>Your legs need time to rest after each run.
You legs can recover in a matter of hours. It's very common to do a morning run and then an afternoon run if you're doing serious training.
Obviously negative, go to any marathon meet and see how strapped up and fricked those morons are. Better to run around on grass and do some uphill work especially backwards.
Explain this to me. From what I've seen you'd need like 3 hours of walking to match the benefits of 1 hour of running. Even then like, a guy who can run 30 miles a week could obvsiouly walk that as well, so whats the upside?
That ratio is bullshit and you get most of the cardio and metabolic benefits from just walking that distance without any of the joint or connective tissue problems.
There is no amount of walking that matches the benefits of running an hour or two a week, just like there is no amount of lifting 5 or 10 pound weights that will match a real resistance training program
That ratio is bullshit and you get most of the cardio and metabolic benefits from just walking that distance without any of the joint or connective tissue problems.
The thing is, many of those benefits are not health related. Bigger leg muscles are good, but won't make you live longer (unless you're running from a guy with a knife or something, I actually once outwalked a fatty with a knife who was trying to rob me lol). Stronger tendons will shield you from some injuries, but so will not running. VO2 max improves quality of life (and even IQ), but the increase that running has over walking won't cause as much of an impact as walking has over sedentarism. It will have an extra impact on your joints too, even though that's mostly a problem if you have too much load (too far/too fast/too fat).
Running is great, don't get me wrong, but if health is all you care about it's not the greatest cost benefit. The increase in effort is not proportional to the increase in health.
The biggest health gains are between being sedentary and getting ~6000-8000 steps per day. After that, the health benefits are marginal [sometimes negative for extreme cases where people do a ton of running and get runner's heart].
VO2max and resting heart rate are two of the better indicators of heart health and if you don't run at all, your RHR and VO2max will never be great, even if you walk 50 miles per week.
The biggest health gains are between being sedentary and getting ~6000-8000 steps per day. After that, the health benefits are marginal [sometimes negative for extreme cases where people do a ton of running and get runner's heart].
VO2max and resting heart rate are two of the better indicators of heart health and if you don't run at all, your RHR and VO2max will never be great, even if you walk 50 miles per week.
i was doing 30-40 miles per week up till last week where I only had 26.32 miles. Before then I went from 250 to 200 in three months. But I built up from 1 mile to 14 mile runs. You have to take it steady at first dont over push yourself. Before my runs I have some OJ mixed with liquid IV and preworkout and I only eat one meal a day. Trail running is the key, running on road ways are terrible no matter how much cushion you have on your feet. good luck bro
Negative
Positive, I would guess it only becomes a negative at 70 miles or more a week but some people can handle that fine
Fatty detected
I don't know. Try googling it
I seek Esoteric IST knowledge
what a b***h
i will frick her
positive
running is the only fitness that matter
Her calcium is a net positive on my health iykwim
Considering you're probably 400 pounds you'll grind your knees to dust long before 30 miles
i do 20 a week and i feel like i could do more tbh senpai
How is that distributed throughout the week? Your legs need time to rest after each run. You know there are other ways to get cardio in, right?
>Your legs need time to rest after each run.
You legs can recover in a matter of hours. It's very common to do a morning run and then an afternoon run if you're doing serious training.
Obviously negative, go to any marathon meet and see how strapped up and fricked those morons are. Better to run around on grass and do some uphill work especially backwards.
>running
Negative, take the walk pill
Yeah just walk for like 5 or 6 miles a day and you are good
Explain this to me. From what I've seen you'd need like 3 hours of walking to match the benefits of 1 hour of running. Even then like, a guy who can run 30 miles a week could obvsiouly walk that as well, so whats the upside?
That ratio is bullshit and you get most of the cardio and metabolic benefits from just walking that distance without any of the joint or connective tissue problems.
There is no amount of walking that matches the benefits of running an hour or two a week, just like there is no amount of lifting 5 or 10 pound weights that will match a real resistance training program
Let's see your VO2 max, Mr. I walk one hour a day
The thing is, many of those benefits are not health related. Bigger leg muscles are good, but won't make you live longer (unless you're running from a guy with a knife or something, I actually once outwalked a fatty with a knife who was trying to rob me lol). Stronger tendons will shield you from some injuries, but so will not running. VO2 max improves quality of life (and even IQ), but the increase that running has over walking won't cause as much of an impact as walking has over sedentarism. It will have an extra impact on your joints too, even though that's mostly a problem if you have too much load (too far/too fast/too fat).
Running is great, don't get me wrong, but if health is all you care about it's not the greatest cost benefit. The increase in effort is not proportional to the increase in health.
seems correct in this regard.
The biggest health gains are between being sedentary and getting ~6000-8000 steps per day. After that, the health benefits are marginal [sometimes negative for extreme cases where people do a ton of running and get runner's heart].
VO2max and resting heart rate are two of the better indicators of heart health and if you don't run at all, your RHR and VO2max will never be great, even if you walk 50 miles per week.
>4.5 miles a day
Anon…
What's wrong with that, exactly? Even when I feel like shit I can easily run 6 miles or more a day
OPM workout has proven to be greatly successful and that's about 45miles a week, so you can do more.
really depends on the frequency.
1 x 30? yes
2 * 15? yes
3 * 10? maybe
6 * 5? no
someone post her breasts
milk truck arrive
HEY EVERYONE DID YOU HEAR WHAT ANON JUST SAID HAHA
Milkies
i was doing 30-40 miles per week up till last week where I only had 26.32 miles. Before then I went from 250 to 200 in three months. But I built up from 1 mile to 14 mile runs. You have to take it steady at first dont over push yourself. Before my runs I have some OJ mixed with liquid IV and preworkout and I only eat one meal a day. Trail running is the key, running on road ways are terrible no matter how much cushion you have on your feet. good luck bro