Is modern man more?

Is modern man more IST than ancient man?

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >european woman
    >dog
    checks out

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      from ancient times

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      from ancient times

      why are you like this?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        brown

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        /misc/ is leaking

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >White women have been fricking dogs since 10.000 bc
      It's in their blood, lmao

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    yes, my hunter gatherer counterpart would probably die in his 30's.my brain may be fried from staring at screens for too long but at least im alive and can afford to permabulk for a few more decades

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Sigh, there are still people repeating that braindead canard

      Average lifespan of 30 was calculated including child mortality.

      If a person survived childhood, they could expect to live until middle age at least. If they avoided getting killed by another human or during a hunt, they could expect to live until 60-70.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It was the jomon average. They didn't live very long because they lived in a place that had super shit native plants and animals for micros besides seasonally salmon.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >For example, hunter-gatherers at age 30 have the same probability of death as present-day Japanese at the age of 72: hence the age of a person in Japan that is equivalent to a 30-y-old hunter-gatherer is 72. In other words, compared with the evolutionary pattern, 72 is the new 30.
        from a study called human mortality improvement in evolutionary context available on pubmed central

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yes and no.
    There would have been more ISTter ancient men than what most average men are today because of their environment and nature.
    However, it's fair to say that there would be a small percentage of people who are IST that would well surpass the average ancient men, and be able to reach higher highs.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No, we're puny compared to them. We also have 10% smaller brains. Our pre-agricultural ancestors were superhuman compared to us.

    >b-but muh technology

    They didn't need technology, because they lived in the niche they evolved into, and were perfectly content with their lot.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >No, we're puny compared to them
      Modern day hunter gatherers are small and lean and get devastatingly mogged by industrialised people. Ötzi was 5'3.

      >they lived in the niche they evolved into, and were perfectly content with their lot
      This is true though

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Modern hunter gatherers live a ridiculously impoverished existence compared to our neolithic ancestors. We used to eat mammoth, giant sloth, wooly rhino and aurochs. Our evolutionary niche was big game hunting, and until round 15k years ago, big game was insanely plentiful. The mean mass of a land mammal used to be 500kg, now its 10kg, there were huge herds of herbivores everywhere. Modern hunter gatherers live NOTHING like our ancestors.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >neolithic
          Characterised by the adoption of farming. Big game hunting cultures would have been much earlier.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Oh, and
            >giant sloth
            is an exclusively New World animal

            Details! You know what I'm talking about. So I mixed up my terms and didn't know the particular habitat of the giant sloth, sue me.

            The fact remains, our ancestors ate big, fat fricking mammals, not gazelle and bush monkey like modern hunter gatherers. A completely different ecosystem.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              No but it doesn't exactly paint you as an expert, and it doesn't address that Ötzi and Cheddar Man were both manlets at 5'3 and 5'5 respectively. Actual remains from the Stone Age, and earlier periods, are almost always manlets/womanlets.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Those guys came way later than what I'm talking about, and you know it. Otzi was, what, 3k BC? That was well after the ecosystem shift, poor Otzi was a modern hunter gatherer.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Holds true for Upper Paleolothic Cro-Magnon remains too. Brain volume was greater, but they were manlets, or at least normalets.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Oh, and
          >giant sloth
          is an exclusively New World animal

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Ötzi would probably murder most modern men in his weight class. Size isn't everything, there's a reason why bodybuilders don't dominate professional fighting

      • 1 month ago
        Your Emperor

        they may be manlets but it's very likely they were stronger from constant exercise. yeah they'll lose out to top athletes today but look at how chimps outperform humans in strength despite averaging around 100 lbs. on top of also being familiar with using spears and bows they'd pretty easily beat the average sedentary modern man. also otzi is just one guy, there could've been other humans that were taller and just didn't get preserved

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Define IST. They were superior performance-wise but looked DYEL.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I want to frick this lady and create a new haplogroup

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    ancient man can still be seen in tribes around the world
    they are strong enough for what their environment demands, but since they don't lift the average joe lifting for 5 years can develop more muscle

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe they are more fit than all you fatties. I was a high-performing college athlete.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yes
    Todays athletes are much better in than the past athletes
    People back then were on their feet all day and did manual labor for everything

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    even the most maxxed out roid trannies are probably not as strong as the average neanderthal teenage girl.
    Note that us homosexual sapiens only made them extinct because they thought we wuz sexy.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You just know

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    More medically sound, yes.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *