I don't care about health, i just want to be lean. Can i drink this or not?
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
I don't care about health, i just want to be lean. Can i drink this or not?
I don't care about health, i just want to be lean. Can i drink this or not?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
|
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
It's a monkey paw
ofc u can lmaooooooooooo what u need anonymous chuds approval to drink coke?? lmaoooooooooooo
>nooo you don't understand I NEED sweet yumyum bubble water I NEED the Coca-Cola(tm) flavor I can't stand to drink WATER like ew wtf? Water? I only drink [PRODUCT] like if it's not chemically engineered do I even consider it worthy of my body? Beverage sisters?? Help me out here
It's 0 calories, moron. But it also makes you crave sugar, so be aware.
I drink 3 per day. I have 13% bodyfat.
you could, but why would you when picrel exists?
based pepsi enjoyer. I think they discontinued Max though. Replaced it w 'improved flavor' formula w less caffeine.
Have been drinking dr pepper zero because they had it for $9 for 24 last 2 times I went to get my goyslop.
I wish they brought Twist back...
Nothing else compares once you've tasted Pepsi Twist greatness...
This thing is a weak cope...
But they did. Pepsi Maxx Twist is currently a thing.
They make lime flavour maxxes like the one in my pic, but the OG actual Pepsi Twist is gone forever, just like the OG monster assault, it's always the best flavours that get axed.
Coke with Lime was better than Pepsi Twist
You put the lime in the Coke, you nut!
33 cans a day and you're safe from aspartame toxicity.
>is Coke Zero good?
OP is a homosexual
lol, yeah dude I heard that the other day. Those morons jumped the gun pushing out click bait about it.
You'd probably OD from caffeine if you drank 33.
I go through about a gram of caffeine per day as a manual labourer. Each (355ml) coke would have 32mg caffeine × 33 cans = 1.056g
Seems fine to me
Caffeine is literal poison
Everybody rags on zero coke but nobody can say why its bad. Only meme answers like
>b-but muh aspartame (you have to drink 100gallons daily for it to me harmful)
>b-but kidney stones (same, very minimal risk)
>Contains zero calories
HMM I DUNNO ANON MY BUDDY'S WIFE SAYS SHE ONLY EATS 1600 CALORIES PER DAY BUT CONTINUES TO GAIN WEIGHT SO I THINK CALORIES MIGHT BE FAKE ITS ALL GENES BUDDY
Tony "big T" Schmitt
SIMPER FI
USAF retired 1964-1966
"I carry a .45 cuz God don't make a .46"
Im fricking her the b***h is LYING
HEH THAT WOULDNT SUPRUSE ME SHE USED TO GET AROUND BACK IN THE HIGH SCHOOL DAYS WE USED TO CALL HER MERRY GO ROUND MARY DONT LET ROBBIE KNOW THAT THAT BOY CAN SCRAP GOBBLESS
Tony "big T" Schmitt
SIMPER FI
USAF retired 1964-1966
"I carry a .45 cuz God don't make a .46"
You forgot to the
>V/r,
Send off
2/10 larp
Had to make sure I wasn't on /k/ for a second
From my personal experience, every time I try to quit soda I manage to go a couple days dry, only to tell myself "Fine, I'll only drink diet." I always end up drinking regular soda within a week.
I drink a 2 liter a day. Is that bad?
as far as the research says, yes you're fine, we're talking big quantities here to even reach the threshold of maybe it could raise risks but we're not sure status, unless you are a toddler.
as others have said, yes, it is safe to drink in human quantities, unless you're a conspiracy theory schizo, personally tho all sugar substitutes give me the shits.
Look here buddy.
Taste is tuned to molecular composition. If something tastes sweet, it's likely your body has a metabolic pathway that can break whatever tastes sweet into energy.
Aspartame for example breaks into an amino acid, wood alcohol, and another amino acid. Wood alcohol isn't good for you. It turns into formaldehyde when it reaches the liver. The two amino acids, phenylalanine and aspartic acid can be plucked apart for energy in the urea cycle.
Sucralose is odd. Studies say it isn't biologically active due to the molecular structure's resemblance to sucrose, but with chlorine atoms attached. When the body encounters sucrose, it's cleaved to fructose and galactose. When the body encounters sucralose, the enzyme meant to cleave the molecule, sucrase, is not able to interact with it all that well due to the unexpected and rather large electronegative properties of the chlorine atoms attached to the molecule. It is said to be mostly excreted since the body can't take in raw sucrose/sucralose without it being broken into monosaccharides. With this in mind, it's worth noting that enzymes are catalysts, meaning they bring the activation energy of a reaction down-- meaning more quick reactions. It does not mean a reaction cannot occur without enzymes, which in the case of sucralose, this is likely the case.
Sucrolose can be hydrolyzed without enzymes, and it can be broken by the gut biome. The resulting chlorinated monosaccharides are then able to pass into the body to be metabolized.
How the dicks a chlorinated galactose or fructose molecule is metabolized is not well studied for -some reason-. However, the resulting molecules of metabolism would likely be an organic salt of chlorine and the two sugar molecules which could be broken down to pyruvate.
tl;dr for sucralose is basically, since it isn't read as a carb/sugar in the nutrition label, it can be heavily loaded into whatever it's sweetening, meaning it can become frickloads of sugar.
This and most sweeteners (doesn't matter if it's zero calories or not) spike your insulin. Which will frick you up really hard.
>artificial sweetener spikes insulin
If this is true, why not use for bulkan alongside sum deca and brotein sheik
What about stevia?
Artificial sweeteners are some of the most well tested food substances in the world. There are literal billions of people who consume artificial sweetened drinks like this shit every single day for decades, so any negative effects are at absolute worst so minimal they can't even be detected
That, or the effects are not as immediate as people suspect and are seen as symptoms of other diseases or poisons.
>Asbestosis/Mesothelioma due to scientists deducing asbestos is not bioactive.
>Glyphosphate/parkinson's disease due to scientists deducing weed killer is not bioactive.
>?????? due to scientists deducing sucralose is not bioactive.
The question is not about health, it's about whether it slows down weight loss or not. Your skin is black.
>There are literal billions of people who consume artificial sweetened drinks like this shit every single day for decades
They are mostly fat people.
Quitting soda is the easiest and the one of the better things you can do for gains.
Any sugary drink is empty and useless calories, just drink water or a lemonade here or there and you'll be fine.
yes, but it makes you crave junk more. ancedotal to me.