>Oops, the conventional wisdom peddled by experts for decades was wrong...
>....again
Nutritional """science""" is such a fricking joke it is unreal
>Oops, the conventional wisdom peddled by experts for decades was wrong... >....again
>Oops, the conventional wisdom peddled by experts for decades was wrong...
>....again
Nutritional """science""" is such a fricking joke it is unreal
Ironically, a low-fat, high-carb diet is exactly what you want if you actually lift
Why would you want to be deficient in fat soluble vitamins? Seems like a bad idea
"Fat soluble" is one of those things that people hear others say and then repeat but doesn't actually mean anything
Okay schizo
Prove me wrong
Don't even know what to do with such an embarrassing post
what do you mean by prove you wrong though? You don't think some vitamins are lipid soluble? You don't think some foods have more of those than others? They aren't actually vitamins?
what do you mean by "doesn't mean anything"
You're moronic. If you take your vitamins with food, then the solubility becomes a non-issue as that is addressed by the digestive system.
>take vitamins to fix a deficient diet
yeah I'll pass. You should eat some bugs
you misunderstand
'he means that the milk lacks milk-fat, the milk-fat is what actually holds the fat soluable vitamins, low-fat milk has less vitamins
its not talking about the digestive system
>doesn't actually mean anything
you what homie
You'll still get enough of those, tubby.
Anyway, we shouldn't listen to science because scientific facts change every 10 years. We should look at reality.
Were people skinnier back when low fat high carb was the hot shit?
Yes, they were
Are people fatter now that high fat low carb is the hot shit.
Yes, they are.
Thus, we can conclude high carb > low carb for dieting, no science needed.
The French eat higher fat and are the healthiest euros
Why would you assume he would be deficient in those?
They're not deficient in vitamins or protein or anything. You're pretty much a troony or a christroon with your coping, bud.
Now do pasteurization
>but muh wholesome lactose intolerant shitskins
Not my problem.
pasteurization doesn't destroy lactose
if anything it makes it harder to digest lactose by destroying enzymes
>pretend to be stupid for as long as possible until the tide shifts
>oops sorry guys! looks like we were mistaken the entire time, honest mistake lol you know how it is
journalistic integrity is an oxymoron
And once a again, a screenshot of a headline.
no quotes from article
no link to article
no summation of what the article actually says
no intelligent thought worth reading
some kvetching about how science is a joke.
OP should be banned for making this low quality thread.
Nutritional science does this back and forth back and forth flip flopping every decade or so because they’ve run out of shit to sell and study but they’ve still got to get funding for nothing somehow it’s all a scam