If you are manlet it's ov...
WHOA
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
If you are manlet it's ov... WHOA
If you are manlet it's ov...
WHOA
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Ya just have to swipe your finger to the bone in one of the most populous cities on earth
>22 hookups
he got more pussy than you in your whole life
correct
and yet only one of those women wanted to actually call themselves his girlfriend
almost like nasty prostitutes will frick anything with a penis and only a low value male thinks merely having sex with these (likely obese) she beasts is a point of pride
So? You're saying this like everyone's life is supposed to play out the exact same way
all this shit tells me is that some nerd spent all his time trying to dip his dick in some prostitute
That seems like way too much work to get a gf. I'd rather save a hooker.
>I can save her
Wonder what women he got
>2,244 right swipes on bumble
>fricked 23 of them
1% success rate sounds pretty good
2244 right swipes from bumble + tinder combined, note their join on the solid blue line. He just put his data together weird. Still yeah 1% success rate
>2244 right swipes from bumble + tinder combined
oh shit you're right. so this turbomanlet macaco boy swiped left on 10 thousand women out of 12 thousand? lol, lmao even.
Yeah if I lived in a big city I’d be swimming in pussy instead I live in Iowa and get nothing oh well who cares
found my wife through OLD after ~10 other dates. this viz is brutal, the match frequency per right swipe is way too low. in NYC a theoretically high-value account should net hundreds of matches monthly and any account that cannot maintain this will get deboosted or only presented to mid-tier userbase. OLD is only useful if you study the profiles of successful users and model yours after them, which typically means dressing well, getting professional photos taken (or asking a friend to help), and short bios. the takeaway from the graph is that the user spent 3 years swiping into the wind and documenting the time sink, an exercise in futility. all this effort to yield a poorly-labeled sankey
as a counterpoint, it also shows that in big cities, even if you are a low value person (midget third worlder brownoid), you can still get pussy with some potentially low level of effort. it's hard to quantify how long the relationship took him out of the dating pool (did he get the girlfriend as the final girl and didn't frick the rest? did it happen midway through and therefore 'pause' part of the 3 year data collection?). it also doesn't tell us how much effort or time he put into both his profile and his chats and the dates, and how many times he banged each girl (sex with 22 different girls =/= sex only 22 times, could be multiple times per girl). the other lacking point is how attractive the women were; if they were all disgusting hambeasts that really makes things look bleak, but they could have been hotties with some weirdly low standards
another pov is that only one of the chicks he cared enough about to pursue a relationship with, it isn't always the chick who gets to decide when things move forward my beta friend
while i disagree about short and nonwhite being indicative of low value (perhaps lower SMV but not inherently less worth as a person, in all likelihood the user has developed relatively higher social skills to make up for their low SMV appearance) those are good points — the viz raises more questions than it answers. perhaps the most cogent question of them all: why is OP browsing r/dataisbeautiful in the first place — having met a number of posters there IRL, can confirm NONE of them lift
>having met a number of posters there IRL, can confirm NONE of them lift
fits right in with IST then
>23 for 51 when dates took place
Pretty good closing percentage
>over 30k swipes for 1 girlfriend
The first 10k approaches is just warmup but unironicly...
I've never used an online dating site