Is it better to go twice as hard one day and be out of commission the next or do a moderate amount over multiple days?
Is it better to go twice as hard one day and be out of commission the next or do a moderate amount over multiple days?
Is it better to go twice as hard one day and be out of commission the next or do a moderate amount over multiple days?
twice as hard as long as you don't get injured
Shit example maybe but some MMA coach on Joe rogan put it like this: imagine you have two guys, one goes all out on pull ups and does 10 reps 3 times a week, he's done 30 by the end of said week, now the next guy moderates himself and only does 5, but he does that every day, by the end of said week he's done 35
But if it's not hurting and you're not exerting yourself you're not making progress.
fake news
This
This is like saying that guy who benches 20kg 60reps did more work and is getting bigger than a guy benching 100kg 10 reps cause 20x60>100x10
DYEL detected
that works for mma training but if strength is your goal higher intensity is better
1 set of 30 pullups stimulates more muscle growth than 7 sets of 5 over a week... Stop listening to idiots
That was Firas Zahabi. Dudes knowledgeable but a true dyel in the very sense of the word. Some stuff he preaches is just bullshit make believe too
Here's the dude lmao
Achievable natty?
The latter. As an example, do any workout and compare the first exercise you do with the last. You only have so much strength and energy to give in a session and it's better to spread it out
First one. You make best gains by going hard and then resting well. Half assing it with no rest is called wasting time. Im talking about strenght training and bodybuilding. For cardio training im not sure, i dont do it
Is it better to frick a girl with a dick that's twice as hard or frick her twice with a half hard dick
Limits usually have to pushed to be improved upon. Pushing limits in either cardio or lifting requires rest follows. You can do something every day but it doesn't have to be the same thing.
for muscle grown and strength is better go hard one day and rest the next
that's why you train a different muscle group every day.
but for endurance/cardio is better go moderate consecutive days
Go as hard as you can and take as much time as you need to recover. Mentzer was right.
>he still doesn't know about localized mTOR signaling
Why not both? Change it up sometimes. Fricking autists are so obsessed with their gay little “routine” that they forget the fun, and importance, of training in different and novel ways.
Because if you want to get stronger all you have to do is progressive overload, sleep and eat food. Doing 10000000 set of 10000 reps of 5 pounds because Andrew Tate and Joe Rogan told you it was a good idea is just filtering people into a DYEL category even though they waste months in the gym
You're getting answers that mix things up.
For strength and hypertrophy, it doesn't matter how you divide your volume, but you have to think in sets.
Obviously a set of 5x100kg is different from a set of 500x1kg, so don't be stupid about that. Also, you gotta work above 70% of your max for strength gains, and it's more efficient above 85%.
And above 85% it MIGHT be pretty much the same if you do 3x5, 4x4 or 5x3, it's so heavy that every rep counts, but afaik the jury is still lot on that one.
Anyway, given the same sets, doing all the work on one day or spreading it around gives the same results.
You should just rotate what you’re doing.
What I do for example;
>cardio
3 mile run m-f
10 mile run sun
>calisthenics
tues, thurs, sat
100 pull ups
200 push ups
100 jump squats
100 jump lunges
100 dips
>lift heavy
mon- chest & shoulders
wed- arms & back
fri-legs
>sit ups
500-1000 every day
>extra curricular
Boxing, bjj, mma, big dick olympics for 3 hours m-f minimum