is it even possible to have big arms (+16 inches) while being all three;
>lean
>natty
>tall
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
is it even possible to have big arms (+16 inches) while being all three;. >lean. >natty. >tall
Holy frick is this you bro? The prettyboy tinder pussy slayer
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
But only with the addition of Roids.
Your welcome.
somebody post the sacred triangle.
>big
>lean
>natty
pick 2.
16 inches isn't that big. EZ.
Black folk, the lot of you
How tall?
6'2
post pic/routine?
just saw a BBC article that claimed he had 19.5 inch arms, like all old timers i think they embellish their own achievements, these dont look like near 20 inchers to me
forgot the image
>6'2
That's not tall enough for 16" arms to be out of reach. You're fine. Do your arm days
>6'2
for this height 18 inches is 16inches
He's probably 17-18". Hackenschmidt at about the same height was measured 18.5" before his match with Alexander Munro.
>18.5"
Actually 19" arms
That's massive wtf
These guys would won 20 Mr Olympia in a row if they were born today
homies didn't even had proper knowledge of nutriton
I'm tall lean and natty and my arms are 16.5 inches. 16.5 isn't 'big'
Perfectly possible.
Some bodybuilders pre-steroids had arms like that
Sandow for example had a 18 inches arms
>post pic
rock climbing once or twice a week + brosplit focusing on incline press one day, front squats the next. 16.5 inch arms @ 195lbs. I'm certain that if I try to go for sub 10% bf I'll lose an entire inch on my arms
There was this coked out bartender on roids at a restaurant i ate at. Bald with a h mustache. cool guy
>I'm certain that if I try to go for sub 10% bf I'll lose an entire inch on my arms
If think below 10% is only for roiders
Our body isn't supposed to survive on such low fat levels
>Sandow for example had a 18 inches arms
This is not true at all. This is my fav era. Sandow had arms 15 inches to 15 and a half inches.
George Hackenschmidts arms were 17 inches.
Lol.
We exaggerate today, despite much evidence, the past wasn't an era of truth, it was an era of mistruths. Especially when you made like 50 dollars a show, you had to be circus act tier to attract people.
In a photo without context, standing next to others, black and white plus low body fat arms appear much, MUCH bigger than reality.
And these guys do have big arms, the average man had 12 inch arms back then.
1910 era 5'9" natty men did not have 19 inch arms, which is the true size of 6'7" wrestlers such as the undertaker in our modern era.
I'm lean, 6'3 and natty and my arms are hard stuck at just over 15in, pretty sure it's just genetics and the fact that long arms = less pronounced biceps
same boat over here, just barely at the cusp of 16 inches, such a slog to get through arm days, having a positive ape index doesn't help either
i have 16s i just want MORE
If you want MORE upper arm then do MORE volume for arms homosexual
replace one of your upper body days with a dedicated arm day.
Despite what roid trannies and larpers tell you here, 16 inches of actual muscle, not fatceps is big and impressive.
And while it is possible at 6'2" natty, it might not look that way. The taller you are, the bigger arms have to be, to look "big"
There are heaps of guys around 5'9" who have 16 inch arms that look big and muscular.
Van Damme is an example of 5'9" with 16 arms.
fuark i forget of jacked Damme looked in his hay day
He was peak perfection, without a massive stupid man booby chest.
moron
say that to my face fricker and not online, see u after school u lil gay boi
Chestlet
>male
>wants to look like he has huge juggs
Tell me without telling me you're going to go from Jim to Jane.
you're literally a boomer troony you homosexual
UR MAD. Ur mom loves me.
A good chest like 44 inches is good, 56 inches is mentally ill.
He has no chest muscles hahahaha
>not fatceps is big and impressive.
True, but what I'm saying is that it's possible natty
16 inch biceps at 6'2" natty are very possible yeah, but they are just not as impressive at that height on a 5'9" guy. And to get them bigger natty at that height, has its issues.
I guess on these things, manlets truly do win.
>but they are just not as impressive at that height AS ON A 5'9" guy *****
>trip shows up
>fitness discourse obliterated
time and time again
Mate I legit replied with evidence, and to be fair, OP used a lust riving image. After that it is not my fault dudes hit on me here.
Try actually talking to me at one point, I'm not the big c**t you think I am. We probably have a whole load of shit in common.
>I'm not the big c**t you think I am.
don't doubt it, but facts is facts.
There are no facts. I trip so I am responsible for what I say, and can be called out for it. And after a few posts, people maybe see me as "honest" and somewhat who they can actually believe versus some totally random anon.
And yeah, maybe too I want people to know me as a real person. I am single with no children or wife. In the next throw of the dice I will be 50. I don;t see myself as worse than some tik tok moron bouncing her ass around for attention though.
I'm short, bald and ugly. You're way off the mark.
What I am though is old enough to not give a frick, to know I will die one day, to know I have no family.
I'm all alone in the world, with frick all to lose, it's not that I am full of myself, it's that I really have nothing (but with is something and nothing)
And I am sorry if I piss you off, but I am just trying to exist.
>(but WHAT is something and nothing) **
>There are no facts.
please re-read this post;
thank you, have a good night.
are all tripgays narcissists?