>Person A does 20 sets of reverse curls every week

>Person A does 20 sets of reverse curls every week
>Person B does 10 sets of wrist flexions and 10 sets of wrist extensions every week
Who will have larger forearms in a year?

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ME

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Correct, I will have bigger forearms.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I would definitely say person B. Person B is actually training his forearms, whereas person A is only really hitting brachioradialis. He isn't even isolating it. He's just hitting it on a lift where the biceps lifts about just as much if not more of the weight. Person B does exercises that actually specifically target the forearms, AND he actually hits all the muscles in his forearms.

    This question is like asking:
    >Person A does 20 sets of lat pulldowns every week
    >Person B does 10 sets of biceps curls and 10 sets of triceps extensions every week
    Who will have larger arms in a year?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hard to say but the guy who does the reverse curls probably. The wrist extensors are fairly small muscles and dont grow much, so the isometric contraction from reverse curls would be enough to get some growth. You would also get some indirect work for the entire forearm just from gripping the bar during reverse curls, especially if you grip really hard. With that much volume you would get more overall forearm development

      The brachioradialis is at least 1/3 of the forearm, wrist curls/extensions dont train it whatsoever. And reverse curl guy is isolating it, at least as much as its biomechanically possible to do so.
      Its incorrect to say the biceps lifts as much or more than the other elbow flexors. The biceps still help but the brachialis and brachioradialis are lifting like 80% of the weight in that position because of how disadvantaged the biceps are.

      """moron question on fit""" """ESL""" bad grammar sub 70 iq time wasting post

      This but at least its fitness related and I have nothing to do so whatever

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >And reverse curl guy is isolating it, at least as much as its biomechanically possible to do so.
        arm wrestling training methods would like to differ

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I don't know what you're implying but flexing the elbow with the wrist in a pronated position is literally the most biomechanically disadvantageous position for the bicep

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            hammer curls with the weight on a belt or rope in your hand while keeping your wrist wienered up and slightly pronating through the rom uses another function of the brachioradialis while hitting it a bit more

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The man who doesn't even train forearms directly yet has good forearm genes

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >genes
      I see roiders are using fat tactics now lmao. Is that the brand of your test?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It doesn't matter whether or you bring up the roider cope. Muscle size in general is controlled by genetics. The man with long muscle bellies in his forearms who doesn't do any direct forearm work will have bigger forearms than the person with short muscle bellies who does direct forearm work. The long muscle bellies and larger wrists guarantee larger forearms by default.

        Muscle length in general corresponds to both the potential to increase cross-sectional area and initial cross-sectional area. If you have short muscle bellies you will have much smaller muscles that someone with longer muscle bellies regardless of training. This is the same reason why people with high calves always have smaller calves than those with low calves. If you have high calves, you'll never have as large calves as someone with low calves. The guy with low calves is probably starting out with 16" calves before he even started training and they just get bigger from there and they might not need direct calf work. The guy with high calves is going to have to train years to get close to the initial size of the guy who has low calves.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The real trvthnuke is that small wrists are actually superior...those who know, know

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >small wrists are actually better, they like make your shit look bigger bro, being smaller makes you look bigger
            this is a copenvke

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              wrists are actually better, they like make your shit look bigger bro, being smaller makes you look bigger
              Its true though

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Okay, let's say, that OP's hypothetical had 2 identical twins, which one will end up with larger forearms?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            If they have good enough genes that deadlift and row is enough to train grip for the twins, then they're going to big forearms regardless of which one they do. If they have bad genes, the one who does wrist curls will have the bigger forearm.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Prompt?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      """moron question on fit""" """ESL""" bad grammar sub 70 iq time wasting post

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    BIG BOOBS AI = COOM

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Viera maid SEXO....
    To answer your question probably B but only by a little, whole A will have bigger upper arms. Both are moronic doing 20 sets of single body part isolation a week.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Where is the nude version?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *