Is cutting a meme or is it just recommended for fat people? Why not just eat at maintenance and recomp? I've gone from fat lard at the start of this year to a 34 inch waist by eating 2000-3000 cals, high protein, and lifting. If lifts keep progressing, TDEE would keep rising and I'll keep getting leaner. Is cutting a meme pushed by dyel ab obsessed skinnyfats?
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
OP is a moron
sage
>source: perma cutting skinnyfat
Don't worry buddy you'll surely get abs this year
/thread
>34 inch waist
still fat
fpbp
Damn samegay how mad are you lol? Dyel with no legs
fpbp
check these dubz
Not matter how many times you reply to yourself you are still a samegay
Most advice is for roiders
If you want to lose bodyfat, cutting while keeping your lifting volume and intensity the same is the best policy. Recomping would take forever to get anything good done and would be less muscle gain than a bulk while also being less fat loss than a cut. Natural Hypertrophy on YouTube did a recomp phase and it took 3 years to yield results. It's a bad idea. Just cut if you want to lose fat
That feels like a bit of an oversimplification I'm just guessing but I've probably lost anywhere from 5-7% bf on my "bulk"
Let's say with a recomp you gain 0.05kg muscle a week, and lose 0.05kg fat a week, after 52 weeks you gained 2.6kg muscle, and lost 2.6kg fat
if you instead cut 600 calories a day, you would gain 0 kg muscle a week, and lose 0.5kg fat a week, after 26 weeks you gained 0kg muscle, and lost 13kg fat.
now you can do a lean bulk of 200 calories, you gain 0.2kg of muscle a week, and gain 0kg fat a week. after 26 weeks you gained 5.2kg muscle, and no fat.
>2.6kg muscle gained + 2.6kg fat lost
>5.2kg muscle gained + 13kg fat lost
If you can handle it, you want to cycle between 500-1000 calorie deficits, and 100-200 calorie surpluses.
People cut too slow, and bulk too fast. recomping protects against bulking too fast, but it stops you from cutting at a reasonable pace.
This is a simplification, don't get hung up on the exact numbers, just try to understand the point
You didn't account for muscle loss on the cut and realistically how many people are on a calorie deficit for 180 days a year very few if any I'd imagine most people do a ~3 month cut in spring
When I said gained 0 I also meant lost 0. Most people who think they lost muscle didn't actually have the muscle they thought they had. I was guilty of this too, I thought I just needed to lose like 10kg to get ripped, but it was more like 20kg.
Wut? You definitely are losing muscle on a cut
>lift X weight
>cut
>can now only lift X-Y weight
It's not like you were lifting that previous weight with your fat
I wont say it can't happen, but I think it's negligible as long as you're not already ripped and you're eating enough protein.
It's pretty common
Samegay
wrong
Cope
seethe?
D8
HS
Cutting isn't a meme per se but you will get garbage advice from dyels on here. If you need to eat less than 2000 calories to cut you need to put on muscle mass first assuming you aren't morbidly obese. That number will rise as your lifts go up
>34inch waist
still a fat lard