Picrel is the limit for natties. Nobody before modern chemicals would have ever been bigger than this. Anybody who is bigger and claims natty is lying about his drug usage.
Picrel is the limit for natties. Nobody before modern chemicals would have ever been bigger than this.
do not reply to demoralization threads
most roiders look worse than this. the majority of people regardless of drugs look like shit. all drugs do is help your good muscle genetics overcome your shitty hormone/receptor genetics
OP AIN'T NOTHIN BUT A troony
>you will be heckin valid only if you reply to muh post
OP AIN'T NOTHIN BUT A troony!
Wrong. That's manlet Natty limit. Natty limit for a 6'0 is picrel.
Does he even lift
Yeah, he's one of the most prominent wrestlers of the old days. Before drugs took over and modern wrestlers started looking like this.
Bottom left top right are ideal for me
OP is obviously a natty in disguise and this thread is made to look roiders look stupid, especially after someone posts
Remember also these bodies were achieved without creatine, without good knowledge of the reps/sets that work best for hypertrophy, without knowledge of macros and micros, and all the other stuff that gives an extra edge.
Impressive, very nice. Now let's see their heights
Pretty good point tbh. Maxick was 5'4" and even in his time was noted as being "below medium height". Sandow did a lot better at 5'8". Hackenschmidt was known for being especially big and was only 5'9".
skip bench press. what else to acquire this look
The bronze era guys swore by isometrics, "tendon training", muscle control, and 2-lb dumbbells (yes, really).
that's all valid stop being a homosexual
Unironically buy a chest expander. All the ye olde guys swore by it.
This is beyond the current natty limit because they didn't have microplastics and pissed out birth control in the water supply
You haven't demonstrated that there is reduced testosterone today due to microplastics, that's sheer conjecture.
There is objectively reduced testosterone, whatever the reason
Reduced AVERAGE testosterone in WESTERN COUNTRIES. The reason is known but people are too psyoped to accept it. 1 to 1 correlation with rise in obesity. The more obese the population, the lesser the testosterone.
Everything else is bullshit. "le microplastix demons" is just a psyop so that you don't fat-shame the low T cucks and instead start protesting for environmental protection policy. Reality is, you want increased testosterone, just reduce fatness. Reminder, the reduced testosterone is only a phenomenon in western countries. Countries that didn't have as much a rise in obesity (but still a rise in microplastix of course) did not see the same decline. Stop falling for this political shit. Microplastix aren't responsible for you not being able to put down the fork.
>The reason is known but people are too psyoped to accept it. 1 to 1 correlation with rise in obesity. The more obese the population, the lesser the testosterone.
That is your theory, not proof
I've never been fat and my t levels were pretty shit, and I think that's common
Maybe put some more effort into your theory and research how much obesity actually effects testosterone and if it's enough to explain the drop, I doubt that it is.
This is the natty limit for big guys.
based, we're goin full jonestown
You can clearly see that some of those dudes are taller than average, 5'10, 5'11, 6'0, unlike a lot of roidtrannies today who both roid and get midget gains.
There is no natty limit. That aside, he possessed an elite tier natty upper body. Quads can get a lot bigger as a natty tho.
There is a limit. Plug your stats in and find out. https://legionathletics.com/tools/muscle-gain-potential-calculator/
>Quads can get a lot bigger as a natty tho.
Not that you should get them bigger.
NTA but agreed. Monster quads on dudes are obscene and hilarious. The loss of athleticism for whatever strength gains they cope with is not worth it. If you can't run a 20 minute 5k you are not athletic, you are not fit.
Why do you think big strong legs means you can't run?
That's a lie. My mustache is bigger
I think he looks pretty admirable and I'd like to have a body like that. Am I just easily impressed?
Upper body looks good legs are small, there were no squat racks and people couldn't build legs effectively
His Legs and Chest are absolute dyel Tier
>Chest
Your mind has been warped and conditioned by homosexual bodybuilding judges
>His Legs and Chest are absolute dyel Tier
Let me guess, you "need" more.
That's the natty limit.
Goals
reeves was'nt natty tho
>An image from 100 years ago of some random circus show muscle man who had rudimentary equipment, an unoptimal-diet and no access to the thousands of scientific studies to learn how to maiximise results is the natty limit.
He has a very impressive physique, but the results in literally every sport has been upwardly progressing in the past 100 years, and bodybuilding should be no exception.
That is more than you need for women anyway any more is for MEN