This. They're just making shit up. Would ANYONE at NASA be able to tell us how they come to these conclusions e.g. about the size of these planets when asked? I doubt it.
>Would ANYONE at NASA be able to tell us how they come to these conclusions e.g. about the size of these planets when asked?
detection of exoplanet + orbit speed around star = angular velocity = mass of star, which is limited by gravitational pressure on matter. Parallax gives you distance from earth and change in size of shadow cast by planet as it passes across a star gives you planet size/orbit speed, throw a few compositional approximations for density and you've got an approximate value for the mass/size of a star. Not really any more complicated than a high school algebra class, though some of the area calculations are done with calculus.
tech limitations are not the thing stopping moon landings it's the budget. No taxpayer is down to fund a multimillion dollar rock collecting mission when we already have metric tons of the shit, and the only people advertising more moon missions are dipshit morons who promised to colonise mars half a decade ago
homie, find me a tax payer that has any say in where their tax dollars go? I'll wait lol.
I will say though, I don't even necessarily think the whole "technological limitation" thing is bullshit considering how absolutely easy it would be for the US to simply stage a new moon landing. All the way from launching a rocket that like (assuming the rocket is actually real and not some sort of holographic thing)- as soon as it's out of visibility, doesn't actually go anywhere and the rest of the "mission" is just a fricking video they show on TV. Why they haven't done this yet, no idea.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>All the way from launching a rocket that like (assuming the rocket is actually real and not some sort of holographic thing)- as soon as it's out of visibility, doesn't actually go anywhere and the rest of the "mission" is just a fricking video they show on TV
there's somewhere in the realm of 100 of them a year in the US alone, it's all for navigational sattelites in low orbit, with a reasonably powerful lens telescope you can even start hunting for them yourself in the sky. >homie, find me a tax payer that has any say in where their tax dollars go?
find me a politician who can get elected running on the policy of "hey we wanna literally shovel your hard earned wage into the fricking void of space" in modern day i'll wait lol
1 month ago
Anonymous
>find me a politician who can get elected running on the policy of...
hahaha true. But then again, all they'd have to do to get people to actually support that is say it's racist not to, so...
Is that why China used cgi for their moon landings? Even India’s looked more legit
1 month ago
achievable natty?
>he doesn't believe the indian moon landings
if you can't believe a jeet could frick up a moon landing so bad it crash landed and infected the site with contamination beyond measure I don't know how to save you
Yeah buncha idiots, remember when they didnt get the vax to stop the spread? It ended up not doing anything, but still they should have folded from our passive aggression
This is where you get confused I believe. I'm a different guy.
But basically no one studies anything. They simply read what the other dudes said and rarely if ever verify anything.
This is why getting the same result is actually less likely than not when repeating any experiment.
I worked in a lab and did scientific studies and the control over typical human behavior is atrocious.
They simply report they did things one way in the paper, while in real life they do things however makes it easier to just get the work done.
This. They're just making shit up. Would ANYONE at NASA be able to tell us how they come to these conclusions e.g. about the size of these planets when asked? I doubt it.
https://i.imgur.com/m8xyUR5.jpg
>they can do this but cant go back to the moon since 1972 due to "budget" and "technological limitations"
ok buddy
https://i.imgur.com/fq30awC.jpg
>No taxpayer is down to fund
homie, find me a tax payer that has any say in where their tax dollars go? I'll wait lol.
I will say though, I don't even necessarily think the whole "technological limitation" thing is bullshit considering how absolutely easy it would be for the US to simply stage a new moon landing. All the way from launching a rocket that like (assuming the rocket is actually real and not some sort of holographic thing)- as soon as it's out of visibility, doesn't actually go anywhere and the rest of the "mission" is just a fricking video they show on TV. Why they haven't done this yet, no idea.
why is everyone saying space is fake now? it wasn't this bad even a year ago. I've been seeing it all over social media
this dogshit chat is another example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wapRzi8jw0s
>why is everyone saying space is fake now?
Did you miss where general relativity was just shown to be false as space is anisotrophic and the universe is probably twice as old as previously hypothesized?
I saw that ~~*headline*~~ and they reported on an ottawa doctor (who was a pajeet) who was speculating wildly out of his ass with no evidence or proposed experiment to find necessary evidence, I didn't know IST was filled with newsguzzling sheeple nowadays.
galaxies being that highly developed early in the universe only means the understanding of how galaxies form is wrong. it doesn't mean the universe is twice as old as thought
I think far-reaching imaginary shit like multiverses, simulation theory, dark matter, string theory etc has given physics a bad rep and it's now crumbling down. People are realising there's a disconnect between reality and ""science"". I agree pop science is a joke nowadays but astronomy as a discipline shouldn't be spat on because of the geeks running it now
>galaxies being that highly developed early in the universe only means the understanding of how galaxies form is wrong. it doesn't mean the universe is twice as old as thought
That isn't the basis of the change in age, the fact that the universe persists beyond what was previously thought to be "CBR" is.
I'm not space is fake but I am space is waste. These discoveries about distant planets, their sizes, whether they can support life etc are literally absolutely useless to us, yet we spend billions on them every year.
Can anyone even name one thing NASA has done to benefit the American public in the last 20 years? My life certainly hasn't changed at all because of them. Those billions could be spent better elsewhere.
>Can anyone even name one thing NASA has done to benefit the American public in the last 20 years?
GPS, better isolation/understanding of genetic/developmental diseases by having an environment free of stressors to test in, self-regenerating metal alloys, improved insulation materials for building in environmentally difficult parts of the world, higher efficiency systems of power production and resource refinement on earth, increased understanding of the senses available to animals and plants as biological stimuli, more efficient gyroscopic sensors and pretty much any modern chemical/electrical/light sensor in any tech at all
>discoveries about distant planets, their sizes, whether they can support life etc are literally absolutely useless to us, yet we spend billions on them every year.
This is NASA on DEI
these sizes are probably just miscalculations
at the distance we are from these bodies, a tiny miscalculation would lead you to think there's a "star 5000 times the size of ours"
it's probably just a calibration issue and they're too fricking stupid to realize it
Most scientists are teacher pet types and actually very stupid.
This is shown over and over.
Have scientists improved anything or has it gotten consistently worse for 100 years easily?
The whole narrative is really falling apart honestly. By now with the modern failed moon missions, losing contact and all, anyone but the biggest idiots know that the moon landings were fake. Because obviously we didn't not only "land" but "return" with a fricking toaster in 1960s which is absolutely bullshit
So it stands to reason there's a bunch of bs regarding space, it's all theory and much further than we understand. Basically we will never, ever, visit other galaxies it's impossible. Mankind's dream is probably limited to some shitty moon on Jupiter and that's at least 1000 years away but humanity is already ruined by technology attention span going into the gutter ripe for another dark age
1. see star in telescope
2. know telescope's resolution
3. know how far away star is
4. determine size of star
wow, sounds fake as frick to me. it's literally the same shit your brain does to determine how far away a tree is, yet you're not at all bothered by that.
I can't believe people are so gullible to believe traveling to the Moon was possible in the 70s but now it is not in 2024.
Science gays have no common sense.
They just say yes to everything the "experts" say.
>I can't believe people are so gullible to believe traveling to the Moon wasn't political dickflashing in the 70s but now it's 100% economical 2024. >culture war gays have no common sense >they just say yes to everything the first contrarian on the internet tells them to
even if someone landed on the moon today you people would just dismiss it as cgi. you can't win an argument with someone who believes in a conspiracy for the sake of believing in a conspiracy
well no, moon landing needs to be fak so earth isn't in space so religious teachngs are true so da joos are bad don't you get it DA JOOS DID IT ALL TO PROVE DA JOOS ARE BAD
The final conspiracy in the oath to enlightenment is realizing that alphabet organizations deliberately float crazy conspiracies to discredit all conspiracy theories.
I still wanna know what really happened with the bomb in nashville on Christmas a few years ago that was in the news for like a day and then nothing.
I'm fully convinced that was just a man caught up in your aforementioned alphabet agency fake conspiracy web and when faced with the inherent contradictions just loss sense of reality and went and did it, last thing you can control feds something something. Just a big flashy ending to something he didn't know how to handle to begin with basically.
The lack of media coverage (even in Nashville, I was there at the time) was strange. Second Ave was destroyed, like an entire block. It was a REALLY big bomb and nobody died except the guy. I think it hasn’t been restored completely to this day.
Also, all phones and communications were shut down for a good amount of time. My theory is that the real crime happened during that loss of comms; presumably alarms and remote security systems that would call for help would also be shut down. It was just a way bigger deal than they made it out to be and I don’t believe a random psycho would get so lucky as to not kill ANYBODY.
After Epstein got whacked in federal custody when he was at the forefront of public discourse I believe anything is possible and don’t believe any official narrative until it’s proven true. For the record I believe we went to the moon multiple times
>just dismiss it as cgi
The funny thing being that flat earthers and moonlanding deniers are the ones who have been caught with their pants down to photoshop and doctor video footage multiple times.
>university level observation from an intro level class >middle school approximation taught to kids
for fricks sake they teach you about ideal and real gasses in high school you fricking shit for brains https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/14%3A_The_Behavior_of_Gases/14.11%3A_Real_and_Ideal_Gases
>what is change in momentum >what is conservation of energy
It genuinely does require you stop paying attention in 6th grade huh you aren't fricking kidding
>When a gas is put under high pressure ts molecules are forced closer together as the empty space between the particles is diminished
guess what doesnt have any pressure
you say that like it's a gotcha? Unless you mean that to genuinely demonstrate that gas has mass and I've misunderstood... That is actually how my lab measures the volume of marked glassware, as the constants required to back-calculate the difference in mass are so well studied by higher end equipment so long as you have a X.XXX accuracy scale or better you're good for that degree of accuracy for volume. Of course tests need to be done to determine the vacuum percentage of the vacuum being drawn, but that's just a simple scaling factor.
if it were to have mass but no weight it would be simultaneously attracted by the gravitational force and unaffected by the gravitational force.
1 month ago
Anonymous
you are correct and that is my point.
gravity as well as the vacuum of space is not real
1 month ago
Anonymous
Your point is lost, all you've suggested is nothing is real, but simple observation proves this wrong. Try restructuring your argument and try again.
1 month ago
Anonymous
what simple observation?
1 month ago
Anonymous
reply to my previous post if you percieve messages on this board
oops simple observation already percieved sorry
1 month ago
Anonymous
Define “real”
1 month ago
Anonymous
Define shill
define bot
1 month ago
Anonymous
>he can’t define the words he uses
many such cases
1 month ago
Anonymous
Explain how you’re attracted to BBC if gravity isn’t real
1 month ago
Anonymous
reply to my previous post if you percieve messages on this board
oops simple observation already percieved sorry
and here the shills have given up. unfortunately these conversations are the inly interesting thing on this site these days
1 month ago
Anonymous
Define shill
1 month ago
Anonymous
so you don't percieve the message board or any messages? Curious how you're replying to them then. I accept your concession, it's okay to be an uneducated midwit.
I looked up and saw Arcturus last night when I took the garbage out. I think it was Arcturus, anyway. Are there any other orangish looking stars like it?
>schizo for believing they LANDED AND RETURNED 3 grown men in the 1960s with a pocket calculator/tetris box >literally a time that PRECEDES when computers were whole fricking rooms
Can we collectively as a planet just accept the moon landings are a joke? What's it going to take mooners I'm serious, you realize your smartphone has exponentially more computing power right? Fly to the moon with it homosexual if it's so easy
But h-hey guys we totally landed on the moon with a calculator in 1960, got whole video footage and returned after having a picnic up there we just floated up on off the moon haha...oh yeah rocket fuel to get us off the moon who needs that
By your logic planes, cars, and whatnot, couldn't exist in the past because with modern technology accidents still happen.
You will never have any concrete evidence against anything the Apollo program produced.
it's okay to admit you're bad at math, someone has to be the brainlet fast food burger boy
There must be an ongoing government program to produce these mooner shills, nobody is this dumb
Literally if it was possible Elon Musk would have already repeated it with his space fascination and billions, and he's in fact creating the innovative rocket that can actually be reused for return missions, you know, the stuff that fricking calculator allegedly did in 1960. By all logical sense it's complete bullshit
1 month ago
Anonymous
Elon "All My Businesses Are Losing Money" Musk can't afford a moon landing and no american taxpayer is supporting more moonrocks when we already have 2 fricking tons of them, plenty of space launches for stellites every year and thats primarily what Elon is doing anyway with Starlink
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Elon musk can't afford that shitty scrap box from the 1960s
Do you think it's made of legendary items or some shit? This guy affords rocket blastoffs every fricking day dumbass. Like I said mooners what fricking logical hurdle is it going to take to snap to reality
1 month ago
Anonymous
>I don’t understand how something works therefore it’s impossible
I hope buzz aldrin punches you in the face like that other fat moron
1 month ago
Anonymous
either all aerospace engineers are frauds or you're not as smart as you think you are
want to take a bet which one is true?
Elon "All My Businesses Are Losing Money" Musk can't afford a moon landing and no american taxpayer is supporting more moonrocks when we already have 2 fricking tons of them, plenty of space launches for stellites every year and thats primarily what Elon is doing anyway with Starlink
>elon musk
https://i.imgur.com/O5jy6z6.png
>trump
name more boring played-out /misc/ attention prostitutes
not enough tin hats in the world for the basement dwelling morons in here. hopefully in a life threatening emergency you refuse service at a hospital the doctors that practice based on modern science. "EvErYtHiNg Is MaDe Up LiEs" morons
Doctors really aren’t a good example of people who should be trusted blindly. >cutting peoples genitals off >getting the country addicted to oxycontin >wrong about everything regarding covid >one leading cause of death in USA is medical malpractice >40% of Americans are in antidepressants >doctors caving to fat people >black doctors have significantly lower requirements for med school
Yeahh.. I mean I’m not gonna throw the baby out with the bath water but come on
What's more impressive is that they could pee pee and poo poo in that thing. 3 people. 3 days there and 3 days back. I honestly find it hard to believe. Technically possible but incredible.
Yes because they totally had reusable rockets in the 1960s, as if it isn't something that's barely getting delved into by SpaceX. They've had several crashes trying to perfect the technology too. It didn't happen bro, and many years after the US looking real stupid with the suspension of disbelief getting bigger and bigger the more people see the mission can't be replicated 60 years later despite exponentially more powerful computers
>literally spilling every facet of logical failures that prove nobody could have landed in 1960s >orangutan brained motherfrickers just keep mumbling "not engineer" "where credentials" "buzz aldrin mothafuka"
Come to think of it when they confronted that old fraud his response was pretty much like yours, no logic just angry at being called out as a fake piece of shit. It's like trying to convince the moronic masses that the world is round
1 month ago
Anonymous
>no logic
"No logic" would be preferring the ramblings of armchair engineers over the combined knowledge of actual aerospace engineers.
Your opinions simply hold no weight when you don't have anything to back them up.
1 month ago
Anonymous
It's not an opinion that they're barely developing rockets that can actually make return trips you fricking imbecile. But according to the tale of the 3 piggies they totally managed to land safely have picnics up there take whole videos and fly back home like they'd taken a trip to Utah. They can't even manage to effectively keep in contact with the shit they send to the moon in the 2020s. How does it feel to be a big dumb ape incapable of grasping anything I'm even saying it may as well be Chinese to you
1 month ago
Anonymous
It's also not an opinion that nobody with an actual degree and experience in space research disagrees with you.
1 month ago
Anonymous
It's not an opinion that they're barely developing rockets that can actually make return trips you fricking imbecile. But according to the tale of the 3 piggies they totally managed to land safely have picnics up there take whole videos and fly back home like they'd taken a trip to Utah. They can't even manage to effectively keep in contact with the shit they send to the moon in the 2020s. How does it feel to be a big dumb ape incapable of grasping anything I'm even saying it may as well be Chinese to you
Where/when was a reusable rocket used in the missions?
1 month ago
Anonymous
What do you think they just propulsed themselves back to earth in that little thing? Do you even know how rockets work lmao you realize they need a complete blastoff to reach the same speed back to earth right?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Somebody probably figured out how much fuel they’d need for a descent and then have enough left over to blast off again. That’s not the same as a reusable rocket you silly goose.
You’re really invested in this, aren’t you?
1 month ago
Anonymous
See you don't know shit, rockets break up after take off that's why they aren't reusable they are meant to shoot a payload into space. That's why it's so groundbreaking that Musk is creating rockets that can actually land to be reusable for the return mission. Nobody landed a fricking rocket in the 1960s lmao its like you haven't seen the failures of the SpaceX tests. You're the one invested in this because they pay you minimum wage to keep the myth going
how does nasa get away with these fairy tales?
This. They're just making shit up. Would ANYONE at NASA be able to tell us how they come to these conclusions e.g. about the size of these planets when asked? I doubt it.
They could try but you wouldn't understand
>i dont understand but someone does
>Would ANYONE at NASA be able to tell us how they come to these conclusions e.g. about the size of these planets when asked?
detection of exoplanet + orbit speed around star = angular velocity = mass of star, which is limited by gravitational pressure on matter. Parallax gives you distance from earth and change in size of shadow cast by planet as it passes across a star gives you planet size/orbit speed, throw a few compositional approximations for density and you've got an approximate value for the mass/size of a star. Not really any more complicated than a high school algebra class, though some of the area calculations are done with calculus.
>they can do this but cant go back to the moon since 1972 due to "budget" and "technological limitations"
ok buddy
tech limitations are not the thing stopping moon landings it's the budget. No taxpayer is down to fund a multimillion dollar rock collecting mission when we already have metric tons of the shit, and the only people advertising more moon missions are dipshit morons who promised to colonise mars half a decade ago
>No taxpayer is down to fund
homie, find me a tax payer that has any say in where their tax dollars go? I'll wait lol.
I will say though, I don't even necessarily think the whole "technological limitation" thing is bullshit considering how absolutely easy it would be for the US to simply stage a new moon landing. All the way from launching a rocket that like (assuming the rocket is actually real and not some sort of holographic thing)- as soon as it's out of visibility, doesn't actually go anywhere and the rest of the "mission" is just a fricking video they show on TV. Why they haven't done this yet, no idea.
>All the way from launching a rocket that like (assuming the rocket is actually real and not some sort of holographic thing)- as soon as it's out of visibility, doesn't actually go anywhere and the rest of the "mission" is just a fricking video they show on TV
there's somewhere in the realm of 100 of them a year in the US alone, it's all for navigational sattelites in low orbit, with a reasonably powerful lens telescope you can even start hunting for them yourself in the sky.
>homie, find me a tax payer that has any say in where their tax dollars go?
find me a politician who can get elected running on the policy of "hey we wanna literally shovel your hard earned wage into the fricking void of space" in modern day i'll wait lol
>find me a politician who can get elected running on the policy of...
hahaha true. But then again, all they'd have to do to get people to actually support that is say it's racist not to, so...
Is that why China used cgi for their moon landings? Even India’s looked more legit
>he doesn't believe the indian moon landings
if you can't believe a jeet could frick up a moon landing so bad it crash landed and infected the site with contamination beyond measure I don't know how to save you
>contaminated site
Was there poop everywhere?
wrong
More like an entire community studied it and verified it for 50 years.
It’s a lost cause, anon. Don’t fricking bother.
Yeah buncha idiots, remember when they didnt get the vax to stop the spread? It ended up not doing anything, but still they should have folded from our passive aggression
This is where you get confused I believe. I'm a different guy.
But basically no one studies anything. They simply read what the other dudes said and rarely if ever verify anything.
This is why getting the same result is actually less likely than not when repeating any experiment.
I worked in a lab and did scientific studies and the control over typical human behavior is atrocious.
They simply report they did things one way in the paper, while in real life they do things however makes it easier to just get the work done.
Those are stars you dumb frick
you should've learned trigonometry in school bro
why is everyone saying space is fake now? it wasn't this bad even a year ago. I've been seeing it all over social media
this dogshit chat is another example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wapRzi8jw0s
>why is everyone saying space is fake now?
Did you miss where general relativity was just shown to be false as space is anisotrophic and the universe is probably twice as old as previously hypothesized?
I saw that ~~*headline*~~ and they reported on an ottawa doctor (who was a pajeet) who was speculating wildly out of his ass with no evidence or proposed experiment to find necessary evidence, I didn't know IST was filled with newsguzzling sheeple nowadays.
galaxies being that highly developed early in the universe only means the understanding of how galaxies form is wrong. it doesn't mean the universe is twice as old as thought
I think far-reaching imaginary shit like multiverses, simulation theory, dark matter, string theory etc has given physics a bad rep and it's now crumbling down. People are realising there's a disconnect between reality and ""science"". I agree pop science is a joke nowadays but astronomy as a discipline shouldn't be spat on because of the geeks running it now
>galaxies being that highly developed early in the universe only means the understanding of how galaxies form is wrong. it doesn't mean the universe is twice as old as thought
That isn't the basis of the change in age, the fact that the universe persists beyond what was previously thought to be "CBR" is.
I'm not space is fake but I am space is waste. These discoveries about distant planets, their sizes, whether they can support life etc are literally absolutely useless to us, yet we spend billions on them every year.
Can anyone even name one thing NASA has done to benefit the American public in the last 20 years? My life certainly hasn't changed at all because of them. Those billions could be spent better elsewhere.
R&D for projects pushing the technical limitations of various disciplines result in cool shit for us down the line
>Can anyone even name one thing NASA has done to benefit the American public in the last 20 years?
GPS, better isolation/understanding of genetic/developmental diseases by having an environment free of stressors to test in, self-regenerating metal alloys, improved insulation materials for building in environmentally difficult parts of the world, higher efficiency systems of power production and resource refinement on earth, increased understanding of the senses available to animals and plants as biological stimuli, more efficient gyroscopic sensors and pretty much any modern chemical/electrical/light sensor in any tech at all
I guess you must be a religioncuck who already accepted some half assed story about existence which is why space exploration means nothing to you
>discoveries about distant planets, their sizes, whether they can support life etc are literally absolutely useless to us, yet we spend billions on them every year.
This is NASA on DEI
these sizes are probably just miscalculations
at the distance we are from these bodies, a tiny miscalculation would lead you to think there's a "star 5000 times the size of ours"
it's probably just a calibration issue and they're too fricking stupid to realize it
could you go through and perform a more accurate estimation?
Yes. No, I will not elaborate.
Yeah, I'm smarter than all the thousands of educated scientists across the globe
Alot of them got vaxxed.
So yeah, I am smarter.
Get your head checked, you're mentally ill and living in a world of delusion.
But anon pfizer admitted they didnt work as advertised… oh wait ure an indian nvm. Yeah theyre fine plz take more.
Most scientists are teacher pet types and actually very stupid.
This is shown over and over.
Have scientists improved anything or has it gotten consistently worse for 100 years easily?
The whole narrative is really falling apart honestly. By now with the modern failed moon missions, losing contact and all, anyone but the biggest idiots know that the moon landings were fake. Because obviously we didn't not only "land" but "return" with a fricking toaster in 1960s which is absolutely bullshit
So it stands to reason there's a bunch of bs regarding space, it's all theory and much further than we understand. Basically we will never, ever, visit other galaxies it's impossible. Mankind's dream is probably limited to some shitty moon on Jupiter and that's at least 1000 years away but humanity is already ruined by technology attention span going into the gutter ripe for another dark age
i'm sure you have working experience in astronomy or aerospace engineering
Math
Simple, if you dont believe NASA you are antisemite and antisemitism is punishable by law
Jews push flat earth to poison the well and because they think it's funny when goys make fools of themselves.
spectroscopy mostly
Anti-science antivax racist
1. see star in telescope
2. know telescope's resolution
3. know how far away star is
4. determine size of star
wow, sounds fake as frick to me. it's literally the same shit your brain does to determine how far away a tree is, yet you're not at all bothered by that.
The biggest object in the universe is Uranus.
Modern day nasa is a fricking joke
One day I will lift Arcturus
It's equivalent to doing a handstand push-up.
I can't believe people are so gullible to believe traveling to the Moon was possible in the 70s but now it is not in 2024.
Science gays have no common sense.
They just say yes to everything the "experts" say.
>I can't believe people are so gullible to believe traveling to the Moon wasn't political dickflashing in the 70s but now it's 100% economical 2024.
>culture war gays have no common sense
>they just say yes to everything the first contrarian on the internet tells them to
even if someone landed on the moon today you people would just dismiss it as cgi. you can't win an argument with someone who believes in a conspiracy for the sake of believing in a conspiracy
well no, moon landing needs to be fak so earth isn't in space so religious teachngs are true so da joos are bad don't you get it DA JOOS DID IT ALL TO PROVE DA JOOS ARE BAD
The final conspiracy in the oath to enlightenment is realizing that alphabet organizations deliberately float crazy conspiracies to discredit all conspiracy theories.
I still wanna know what really happened with the bomb in nashville on Christmas a few years ago that was in the news for like a day and then nothing.
I'm fully convinced that was just a man caught up in your aforementioned alphabet agency fake conspiracy web and when faced with the inherent contradictions just loss sense of reality and went and did it, last thing you can control feds something something. Just a big flashy ending to something he didn't know how to handle to begin with basically.
The lack of media coverage (even in Nashville, I was there at the time) was strange. Second Ave was destroyed, like an entire block. It was a REALLY big bomb and nobody died except the guy. I think it hasn’t been restored completely to this day.
Also, all phones and communications were shut down for a good amount of time. My theory is that the real crime happened during that loss of comms; presumably alarms and remote security systems that would call for help would also be shut down. It was just a way bigger deal than they made it out to be and I don’t believe a random psycho would get so lucky as to not kill ANYBODY.
After Epstein got whacked in federal custody when he was at the forefront of public discourse I believe anything is possible and don’t believe any official narrative until it’s proven true. For the record I believe we went to the moon multiple times
God isn't real, israelites are bad, america wasn't first on the moon.
>just dismiss it as cgi
The funny thing being that flat earthers and moonlanding deniers are the ones who have been caught with their pants down to photoshop and doctor video footage multiple times.
>hydrogen clumps together to form a star
>gas is weightless and always fills a vacuum
space is fake and gay
>university level observation from an intro level class
>middle school approximation taught to kids
for fricks sake they teach you about ideal and real gasses in high school you fricking shit for brains https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/14%3A_The_Behavior_of_Gases/14.11%3A_Real_and_Ideal_Gases
you're trying to argue with people who think .webm related proves that rockets can't work in a vacuum
>what is change in momentum
>what is conservation of energy
It genuinely does require you stop paying attention in 6th grade huh you aren't fricking kidding
obese hands. why i am not suprised?
I hear the vacuum
>When a gas is put under high pressure ts molecules are forced closer together as the empty space between the particles is diminished
guess what doesnt have any pressure
>guess what doesnt have any pressure
filtered by 6th grade physics
man this
is perfect shill bait
>gas is weightless
Care to explain atmospheric pressure?
fill a balloon and weight it
that is if it doesn't float away
you say that like it's a gotcha? Unless you mean that to genuinely demonstrate that gas has mass and I've misunderstood... That is actually how my lab measures the volume of marked glassware, as the constants required to back-calculate the difference in mass are so well studied by higher end equipment so long as you have a X.XXX accuracy scale or better you're good for that degree of accuracy for volume. Of course tests need to be done to determine the vacuum percentage of the vacuum being drawn, but that's just a simple scaling factor.
gas has mass and that's what your equipment measure
its still weightless though
if it were to have mass but no weight it would be simultaneously attracted by the gravitational force and unaffected by the gravitational force.
you are correct and that is my point.
gravity as well as the vacuum of space is not real
Your point is lost, all you've suggested is nothing is real, but simple observation proves this wrong. Try restructuring your argument and try again.
what simple observation?
reply to my previous post if you percieve messages on this board
oops simple observation already percieved sorry
Define “real”
define bot
>he can’t define the words he uses
many such cases
Explain how you’re attracted to BBC if gravity isn’t real
and here the shills have given up. unfortunately these conversations are the inly interesting thing on this site these days
Define shill
so you don't percieve the message board or any messages? Curious how you're replying to them then. I accept your concession, it's okay to be an uneducated midwit.
Why is it hard to believe that the Universe is a real fricking big place?
Phoneposters, tourist, /misc/acks and indians should be gassed.
>politics? this is a board for homosexual posting!!!!
stfu
>indians should be gassed
You can't do that or else IST (and IST) would've been dead immediately
we have also colonized IST sir
awwww, gonna cwy because da jannies didn't cwean up the powiticaw fwead?
kys troony
I looked up and saw Arcturus last night when I took the garbage out. I think it was Arcturus, anyway. Are there any other orangish looking stars like it?
Maybe one or two.
Betelgeuse
Aldebaran
Damn, our sun is such a pussy little homosexual star.
That's quite a sirius mog
Please leave.
I tried to make a funny mog thread and it turned into a schizo discussion. This place never seizes to amaze me.
>i posted a schizo theory about "suns" a trillion miles away and it got derailed
>seizes
>DID YOU JUST WRITE A HECKIN WORDERINO WRONG?!?!
🙂
ceases*
>schizo for believing they LANDED AND RETURNED 3 grown men in the 1960s with a pocket calculator/tetris box
>literally a time that PRECEDES when computers were whole fricking rooms
Can we collectively as a planet just accept the moon landings are a joke? What's it going to take mooners I'm serious, you realize your smartphone has exponentially more computing power right? Fly to the moon with it homosexual if it's so easy
post engineering credentials
>https://www.npr.org/2023/04/25/1171924186/contact-is-lost-with-a-japanese-spacecraft-attempting-to-land-on-the-moon
But h-hey guys we totally landed on the moon with a calculator in 1960, got whole video footage and returned after having a picnic up there we just floated up on off the moon haha...oh yeah rocket fuel to get us off the moon who needs that
By your logic planes, cars, and whatnot, couldn't exist in the past because with modern technology accidents still happen.
You will never have any concrete evidence against anything the Apollo program produced.
There must be an ongoing government program to produce these mooner shills, nobody is this dumb
Literally if it was possible Elon Musk would have already repeated it with his space fascination and billions, and he's in fact creating the innovative rocket that can actually be reused for return missions, you know, the stuff that fricking calculator allegedly did in 1960. By all logical sense it's complete bullshit
Elon "All My Businesses Are Losing Money" Musk can't afford a moon landing and no american taxpayer is supporting more moonrocks when we already have 2 fricking tons of them, plenty of space launches for stellites every year and thats primarily what Elon is doing anyway with Starlink
>Elon musk can't afford that shitty scrap box from the 1960s
Do you think it's made of legendary items or some shit? This guy affords rocket blastoffs every fricking day dumbass. Like I said mooners what fricking logical hurdle is it going to take to snap to reality
>I don’t understand how something works therefore it’s impossible
I hope buzz aldrin punches you in the face like that other fat moron
either all aerospace engineers are frauds or you're not as smart as you think you are
want to take a bet which one is true?
it's okay to admit you're bad at math, someone has to be the brainlet fast food burger boy
It's over, sunbros.
I took Ashwaghanda and now I have a boner.
I thought this shit was supposed to make you relax?
>alex jones
>elon musk
>trump
name more boring played-out /misc/ attention prostitutes
>snoopy
Grow up moron.
>announcing a sage
newbie
not enough tin hats in the world for the basement dwelling morons in here. hopefully in a life threatening emergency you refuse service at a hospital the doctors that practice based on modern science. "EvErYtHiNg Is MaDe Up LiEs" morons
Doctors really aren’t a good example of people who should be trusted blindly.
>cutting peoples genitals off
>getting the country addicted to oxycontin
>wrong about everything regarding covid
>one leading cause of death in USA is medical malpractice
>40% of Americans are in antidepressants
>doctors caving to fat people
>black doctors have significantly lower requirements for med school
Yeahh.. I mean I’m not gonna throw the baby out with the bath water but come on
>This thing totally supported our weight on the blastoff back to earth bro trust me! You can practically have a whole picnic up on there
What's more impressive is that they could pee pee and poo poo in that thing. 3 people. 3 days there and 3 days back. I honestly find it hard to believe. Technically possible but incredible.
That’s just the moon lander, they travelled in a rocket.
Their internet degree didn't teach them that
Yes because they totally had reusable rockets in the 1960s, as if it isn't something that's barely getting delved into by SpaceX. They've had several crashes trying to perfect the technology too. It didn't happen bro, and many years after the US looking real stupid with the suspension of disbelief getting bigger and bigger the more people see the mission can't be replicated 60 years later despite exponentially more powerful computers
>they just couldn't... OKAY!!
Do you have any concrete evidence of fakery that's not based on feelings?
>literally spilling every facet of logical failures that prove nobody could have landed in 1960s
>orangutan brained motherfrickers just keep mumbling "not engineer" "where credentials" "buzz aldrin mothafuka"
Come to think of it when they confronted that old fraud his response was pretty much like yours, no logic just angry at being called out as a fake piece of shit. It's like trying to convince the moronic masses that the world is round
>no logic
"No logic" would be preferring the ramblings of armchair engineers over the combined knowledge of actual aerospace engineers.
Your opinions simply hold no weight when you don't have anything to back them up.
It's not an opinion that they're barely developing rockets that can actually make return trips you fricking imbecile. But according to the tale of the 3 piggies they totally managed to land safely have picnics up there take whole videos and fly back home like they'd taken a trip to Utah. They can't even manage to effectively keep in contact with the shit they send to the moon in the 2020s. How does it feel to be a big dumb ape incapable of grasping anything I'm even saying it may as well be Chinese to you
It's also not an opinion that nobody with an actual degree and experience in space research disagrees with you.
Where/when was a reusable rocket used in the missions?
What do you think they just propulsed themselves back to earth in that little thing? Do you even know how rockets work lmao you realize they need a complete blastoff to reach the same speed back to earth right?
Somebody probably figured out how much fuel they’d need for a descent and then have enough left over to blast off again. That’s not the same as a reusable rocket you silly goose.
You’re really invested in this, aren’t you?
See you don't know shit, rockets break up after take off that's why they aren't reusable they are meant to shoot a payload into space. That's why it's so groundbreaking that Musk is creating rockets that can actually land to be reusable for the return mission. Nobody landed a fricking rocket in the 1960s lmao its like you haven't seen the failures of the SpaceX tests. You're the one invested in this because they pay you minimum wage to keep the myth going
post degree
The only ones who have been to the moon are the Germans from the breakaway civilization in the antarctic who have actual UFO technology.
If the moon landing was fake how did they get the dune buggy up there?
unironically the most fitness-related thread at this moment.
>see size difference and immediately go "mogged"
Zoomers can only think in memes. Don't @ me if you're under 35.