Generally? Yes you have to fill less space with muscles. Think of a muscle as a cube, the shorter you are the smaller the cube is and it means the cube needs less muscles to be full
That's bullshit. You need less power to move a smaller object, doesn't change the fact that a bigger engine has a better power output than a small engine.
A Bugatti Veyron at 1900kg completely smokes a Porsche GTS 3 at 1400kg.
Dumbass, Your example has a 500 hp car vs 1,000 hp car.
Compare both to an F1 car, 800kg with 1,000 hp.
The whole point of Motorsport is to make the car as light as possible with as much power as possible.
We’re also talking about aesthetics. Compare Christian McCaffrey to George Kittle. McCaffrey managed nine reps at the combine but looks jacked….because he’s short. Kittle got 22 and looks skinny (by nfl standards) but is also one of the best blocking TE in the NFL.
Same team, both gifted athletes, both train hard, top tier nutrition, etc but one LOOKS more jacked.
Yes, but you're assuming a 5'6 man and a 6'5 man would have the same ability to synthesise muscle.
We accept as self-evident that a taller man has a larger appetite because he has more mass to sustain - the tall man's muscles have a larger volume and surface area, and therefore have a proportionately higher volume in which muscle protein synthesis can take place.
If this were true you’d have giants winning bodybuilding contests which never happens. 6’ is RARE in high level bodybuilding. There is an exponential increase in difficulty. You’re suggesting a linear progression which doesn’t exist in nature in any form.
It becomes exponentially more energy to increase lifts the heavier the eight becomes.
Starting strength has you adding 5lbs a week. With a linear progression you’d have novice lifters benching 395 in 1 year (135 starting point) and 655 in two, it doesn’t happen.
Every one of the squares you see in physics equations is an exponential increase.
That's just a numbers game - for every giant, there are tens of thousands of average-sized or short dudes. Since bodybuilding requires a combination of inclination, determination, genetics, good muscle insertions, etc, it stands to reason that the majority of those who have the right combination of these factors will NOT be giants.
Richters is 7'2. In pic rel he was only 28 years old. If he can achieve this level of mass at his height, then 6'5 dudes have no excuse.
Last years top 3 Olympia >Hadi Choopan 1.69 m >Derek Lunsford 167.5cm >Nick Walker 170cm
other top 10 guys >William Bonac 170cm >Brandon Curry 173cm >Hunter Labrada and Mamdouh Elssbiay both 175cm
Samson Dauda, Andrew Jacked and Rafael Brandão are the only ones 180cm or taller in last years top 10 Olympia, and look how long it took Samson to fill out his frame and get to this point. He's not new, he just wasn't good until 2021.
He's fake natty. There's a video somewhere of someone asking him if he thinks it's OK to lie about taking drugs. He goes off on a big cope speech about how as long as you aren't competing then it's fine and nobodies business what you do or do not take and whether you feel comfortable sharing that etc. The guy then asks if he takes steroids and he says no lmao but hey he's not competing so it's not immoral to lie, right?
You don't think people who use their bodies as advertisement for the supplements/shakes/workout programs they sell should have to disclose whether or not they're on steroids?
If you're talking about someone who is just a lifter then I'm with you that it's entirely their own business, but if you're selling something it's absolutely immoral to lie about it and mislead people into thinking they can attain your physique if they just buy your products.
How is that any different to someone who doesn't get money lying about their natty status? I think it's a dog eat dog world and you can stand on your pedestal and seethe but they're getting paid and they obviously don't care. I have no sympathy for idiots who eat it up. Sell them a dream who cares. You only do because you're not willing to do it really. Why not start a movement exposing the fitness industry. You don't really care, you just don't like that someone is bigger than you and making money cheating. Let them have it, it doesn't come for free
>How is that any different to someone who doesn't get money lying about their natty status?
It's completely different because there's the motivation of money involved and the exploitation that follows dipshit. You can not care about the people who fall for it but you can't call it the same thing as keeping a personal secret that impacts nobody.
>You only do because you're not willing to do it really. Why not start a movement exposing the fitness industry. You don't really care, you just don't like that someone is bigger than you and making money cheating
That's a lot of assumptions and projection there buddy. I don't give a frick about someone being bigger than me, someone always is and someone always makes more money. So what? It's very telling that your defense of the matter is crying "jealousy" and "do something about it". Am I jealous of someone who gets rich selling drugs to children because I say I disapprove? Can I not ever talk about it when it's brought up without being told to join the police and put an end to crime or shut up? Taking the stance of "don't ever say anything critical unless you're prepared to personally bring it to an end" is a very dumb stance to take and the hard cope that is thinking disapproval must be motivated by jealousy is frankly embarassing. Give your head a shake man.
I don't care enough to do anything about it, only enough to post on an Hungarian sheep shearing forum, but I do feel for the young lads who fall for it because they don't know any better.
The fitness industry has been nothing but snake oil salesmen for at least half a century.
Something everyone misses is your frame, if you're tall you need to have wide shoulders to go along with your height or your proportions look all fricked. If you're short with an "average" frame it's probably much easier to look wider.
It's easier to fill out a smaller frame than a big one but taller will always look better even if the same amount of muscle doesn't fill out as much. On top of that, taller usually means stronger.
If I was a lanklet and saw some fricking muscular turbomanlet miring himself like that in my gym I would start roiding that day and try my best to always go to the gym at the same time as the manlet so he could watch me mog him in real time.
Chronic heart failure. I have the musculoskeletal deficits of an 85 year old. (104 lbs).
>it's another thinly veiled lanklet cope thread
"M-my blood runs passively against the forces of gravity in the absence of a subpulmonary ventricle", anon, who was 5'7", coped. "If I was six feet tall, the consequences of this would be even more pronounced!"
For real, I'd take being three inches shorter over being three inches taller.
When there's a 60% probability you'll be alive in two years, your world becomes very small, when usually it was fricking gigantic because you're 5'7" and everything appears big from down here. I don't worry about superficial bullshit.
Yup. Too lazy to go find them but he posted a pic on maybe instagram of him getting the jab and encouraging others to do so.
Also when George Groid ODed on fentanyl and lefties decided to start a cultural revolution he went fully onboard. Watched one of his videos at the time and he intro'd it by regurgitating israeli talking points like "blahblahblah we live in a system of white supremacy and we must all undo this" or whatever the frick. Guy always rubbed me as a homosexual but i unsubbed right when I heard that and hes since become even more insufferable with the "le ebin science based workout!" and shilling the clot shot. Absolute fricking homosexual
>500ngl (Average natural testosterone) produces 40 lb of lifetime muscle >height has no influence or relationship with testosterone levels >40 lb of muscle stretched out on a 5' guy >40 lb of muscle stretched out on a 6' guy >How will they look different
I honestly think anybody who thinks short people don't build/develop physiques much faster is literally a sub 95 IQ. Empirically, how many famous fitness youtube manlets do you need for even your mongoloid IQ to realize it?
So a tall person has the same amount of test, on average, as a short guy, but more diluted?
Come off it m8
See
https://i.imgur.com/SCqn9pA.jpg
That's just a numbers game - for every giant, there are tens of thousands of average-sized or short dudes. Since bodybuilding requires a combination of inclination, determination, genetics, good muscle insertions, etc, it stands to reason that the majority of those who have the right combination of these factors will NOT be giants.
Richters is 7'2. In pic rel he was only 28 years old. If he can achieve this level of mass at his height, then 6'5 dudes have no excuse.
>it's easier for short guys >posts a roided out dude
I mean, it's not that hard to be a buff guy when you've been cruising for years like he has. Your height doesn't matter in this case.
>NOOOO HE'S NATTY NOOO
Wtf lmao, frick off Black person, he's literally an influencer, he has to juice. They all do, it's their job.
If you just look at their solo pictures then yes, is easier for a tinier body to look yoked, but put those yoked midgets next to a regular dyel dude and suddenly they don't look so impresive, I don't hate manlets since it's nobody's foult being born short, but it's hard to mire someone that I tower over.
Yes its way easier. All of the main lifts become a lot easier because you have better leverage over your body, and your body has less space that needs to be filled with muscle.
Yes.
No
Hate this smug "muh science" gay and I've never even watched a video of his
I.dont even know who this dude is. You do. Think about that. Don't bother telling me. thread hidden
>Think about that.
why? do you really think that is something worth pondering over?
fricking zoomers holy shit
Generally? Yes you have to fill less space with muscles. Think of a muscle as a cube, the shorter you are the smaller the cube is and it means the cube needs less muscles to be full
i've always thought it's easier for lil guys to look muscular but, on the flipside, easier for them to look fat.
they always look laughable
no because if u are tall dude, you should be lifting more and eating more.
short people getting bigger it's the ultimate tall man cope. they are not going as hard cuz they are pussy
ofc if a manlet do 140 and you do 140 then he will gain more. you should be doing 150 or 160 as appropriate for your height
in reality, short dudes have bigger drive because they are shorter.
tall guys do have higher risk to frick up their spine with severe injury tho
Hahahaha, manlet rage
This, it's an insane cope from tall people.
>Is it easier for small cars to be faster than big cars?
lol
It is much easier for small cars to be faster than large cars. Power to weight is exponential.
That's bullshit. You need less power to move a smaller object, doesn't change the fact that a bigger engine has a better power output than a small engine.
A Bugatti Veyron at 1900kg completely smokes a Porsche GTS 3 at 1400kg.
Dumbass, Your example has a 500 hp car vs 1,000 hp car.
Compare both to an F1 car, 800kg with 1,000 hp.
The whole point of Motorsport is to make the car as light as possible with as much power as possible.
We’re also talking about aesthetics. Compare Christian McCaffrey to George Kittle. McCaffrey managed nine reps at the combine but looks jacked….because he’s short. Kittle got 22 and looks skinny (by nfl standards) but is also one of the best blocking TE in the NFL.
Same team, both gifted athletes, both train hard, top tier nutrition, etc but one LOOKS more jacked.
>muh Black person ball
have a nice day you israelite homosexual
They’re both white
CMC is such a dream boat. I can’t wait to draft him in fantasy. Kittle is a worthless TE though. All hail KELCE
>Power to weight is exponential.
It's 1:1 moron, what a dumb fricking comment lmao, you don't even know what exponential means
Shoo shoo angry manlet.
ok, whatever you say.
Infinitely, 10 lbs of muscle on some manlet at 5’2” is life changing. 10 lbs of muscle on a 6’7” bball player is completely unnoticeable.
Works the same with fat which is a plus for taller people, you can get away with being out of shape for longer.
Most bodybuilders are short.
correct answer
Yes, but you're assuming a 5'6 man and a 6'5 man would have the same ability to synthesise muscle.
We accept as self-evident that a taller man has a larger appetite because he has more mass to sustain - the tall man's muscles have a larger volume and surface area, and therefore have a proportionately higher volume in which muscle protein synthesis can take place.
If this were true you’d have giants winning bodybuilding contests which never happens. 6’ is RARE in high level bodybuilding. There is an exponential increase in difficulty. You’re suggesting a linear progression which doesn’t exist in nature in any form.
Starting Strength by Mark Rippetoe is a linear progression found in nature.
It becomes exponentially more energy to increase lifts the heavier the eight becomes.
Starting strength has you adding 5lbs a week. With a linear progression you’d have novice lifters benching 395 in 1 year (135 starting point) and 655 in two, it doesn’t happen.
Every one of the squares you see in physics equations is an exponential increase.
That's just a numbers game - for every giant, there are tens of thousands of average-sized or short dudes. Since bodybuilding requires a combination of inclination, determination, genetics, good muscle insertions, etc, it stands to reason that the majority of those who have the right combination of these factors will NOT be giants.
Richters is 7'2. In pic rel he was only 28 years old. If he can achieve this level of mass at his height, then 6'5 dudes have no excuse.
it's because tall people usually get herniated disc and they are not as hard workers
tall people are very lazy compared to 175cm people
>tall people are lazy
And I realize I’m arguing with a moron
>Works the same with fat which is a plus for taller people
nah you either just look like a plank or end up the worst kind of skinnyfat
t. lanklet
Last years top 3 Olympia
>Hadi Choopan 1.69 m
>Derek Lunsford 167.5cm
>Nick Walker 170cm
other top 10 guys
>William Bonac 170cm
>Brandon Curry 173cm
>Hunter Labrada and Mamdouh Elssbiay both 175cm
Samson Dauda, Andrew Jacked and Rafael Brandão are the only ones 180cm or taller in last years top 10 Olympia, and look how long it took Samson to fill out his frame and get to this point. He's not new, he just wasn't good until 2021.
Short kings stay winning
only if you dont have any reference
in pic related you can tall that he is incredibly small
so he kind of doesnt look yoked
in other pictures he looks big because you cant see that he is a literal midget
Is he natty?
He vehemently denies ped use BUT he reports his 1 rep max using the stupid calculators so he’s an established liar.
Can’t say for sure but I’ve come to conclude everyone, EVERY SINGLE PERSON, who uses their physique to make make money is on something.
He's fake natty. There's a video somewhere of someone asking him if he thinks it's OK to lie about taking drugs. He goes off on a big cope speech about how as long as you aren't competing then it's fine and nobodies business what you do or do not take and whether you feel comfortable sharing that etc. The guy then asks if he takes steroids and he says no lmao but hey he's not competing so it's not immoral to lie, right?
idk. I feel the same way and I'm natty. I've had the same conversation when it's inevitably come up with other lifters a couple of times
You don't think people who use their bodies as advertisement for the supplements/shakes/workout programs they sell should have to disclose whether or not they're on steroids?
If you're talking about someone who is just a lifter then I'm with you that it's entirely their own business, but if you're selling something it's absolutely immoral to lie about it and mislead people into thinking they can attain your physique if they just buy your products.
How is that any different to someone who doesn't get money lying about their natty status? I think it's a dog eat dog world and you can stand on your pedestal and seethe but they're getting paid and they obviously don't care. I have no sympathy for idiots who eat it up. Sell them a dream who cares. You only do because you're not willing to do it really. Why not start a movement exposing the fitness industry. You don't really care, you just don't like that someone is bigger than you and making money cheating. Let them have it, it doesn't come for free
>How is that any different to someone who doesn't get money lying about their natty status?
It's completely different because there's the motivation of money involved and the exploitation that follows dipshit. You can not care about the people who fall for it but you can't call it the same thing as keeping a personal secret that impacts nobody.
>You only do because you're not willing to do it really. Why not start a movement exposing the fitness industry. You don't really care, you just don't like that someone is bigger than you and making money cheating
That's a lot of assumptions and projection there buddy. I don't give a frick about someone being bigger than me, someone always is and someone always makes more money. So what? It's very telling that your defense of the matter is crying "jealousy" and "do something about it". Am I jealous of someone who gets rich selling drugs to children because I say I disapprove? Can I not ever talk about it when it's brought up without being told to join the police and put an end to crime or shut up? Taking the stance of "don't ever say anything critical unless you're prepared to personally bring it to an end" is a very dumb stance to take and the hard cope that is thinking disapproval must be motivated by jealousy is frankly embarassing. Give your head a shake man.
I don't care enough to do anything about it, only enough to post on an Hungarian sheep shearing forum, but I do feel for the young lads who fall for it because they don't know any better.
Very true.
shut up
Black person
The fitness industry has been nothing but snake oil salesmen for at least half a century.
Something everyone misses is your frame, if you're tall you need to have wide shoulders to go along with your height or your proportions look all fricked. If you're short with an "average" frame it's probably much easier to look wider.
>frame
frick off lookism homosexual and go back to /LULZ/
If you’ve ever even once in your life taken a gym selfie like this you are a gay
Am short. No
It's easier to fill out a smaller frame than a big one but taller will always look better even if the same amount of muscle doesn't fill out as much. On top of that, taller usually means stronger.
>6'5
>gym bro is 5'7
>we started lifting around the same time
>mfw I can lift heavier than him, but look DYEL compared to him
It definitely takes quite a bit longer to actually look like you're lifting when you're taller.
If I was a lanklet and saw some fricking muscular turbomanlet miring himself like that in my gym I would start roiding that day and try my best to always go to the gym at the same time as the manlet so he could watch me mog him in real time.
Yeah but what’s the point? No one cares if you’re short and lift you’re just compensating
I don't know, anon. I'm 5'7" and too weak to carry groceries, so I lift.
My waifu loves me unconditionally.
How are you so weak you couldn’t carry bags? I’m 5’7 and lifting has changed literally nothing I’m a bit stronger now that’s it
Chronic heart failure. I have the musculoskeletal deficits of an 85 year old. (104 lbs).
"M-my blood runs passively against the forces of gravity in the absence of a subpulmonary ventricle", anon, who was 5'7", coped. "If I was six feet tall, the consequences of this would be even more pronounced!"
For real, I'd take being three inches shorter over being three inches taller.
When there's a 60% probability you'll be alive in two years, your world becomes very small, when usually it was fricking gigantic because you're 5'7" and everything appears big from down here. I don't worry about superficial bullshit.
Of course, much less volume to fill out.
Considering 10lbs of muscle looks bigger on short guys, yes, but short guys don't necessarily build muscle faster
Christ please tell me this is photoshopped.
I'd definitely feel bad for this midget homosexual if he didnt push the "vaccine" and the "systemic racism" myth. Absolute fricking cuck.
Jesus this homosexual pushed the vax and he's a Black person lover? Now I'm gonna shit up his comment section on all his videos
Yup. Too lazy to go find them but he posted a pic on maybe instagram of him getting the jab and encouraging others to do so.
Also when George Groid ODed on fentanyl and lefties decided to start a cultural revolution he went fully onboard. Watched one of his videos at the time and he intro'd it by regurgitating israeli talking points like "blahblahblah we live in a system of white supremacy and we must all undo this" or whatever the frick. Guy always rubbed me as a homosexual but i unsubbed right when I heard that and hes since become even more insufferable with the "le ebin science based workout!" and shilling the clot shot. Absolute fricking homosexual
>500ngl (Average natural testosterone) produces 40 lb of lifetime muscle
>height has no influence or relationship with testosterone levels
>40 lb of muscle stretched out on a 5' guy
>40 lb of muscle stretched out on a 6' guy
>How will they look different
I honestly think anybody who thinks short people don't build/develop physiques much faster is literally a sub 95 IQ. Empirically, how many famous fitness youtube manlets do you need for even your mongoloid IQ to realize it?
So a tall person has the same amount of test, on average, as a short guy, but more diluted?
Come off it m8
See
for explanation
>it's another thinly veiled lanklet cope thread
>it's easier for short guys
>posts a roided out dude
I mean, it's not that hard to be a buff guy when you've been cruising for years like he has. Your height doesn't matter in this case.
>NOOOO HE'S NATTY NOOO
Wtf lmao, frick off Black person, he's literally an influencer, he has to juice. They all do, it's their job.
He's clearly asking a question, not making a statement, anon.
If you just look at their solo pictures then yes, is easier for a tinier body to look yoked, but put those yoked midgets next to a regular dyel dude and suddenly they don't look so impresive, I don't hate manlets since it's nobody's foult being born short, but it's hard to mire someone that I tower over.
Yes. Also Nippard is so incredibly disproportioned he just looks goofy and weird.
My roommate and I basically train exactly the same and he looks way way stronger
The difference being I am 6'4 and he's 5'7
How tall is he? He looks tiny in this picture, like his arms look like they're a foot long
Yes its way easier. All of the main lifts become a lot easier because you have better leverage over your body, and your body has less space that needs to be filled with muscle.
Peak performance
looks like the dutch roidtroony who posts here sometimes
You talking about worm bro, the guy that never posts legs and just says I mog you?
now do leg extension surgery