https://maineroast.com/blogs/news/why-exercise-isn-t-enough-for-weight-loss-proven-by-one-insanely-active-east-african-tribe
>“Surprisingly, despite spending their days trekking long distances to forage for wild plants and game, the Hadza burned no more calories each day than adults in the U.S. and Europe. The team ran several analyses accounting for the effects of body weight, body fat percentage, age, and gender. In all analyses, daily energy expenditure among the Hadza hunter-gatherers was indistinguishable from that of Westerners.”
manlets+low iq.
never improve.
you won't improve exercising, the science is settled.
all this proves is that exercise isn't the way to weight loss
it does give them S tier cardio though
so my calorie expenditure would be the same whether I were sitting on my ass all day or hinking 10 miles?
>so my calorie expenditure would be the same whether I were sitting on my ass all day or hinking 10 miles?
yes, your body adapts to it.
exactly, scientists need to find out how to actually do it.
exercises + diet = scam
no one was exercising or dieting 100 years ago. no obese people.
THEY ATE LESS
THEY DID MORE
...and they didnt lose weight 🙂
the point being they were skinner back then because they ate less and did more. People now are fatter and they eat more and do less. Where are all the fat people who diet and exercise properly? Show me some
Yeah thats why phelps and bolt had to eat like 7k calories when they were training. Or anyone that has actually done hard physical shit for long periods for that matter. You people will gobble up any bullshit, if it has words like 'analyses' or 'scientists' in it. No matter how obviously moronic it is.
>Yeah thats why phelps and bolt had to eat like 7k calories when they were training
>You people will gobble up any bullshit
oh so you're the guy who buy all the shakes athletes advertise.
your expenditure through physical activity would increase but your metabolism would slow down
the only way to get a meaningful deficit and lose weight would be by controlling diet
>your expenditure through physical activity would increase but your metabolism would slow down
Can you do me a favour and think this over for a few minutes? For example you could ponder why the body would expend more energy during physical activity and how it would replace the energy spent.
the body compensates for the extra activity by reducing other energy consumers.
this tbh
thats why fat people exercise, eat less and it doesnt work
our body wants to store fat.
no, it's because they're lazy slobs who are willing to neither decrease their intake or increase their activity enough to make a difference
No.
>your expenditure through physical activity would increase but your metabolism would slow down
most moronic shit I have read all day
what if your regular tdee is 2500kcal and you burn another 2500 kcal running a marathon or something, will your metabolism slow down to 0 kcal and you die?
>Hadza people are 4'9 on average
>some European countries are 6 ft tall on average
>sedentary tall people burn as many calories as active short people do
lmao
You're a genius OP, certainly nobody thought to control for body mass when comparing the two groups.
Of course they did, the clickbait writer just left that part out to get that gotcha headline :^)
THIS so much THIS!
I knew something was up when I lost 30 lbs last year. I mean, I was calculating my calories and doing cardio in addition to my weight routine. But it just seemed too easy, I KNEW there was something else happening behind the scenes.
I acktually attribute it to how I cut out unhealthy foods like frozen fruit, which are full of sugar, and was staying cool with the ac turned low
Normalize losing weight in non-traditional ways people!
Use of AC is associated with obesity.
Your mom is associated with obesity
its actually associated with hot weather but whatever, homosexual
Wow. SUCH REVELATION.
KEK.
It has long been known, and is absolutely no news, that voluntary activity is only a small fraction of TDEE. Meaning even doubling it will not chage TDEE significantly.
THE HUMAN BODY STILL DOES NOT BREAK THE LAWS OF PHYSICS.
that's not what the study is arguing
when you use more calories through exercise, the body adapts by using less calories through normal regulation
the hadza are using still using loads of of calories by running around
The principle you're claiming can only work within limits. Your body can not regulate NEAT down to 0. So if you ate 13 MJ and cycled hard (suppose you are able to cycle hard) 4 times a day you'd use up everything you ate. Your body would not be able to compensate by essentially being dead and going beyond, towards negative NEAT... because ... even the body of a delusional fatty does not break physics.
Don’t care. Still exercising and eating healthy.
That would explain why TDEE is completely inconsistent. When I'm bulking my TDEE increases, when I'm cutting my TDEE lowers.
In a randomized, controlled trial of 52 obese men (BMI 31.3 ± 2.0 kg/m2), Ross et al. (6) demonstrated a body weight decrease of 7.5 kg over 3 months in the exercise-only group (16 men) that was comparable to that of the calorie-restricted group. Duration of exercise was based on the goal of a daily 700-calorie energy expenditure (∼60 min/day), suggesting that performing exercise greater than the minimum national recommendations for health of 150 min/week may be required to achieve clinically meaningful weight loss.
Donnelly et al. (7) demonstrated weight loss with exercise alone in a group of 141 overweight or obese (BMI 31 kg/m2) men and women in the Midwest Exercise Trial 2. Exercise was supervised for 10 months with an exercise calorie-equivalent reduction of either 400 or 600 calories 5 days per week and a completion rate of 65%. In the completion group, weight losses were 3.9 ± 4.9 and 5.2 ± 5.6 kg, respectively. This demonstrated a clinically significant weight loss for both men and women. However, the amount of activity to achieve this weight loss was again greater than the general exercise recommendations for health.
Weiss et al. (8) demonstrated not only effective weight loss (7% over 16.8 weeks) with exercise alone, but also preservation of lean body mass (LBM) and improvement of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) when compared to weight loss with a comparable energy deficit through calorie restriction alone; the latter resulted in both a loss of LBM and a decrease in VO2max. In addition, as with other studies that have demonstrated weight loss with exercise, the amount of exercise was substantial at 7.4 ± 0.5 hours/week.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5556592/
Studying some tribe on the other side of the planet =/= studying western people
>look at muh hecken active africarinos, eating elephant turds and running in circles and shiet. Dey never burn calories.
OP, if your mom, sister or girlfriend ever seen me there pussies would be throb activated, cream factories.
Yeah but they’re still fricking skinny, you know why, because they are eating real food in limited amounts, not McDonald’s, donuts and liquid sugar. All that proves in diet is more important for weight loss than burning calories, which is what the fitness community have been saying for a long time.
Let’s do another experiment, give the same tribe unlimited access to western “food”, and they’ll get fat for sure.
You shouldn't compare yourself to a Black person tribe.
Compare yourself to yourself laying on your couch all day long. Exercise you weak b***h.
Bullshit
not bullshit, science.