes.
The one significant finding, again, was for CVD events where it was claimed that the risk ratio (RR) for CVD events from meta-analysis was 0.79 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.93). Analysis 1.38 (of a number of analyses), on Page 159, ran a sensitivity analysis for RCTs that did actually reduce saturated fat – excluding studies that aimed to reduce saturated fat but didn’t – and the one finding for CVD events ceased to be significant.
https://i.imgur.com/kfjHx50.png
Analysis 1.44, showed a 21% statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular events when you replace saturated fat with pufa, pic related the forest plot of the analysis >When we subgrouped according to replacement for SFA, the PUFA replacement group suggested a 21% reduction in cardiovascular events,
You did not, in fact, "readed" the study.
12 months ago
Anonymous
That dumb post mentions analysis 1.38 as their argument but that analysis was not about replacing saturated fat with pufa so is literally worthless and a strawman, analysis 1.44 see
https://i.imgur.com/kfjHx50.png
Analysis 1.44, showed a 21% statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular events when you replace saturated fat with pufa, pic related the forest plot of the analysis >When we subgrouped according to replacement for SFA, the PUFA replacement group suggested a 21% reduction in cardiovascular events,
is the actual evidence with composite endpoints replacing sfa with pufa therefore the best evidence of the study, replacing sfa with pufa reduces heart disease
Pasture-raised or wild ruminant flesh is one of the healthiest things to eat on a daily basis
The "studies" that "prove" red meat is bad for you are a sad joke and have been refuted soundly since the 80's
Karma is a funny thing. According to the Indian caste system, people born into a certain caste are not supposed to deviate from jobs acceptable to their born caste. If you were born into a low caste, you are meant to live as a low person. This was to teach your soul some sort of lesson about humility and suffering. Attempting to raise up out of your caste was actually bad karma, even if in doing so you did good deeds along the way. You are in effect turning your back on the lessons you were meant to learn. Certain schools of thought have taken this to the logical extreme conclusion, that where and who you are born to determines what you should do in life. If you were born into a family of watchmakers, you too should be a watchmaker, and try to be your best at it. A police family? Same thing. Be the best cop you can be. Anything else is bad karma. Deviation from your intended lesson. This becomes interesting if someone is born into a criminal family. It means you are meant to be a criminal in this life. So in this scenario, stealing, murdering, raping, well, it's actually good karma. To someone born to be a criminal, being "nice" has negative karmic implications. That being said. My grandfather raised beef cattle. My father worked for a time as a butcher. I figure I better eat beef, just in case.
I don’t even mind the one that do it because they don’t want to harm animals or whatever so long as they shut the frick up about it
The worst ones are the ones that peddle their awfully unhealthy diet and cope about it on here
It does none of those things, and even if it did, there's a billion other things that also do all of that, so who gives frick? I don't see you fearmongering about those. Stop worrying about nothing, you fricking pansy.
>Jews want you to stop eating red meat!
Meanwhile, in reality it was a white dude who told people to cut down the red meat, while John Yudkin(israeli) told everyone it was sugar that was causing all the heart disease.
I think people say that because globalists don’t want people to eat meat, they want them to eat slop and live in the pod, and people make connections between globalists and israelites
sure thing, Moishe, whatever you say
OP here,
Pic unrelated
Also I’m gay
kys homosexual
Agreed. I have switched and began eating fish instead of red meat, I already feel a million times better. Lifts have increased as well.
I guess that's why most strongmen eat ribeye daily fricko
post hand curryBlack person
>negative karma
What is this, reddit? All karma is negative
This homosexual played too much Fable and thinks you're le evil if you eat meat
>All karma is negative
very based
based nirvana enjoyers
None of this is true, now is my butter chicken ready yet, Rajneesh?
>gives you cancer
>makes you fat
>gives you diabetes
>gives you heart disease
>gives you negative karma
the proper way to say good morning to your trans gf
>gf
i want to sniff a girl's butthole so fricking badly bros
Shut up israelite
>Moxy was a israelite all along
Now it all makes sense, /misc/ was right as usual
kys moxyte
Can’t tell if this is just bait or real
Not even the brain dead vegans on here are this moronic
Based. Meat eating makes you unhealthy and sends you to hell. Vegetarian is the way.
>Vegetarian is the way.
Vegetarianism makes no sense morally or healthwise.
>Morally
You either think meat and animal products are fine morally, and will eat both.
Or you go vegan and eat either neither. Enslaving cows for their milk is not any better than killing them for meat after all
>Health
So somehow in a vegetarian's head meat is unhealthy, but eggs and milk are magically good? Get some consistensy bro
So either go vegan or stfu
>So either go vegan or stfu
That's the thing, being a vegan is Hell on Earth and not sustainable for very long outside of people with a 600lb Life level of mental illness. Being a vegetarian is a whole lot easier and it's a way to have your cake and eat it, too- you can act like you're morally superior to people who eat meat while not ending up emaciated and insane by completely foregoing any animal products at all.
carnivory is morally superior and kills less animals
Bullshit.
Gm sir
>gives you negative karma
I don't use Reddit.
>gives you negative karma
GOOD MORNING SIRS
Kys israelitehomosexual
How can meat give me Cancer if I was born in April?
>delusional vegan thread
you cancer
possibly, but every food does
you fat
no
you diabetes
no
you heart disease
yes
you negative karma
yes
you cancer
no
>T.
>gives you cancer
wrong
>makes you fat
wrong
>gives you diabetes
wrong
>gives you heart disease
wrong
>gives you negative karma
wrong
>you're gay
correct
Jesus Christ, moxyte, get a life.
Okay, why then I'm made of red meat?
>gives you gains
worth it.
>food_tribalism.bat being uploaded to npc OS
Frick off homosexual.
I'm debulking (I wouldn't call it a cut) and just had a delicious, anabolic, and reasonably sized meal of
>8oz sirloin
>2 steamed eggs
>half bunch asparagus
>10oz whole milk
>1 Apple
didn't have the appetite for starch but I'll have oatmeal in the morning
Nobody asked
are you guys sereiously telling me that paleo and keto is the only diest going forward?
>gives you negative karma
I don't use reddit so I don't care
Oy vey
>Gives you negative karma
of course karma would only matter for a redditor
Ah yes, all our meat eating ancestors with diabetes, of course.
dummy, food makes you fat
>karma
Kek. But it's the vegan pajeets that look like bloated overgrown children with puffy faces.
All the cultures that eat mostly meat and animal fat tend to be leaner and stronger.
>eat onions not meat
Buddhism isn't vegetarian
>if you stomp a beetle its 3 more reincarnations for you
That's Jainism
have a nice day, redditor
>people getting baited hard ITT
Didn't read plus you're black
no vegan shills, I will NOT eat the bugs, I am a carnivore like my ancestors
Nobody ancestors were carnivores
You realize we only have a couple decades left before it's either bugs or 3D printed meat, right? Ain't enough cows to last
there are more than enough for the current population in your country. if they keep importing people, and the imports outbreeding the huwhites, then yeah
I like to think that a israelite dies every time I support my local economy by buying 3kg of red meat from my local butcher.
>He doesn't get the low-karma exclusive perks.
I dont understand the karma thing, animals whole goal is to survive and procreate and our use for cows has made them excel beyond almost any other animal, theyre the equivalent of an actress who had to suck harveys dick then got to become a famous millionaire who never had to work another day in her life
Its unnatural what we're doing but its benefitting the cows as much as us
>the biggest industry in the world
>makes the most money
>literal hellspawn tier factories of flesh
uh yeah guys DA JOOS hate the meat industry its our last line of defense against DA EBIL JOOS
grains, sugar, seed oils, are all much more profitable than any animal food
at least seed oils are healthier than red meat
You didn't disprove his post (because you can't) and then you just posted some moronic made up shit (because you are a homosexual)
What is there to disprove, the meat industry, dairy industry and fish industry together are a trillionaire business too so what, and pufa(seed oils) is healthier than saturated fat(red meat) that's just a fact
What enjoyment do you get out of lying on the Internet
I'm being paid by big seed oil corp obviously
makes his tiny wiener hard
>what is there to disprove
maybe this one
>grains, sugar, seed oils, are all much more profitable than any animal food
protip, you cant you lying Black person homosexual
snort my shit then have a nice day holy shit
Are you mad, are you the same moron that got BTFO in the other thread
>schizo rambling
yep, its vegan time
Then prove it. Oh wait you can't since its not true.
Lee Hooper 2020, replacing saturated fat with pufa leads to a significant reduction of heart disease
1) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on total mortality.
2) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on CVD mortality.
3) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on CHD mortality.
4) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on fatal heart attacks.
5) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on non-fatal heart attacks.
6) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on CHD events.
7) There was no significant effect from reducing saturated fat on strokes.
The one significant finding, again, was for CVD events where it was claimed that the risk ratio (RR) for CVD events from meta-analysis was 0.79 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.93). Analysis 1.38 (of a number of analyses), on Page 159, ran a sensitivity analysis for RCTs that did actually reduce saturated fat – excluding studies that aimed to reduce saturated fat but didn’t – and the one finding for CVD events ceased to be significant.
Analysis 1.44, showed a 21% statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular events when you replace saturated fat with pufa, pic related the forest plot of the analysis
>When we subgrouped according to replacement for SFA, the PUFA replacement group suggested a 21% reduction in cardiovascular events,
>t. didn't even read the synopsis of the study, just read some random ass webpage that misinterpreted the study
see
I readed the study and pufa reduced heart disease
see
You did not, in fact, "readed" the study.
That dumb post mentions analysis 1.38 as their argument but that analysis was not about replacing saturated fat with pufa so is literally worthless and a strawman, analysis 1.44 see
is the actual evidence with composite endpoints replacing sfa with pufa therefore the best evidence of the study, replacing sfa with pufa reduces heart disease
You need to brush up on your readeding
Good joke, anon.
Source? And I mean something that actually bothers to make a distinction between grass-fed beef with minimal seasoning and fast food burger patties.
Pasture-raised or wild ruminant flesh is one of the healthiest things to eat on a daily basis
The "studies" that "prove" red meat is bad for you are a sad joke and have been refuted soundly since the 80's
Karma is a funny thing. According to the Indian caste system, people born into a certain caste are not supposed to deviate from jobs acceptable to their born caste. If you were born into a low caste, you are meant to live as a low person. This was to teach your soul some sort of lesson about humility and suffering. Attempting to raise up out of your caste was actually bad karma, even if in doing so you did good deeds along the way. You are in effect turning your back on the lessons you were meant to learn. Certain schools of thought have taken this to the logical extreme conclusion, that where and who you are born to determines what you should do in life. If you were born into a family of watchmakers, you too should be a watchmaker, and try to be your best at it. A police family? Same thing. Be the best cop you can be. Anything else is bad karma. Deviation from your intended lesson. This becomes interesting if someone is born into a criminal family. It means you are meant to be a criminal in this life. So in this scenario, stealing, murdering, raping, well, it's actually good karma. To someone born to be a criminal, being "nice" has negative karmic implications. That being said. My grandfather raised beef cattle. My father worked for a time as a butcher. I figure I better eat beef, just in case.
i hate vegans so much its unreal
uninformed, uneducated, ignorant, gaslighting leftis homosexuals, all of them
I don’t even mind the one that do it because they don’t want to harm animals or whatever so long as they shut the frick up about it
The worst ones are the ones that peddle their awfully unhealthy diet and cope about it on here
It does none of those things, and even if it did, there's a billion other things that also do all of that, so who gives frick? I don't see you fearmongering about those. Stop worrying about nothing, you fricking pansy.
damn op's been busy
>Jews want you to stop eating red meat!
Meanwhile, in reality it was a white dude who told people to cut down the red meat, while John Yudkin(israeli) told everyone it was sugar that was causing all the heart disease.
I think people say that because globalists don’t want people to eat meat, they want them to eat slop and live in the pod, and people make connections between globalists and israelites