M O G G E D

M O G G E D

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how does nasa get away with these fairy tales?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This. They're just making shit up. Would ANYONE at NASA be able to tell us how they come to these conclusions e.g. about the size of these planets when asked? I doubt it.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They could try but you wouldn't understand

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >i dont understand but someone does

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Would ANYONE at NASA be able to tell us how they come to these conclusions e.g. about the size of these planets when asked?
        detection of exoplanet + orbit speed around star = angular velocity = mass of star, which is limited by gravitational pressure on matter. Parallax gives you distance from earth and change in size of shadow cast by planet as it passes across a star gives you planet size/orbit speed, throw a few compositional approximations for density and you've got an approximate value for the mass/size of a star. Not really any more complicated than a high school algebra class, though some of the area calculations are done with calculus.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >they can do this but cant go back to the moon since 1972 due to "budget" and "technological limitations"
          ok buddy

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            tech limitations are not the thing stopping moon landings it's the budget. No taxpayer is down to fund a multimillion dollar rock collecting mission when we already have metric tons of the shit, and the only people advertising more moon missions are dipshit morons who promised to colonise mars half a decade ago

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >No taxpayer is down to fund

              homie, find me a tax payer that has any say in where their tax dollars go? I'll wait lol.

              I will say though, I don't even necessarily think the whole "technological limitation" thing is bullshit considering how absolutely easy it would be for the US to simply stage a new moon landing. All the way from launching a rocket that like (assuming the rocket is actually real and not some sort of holographic thing)- as soon as it's out of visibility, doesn't actually go anywhere and the rest of the "mission" is just a fricking video they show on TV. Why they haven't done this yet, no idea.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >All the way from launching a rocket that like (assuming the rocket is actually real and not some sort of holographic thing)- as soon as it's out of visibility, doesn't actually go anywhere and the rest of the "mission" is just a fricking video they show on TV
                there's somewhere in the realm of 100 of them a year in the US alone, it's all for navigational sattelites in low orbit, with a reasonably powerful lens telescope you can even start hunting for them yourself in the sky.
                >homie, find me a tax payer that has any say in where their tax dollars go?
                find me a politician who can get elected running on the policy of "hey we wanna literally shovel your hard earned wage into the fricking void of space" in modern day i'll wait lol

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >find me a politician who can get elected running on the policy of...

                hahaha true. But then again, all they'd have to do to get people to actually support that is say it's racist not to, so...

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Is that why China used cgi for their moon landings? Even India’s looked more legit

              • 3 weeks ago
                achievable natty?

                >he doesn't believe the indian moon landings
                if you can't believe a jeet could frick up a moon landing so bad it crash landed and infected the site with contamination beyond measure I don't know how to save you

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >contaminated site
                Was there poop everywhere?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          wrong

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous
        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          More like an entire community studied it and verified it for 50 years.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It’s a lost cause, anon. Don’t fricking bother.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah buncha idiots, remember when they didnt get the vax to stop the spread? It ended up not doing anything, but still they should have folded from our passive aggression

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            This is where you get confused I believe. I'm a different guy.
            But basically no one studies anything. They simply read what the other dudes said and rarely if ever verify anything.

            This is why getting the same result is actually less likely than not when repeating any experiment.
            I worked in a lab and did scientific studies and the control over typical human behavior is atrocious.
            They simply report they did things one way in the paper, while in real life they do things however makes it easier to just get the work done.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Those are stars you dumb frick

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you should've learned trigonometry in school bro

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Modern day nasa is a fricking joke

      This. They're just making shit up. Would ANYONE at NASA be able to tell us how they come to these conclusions e.g. about the size of these planets when asked? I doubt it.

      https://i.imgur.com/m8xyUR5.jpg

      >they can do this but cant go back to the moon since 1972 due to "budget" and "technological limitations"
      ok buddy

      https://i.imgur.com/fq30awC.jpg

      >No taxpayer is down to fund

      homie, find me a tax payer that has any say in where their tax dollars go? I'll wait lol.

      I will say though, I don't even necessarily think the whole "technological limitation" thing is bullshit considering how absolutely easy it would be for the US to simply stage a new moon landing. All the way from launching a rocket that like (assuming the rocket is actually real and not some sort of holographic thing)- as soon as it's out of visibility, doesn't actually go anywhere and the rest of the "mission" is just a fricking video they show on TV. Why they haven't done this yet, no idea.

      why is everyone saying space is fake now? it wasn't this bad even a year ago. I've been seeing it all over social media

      this dogshit chat is another example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wapRzi8jw0s

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >why is everyone saying space is fake now?
        Did you miss where general relativity was just shown to be false as space is anisotrophic and the universe is probably twice as old as previously hypothesized?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I saw that ~~*headline*~~ and they reported on an ottawa doctor (who was a pajeet) who was speculating wildly out of his ass with no evidence or proposed experiment to find necessary evidence, I didn't know IST was filled with newsguzzling sheeple nowadays.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          galaxies being that highly developed early in the universe only means the understanding of how galaxies form is wrong. it doesn't mean the universe is twice as old as thought

          I think far-reaching imaginary shit like multiverses, simulation theory, dark matter, string theory etc has given physics a bad rep and it's now crumbling down. People are realising there's a disconnect between reality and ""science"". I agree pop science is a joke nowadays but astronomy as a discipline shouldn't be spat on because of the geeks running it now

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >galaxies being that highly developed early in the universe only means the understanding of how galaxies form is wrong. it doesn't mean the universe is twice as old as thought
            That isn't the basis of the change in age, the fact that the universe persists beyond what was previously thought to be "CBR" is.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not space is fake but I am space is waste. These discoveries about distant planets, their sizes, whether they can support life etc are literally absolutely useless to us, yet we spend billions on them every year.

        Can anyone even name one thing NASA has done to benefit the American public in the last 20 years? My life certainly hasn't changed at all because of them. Those billions could be spent better elsewhere.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          R&D for projects pushing the technical limitations of various disciplines result in cool shit for us down the line

        • 3 weeks ago
          achievable natty?

          >Can anyone even name one thing NASA has done to benefit the American public in the last 20 years?
          GPS, better isolation/understanding of genetic/developmental diseases by having an environment free of stressors to test in, self-regenerating metal alloys, improved insulation materials for building in environmentally difficult parts of the world, higher efficiency systems of power production and resource refinement on earth, increased understanding of the senses available to animals and plants as biological stimuli, more efficient gyroscopic sensors and pretty much any modern chemical/electrical/light sensor in any tech at all

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I guess you must be a religioncuck who already accepted some half assed story about existence which is why space exploration means nothing to you

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >discoveries about distant planets, their sizes, whether they can support life etc are literally absolutely useless to us, yet we spend billions on them every year.
          This is NASA on DEI

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        these sizes are probably just miscalculations
        at the distance we are from these bodies, a tiny miscalculation would lead you to think there's a "star 5000 times the size of ours"
        it's probably just a calibration issue and they're too fricking stupid to realize it

        • 3 weeks ago
          achievable natty?

          could you go through and perform a more accurate estimation?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes. No, I will not elaborate.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, I'm smarter than all the thousands of educated scientists across the globe

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Alot of them got vaxxed.
            So yeah, I am smarter.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Get your head checked, you're mentally ill and living in a world of delusion.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                But anon pfizer admitted they didnt work as advertised… oh wait ure an indian nvm. Yeah theyre fine plz take more.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Most scientists are teacher pet types and actually very stupid.
            This is shown over and over.
            Have scientists improved anything or has it gotten consistently worse for 100 years easily?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The whole narrative is really falling apart honestly. By now with the modern failed moon missions, losing contact and all, anyone but the biggest idiots know that the moon landings were fake. Because obviously we didn't not only "land" but "return" with a fricking toaster in 1960s which is absolutely bullshit

        So it stands to reason there's a bunch of bs regarding space, it's all theory and much further than we understand. Basically we will never, ever, visit other galaxies it's impossible. Mankind's dream is probably limited to some shitty moon on Jupiter and that's at least 1000 years away but humanity is already ruined by technology attention span going into the gutter ripe for another dark age

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          i'm sure you have working experience in astronomy or aerospace engineering

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Math

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Simple, if you dont believe NASA you are antisemite and antisemitism is punishable by law

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Jews push flat earth to poison the well and because they think it's funny when goys make fools of themselves.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      spectroscopy mostly

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Anti-science antivax racist

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      1. see star in telescope
      2. know telescope's resolution
      3. know how far away star is
      4. determine size of star
      wow, sounds fake as frick to me. it's literally the same shit your brain does to determine how far away a tree is, yet you're not at all bothered by that.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The biggest object in the universe is Uranus.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Modern day nasa is a fricking joke

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    One day I will lift Arcturus

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's equivalent to doing a handstand push-up.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can't believe people are so gullible to believe traveling to the Moon was possible in the 70s but now it is not in 2024.
    Science gays have no common sense.
    They just say yes to everything the "experts" say.

    • 3 weeks ago
      achievable natty?

      >I can't believe people are so gullible to believe traveling to the Moon wasn't political dickflashing in the 70s but now it's 100% economical 2024.
      >culture war gays have no common sense
      >they just say yes to everything the first contrarian on the internet tells them to

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      even if someone landed on the moon today you people would just dismiss it as cgi. you can't win an argument with someone who believes in a conspiracy for the sake of believing in a conspiracy

      • 3 weeks ago
        achievable natty?

        well no, moon landing needs to be fak so earth isn't in space so religious teachngs are true so da joos are bad don't you get it DA JOOS DID IT ALL TO PROVE DA JOOS ARE BAD

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The final conspiracy in the oath to enlightenment is realizing that alphabet organizations deliberately float crazy conspiracies to discredit all conspiracy theories.

          I still wanna know what really happened with the bomb in nashville on Christmas a few years ago that was in the news for like a day and then nothing.

          • 3 weeks ago
            achievable natty?

            I'm fully convinced that was just a man caught up in your aforementioned alphabet agency fake conspiracy web and when faced with the inherent contradictions just loss sense of reality and went and did it, last thing you can control feds something something. Just a big flashy ending to something he didn't know how to handle to begin with basically.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The lack of media coverage (even in Nashville, I was there at the time) was strange. Second Ave was destroyed, like an entire block. It was a REALLY big bomb and nobody died except the guy. I think it hasn’t been restored completely to this day.

              Also, all phones and communications were shut down for a good amount of time. My theory is that the real crime happened during that loss of comms; presumably alarms and remote security systems that would call for help would also be shut down. It was just a way bigger deal than they made it out to be and I don’t believe a random psycho would get so lucky as to not kill ANYBODY.

              After Epstein got whacked in federal custody when he was at the forefront of public discourse I believe anything is possible and don’t believe any official narrative until it’s proven true. For the record I believe we went to the moon multiple times

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          God isn't real, israelites are bad, america wasn't first on the moon.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >just dismiss it as cgi
        The funny thing being that flat earthers and moonlanding deniers are the ones who have been caught with their pants down to photoshop and doctor video footage multiple times.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >hydrogen clumps together to form a star
    >gas is weightless and always fills a vacuum
    space is fake and gay

    • 3 weeks ago
      achievable natty?

      >university level observation from an intro level class
      >middle school approximation taught to kids
      for fricks sake they teach you about ideal and real gasses in high school you fricking shit for brains https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/14%3A_The_Behavior_of_Gases/14.11%3A_Real_and_Ideal_Gases

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >gas is weightless
        Care to explain atmospheric pressure?

        you're trying to argue with people who think .webm related proves that rockets can't work in a vacuum

        • 3 weeks ago
          achievable natty?

          >what is change in momentum
          >what is conservation of energy
          It genuinely does require you stop paying attention in 6th grade huh you aren't fricking kidding

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          obese hands. why i am not suprised?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I hear the vacuum

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >When a gas is put under high pressure ts molecules are forced closer together as the empty space between the particles is diminished
        guess what doesnt have any pressure

        • 3 weeks ago
          achievable natty?

          >guess what doesnt have any pressure
          filtered by 6th grade physics

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >gas is weightless
        Care to explain atmospheric pressure?

        [...]
        you're trying to argue with people who think .webm related proves that rockets can't work in a vacuum

        man this

        >hydrogen clumps together to form a star
        >gas is weightless and always fills a vacuum
        space is fake and gay

        is perfect shill bait

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >gas is weightless
      Care to explain atmospheric pressure?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        fill a balloon and weight it
        that is if it doesn't float away

        • 3 weeks ago
          achievable natty?

          you say that like it's a gotcha? Unless you mean that to genuinely demonstrate that gas has mass and I've misunderstood... That is actually how my lab measures the volume of marked glassware, as the constants required to back-calculate the difference in mass are so well studied by higher end equipment so long as you have a X.XXX accuracy scale or better you're good for that degree of accuracy for volume. Of course tests need to be done to determine the vacuum percentage of the vacuum being drawn, but that's just a simple scaling factor.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            gas has mass and that's what your equipment measure
            its still weightless though

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              if it were to have mass but no weight it would be simultaneously attracted by the gravitational force and unaffected by the gravitational force.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you are correct and that is my point.
                gravity as well as the vacuum of space is not real

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Your point is lost, all you've suggested is nothing is real, but simple observation proves this wrong. Try restructuring your argument and try again.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                what simple observation?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                reply to my previous post if you percieve messages on this board
                oops simple observation already percieved sorry

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Define “real”

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Define shill

                define bot

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >he can’t define the words he uses
                many such cases

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Explain how you’re attracted to BBC if gravity isn’t real

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                reply to my previous post if you percieve messages on this board
                oops simple observation already percieved sorry

                and here the shills have given up. unfortunately these conversations are the inly interesting thing on this site these days

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Define shill

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so you don't percieve the message board or any messages? Curious how you're replying to them then. I accept your concession, it's okay to be an uneducated midwit.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why is it hard to believe that the Universe is a real fricking big place?

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Phoneposters, tourist, /misc/acks and indians should be gassed.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >politics? this is a board for homosexual posting!!!!
      stfu

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >indians should be gassed
      You can't do that or else IST (and IST) would've been dead immediately

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        we have also colonized IST sir

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]
    Phoneposters, tourist, /misc/acks and indians should be gassed.

    awwww, gonna cwy because da jannies didn't cwean up the powiticaw fwead?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        kys troony

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I looked up and saw Arcturus last night when I took the garbage out. I think it was Arcturus, anyway. Are there any other orangish looking stars like it?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe one or two.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Betelgeuse
      Aldebaran

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Damn, our sun is such a pussy little homosexual star.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's quite a sirius mog

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Please leave.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I tried to make a funny mog thread and it turned into a schizo discussion. This place never seizes to amaze me.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >i posted a schizo theory about "suns" a trillion miles away and it got derailed

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >seizes

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >DID YOU JUST WRITE A HECKIN WORDERINO WRONG?!?!

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          🙂

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ceases*

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >schizo for believing they LANDED AND RETURNED 3 grown men in the 1960s with a pocket calculator/tetris box
      >literally a time that PRECEDES when computers were whole fricking rooms

      Can we collectively as a planet just accept the moon landings are a joke? What's it going to take mooners I'm serious, you realize your smartphone has exponentially more computing power right? Fly to the moon with it homosexual if it's so easy

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        post engineering credentials

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >https://www.npr.org/2023/04/25/1171924186/contact-is-lost-with-a-japanese-spacecraft-attempting-to-land-on-the-moon

          But h-hey guys we totally landed on the moon with a calculator in 1960, got whole video footage and returned after having a picnic up there we just floated up on off the moon haha...oh yeah rocket fuel to get us off the moon who needs that

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            By your logic planes, cars, and whatnot, couldn't exist in the past because with modern technology accidents still happen.
            You will never have any concrete evidence against anything the Apollo program produced.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              it's okay to admit you're bad at math, someone has to be the brainlet fast food burger boy

              There must be an ongoing government program to produce these mooner shills, nobody is this dumb

              Literally if it was possible Elon Musk would have already repeated it with his space fascination and billions, and he's in fact creating the innovative rocket that can actually be reused for return missions, you know, the stuff that fricking calculator allegedly did in 1960. By all logical sense it's complete bullshit

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Elon "All My Businesses Are Losing Money" Musk can't afford a moon landing and no american taxpayer is supporting more moonrocks when we already have 2 fricking tons of them, plenty of space launches for stellites every year and thats primarily what Elon is doing anyway with Starlink

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Elon musk can't afford that shitty scrap box from the 1960s

                Do you think it's made of legendary items or some shit? This guy affords rocket blastoffs every fricking day dumbass. Like I said mooners what fricking logical hurdle is it going to take to snap to reality

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I don’t understand how something works therefore it’s impossible
                I hope buzz aldrin punches you in the face like that other fat moron

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                either all aerospace engineers are frauds or you're not as smart as you think you are
                want to take a bet which one is true?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it's okay to admit you're bad at math, someone has to be the brainlet fast food burger boy

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's over, sunbros.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I took Ashwaghanda and now I have a boner.

    I thought this shit was supposed to make you relax?

    • 3 weeks ago
      sage

      >alex jones

      Elon "All My Businesses Are Losing Money" Musk can't afford a moon landing and no american taxpayer is supporting more moonrocks when we already have 2 fricking tons of them, plenty of space launches for stellites every year and thats primarily what Elon is doing anyway with Starlink

      >elon musk

      https://i.imgur.com/O5jy6z6.png

      >trump

      name more boring played-out /misc/ attention prostitutes

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >snoopy

        Grow up moron.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >announcing a sage
        newbie

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    not enough tin hats in the world for the basement dwelling morons in here. hopefully in a life threatening emergency you refuse service at a hospital the doctors that practice based on modern science. "EvErYtHiNg Is MaDe Up LiEs" morons

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Doctors really aren’t a good example of people who should be trusted blindly.
      >cutting peoples genitals off
      >getting the country addicted to oxycontin
      >wrong about everything regarding covid
      >one leading cause of death in USA is medical malpractice
      >40% of Americans are in antidepressants
      >doctors caving to fat people
      >black doctors have significantly lower requirements for med school
      Yeahh.. I mean I’m not gonna throw the baby out with the bath water but come on

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >This thing totally supported our weight on the blastoff back to earth bro trust me! You can practically have a whole picnic up on there

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What's more impressive is that they could pee pee and poo poo in that thing. 3 people. 3 days there and 3 days back. I honestly find it hard to believe. Technically possible but incredible.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That’s just the moon lander, they travelled in a rocket.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Their internet degree didn't teach them that

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes because they totally had reusable rockets in the 1960s, as if it isn't something that's barely getting delved into by SpaceX. They've had several crashes trying to perfect the technology too. It didn't happen bro, and many years after the US looking real stupid with the suspension of disbelief getting bigger and bigger the more people see the mission can't be replicated 60 years later despite exponentially more powerful computers

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >they just couldn't... OKAY!!
            Do you have any concrete evidence of fakery that's not based on feelings?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >literally spilling every facet of logical failures that prove nobody could have landed in 1960s
              >orangutan brained motherfrickers just keep mumbling "not engineer" "where credentials" "buzz aldrin mothafuka"

              Come to think of it when they confronted that old fraud his response was pretty much like yours, no logic just angry at being called out as a fake piece of shit. It's like trying to convince the moronic masses that the world is round

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >no logic
                "No logic" would be preferring the ramblings of armchair engineers over the combined knowledge of actual aerospace engineers.
                Your opinions simply hold no weight when you don't have anything to back them up.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's not an opinion that they're barely developing rockets that can actually make return trips you fricking imbecile. But according to the tale of the 3 piggies they totally managed to land safely have picnics up there take whole videos and fly back home like they'd taken a trip to Utah. They can't even manage to effectively keep in contact with the shit they send to the moon in the 2020s. How does it feel to be a big dumb ape incapable of grasping anything I'm even saying it may as well be Chinese to you

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's also not an opinion that nobody with an actual degree and experience in space research disagrees with you.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's not an opinion that they're barely developing rockets that can actually make return trips you fricking imbecile. But according to the tale of the 3 piggies they totally managed to land safely have picnics up there take whole videos and fly back home like they'd taken a trip to Utah. They can't even manage to effectively keep in contact with the shit they send to the moon in the 2020s. How does it feel to be a big dumb ape incapable of grasping anything I'm even saying it may as well be Chinese to you

                Where/when was a reusable rocket used in the missions?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                What do you think they just propulsed themselves back to earth in that little thing? Do you even know how rockets work lmao you realize they need a complete blastoff to reach the same speed back to earth right?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Somebody probably figured out how much fuel they’d need for a descent and then have enough left over to blast off again. That’s not the same as a reusable rocket you silly goose.

                You’re really invested in this, aren’t you?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                See you don't know shit, rockets break up after take off that's why they aren't reusable they are meant to shoot a payload into space. That's why it's so groundbreaking that Musk is creating rockets that can actually land to be reusable for the return mission. Nobody landed a fricking rocket in the 1960s lmao its like you haven't seen the failures of the SpaceX tests. You're the one invested in this because they pay you minimum wage to keep the myth going

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                post degree

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The only ones who have been to the moon are the Germans from the breakaway civilization in the antarctic who have actual UFO technology.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If the moon landing was fake how did they get the dune buggy up there?

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    unironically the most fitness-related thread at this moment.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >see size difference and immediately go "mogged"
    Zoomers can only think in memes. Don't @ me if you're under 35.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *