How many sets per muscle group should a man (male) lifter do per week?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
How many sets per muscle group should a man (male) lifter do per week?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Could surgery have saved him?
no he was mentalcel
You mean manletcel?
No, he was a /weakmind/ gigapussy
He didn't need to be saved, as he was the Supreme Gentleman already.
My mom said he was handsome.
Would she have had sex with him?
By p
He was an attractive guy, it's too bad he was a manlet lmao
>He was an attractive guy, it's too bad he was a manlet lmao
Nope, that's photoshopped as frick. He was average looking to low average.
He was still very young and baby faced. Lots of guys lean out and look way more masculine as definition is revealed and face musculature gradually grows over time.
He was 22, not 18. He wouldn’t have randomly become attractive at 25 and by then being a virgin and autistic would mean that even if he was Chad he’d still be too broken to get laid.
>and by then being a virgin and autistic would mean that even if he was Chad he’d still be too broken to get laid.
You're on some A grade copium to think
wouldn't get pussy even as a giga autist moron with no social skills.
yes, he’d sperg out and spill spaghetti. He wouldn’t get laid unless a womban literally raped him.
>yes, he’d sperg out and spill spaghetti. He wouldn’t get laid unless a womban literally raped him.
Yeah, whatever you say deathnicel. Keep believing your 'game' matters.
He has a very feminine and untrustworthy face. There's no way women weren't repulsed by him.
>he didn't even looksmaxx by lowering bodyfat and do something to his hair and he thought it was over
Elliot Rodger was a dumb frick that got filtered by natural selection jej
2 to 3 if you're natty
Amazing that he didn't try roid maxxing and putting in effort into his looks first before offing himself.
Iirc the current research shows 8-10 sets per muscle group per week is optimal which should be easy to hit if you're training every group twice a week. You can get gains beyond 8-10 sets but the returns and convenience diminish significantly enough that for most people it isn't worth going over like 12-15, plus overtraining and strain could hinder progress
>muh science
I saw the Israelet video. What exercises where those "scientist" using? A squat is not the same as a side raise, and a Dorian Yates murderset is not the same as counting to 10.
>Iirc the current research shows 8-10 sets per muscle group per week is optimal which should be easy to hit if you're training every group twice a week. You can get gains beyond 8-10 sets but the returns and convenience diminish significantly enough that for most people it isn't worth going over like 12-15, plus overtraining and strain could hinder progress
Listen, incel. IDGAF about that wall of text nor what your goyientists say. I do 30 sets per week for my side delts and I'm ballooning them the frick out. Stay with your lmao10sets per week while the big boys grow and stretch pussies.
I once saw a video of Lee Priest doing 20 biceps+20 triceps sets and it looked perfect so my rule is 20x2 a week for small muscles 20 for quads glutes hams or meme muscles with placebo gains like calves and abs.
lmfao
Highly individual, consensus currently is 10ish per week
.
Could looksmaxxing have saved him?
10 - 20