Is 300 calories of fruit the same as 300 calories of cheese for weight loss or are healthy calories somehow better?

Is 300 calories of fruit the same as 300 calories of cheese for weight loss or are healthy calories somehow better?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Both are healthy. But yeah, calories are calories for weight loss, but you'll feel better eating the food that has more nutrients in it for those calories

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >you'll feel better eating the food that has more nutrients in it for those calories
      which in this case is the cheese because it has more protein.
      or whatever you mean by this vague shit that you can spin in every direction.

      Anyway, here is my spin:
      Cheese is good for you. Eat more cheese. An apple a day may keep doctors away, but what if you need a doctor one day, but you kept him away by eating apples all the time? Cheese is the safer choice, especially if you don't want to lose muscle or brain mass.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Thanks Dr. Anon, you know a lot of thinking

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This. You can eat 26 apples to get 2k calories or you can 7 twinkies.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There’s no way a single Twinkie has 300 calories

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Calories don't in the context of a biological system. They are the photons emitting via combustion and do not accurately estimate the energy available to the human body.
    The human body is not a closed thermodynamic system and therefore the first law of thermodynamics does not apply to it. The human body will have a different hormonal response to different amounts and combinations of substrate which will up or down-regulate hunger, satiety, bmr, growth/healing, autophagy, etc. So no, they are not the same. And the impact these differences will have on your health increases with age, and current metabolic health.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >They are the photons
      moron

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is worse than the guy that thinks calories aren't real and only mass eaten matters.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's not so much "healthy calories", as you could lose weight eating at a 1000 calorie deficit of straight up butter. however, you'll feel like shit all day because you're only getting the nutrients of butter. eat 500 calories of whole grain rice and eat 500 calories of pizza. I guarantee you you'll feel more full, and have more energy than that 500 calorie slice of za

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    300 calories from fruit will probably be a larger volume and will fill you up more.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This. Cheese is dense and has no fiber, it won't satiate you much.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dunno but I recommend simmering the apples in a pan and adding the cheese on top, get it nice and melty.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    a calorie is a calorie

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not true. If you boil the calories out of fudge it becomes diet food.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    In the short term no difference will be noticed. Maybe someone with type 2 diabetes would benefit more from avoiding the carbs.
    In the long term, 10 years and much more, the calories that come from nutritious food will make the person be more healthy and less sick compared to someone that just ate trash with low nutrition. CICO is great if you are planning short term, in the sense that calories are calories and that is all that matters. Long term you should aim for more than just the calories, you have to strategically place them in a way that is convenient for you.
    If your maintenance calories are around 2300kcal per day and you eat 1500kcal from just cake and some other person with your same metabolism eats 2500kcal from nutritious foods, he'll be fatter but will be healthier and probably live longer than you.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >he'll be fatter
      He'll be bigger, and have more muscle mass. And, if given so much time that the 2500 becomes his maintenance, he might even recomp to the same bf% as the 1500 cal guy - that in the meanwhile has lost substantial muscle mass as the body habituates to the lower calories with few nutrients, and is either skeletal, or skinnyfat going into skeleton.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    CICO explains the lion's share of everything

    the fat you eat is the fat you wear, though. your body doesn't like to make new fat. you would just feel more energetic and burn off the apple

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this guy is a moron and he's so frickin stupid he doesn't even realize he shouldn't be giving anyone advice because he's that moronic. This a dangerous combo.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    split the difference and get 150 from each if you're so worried but its literally just CICO

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *