Bone structure and shoulder to waist to height ratio is a thing, but ectos can still put on muscle.
Literally every man will look better with muscle regardless of body type compared to be a skeleton/fatty
i think it's real in the sense that if your skeleton is narrow less food can pass through you at once, which will automatically regulate how much you eat, and opposite for a wide skeletons
100% bullshit. The main thing that determines your body type is nutrition, especially in childhood. If you parents gave you plenty of meat and other protein rich foods you will be big and strong
It is a way to classify body shapes, as with everything, reality has to be simplified for discussion. Same with for example personality types like INTJ or ESPF whatever, they are just one attempt to summarize reality into a workable model.
Or income classes like elite, middle class, lower class. Obvious there is one man who makes 64,999 dollars and another man who makes 65,001 dollars, they are in different classes according to the model but they are obviously extremely similar. A model will always be simpler than reality since that's the whole point of a model
There is some variation based on muscle insert position, but its mostly bullshit.
When I was 25% bodyfat I would look like right, when I was 12% I would look like left, when I lifted and gained muscle and then cut again to 12% I would look like center.
What defines body shape is mostly how high your trap inserts are, how wide your clavicle is, and how thick your rectus sheath is.
Zyzz and tom hardy are a good example of high trap inserts.
High traps give your upper torso a more rounder look, a negative V taper. It means you need much bigger shoulders to look like you have wider shoulders, even if your frame naturally does.
Your rectus sheethe is the lower abdominal wall, which stretches somewhat horizontally across your hips. Some people have a thicker version, and so it is much harder to achieve the V taper that middle pic shows.
But mostly this classification for bodies is just a cope for fatties to go "I'm this way because I'm an endomorph, guess I can't fix it so I'll never change anything about my diet or excersize regiment"
It "was" in the sense that most men tend to fall in one of the 3. I think the high prevalence of skinny fat now kind of throws a wrench in it. It's mostly just frame.
Half true. Yes people have different bone structure. But just because you have a large structure that doesn't means that will have a easy time gaining muscle and a hard time losing far. That part is bullshit
it's true in that there are differences in frame, but reality is more nuanced. for example, I have broad shoulders but only average wrists ( 7") and thick ankles. and one my friends is the inverse, he has ridiculousy thick wrists but his shoulders are narrow
individual differences in metabolism are almost negligible, save for a small percentage of outliers
Do people have different bone structures? Yes, that much is obvious. Does this mean that your metabolism is somehow different, and you should train differently? Frick no that's bullshit and israelitepaganda.
Now some people would argue against developing certain muscles to avoid looking kinda goofy, like oh don't train legs or you'll look like a stump, or don't train traps you'll look like a thumb. Is that part true? Depends, I'm of the belief you should train everything you can, if not mass then strength at least.
I went to high school with a guy who was 6'4 our freshman year. I don't think he even weighed 170lbs. He was 6'8 by sophomore year, and was 180lbs. He also couldn't dunk a basketball, somehow. He messaged me about a year after we graduated because I was a gymcel whom he wanted advice from, and bragged to me for about 10 minutes about how he had "Bulked up to 200lbs."
people vary but this classification is pointless. more cope for body dysmorphic losers
There's more variety to humans than just three basic body types so it's a myth and a very moronic one.
>just three basic body types
>fit really thinks this is about 3 body types and not about the spectrum between them
It's just more demoralization bullshit.
Bone structure and shoulder to waist to height ratio is a thing, but ectos can still put on muscle.
Literally every man will look better with muscle regardless of body type compared to be a skeleton/fatty
i think it's real in the sense that if your skeleton is narrow less food can pass through you at once, which will automatically regulate how much you eat, and opposite for a wide skeletons
>if your skeleton is narrow
>i think it's real in the sense that if your skeleton is narrow less food can pass through you at once
lol
It's a moronic pseudoscience. Just read the original recearch, it's painfully obvious. Author literally git everything backwards.
100% bullshit. The main thing that determines your body type is nutrition, especially in childhood. If you parents gave you plenty of meat and other protein rich foods you will be big and strong
It is a way to classify body shapes, as with everything, reality has to be simplified for discussion. Same with for example personality types like INTJ or ESPF whatever, they are just one attempt to summarize reality into a workable model.
Or income classes like elite, middle class, lower class. Obvious there is one man who makes 64,999 dollars and another man who makes 65,001 dollars, they are in different classes according to the model but they are obviously extremely similar. A model will always be simpler than reality since that's the whole point of a model
There is some variation based on muscle insert position, but its mostly bullshit.
When I was 25% bodyfat I would look like right, when I was 12% I would look like left, when I lifted and gained muscle and then cut again to 12% I would look like center.
What defines body shape is mostly how high your trap inserts are, how wide your clavicle is, and how thick your rectus sheath is.
Zyzz and tom hardy are a good example of high trap inserts.
High traps give your upper torso a more rounder look, a negative V taper. It means you need much bigger shoulders to look like you have wider shoulders, even if your frame naturally does.
Your rectus sheethe is the lower abdominal wall, which stretches somewhat horizontally across your hips. Some people have a thicker version, and so it is much harder to achieve the V taper that middle pic shows.
But mostly this classification for bodies is just a cope for fatties to go "I'm this way because I'm an endomorph, guess I can't fix it so I'll never change anything about my diet or excersize regiment"
Very real. Bone girth, hormonal profile, fat distribution are have observable effects.
It "was" in the sense that most men tend to fall in one of the 3. I think the high prevalence of skinny fat now kind of throws a wrench in it. It's mostly just frame.
Body type clarification but doesnt abide too much to genetics
You can turn from ecto to meso unless your a lazy c**t
Half true. Yes people have different bone structure. But just because you have a large structure that doesn't means that will have a easy time gaining muscle and a hard time losing far. That part is bullshit
it's true in that there are differences in frame, but reality is more nuanced. for example, I have broad shoulders but only average wrists ( 7") and thick ankles. and one my friends is the inverse, he has ridiculousy thick wrists but his shoulders are narrow
individual differences in metabolism are almost negligible, save for a small percentage of outliers
>Me, ectomorph
>My bf, endomorph who wraps his hairy huge arms around me when sleeping.
Kino af senpai.
ywnbaw
have a nice day you worthless pozloaded subhuman sodomite homosexual
this:
Why must homosexuals make everything about them?
>is it just a myth?
Yes, these cartoon men do not actually exist in real life.
Do people have different bone structures? Yes, that much is obvious. Does this mean that your metabolism is somehow different, and you should train differently? Frick no that's bullshit and israelitepaganda.
Now some people would argue against developing certain muscles to avoid looking kinda goofy, like oh don't train legs or you'll look like a stump, or don't train traps you'll look like a thumb. Is that part true? Depends, I'm of the belief you should train everything you can, if not mass then strength at least.
if you exercised when you were a kid you'll grow up wider
>tfw endomorph
How fricking over is it bros? I’m always going to look wide and fat no matter what
the only people ive heard reference this are dyels that works out maybe once a week
>TFW xenomorph
I got up to 220 at 6'4 and people still call me skinny probably because of bone structure
I went to high school with a guy who was 6'4 our freshman year. I don't think he even weighed 170lbs. He was 6'8 by sophomore year, and was 180lbs. He also couldn't dunk a basketball, somehow. He messaged me about a year after we graduated because I was a gymcel whom he wanted advice from, and bragged to me for about 10 minutes about how he had "Bulked up to 200lbs."