https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0002916523661192
But you gotta eat that protein-rich meat for maximum gains, huh? Too bad there won't be a nice calf to look at when it gets amputated.
Red meat associated with diabetes
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0002916523661192
But you gotta eat that protein-rich meat for maximum gains, huh? Too bad there won't be a nice calf to look at when it gets amputated.
a future troon wrote this post
>Frick science, I'm gonna eat whatever I wa-ACK
>TRUST THE SCIENCE!!! (Except chromosomes, that stuff is bullshit!)
>He still thinks sex is determined by chromosomes
How does it feel to be scientifically illiterate?
https://open.lib.umn.edu/evolutionbiology/chapter/7-4-sex-its-about-the-gametes-2/
Meanwhile, in the earlier section
https://open.lib.umn.edu/evolutionbiology/chapter/7-3-what-distinguishes-the-sexes-2/
>You may have thought to look for chromosomes (long stretches of DNA) that can distinguish male from female. In a species in which male and female look similar, and in which males lack a penis, chromosomes may be helpful. However, not all organisms have sex determined entirely by genes on specific chromosomes. In the previous examples, the birds, butterflies, and snakes have chromosomes that can indicate sex, but the chameleons do not!
This does not discount the fact that even without distinct sexual chromosomes for a species, that sex is not genetic. Humans are an example of a species where there are chromosomal markers for sex. XX = female, XY = male. Any combination XXY, XYY, etc. are just genetic disorders (extremely rare disorders) like down syndrome (extra chromosome add to the 21st chromosome pair).
You just gave yourself away as a troony
Cited by NO ONE
Lumps in processed meats to skew the results.
Sorry vegan homosexual, nice try.
Oh no, not an association! Did you know that ice cream is associated with sun burns? Better watch out, OP.
Do you watch Bart K by any chance?
I hate steak, lamb, and ground meat
Love me some hotdogs and bacon though.
Wtf you eat dogs? Ur a chink?
Troon science
>associated
Correlation does not equal causation.
Who funded the study?
Strange how most all of our species ate red meat all through history and prehistory with fat and marrow and organs, even drinking and eating stuff made from the bones left over. The beetus basically absent for all of that time, tens of thousands of years on all different continents. Then in the late 20th and early 21st century, only in North America and Europe, red meat became associated with every possible condition of poor health. Especially stuff that almost never happened before that time in those places.
Really makes you think.
wild game that human ancestors ate has much lower fat content than the factory farmed meat you eat every day. Also human ancestors did not eat meat every day. Also they often died before time to develop diabetes.
That would be a valid argument if we didn't come to various periods especially after the industrial revolution where the average lifespan reached nearly 70 and meat consumption only slightly increased through the 20th century.
One could say that normgroids eat too much meat and that the meat is of bad quality, which is true. But it is absurd in that to blame the consumption of red meat rather the the agricultural factors that created the inferior ZOGmeat, or the lack of impulse control among the fats. These are the things giving them chronic diseases, a product of their civilization and culture rather than the rating of red meat.
Funny how the populations of the world that eat the most beef also live the longest. It's almost as if beef is taking the collective responsibility of the rest of the fast food industry and sugars.
There is no way you're getting diabetes from just red meat. These studies are always useless because the people in it are lying about their diets. Every vegan cheats on their diet and binges on processed junk food and every mentally ill carnivore and ketolard is binging on beer and junk food constantly throughout the week. Those fad diets are not sustainable and they always lead to the people crashing and binging. It's so common that everyone has an anecdotal example of it happening with someone they know.
yeah the study sucks. they just asked a bunch of women how frequently they eat red meat and correlated it to diabetes.
but the thing is who are the people living in the land of cheeseburgers that are actively avoiding/restricting red meat? well a lot of them are probably people following a diet of some kind that’s also gonna restrict the things that turn you into a fat frick that gets diabetes.
>associated
stop posting useless nutrition and health studies. It's too hard to adjust for all possible confounders.
What you want is a causal link
In the case of carnivores amino acids are used to form either glucose or fats which mean consuming too much meat results in high blood sugar, people with diebetus have always been told to noteat too much meat because it spikes insulin
Oh no. Not a bullshit correlation study where statistics as usual are just manipulated to say whatever the author wants.
I don't hate correlational studies as much as you do, but it's a problem that we can't read the full article to see how they get their numbers.
Also, we already have review studies of red meat that show either a small or no increase of diabetes risk.
>Every molecule of protien started in plants.
Fair point, but my gut evolved to be an omnivore, and cows turn plant potien into MANY much more SUPERIOR forms of protein for me to use. So why should I care if someone settles for the worst source of protein you can find?
>Every molecule of protien started in plants.
Wrong, every molecule of protein started in the big bang.
>every atom in your body started in a star
>Broccoli
>loaded with protein
>2.8g in 100g serving
>Plant proteins have DIAAS scores less than 0.80 (broccoli is likely on the lower end due to fiber content and having no fat) meaning only 2.8*0.8 = 2.24 g protein is absorbed
>Maintenance numbers for a person who lies in bed all day is 0.36g/lb
>150 lb man therefore requries 0.36*150 = 54 g of protein
>150 lb man requires at least 54/2.24 = 24.11 servings of broccoli which is 2.41 kg or 5.3 lbs of broccoli per day to meet protein needs if we pretend that broccoli is not deficient in at least one amino acid
>200g of lean beef or chicken (28-31 g for 100g serving) to meets that requirement
>somewhat active and elderly people require 0.5g/lb or more
>serious athletes/body builders require as much as 1g/lb or more
/truth.
only morons and vegan shills say otherwise, meat is more effective, period.
You can only process more than 0.8g of protein per pound of LEAN mass if you're roiding
The rest of this post is spot on tho
Plants get their protein from the ground or from manure
So he might as well eat shit
Now show 50g of protein veggies vs meat
Being black is associated with having an IQ below white average.
Don't post racist science you fricking frick.
So what though when NDEs are actually solid proof of life after death, because anyone can have them if they come close to and survive death. And they are so extremely real to those who have them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U00ibBGZp7o
As this NDEr described their NDE:
>"Now, what heaven looks like? 'OMG' doesn't even describe how beautiful this place is. Heaven is, there are no words. I mean, I could sit here and just not say anything and just cry, and that would be what heaven looks like. There are mountains of beauty, there are things in this realm, you can't even describe how beautiful this place is. There are colors you can't even imagine, there are sounds you can't even create. There are beauties upon this world that you think are beautiful here. Amplify it over there times a billion. There are, it's incredibly beautiful, there's no words to describe how beautiful this place is, it's incredibly gorgeous."
And importantly, even dogmatic skeptics have this reaction, because the NDE convinces everyone:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mysteries-consciousness/202204/does-afterlife-obviously-exist
So anyone would be convinced if they had an NDE, we already know this, no one's skepticism is unique.
>muh brain chemistry
Neuroscientists are convinced by NDEs too. What do skeptics think they understand that neuroscientists do not?
>muh DMT causes it
Scientifically refuted already, and NDErs who have done DMT too say that the DMT experience, while alien and really cool and fun, was still underwhelming to the point of being a joke when compared to the NDE.
So who cares about what happens here on Earth anyway with diseases and stuff?
back to /x/ schizo!
> who cares about what happens here on Earth anyway with diseases and stuff?
To improve/learn lessons for the next cycle
JUST IN
HOT NEWS
BREATHING ASSOCIATED WITH DIABETUS
LITERALLY EVERY PERSON SUFFERING FROM THE BETUS BREATHES
COINCIDENCE?
I THINK NOT! STOP BREATHING TODAY!
op associated with homosexuality
You get diabetes by being a fat frick and eating until your body no longer has an efficient way to use the calories. It has nothing to do with the food you eat.
>It has nothing to do with the food you eat.
Eating a high fat diet, especially one high in vegetable fats, is far more likely to give you diabetes than a diet with the same caloric intake but different macros. This is why you can induce diabetes with a keto diet and reverse it with a high carb, low fat diet.
>Sciencedirect.com
It says science on it so it has to be true! I don't know what controlling for variables means!
> its totally not high carbs diets most people have been tricked into eating.
> its totally muh red meat.
> its muh hecking red meaterino!!!
Trust The Experts or nature huh?
>fats have beetus
>fats eat a lot of red meat (and a lot of everything else)
>clearly this means red meat is the issue not being fat as frick
oh I guess we should just eat the crickets then eh?
Aх, кoтлeтки. Люблю их.
10/10 taste
manga name?
>[Misaki (BUTA)] Kawaii no wa Zurui | Callin' me Cute Ain't Fair
thanks comrade
>But you gotta eat that protein-rich meat for maximum gains, huh? Too bad there won't be a nice calf to look at when it gets amputated.
I don't care.
don't care lol
>Giga Chad dresses like a 4th grader to lure in christisraelite pedophiles (gay btw)
Keyed
i wike mcdonal duble cheesburger
why are they allowed to publish lies like that
why nobody catalog the donators and sponsors of these "studies"
Their study finds a correlation between red meat and diabetes but they go right to "must eat plant based protein" and don't even consider chicken, turkey or fish, feels like vegan propaganda, especially lumping in processed and unprocessed meats together.
the study doesn't say that, it even says dairy is better than red meat
You are correct, I apologize. I think I read an article about the study that had that in it and confused it for what the actual study said. Sorry.
Goyscience
Remember to get VAXXD!!
Lab meat is basically glyphosate, i.e. roundup
So red meat is correlated with diabetes.
So is sugar.
Yet I eat at least half a lb of red meat a day and about 80-120g of sugar a day.
Somehow I don't have diabetes. Perhaps it has something to do with me not being overweight, having a high muscle mass index, and working out regularly?
>Amputated
It won't be if you have even the slightest grain of self control not to drink a whole soda bottle at +20mmol
>food frequency questionnaires
israelite propaganda wont eat the bugs fricking israelites
It's always PROCESSED meat that's the problem
Whole red meat is ideal for lifters
Deli meat fricks your body up so bad