IT'S FRICKING OVER
First Erythritol, then sucralose (Splenda), now Aspartame.
What the frick, that's like all the good sugar alternative.
I guess there's just Monk Fruit and Stevia left.
IT'S FUCKING OVER. First Erythritol, then sucralose (Splenda), now Aspartame.
People knew about this like 20+ years ago, man.
THIS
I'VE BEEN AVOIDING ASPARTAME BECAUSE I WAS TOLD IT CAUSES CANCER A LONG LONG TIME AGO
>t. Full fat coke enjoyer
Always do opposite of what WHO says
zased
Lmao.. alternative health people are coming around to defending aspartame. Specifically some of the Peaty guys on Twitter. Reduces tryptophan in the brain supposedly, which is a good thing in theory.
https://twitter.com/raypeatfan/status/1659000822519267329/
Not sure I buy it being safe but "Do the opposite of whatever medical authorities say" is not a bad rule to live by generally.
>"Do the opposite of whatever medical authorities say" is not a bad rule to live by generally.
So this is the chudtard mindset... first artificial sweeteners are bad, until the doctors say it's bad then they're good somehow? How about you think about it for yourself instead of just being an inverted soigoy?
I already said I don't really buy aspartame being safe, so no I didn't decide it was good when doctors said it was bad. I'm just saying that generally the advice of the WHO is so bad that someone who does the opposite of what they say will be healthier.
This is literally what happened. Years of "avoid aspartame" then WHO confirms it and now they want to suck it up. Time to go eat lead then I guess.
spbp. still using erythritol
get fricked antichrist
>Using Christian imagery to advocate for Goyslurp and Big Soda
Whatever you say shlomo
>christcuck
>shlomo
same thing anon!
>Diet Coke is fricking goyslurp, frick off rabbi
>Coca Cola™ is based, healthy and the drank of winners, buy Coca Cola™ shares
>Posts a picture of his mother by accident
Where the frick did you get any of that.
The funny part about this post is that it's not even bad reading comprehension, it's just actual hallucinations.
If my priest looked like that, I'd pray to be molested.
This is a fake image. Look at the hands and the moves that glass Jesus in the background is throwing.
I don't believe for a second they would give reliable information, in which case ignoring what the WHO says is the best policy.
Go ahead and get AIDS then. You already suck Black person dick, so you're practically almost there.
While I die from cancer I'm gonna do a shitload of drugs
People knew about this for thirty years and my sister still gives her kids diet sodas exclusively
>possible
Overconsumption of sugar is way worse, WHO can suck my ass
moron. It’s all bad
>everything is bad just dont eat
ngmi
dont eat anything that comes packaged, yes
Why not just stop drinking sweet water, artificially sweetened or otherwise?
Why do anything except eat work shit sleep? It’s not necessary right?
genuinely why do you think this
Sugar is
>really addictive
>added to everything
>a bottle of coke has 150g of sugar in it and you can gulp it in a short while and not realize how many calories you consumed
and most importantly
>causes diabetes because it's easy to overconsume and has high gi
>diabetes is a shortcut to things like cardiovascular disease, high bp, stroke, liver disease, etc., which are the leading causes of death.
My opinion, if you're not a fatty and you don't have problems with overeating, eating a couple of grams of sugar a day is probably better for you than artificial sweeteners. But if you're a fatty, I think the lesser evil is consuming fake sugar, since it won't give you diabetes and it doesn't have that many calories. The only problem is that some of them are possible carcinogens, but to be honest, overconsumption of sugar is going to be way worse for you than overconsumption of sucralose. And still, the evidence of them being carcinogenic is vague.
because we don't actually know how cancer babby is formed, we only have case studies of people that already have cancer and we presume that whatever they're doing is what gave them cancer-- this is literally not science, it's an educated guess at best in most non-chernobyl circumstances
one thing we do know about cancer though, is that cancer thrives on sugar; it is conclusively, irefutably proven that sugar intake makes cancers grow significantly faster
https://www.who.int/news/item/04-03-2015-who-calls-on-countries-to-reduce-sugars-intake-among-adults-and-children
Fake sugars/artificial sweeteners literally destroy your gut microbiome, it's like taking antibiotics except it doesn't kill the bad shit. You'd have to be a fricking moron to not just drink a little bit of sugar or use some self control compared to the alternative. They also cause insulin resistance.
now you post proofs
I can't fricking post the links for you since the heckin epic system thinks my post is spam but if you google those quotes you should find the studies they are taken from.
>"...showing that the ones who used AS had a higher insulin resistance. The study also showed that the duration of use of artificial sweeteners had a direct impact on insulin resistance."
>"These data show that chronic consumption of sucralose can affect insulin and glucose responses in non-insulin resistant healthy young adults with normal body mass index"
>"These findings indicate that saccharin, sucralose, and aspartame all promote pathogenic changes in two model gut bacteria, E. coli and E. faecalis, which could worsen the effect of consuming artificial sweeteners in the diet on gut health."
>MUH HECKING GUT BIOME
I hope you get cancer up the ass homosexual
>t.smells like shit and is actually going to get ass cancer because of his shit diet
False dichotomy.
Goddamn the sweet tooth of you guys, are you 5
Americans go 5 minutes without eating something sweet challenge: Impossible mode
>Overconsumption of sugar is way worse
>drinking gasoline is okay because drinking bleach is way worse
>then sucralose
Learn to read articles and not just headlines. Seriously.
>correcting people
>can't use then/than properly
>literal nonsense
>WHO
>possibly
>latest science
Yeah I'm gonna go ahead and chug some zero coke now
>x is a le possible carcinogen, ZOMG!!!
they post useless studies like this all the time with inconclusive data so they can use it for a scary headline against their competitors
If you believe all of these shit-tier studies then everything will give you cancer (possibly!) so why even care
I once bought whey with aspartame by accident and threw it in the trash immediately, glad I trusted my instincts.
Whey is full of heavy metals some fricking sweetener is the least of your problems
>he said while drinking beer each weekend having cheat days with fried snacks and drinking milk
cool projection homosexual
>Shitskin betrays his melanin enriched skin by his hatred of milk
Every fricking time. I hope your neighbors dog takes a shit on your lawn tonight.
sugarchads we stay winning
And you stay fat
sugar is weight loss food
Huh, the same guys that claim being a trany is not a mental illness?
>now they trust WHO all of a sudden
yet you gays don't believe a word they say about meat, saturated fat and cholesterol baka
Even a broken clock is right two times a day.
much easier to admit you believe what you want to believe. be brave, be honest
More like WHO frickin' cares? So I die at 70 instead of at 80 while sat in a care home stewing in soiled nappy with a black eye from a Nigerian care worker. And what?
Me personally I would ask for a Vietnamese nurse that I could sneak ass grabs while she washes my saggy balls
>Vietnamese
>ass
Pick one
The frick? You think someone who is physically active his entire life and makes sure to keep his muscular structure into old age, will age the same way as a normie? Especially now that we know how to fight dementia before it even creeps up on us, which surprise, is the same as keeping your muscles just instead of keeping physically active, you stay mentally active. But I guess it's expected of westerners to put their parents into a care home once they are 70 lol.
DING! DING! DING!
AAAAAND WE HAVE IT! THE BIGGEST moron OF THE DAY!
CONGRATULATIONS YOU FRICKING homosexual
>Especially now that we know how to fight dementia before it even creeps
we dont know that, moron
We do. Don't eat carbs.
I shared a house with a Nigerian care worker for a few months. Was a pretty cool guy although I lent him $20 right before we moved out and he never paid me back, blocked me immediately after moving out kek
You paid him $20 to never talk to you again.
I'm going to start lending 20s to everyone I'm sick of hearing from
I drank pepsi max daily for like 10+ years but quit it cold turjey because I saw somewhere that aspartame lowers test.
Don't give a shit about it causing cancer though.
>be me
>someone with a tiny hat and shitty body gives me health advice
>don’t care
>be you
>little man with tiny hat puts sugar in everything
>USA fattest developed nation with lowest life expectancy
>”it’s great!”
Who the frick on IST drinks the sugary israelite?
Why can't anything in life not be shit?
I knew that fake shit was bad for you.
Just stop consuming so much overly sweet slop, simple. If you absolutely must, just use actual, real sugar in moderation.
>Same WHO that says vax is perfectly safe
Yeah, I'll keep drinking diet soda and you can't stop me
>he needs everything to be sweet like a tiny baby
Honey chads keep on winning.
WTF AAAAAAAAA
whats so bad about…..idk…….uh……REGULAR FRICKING SUGAR??? why did we even stop using it anyway? its cheaper, easier to produce, and wont give you TURBO cancer.
Nothing really wrong with it.
The over consumption of it is the problem, to humans, any liquid that isn't water tastes like shit unless it has an ungodly amount of sugar in it. In the 80s or so it fricking destroyed the whole industry when everyone was told to fricking stop drinking soda by various governments, so the manufacturers had to make diet alternatives and use clever marketing or else they'd close up shop
But in the states we don’t make soda with sugar. We make it with shitty high fructose corn syrup, which is fricking horrible.
It's funny because in my country soda with corn syrup is considered a bit of a delicacy and the authentic way to drink soda
Becuase it causes insulin spikes and if done frequently leading to hyperinsulinemia which causes practically everything.
Just eat/drink foods that don't contain added sugar... Sugar isn't bad as long as it isn't a lot. Even then, it doesn't cause cancer. Sugar CAN cause diabetes, but only if you're eating a bunch of it, usually from candy and shit.
I'll take a vague risk of cancer over empty calories and guaranteed diabeetus and rotten teeth.
I have like a wild idea OP, listen here:
why don't you, and don't be bigoted about it, just use regular sugar and stop being a homosexual?
>the weak westoid doesn't know about ***via
Ngmi
Everything is a carcinogen, if you sell sugar.
>WHO says vaccines work
>OMMGGGG NOOO YOU CAN'T TRUST THOSE SATANIC CABALS HAHAHA VAXX ===== DEATH!!!111
>WHO says sweeteners are bad for you
>heh, not listening to what those crooks claim
what even is this fricking board
>WHO says vaccines work
the ones that were extensively tested for 7+ years or the ones that skipped all the regulations?
Either you can trust the WHO or you can't, which one is it
I've never trusted them. Continue to drink diet soda.
Its in corporate interest to promote artificial sweeteners, so evidence against it is against corporate interest. The stevia/monk fruit lobby is much smaller than the corporate heavy hitter of coke and other beverage creators.
Similarly, promoting that the vaccine is good and effective is in line with the corporate interest of pharmaceuticals, so if you can detect what is in corporate interest for the statement, then you can decide what studies you want to trust and studies you don't want to trust. Simple as.
I trust my gut instinct, and my gut always told me that vaccines and artificial sweetners were evil. I don't give a shit if the WHO agrees with me on one thing but not the other
Uh oh vaxxie meltdown~
How are those contradictory? Both times the board is distrusting the WHO
It is currently impossible for human technology to eliminate rhinoviruses/coronaviruses using vaccines. They are not effective. We have been trying really hard for a century. Once we cured polio, the race was on to try and cure everything. People gave up on curing flu/cold very quickly.They are simply too volatile, they mutate and spread too quickly. The only thing a vaccine against any rhinovirus/coronavirus will do is give you a higher probability of not coming down with debilitating flu-like symptoms when you do get infected. You might want to read this sentence again, to make sure you understand. For all intents and purposes, with the technology and knowledge available to the human race today, creating vaccines for flu/cold viruses is a complete fool's errand that does literally nothing while also frivolously altering your DNA with random chunks of virus code. This isn't a conspiracy theory or some new idea. This was perfectly understood, unanimously agreed upon and literally taught in med school up until February 2020.
In a similar vein, people have been trying to pin something on aspartame for decades. The people that are most irrationally anti-vax are also anti-aspartame, and have been, again, for decades.
WHO that there is no evidence of corona existing back when /misc/ was going apeshit about how it's the apocalypse. WHO receives a significant amount of its funding contributions from the CCP and those funding contributions have been going up and up since 2019. Just pointing that out, but I'd also want to point out that the state of California, for example, has labeled every single substance on Earth as being carcinogenic. Including live wood and soil. There is no scientific method consensus here. It's just piss in the wind because some they/them pencil pushing troon threw a dart at a cork board full of case studies, turning the one paper the dart landed on into government scripture. That's the real 2020 coof/misc/ redpill. Everything is bullshit.
>drinking diet soda
>drinking soda
drink some fricking water before you get kidney stones
The first ingredient of soda is water. It's water with some chemicals in it. Guess what comes out of the tap.
Shan’t be drinking sugary drinks
Will keep having my pre workout sips
Simple as
literally WHO? unironically never heard of them
>Aspartame
We've known that causes cancer forever, though. This isn't new.
What about that berry that makes everything taste delicious? why hasn't that caught on?
we've known aspartame is poison for decades
My grandparents drink diet drinks and theyre all in their late 80s and my parents have always had that shit and theyre in their late 60s
That said, I do think its probably unhealthy to use, but Im kind of addicted to it.
Im like 80% water 20% diet coke, and id love to be 100% water, but I just feel like I need that diet coke for some meals you know?
Bro just drink sparkling water, it gives a bit of flavor without the shitty sweeteners and it’s bubbly.
Reject modernity, embrace tradition.
You shouldn't be drinking calories, period, unless the drink is loaded with fiber to cushion the carbohydrates.
conspiratards just keep on winning
keep seething, npc bugmen
How many 2 more weeks until the mass artificial sweetener guzzler die off?
Imagine drinking soda instead of eating these juicy mfs
>WHO
stopped reading right there
if anything this makes me want to drink more diet coke
Trust le heckin science !!! Consime sugar goy !
Category 2b = gives cancer to 30% of the rats that are dosed with 1000x the daily dose that a usual consumer would ever be exposed to
>oh no i shouldnt drink fake sweet fizzy chemical shit
DRINK MILK LIKE A FRICKING MAN
They put this guy in jail for calling this out. Everyone called him a lying piece of shit. I read his book though and saw no lies or bullshit. Based Trudeau thank you for exposing the lies and keeping me safe.
Stevia can cause fertility issues. Look it up.
BRING BACK CYCLAMATE!!!
>BRING BACK CYCLAMATE!!!
This was banned in like 1970 for no real reason. They could never verify any of the claims against it. Then, the only actual study done on Cyclamate much later was done by giving monkeys the equivalent of 30 cokes worth of cyclamate per fricking day, then these white coats all sit around and whine that it caused cancer after 24 YEARS of 30 cokes per day. Like, seriously?
Cyclamate was absolutely torpedoed by special interests.
Unlike Olestra. Olestra would have made fantastic memes if it came out today.
Most likely metabolite would be cyclohexylamine which is enough reason to not consider its use. Once again, as other have stated, just eat regular sugar.
"thing causes cancer" studies are always trash. lots of fat asses etc. consume the alternative in massive quantities and get cancer so it's cancerous is all it ever amounts to.
Monk fruit chads cannot stop winning
The scientific article is total bullshit. This already been debunked.
Quick rundown is:
i) They only did in vitro ie. Gave Asparate to cells in a dish (in vitro to human studies not translate well)
ii) The amount of asparate they gave to the cells were almost 1000x the amount you'd get from drinking any artifical soda, so it's utter bullshit. Even water is deadly at 1000x the recommended dosage.
TL;DR It's safe to drink artifical soda, article is shit.
>aspartame causes le cancer
lol
aspartame is fully metabolized into amino acids and methanol in the body
methanol is not a carcinogen
the labs finding evidence of carcinogenicity are probably using shitty aspartame product
ksk24n
>The WHO is coming out against every non-sugar based sweetener suddenly after decades of research showing otherwise
Gee I wonder who is behind this.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/09/13/493739074/50-years-ago-sugar-industry-quietly-paid-scientists-to-point-blame-at-fat
https://www.statnews.com/2016/09/12/sugar-industry-harvard-research/
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/13/well/eat/how-the-sugar-industry-shifted-blame-to-fat.html
https://www.bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i4936
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/sep/12/sugar-industry-paid-research-heart-disease-jama-report
https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/sugar-harvard-conspiracy-1.3759582
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/sugar-industry-paid-experts-downplay-health-risks
First they went after fat, now this. Hmmm Really makes you wonder who is behind this.
>fake foods over real foods
okay rabbi
>Yes goy, keep drinking that sugar
okay rabbi
lol aspartame = cancer is a 15 year old "theory" at least, the bad rap made everyone ditch it years ago here
saccharine is king anyways, sucralose is disgusting
The metric they're using is that if you give rats 1000 sodas worth it gives them a marginal percent raise in cancer or something like that
That's known to the state of California tier
It's a carcinogen in the same manner that drinking something hot technically can give you cancer (look it up)
Zoomer detected. The whole aspartame thing was big news 20 years ago. Dick Cheney had ties to getting it FDA approved for his friend or some shit. It was back in the Iraq invasion shit show. Still not sure I believe it or not but this has been kicked around forever.
Close it was Rumsfeld
>Stevia
Uuuhm boys, who wants to tell him?
sweet baby, sweet sweet baby.
you can't get sweet flavor without getting cancer.
you can't even do that miracle berry trick with citric acid or you'll get cancer. sweet flavors just trick your body into producing cancer.
just how it is.
>Possible
It's fricking nothing, as usual with these kinds of headlines.
Almost everything had studies saying they could be a possible carcinogen, and the rule of if it ain't "natural" it'll give you cancer is just completely moronic.
I'm sure all of you will keep eating red meat and eggs.
No anon, aspartame sounds bad so it must be, simple as.
>The studies that suggest a link between cancer and aspartame use several thousands times the normal human consumption.
And what if they did a little oopsie when calculating?
Also are you going to take a small chance of dying every time you drink one or consume something else? It's like buying an inverse lottery ticket every time - sure it'll probably not give you cancer, but it might.
People then wonder why cancer rates are skyrocketing.
You could say that about almost literally everything you consume.
????? Do you think that when you consume a carcinogen it's a lottery where you have a certain % chance to get cancer from it? When you chronically consume enough carcinogens to make a difference over a long period of time, years to decades, you are more likly to develop cancer. And aspartame has to be consumed in an unrealistic quantity to even come close to making any noticeable difference. What are you not understanding?
>What are you not understanding?
The core concept I guess.
Sunscreen also blocks UVB so you dont create vitamin D leading to much worse health, of course they all know this and the FDA couldnt give a frick.
Who could have ever thought there was something bad about fake sugar ;_;
moronic people because it's not true
>WHO
0 credibility
Why the frick do you losers need fake sweeteners? Milk, water, coffee, good enough for gramps, good enough for me.
>good enough for gramps, good enough for me.
>sent from my iPhone
Your grandpa drank Coca-Cola because it was the American thing to do. So did your great grandfather.
Haha it's crazy right? I dunno. It's got no calories and it tastes alright, right? Regular soda is kind of like a desert! Well, I guess I should trust the WHO right? They did pretty good with COVID so why not? I guess I got plenty of years left before I'll get cancer from this, yea? Maybe I should take up smoking. Gonna get cancer anyway huh? Haha I guess I'll just have a coke zero with some bourbon instead.
real sugar
Good, maybe this will wake up people and make them realize they're paying the same price for diet sodas as other pay for sugar filled sodas.
Most need to cut soda and replace it water or drink mixes free of sugar and sugar alternatives.
>Erythritol
That study was shit, it's safe. Sadly very expensive where I live.
>Sucralose
The evidence is still not fully convincing, but I would stay away from it just in case.
> Aspartame
The dose makes the poison, as with everything.
>Stevia
It's good, but often sold along with other stuff. Pure stevia is the best, but I dont want it mixed with Acesulfame, cyclamate or any other thing.
>Monk fruit
Good but rare to find depending where you live.
It's also fair to mention that if your eating habits are in check and all you want is to put something sweet in your coffee/tea then a spoon or two of sugar are not going to do any bad.
https://www.amazon.com/Granular-Monk-Fruit-Sweetener-Erythritol/dp/B077VSBDGL
>Sucralose
>The evidence is still not fully convincing, but I would stay away from it just in case.
The study was clickbait by design. It says nothing about sucralose if you actually read the article, the FIRST LINE says "sucralose-6-acetate, a structural analog of the artificial sweetener sucralose"
Sucralose-6-acetate is NOT sucralose. Its a byproduct of manufacturing. Thats exactly like saying since its possible that when you make fermented foods, bad bacteria can get in and make it toxic, eating fermented food will kill you
allulose
Water, Milk and Coffee (french-pressed, not the phytoestrogen instant) chads just keep on winning
>The studies that suggest a link between cancer and aspartame use several thousands times the normal human consumption.
Can you prove that this is the case? Can you show us these studies that have these numbers?
Honey mogs all.wdwanr
>avoiding sugar
come home white man
What's wrong with erythritol?
>What's wrong with erythritol?
The powers that be have fabricated a new study saying it causes heart attacks and strokes, in an attempt to draw attention away from the vaccine they used to kill people off.
two more weeks, right?
Cyclamatebros we still good?
why do people need sugar or a sweetness substitute?
because people like sweet things, are you an alien?
I like to have a sugar drink before a run or workout, it makes me feel a bit better.
Because it gives you fast burning calories to use. An sugar substitute will not.
Someone has tried alulose here ? I'm tempted to buy some but it's impossible to find here and thus have to import it
hope u lads are eating less than 70g of red meat
https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/eat-well/food-guidelines-and-food-labels/red-meat-and-the-risk-of-bowel-cancer/
its not actually red meat but deli meat
Just drink water or milk, dude
>Anonymous 06/29/23(Thu)05:01:00
I just want to point out this thread was made 22 hours ago, only has 153 replies, and yet it still exists. That defies all normalities for this board and threads hitting page 10 in 5 minutes.
This is how you know this entire fricking board is engineered and fake.
Its almost like the board is filled with zoomers who survive on sugar free energy drinks to meet their macros.
Thereby freaking out when they see this as they scroll the frontpage on their phone.
Trump said it best
Maybe you don't need things to be sweet all the time like a baby
what's wrong with erythritol
2 possibilities:
They found a cheaper fake sweetener and want to destroy the old one with hit pieces.
or
They need something to blame all the new cancers caused by the safe & effective.
Well, thank goodness High Fructose Corn Syrup is 100% safe, has no negative impacts on health, doesn't provoke a biological and neural addiction identical to alcohol, doesn't spike insulin at 400% of the rate of natural sugars, and is other just fricking awesome and super good for you.
>IST fighting to defend their lab chemical artificial flavors that are giving them cancer
>will then go on and say lettuce isn't natural
This board is so fricking contrarian.
>fake ass industrial chemicals in your ((food)) is bad for you
are you seriously just now hearing that diet coke is worse than regular coke? this was an old meme when I was 4 yrs old in 1995, it's been common sense for decades far as i knew
who cares? the opportunity cost of spending all your time worrying about this shit completely insane, and you're already being subjected involuntarily to hundreds of hard carcinogens and DNA corrupting chemicals and waste products daily if you live in the first world.
the animals who run the WHO, FDA, and big pharma literally built their careers poisoning you and lowering the average quality of life on earth so that you will purchase a long list of products to slightly increase your proximity to "tolerable" 1 day at a time. They approve "drugs" which are often quite literally just novel compounds that more often than not are considered effective because they are so toxic to human cells that they trigger a desperate immune response which essentially focuses your entire body on fixing the desired cell or tissue type that the particular novel toxin targets.
the most vile people imaginable, the most sinister cabal of cyberpunk technocrat neocons built the world you live in now around this.
but make sure you choose 1 type of goyslop over the other, surely you've found some kind of loophole where you can get something that tastes good, with no calories, that isn't literally just FDA-waived poison
don't care. I drink about 1 diet coke a week. sometimes I go 2-3 weeks without drinking one. diet coke is just tasty.
>Trusting the WHO for anything involving money
yeah, nah
I'm sure the artificial sweetener manufacturers don't lobby at all. Is it that unfathomable that drinking chemical slop is not good for you? It's a massive industry, they would do anything to prove their product is safe to use.
>this post is sponsored by the artificial shittener industry
We've been consuming aspartame for decades and the only link to xancer was a debunked study from a fraudster. Stop being manipulated by the israelites at the WHO and the media.
>stevia is better because... i say so!!! And its natural!?!?
>pretty much one of the most expensive no calorie sweeteners
>studies show that stevia literally nukes the gut microbiome
>aspartame doesnt do anything to the body
>dirt cheap
>omgfgf you will POSSIBLY, with weak evidence, get cancer in 50 years if you drink diet coke, just drink the original one that has half a kg of sugar in each can, we gotta crank those diabetes numbers up
I hate the israelites so much
>This study is sponsored by the sugar industry
Dont listen to cancer research unless its evidence is overwhelming. Everything causes cancer in extreme amounts.
Who even drinks coke past the age of 12?
>12
Most youngin's don't get proper access to work coffee until 16-21
stevia
fricking morons are still guzzling down the mystery juice and then act surprised when told it's bad
just fricking eat and drink natural stuff. if you can't see the raw product, then don't consume it
Do you have inner monologue? Can you hear words in your head when you think? Can you picture an apple in your mind's eye?
does broccolicount as natural?
what about pizza can we get a natureometer on taht one?
>IT'S FRICKING OVER
>First Erythritol, then sucralose (Splenda), now Aspartame.
>What the frick, that's like all the good sugar alternative.
>I guess there's just Monk Fruit and Stevia left.
as scooby1961 used to say, if it tastes good, SPIT IT OUT, the most based advice i have ever received in my life, got me into offal, and vegetables and i have never been in better shape and health
I'm gonna take advice from these people?
yeah right