now that strenght training has been established as a meme, why bother ever benching/OHPing with a barbell instead of dumbbells?

now that strenght training has been established as a meme, why bother ever benching/OHPing with a barbell instead of dumbbells?

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    to mog people

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    SHADOW WIZARD MONEY GANG

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      NUKES ARE NOW LEGAL

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Don't do barbell OHP or barbell bench unless you enjoy it. If you enjoy dumbbells more, do that.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    roll

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      why is there no mage with number 66

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        im killing myself

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    because you can exhaust your large muscle groups quickly and then do hypertrophy
    but lifting for aesthetics is gay as frick, I lift for functionality.
    Pick up big rock, put down big rock. Simple as.

    [...]

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >because you can exhaust your large muscle groups quickly and then do hypertrophy
      why would you fatigue your muscles for suboptimal hypertrophy?
      >but lifting for aesthetics is gay as frick, I lift for functionality.
      that's a moronic outlook

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >that's a moronic outlook
        He's right though.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >why would you fatigue your muscles for suboptimal hypertrophy?
        for optimal hypertrophy

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Home. Shut up. You can do 8-10 sets before you lose on hypertrophy. It's just a steep Cutoff for gains after 6 sets. 60%-80% 3RM of course.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    roll

    why is there no mage with number 66

    [...]
    roll

    im killing myself

    dubs = pick any mage you want

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >strenght training has been established as a meme
    Yeah, maybe to DYEL zoomers who think strength doesn't matter. When you grow up, you'll realise there's no substitute for raw strength.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      strength matter because after a certain age everything diminishes, even with trt

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Machines
    >Doesn't work stabilizers
    >Only major muscle groups
    >Have to share equipment with women

    Barbell
    >Works stabilizers well
    >Works major muscle groups well
    >Easy to progressively overload

    Dumbbell
    >Works stabilizers a lot
    >Works major muscle groups well, but not as effectively as barbells
    >Hard to progressively overload
    >Only go up to 90lbs at most gyms

    I think there is a balance to be found between all of them. But Barbell training is simply the most practical, and if you had to choose one it is the most balanced. I don't even see how you would squat or deadlift a lot without a barbell.

    Even Mark Rippetoe isn't against Dumbbells once you get to late intermediate training, they are the best way to train stabilizers, but that's about it.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      To put it another way. The limiting factor when using machines is raw strength. The limiting factor when using Dumbbells is stabilizers. But compound Barbell movements require both stabilizers and the major muscle groups to be done effectively.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >stabilizers

      You do understand that "stabilizers" aren't real, right? You understand it's a neurological adaptation just like strength training is?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >biceps, traps, rhomboids, rear delts dont exist
        Black person

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I have a question. Do you think the muscles in your upper back work during an overhead press and bench press? If you answered yes, then what do you suppose their purpose is? If you answered no, then you have some research to do.

          If someone is strong as frick on barbell or dumbbell bench, they will be strong as frick at any machine press.
          The reverse isn't true, and you are moronic.

          If you isolated every single one of these without free weights and then tried to OHP or bench press, you'd have the same fricking problem. "Stabilizing" is a neurological adaptation like balancing. Otherwise everyone would be incorporating bosu balls in their lifts.

          And you are all moronic Black folk who have some research to do.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Even if it was purely neurological. That doesn't actually change anything about my statement. Machines don't get you ready for natural human movement. Barbells and Dumbbells do. Whether that's due to a neurological adaptation or a muscular change doesn't matter. Although I think it is both. It's well known during movement your opposing muscles contract to maintain stability, try benching with a torn bicep.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              It only matters if you're strength training. If you're training for size, the muscles used in stabilization aren't worked enough to stimulate growth. This is why bodybuilders isolate in the first place.

              You can theoretically get big on machines only, but I personally like using dumbbells and depending on the gym they might not have machines that will cover every muscle group.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Do you exist in the real world? If yes, then your ability to do natural human movement matters.

                Bodybuilders are gay morons who cares what they do.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                lol lemme know when you ever have to wrap your hand around a narrow bar and push it to accomplish something in this "real world" you speak of.

                Meanwhile I'll stick to machine isolations and smash 9s, while you stay a fat frick muttering about "muh functional strength" when you get rejected by downies and Black folk.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Cope harder weakling

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                lol knew you were fat

                called it. You're probably some kind of mutt, too

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >wrap your hand around a narrow bar
                Muscles are motor units.

                >he needs unnaturally large muscles to get women
                You were never going to make it, lets be honest.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >unnaturally large
                lol

                lmao even

                Enjoy your 30+ used up slags with "good personalities", fatty.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                If I can Bench Press 315, Squat 405, and Deadlift 495, then my muscles will be the correct anatomical size, and I, and any women in the world, will be happy with them.

                It's as simple as that. Spiritually homosexual bodybuilders can cope about it online, I don't really care that you are too mentally weak to lift heavy weights.

                The idea that only fat people can lift heavy weights, is also a cope. You're weak because you're a mentally weak person, that's really all there is to it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >muh big three

                Okay, you obese Tyrannosaurus. Enjoy slamming guttertrash to the end of your days, I don't care.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >no you can't care about important things, you need to be vain like a woman, you need to be homosexual like me
                frick off weak homosexual

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I have a question. Do you think the muscles in your upper back work during an overhead press and bench press? If you answered yes, then what do you suppose their purpose is? If you answered no, then you have some research to do.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If someone is strong as frick on barbell or dumbbell bench, they will be strong as frick at any machine press.
        The reverse isn't true, and you are moronic.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    > given $FALSE_PREMISE, why $TRUTH
    Why must this be every thread on this board?

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    maybe you should state your goals first. as you are on IST I will assume you are a noodle arm zoomer whose only reason to go to the gym is to pick up girls. In that case, I think you should just stay home and don't bother doing either and come back when you find a real reason to go to the gym.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The redpill that IST isn't ready for is the fact that DBs don't necessarily give you more ROM on bench and OHP, in fact once you get strong enough they actually reduce ROM due to how big the dumbbells get. Yes you can fix this by using a neutral grip and going wide so they don't hit your torso, but is anybody on here actually doing this? Probably not.
    >y-you're not doing it either!
    I'm a ringpilled chad, my presses are either with a barbell or on rings. Easy fix

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    well yeah, there's no reason to fall into powershitter dogma of squat / bench / deadlift
    use whatever fits your needs

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >strenght training has been established as a meme,
    strenght training still works for me moron

    [...]

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    deliver me

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I choose ballsack

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Rolling

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I choose bass, I want the funk

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *