no, it just makes you healthy.
Don't believe the israelites that tell you to eat goyslop
The opposite. Read meat contains TVA which helps fight cancer. You'll notice a lot of diet studies group red meat with processed meat, thats how you know it's bullshit
The opposite. Read meat contains TVA which helps fight cancer. You'll notice a lot of diet studies group red meat with processed meat, thats how you know it's bullshit
Just stupid normies who read about studies from stupid journalists that don't understand the studies and manage to summarize "processed red meat treated with nitrates" into "red meat".
Is process red meat treated with nitrates (e.g., spam or salami) correlated with cancer (and correlation isn't causation)--yes, it is. But no such correlation has been definitively shown for red meat (and probably can't be and even if it did I highly, highly doubt it'd be a true causal link).
Grass fed red meat is based and everyone should be eating it to be healthier.
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE COVID 19 VACCINES CAUSE HEART FAILURE. YOU ARE SPREADING MISINFORMATION. THE VACCINES ARE SAFE AND EFFECTIVE YOU FRICKING FACIST
the cdc has already tracked the deaths from the vaccine due to Myocarditis and thrombosis. We already have plenty of famous people who died from the shot. You know what's really misinformation, CALLING IT A VACCINE! IT'S NOT!
No, as long as it is not processed and you are eating mostly lean red meat (not that animal fat is uniquely bad, just caloric), you will be fine eating it.
No shit basically all cardiovascular disease is caused by metabolic dysfunction, i.e. insulin dysfunction (i.e. fricked-up production of insulin or insensitivity). Without glucose and fructose you're basically immune to this shit.
>causes cancer
There is a correlation between red meat consumption and higher rates of certain cancers. It's not entirely clear it's causal. Red meat is also linked with higher rates of heart disease.
>shortens your lifespan
Red meat is not linked with all-cause mortality, so on average it won't shorten your lifespan. Probably it has health benefits which balance the negative effects.
I'd stick away from red meat if you have a genetic predisposition to heart disease. Otherwise enjoy it in moderation but don't go full moron. Also processed meat is poison don't eat that shit.
no, it's the single best food you can eat. but because people typically only eat the meat, instead of also eat the organs and skin, you should take 10-15g glycine per day (which is a good idea anyway, even if you don't eat meat).
Impossible to accurately measure since cancer detection is up historically and there have been other foundational dietary changes. So we don't have the longitudinal breadth to accurately measure.
>red meat causes cancer
the largest, most expensive nutrition clinical trial of all time disproved this. anything else is cope >Most importantly for the IARC report, two major dietary intervention studies that should have contributed to the assessment of the claimed relationship of red meat and cancer were not considered. The first was a study of colon polyps, the precancerous growths that greatly increase the likelihood of developing colon cancer. Almost 1,900 subjects with a recent history of having a polyp removed were divided into a control group that ate their usual diet and a group following a diet characterized by significant decreases in total fat, red, and processed meat along with increases in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and legumes (Schatzkin et al., 2000). Participants were followed for 3 years and at the end of that time, the recurrence of colon polyps was identical in both diet groups. It is possible that the precancerous stage may not have been the proper time for dietary intervention. The Women’s Health Initiative, therefore, studied a low-fat diet, achieved in large part by reducing red- and processed-meat consumption, among almost 49,000 women (Beresford et al., 2006); about 30,000 followed their normal diets and almost 20,000 were assigned to low-fat diets. After 9 years, the rate of colon cancer was almost identical in the low-fat and control-diet groups. These studies strongly suggest that the observational studies are not supported by dietary intervention studies at either the precancerous or malignant tumor stages of colon cancer.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015455/
>red meat causes cancer
the largest, most expensive nutrition clinical trial of all time disproved this. anything else is cope >Most importantly for the IARC report, two major dietary intervention studies that should have contributed to the assessment of the claimed relationship of red meat and cancer were not considered. The first was a study of colon polyps, the precancerous growths that greatly increase the likelihood of developing colon cancer. Almost 1,900 subjects with a recent history of having a polyp removed were divided into a control group that ate their usual diet and a group following a diet characterized by significant decreases in total fat, red, and processed meat along with increases in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and legumes (Schatzkin et al., 2000). Participants were followed for 3 years and at the end of that time, the recurrence of colon polyps was identical in both diet groups. It is possible that the precancerous stage may not have been the proper time for dietary intervention. The Women’s Health Initiative, therefore, studied a low-fat diet, achieved in large part by reducing red- and processed-meat consumption, among almost 49,000 women (Beresford et al., 2006); about 30,000 followed their normal diets and almost 20,000 were assigned to low-fat diets. After 9 years, the rate of colon cancer was almost identical in the low-fat and control-diet groups. These studies strongly suggest that the observational studies are not supported by dietary intervention studies at either the precancerous or malignant tumor stages of colon cancer.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015455/
was on the WHO IARC report. he basically said its a fraud
>science says yes
>brought to you by the same science as "the northern ice shelf will be completely gone by Sept 213" and "14 days to flatten the curve"
No
Bullshit
Go sun your balls vegan soiboi
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06749-3
I ate a hamburger once now I have AIDS. Doc says I stop rimming Puerto Rican man prostitute that I might recover and not die.
nope.
but that doesn't mean you should only eat it.
no, it just makes you healthy.
Don't believe the israelites that tell you to eat goyslop
Even if it did I wouldn't stop eating it.
The opposite. Read meat contains TVA which helps fight cancer. You'll notice a lot of diet studies group red meat with processed meat, thats how you know it's bullshit
Just stupid normies who read about studies from stupid journalists that don't understand the studies and manage to summarize "processed red meat treated with nitrates" into "red meat".
Is process red meat treated with nitrates (e.g., spam or salami) correlated with cancer (and correlation isn't causation)--yes, it is. But no such correlation has been definitively shown for red meat (and probably can't be and even if it did I highly, highly doubt it'd be a true causal link).
Grass fed red meat is based and everyone should be eating it to be healthier.
according to the world health organization yes. but carnivore grifter youtube "doctors" disagree.
make sure you get your latest jab!
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE COVID 19 VACCINES CAUSE HEART FAILURE. YOU ARE SPREADING MISINFORMATION. THE VACCINES ARE SAFE AND EFFECTIVE YOU FRICKING FACIST
the cdc has already tracked the deaths from the vaccine due to Myocarditis and thrombosis. We already have plenty of famous people who died from the shot. You know what's really misinformation, CALLING IT A VACCINE! IT'S NOT!
>FACIST
I guess the jab also impairs your ability to spell correctly in addition to causing heart disease and strokes.
Yes, so stay away from my meat
Maybe go drink goybeans
No, as long as it is not processed and you are eating mostly lean red meat (not that animal fat is uniquely bad, just caloric), you will be fine eating it.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34934897/
Science is valid only when it supports your narrative.
Apparently there is value in being contrarian to main narrative. It gives your life purpose.
go sun your balls soiboi
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37385184/
No shit basically all cardiovascular disease is caused by metabolic dysfunction, i.e. insulin dysfunction (i.e. fricked-up production of insulin or insensitivity). Without glucose and fructose you're basically immune to this shit.
As if anyone on /fit would know.
https://academic.oup.com/biomedgerontology/article/77/9/1866/6444397?login=false
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34612096/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32308009/
In old people sure. Everything becomes potentially a hazard when you go that much systematic inflammation going on. Before those years no.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36586217/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1407826/
you are what you eat so yes cooked meat will cause cancer
>causes cancer
There is a correlation between red meat consumption and higher rates of certain cancers. It's not entirely clear it's causal. Red meat is also linked with higher rates of heart disease.
>shortens your lifespan
Red meat is not linked with all-cause mortality, so on average it won't shorten your lifespan. Probably it has health benefits which balance the negative effects.
I'd stick away from red meat if you have a genetic predisposition to heart disease. Otherwise enjoy it in moderation but don't go full moron. Also processed meat is poison don't eat that shit.
no, it's the single best food you can eat. but because people typically only eat the meat, instead of also eat the organs and skin, you should take 10-15g glycine per day (which is a good idea anyway, even if you don't eat meat).
Impossible to accurately measure since cancer detection is up historically and there have been other foundational dietary changes. So we don't have the longitudinal breadth to accurately measure.
I'd be more concerned that fruits and vegetables seem to have more recalls than meat.
>red meat causes cancer
the largest, most expensive nutrition clinical trial of all time disproved this. anything else is cope
>Most importantly for the IARC report, two major dietary intervention studies that should have contributed to the assessment of the claimed relationship of red meat and cancer were not considered. The first was a study of colon polyps, the precancerous growths that greatly increase the likelihood of developing colon cancer. Almost 1,900 subjects with a recent history of having a polyp removed were divided into a control group that ate their usual diet and a group following a diet characterized by significant decreases in total fat, red, and processed meat along with increases in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and legumes (Schatzkin et al., 2000). Participants were followed for 3 years and at the end of that time, the recurrence of colon polyps was identical in both diet groups. It is possible that the precancerous stage may not have been the proper time for dietary intervention. The Women’s Health Initiative, therefore, studied a low-fat diet, achieved in large part by reducing red- and processed-meat consumption, among almost 49,000 women (Beresford et al., 2006); about 30,000 followed their normal diets and almost 20,000 were assigned to low-fat diets. After 9 years, the rate of colon cancer was almost identical in the low-fat and control-diet groups. These studies strongly suggest that the observational studies are not supported by dietary intervention studies at either the precancerous or malignant tumor stages of colon cancer.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015455/
>the largest, most expensive nutrition clinical trial of all time disproved this
where does it say it?
No.
It's true according to the world health organization and it's paid for by israelites so I'm gonna go ahead and assume it's false.
the author of the paper in
was on the WHO IARC report. he basically said its a fraud