oh no no no no.... hahahahahaha

oh no no no no.... hahahahahaha

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    arnie doesn't even place in a modern olympia, but he's far more aesthetic looking

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Well thats the point. Its not about building the most beautiful body these days just about who roided the most.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    arnold will never be surpassed

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He was many times.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        based mentzerposter

        no disrespect to arnold though, still mogs all modern competitors in terms of aesthetics. objectively and quantifiably they are "better" (leaner, more mass evenly distributed on the legs) but just like being a gay who listens to that cuck from RP instead of hitting the gym and eating, objective measurement doesn't make things better. old physiques looked so much better. this new dry, striated bullshit is awful compared to the full physiques guys went into shows with in the 70s/80s

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Germanic physique ideal for aesthetics
      Not Aryan
      Bumstead is an Anglo physique, long torso, shorter legs, ideal for deadlift and squat see Eddie Hall and Cbum heavy lifting.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Crazy to think that CBum is 10 lbs heavier than Arnold AND leaner. Still has smaller arms but way bigger legs
    I hate modern bodybuilding, silver and golden age were the peak

    Arnold can whine all he wants about how mass monsters destroyed bodybuilding, but he was the first mass monster

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, but arnold was 6'2, not these 5'5 meatballs + his upper body looked like that of a god, come on, there is no comparison to the monstrosities we see now on stage

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        things were different, compare this with:

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          with this shit... it's all manlets looking like hard dehydrated cocks

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Well yeah, compared to Brian Shaw, find me someone who doesn't look like a manlet next to him (hard mode: no nogball players)

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              lou is 1.96m, brian is is only 2.03m.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Cbum is 6’1” and Ramon is 5’11” classic is drifting towards only tall physiques.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          cbum is 5'10 and ramon 5'8
          they both lie about it

          • 1 month ago
            Reddit Randy

            You are such a coping gay.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I don't understand your last sentence. Yeah Arnold was big but he was aesthetically big and still had a small waist. He complains about guys with giant bubble guts and guys who get huge without being proportional, his critique of Big Ramy's massive shoulders dwarfing his arms at the recent Olympia is a good example.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Arnold was a mass monster but he had the height and proportional physique to look good. Compare 6'2 and 235lbs on stage to 5'6 and 240lbs. Absolutely ridiculous.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Cbum 6'1" 240lbs diced and dry mogs everyone.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    dude modern bodybuilding is so fucking gay. enough with the over the top spray tan and the g strings and the tumour legs and the striated glute spread

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    lol i never realized this, why do they have to show their raisin ass like it's the most prized possession?
    jesus fucking christ bodybuilding is literally the gay sport

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why doesn't arnold have striated glutes? he seems to be just as lean in the rest of the body? Is there some particular modern drug that gives you striations on glutes? or is it a particular exercise people only do now for glutes that wasn't done in the 70s?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If you pulled up with fucking striated glutes (which objectively look UGLY as fuck) to all the old school bodybuilders they’d be repulsed.

      The reason why Arnold’s era is called “the golden era” is because the bodies actually looked GOOD

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      To have striated glutes, you need to be lean as fuck. Diced and peeled, dry as a raisin. So it's basically used as a measure of "how good is his conditioning"

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If Arnie was in his 20s now, he'd have access to an infinite amount of bodybuilding knowledge nobody had back then, he'd be on all of the modern drugs and supplements. He'd be back to mogging everyone on stage

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Arnold at 18. Natty achievable? He started roiding around this age iirc

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Absolutely not. Look at those baseball ceps.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Aside from the biceps, yeah.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *