Its not fairly absurd, it is outside of this world absurd. kino is 5'10 and 178lbs here. adjusting the height, ~25lbs of lean muscle mass on an already elite physique is not "probs not running much", its "taking everything and the kitchen sink".
Its funny how in 2015-16 kino was considered the juiciest and biggest fake natty ever. Zoomers are so fricking brainwashed by literally everyone lying that nowadays a 5'9 200lbs with abs is "probably just little bit of TRT" lol.
>probably just little bit
This shit boggles the mind, i've seen so many posts with this inane speculation, literally who cares when it's a roidtroony fraud either way?
Because people want to get that same physique and knowing if they're blasting gear or not makes it more or less realistically possible for them? Did I really need to type that out for you?
kino is natty, and 25 pounds of muscle seems attainable for someone who clearly has spent many years in the gym, he doesn't look massively bloated/drawn out or crazy vascular, no gyno, acne, and the lack balding makes me think that he just has good genetics and great muscle maturity
>elite physique
Maybe to show off but I've noticed most people with low body fat like that can't handle real world applications of their bodies. Most of these people have no conditioning at all and get winded after 5 minutes.
maybe if the was the exact same size with 5~10% more bodyfat he could be natty, but that lean?
the fact you even have to ask shows how much of a moron you are
well the OP pic is clearly on steroids but I'm speaking as someone who had a 6 pack as high as 94kg at 6'2 (granted it wasnt the most well-defined set of abs) with only 4 years of probably sub-optimal training, if you really get everything dialed for a good 5 years at least its possible.
Tyrom Woodley supposedly walked around near 200lbs, but that is likely UFC bullshit bearing in mind the largest GSP got to was 190ish (as said on joe rogan after his comeback at middleweight) and he was larger than woodley.
Naturals can’t get lean at 200 lb unless 6’2+. And this gets disputed because moronic natty homosexuals see a line in their abdominals one day and think that constitutes “abs” while at 16% bf.
You cannot be 200 lb and under 13% bf as a natural
This is probably going to sound like total bullshit and I'm still trying to get a sense of it. But I feel like genuine impressive natty physiques always have some sort of visible "character" or story to them. There's just something visually that is an expression of years of hard work, but some rough edges due to differing genetics/training methods/etc.
While the height/weight/BF% his physique looks too soft and artificial to be believable natty. Anyways this is all bullshit but I believe it anyways.
Not natty
>gym selfie with sweat all over
>no pump
He said he was doing legs
squats warm up the whole body
not natty, 200lbs at 5'9 while lean is fairly absurd, probs not running much but still enhanced
Its not fairly absurd, it is outside of this world absurd. kino is 5'10 and 178lbs here. adjusting the height, ~25lbs of lean muscle mass on an already elite physique is not "probs not running much", its "taking everything and the kitchen sink".
Its funny how in 2015-16 kino was considered the juiciest and biggest fake natty ever. Zoomers are so fricking brainwashed by literally everyone lying that nowadays a 5'9 200lbs with abs is "probably just little bit of TRT" lol.
>probably just little bit
This shit boggles the mind, i've seen so many posts with this inane speculation, literally who cares when it's a roidtroony fraud either way?
Because people want to get that same physique and knowing if they're blasting gear or not makes it more or less realistically possible for them? Did I really need to type that out for you?
kino is natty, and 25 pounds of muscle seems attainable for someone who clearly has spent many years in the gym, he doesn't look massively bloated/drawn out or crazy vascular, no gyno, acne, and the lack balding makes me think that he just has good genetics and great muscle maturity
You are fricking dumb
Not natty
Peak gym genetics here.
Btw he didn't attain that body with his program.
Can you elaborate? I was literally about to start his program next week, I dont like to hear this
>elite physique
Maybe to show off but I've noticed most people with low body fat like that can't handle real world applications of their bodies. Most of these people have no conditioning at all and get winded after 5 minutes.
Coping homosexual
Hes got boulder shoulders, and he's damn near 10%
I wight 200 lbs at 5'9 and look nothing like that
What a punchable face holy frick
It’s the zoomer baby fat. He’ll grow out of it in his 20s.
Having fat in your face gives you more of a youthful look also you age better. There’s a difference between a fat face and healthy collagen glow fat
Would you say… baby fat?
not even close. thats about 30lbs of extra lean muscle mass than what you can carry naturally as 5'9 with abs.
maybe if the was the exact same size with 5~10% more bodyfat he could be natty, but that lean?
the fact you even have to ask shows how much of a moron you are
Yup you’re stupid
As always, probably just lying
Yes, but only if you’re 5 feet tall
>that lean at 200lbs 5'9
No
Great physique but just looking at him makes me gassed out.
200 lbs lean as a natty is borderline impossible unless you are like 6'4.
nah bro this guy is just different bro man, he just is different bro man dude he just is different
its possible as short as 6'0 imo
mm idk about that lmao that'd be a 24 ffmi at 12% that dude may be even leaner
well the OP pic is clearly on steroids but I'm speaking as someone who had a 6 pack as high as 94kg at 6'2 (granted it wasnt the most well-defined set of abs) with only 4 years of probably sub-optimal training, if you really get everything dialed for a good 5 years at least its possible.
Post body
i dont feel like it
Well then ur lying
its really not that hard to believe man, dyel?
>5'9
yeh its over bro
Sarms isn't steorids according zoomers
Tyrom Woodley supposedly walked around near 200lbs, but that is likely UFC bullshit bearing in mind the largest GSP got to was 190ish (as said on joe rogan after his comeback at middleweight) and he was larger than woodley.
hate that disgusting looking beard those people have. disgusting.
no
Daily reminder you can roid to this and natties still aren't sure
That probably about the absolute natty peak so he's pretty much guaranteed to be roiding since he's lean all the time
>Peak natty
I swear you guys lie to yourselves constantly lol
he's not 200 lbs
Naturals can’t get lean at 200 lb unless 6’2+. And this gets disputed because moronic natty homosexuals see a line in their abdominals one day and think that constitutes “abs” while at 16% bf.
You cannot be 200 lb and under 13% bf as a natural
Possibly, it's actually hard to say. He doesn't have boulder shoulders or huge traps/upper traps and around 12-13%bf
5'9 cap
>5’
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA WHY EVEN LIFT
This is probably going to sound like total bullshit and I'm still trying to get a sense of it. But I feel like genuine impressive natty physiques always have some sort of visible "character" or story to them. There's just something visually that is an expression of years of hard work, but some rough edges due to differing genetics/training methods/etc.
While the height/weight/BF% his physique looks too soft and artificial to be believable natty. Anyways this is all bullshit but I believe it anyways.