How can so called "experts" look at the same exact science and literature, studies and papers, and come to two totally opposite conclusions about the health of this stuff?
How can so called "experts" look at the same exact science and literature, studies and papers, and come to two totally opposite conclusions ...
because most of these "studies" are BS cash grabs with no merit in premise or execution.
>t. work as a contractor on NSF-grant funded scientific projects for a living
the shit I have seen......
because "health" is a hard to define parameter that we have a hard time benchmarking mostly
What a wiener sucker shut the frick up
FART ON MY DICK
A
R
T
O
N
M
Y
D
I
C
K
Because science always follows what the current socio-political climate says.
Did you hear? Static stretching is good for max strength and hypertrophy now. It also doesn't make you slow anymore.
Science!
sneed oils are bad in that sense that if its reheatead 1000x times a day its going to be unhealthy, this is the practice in fast food. otherwise it has no negative health effects.
>this is the practice in fast food. otherwise it has no negative health effects.
you are so fricking clueless about seed oils and how they are made its not even funny
heating it once does nothing.
inb4
>reeee its processed
stop drinking water to, moron.
Last time I checked heating water doesn't produce trans fats
>heating it once does nothing.
wrong
r
o
n
g
>removing impurities from your products is bad
do amerilards really?
>transfats are le good xdddd
anon, you ARE a fricking amerilard
>anon, you ARE a fricking amerilard
wrong
r
o
n
g
point ignored
ok keep eating transfats then you moronic homosexual i literally dont care
you seem to care an awful lot actually
how's your relationship with your mother?
Science has become a corrupt thing, accepting this has been one of the main reasons why I refused any totally materialist philosophy. Scientists used to make studies about how healthy smoking tobacco is, or how asbestos isn't really all that bad for you. Enjoy being a sucker for globocorp if you doubt any of this.
This was always an issue, but it’s times 1000000 now. Science used to be filled with highly intelligent nerds in it out of intellectual curiosity. Now it’s increasingly filled with people filtered for ideological leftism and ethnicity/gender
social studies were always israelite infested, it’s why they were never considered science
99% of papers are grant seeking garbage, when unsaturated fat is heated it turns to trans fat which kills you, they fraud the serving size to not have to label it, or just lie
Depends which papers you decide to include/reference. Beyond that you'd need to look at the specifics of each experiment because they all have flaws. Which flaws invalidate the result if any? And so on...
No point in arguing with these people, just let them poison themselves lmao
Olive oil.
Fish oils.
Those are the ones that beat the others. I think lard comes after that, or possibly certain nut oils.
because for every study on pubmed that says A you can find two more that say B
money and personal bias
> How can so called "experts" look at the same exact science and literature, studies and papers, and come to two totally opposite conclusions about the health of this stuff?
we will forever live in this loop
>conduct study poorly
>get funding from entity with direct financial stake in the outcome
>results say X may be ok under certain conditions
>media: X IS BEST THING EVER, SAYS THE SCIENCE
>time passes
>conduct new study poorly
>study is again funded by an entity with a direct financial stake in the outcome
>results say X may not be ok under certain conditions
>media: X IS WORST THING EVER, SAYS THE SCIENCE