Seed oils are necessary for normal bodily function
>George Oswald Burr (Fig. 1), reported that the deficiency disease observed in rats fed a fat-free diet was caused by the absence of dietary fatty acids, not by the lack of a lipoid contained in the fat, and he concluded that fat was an essential dietary component
>Burr then demonstrated that the addition of a small amount of linoleic acid, the 18-carbon ω-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid containing two double bonds (18:2ω-6), cured this deficiency disease and, therefore, was an essential fatty acid
>These two seminal papers are now regarded as classics in biochemistry
Explain this, seedoil tards
>And later, in the 1960s, patients consuming long-term parenteral (IV) nutrition devoid of linoleic acid developed skin rashes and other signs of essential fatty acid deficiency, which also reversed after the addition of linoleic acid [*].
drink motor oil instead. It's good for an engine so it's good for you too.
>drink motor oil instead.
Literally the same thing
according to what you are saying, the rats were fed a fat free diet.
people are arguing that saturated fats are healthier then poly unsaturated fatty acids, thats not the same thing as advocating a fat free diet.
also, linoleic acid is good for you in the right amount and proportions, but the seed oils we consume contain very high amounts of linoleic acid, and not as much omega 3 and 9 in proportion.
so what you just said doesn't address the actual concerns of a diet heavy in seed oils.
Your methods lead to obesity and chronic illness.
>study date 1929
In another friend, one of you told me that pre-war studies are the most valuable ones, for obvious reasons.
>starve living organisms of essential macronutrient (things that make life and basic organ function possible)
>give lab rat a small amount of missing, artificially removed macronutrient so that it can continue living
>anon now thinks sneed oils are good, because lab rats were artificially starved of a macronutrient
This board really is, moronic, then.
That's akshually true but only really in the case of nutrition, select other fields and mostly re: the US.
>human physiology has radically changed since 1929
it was literal fat free diet anon. you need less o6 than potassium ffs
>fat-free diet
Of course this is bad for you, moron, that doesn't mean sneed oils are good
What about this then
>Documented instances of linoleic acid deficiency occur in [*,*]:
>Infants who are given formula that doesn’t contain essential fatty acids like linoleic acid
>Seriously ill patients on parenteral (IV) nutrition
>People who are starving or severely malnourished
So how come linoleic acid is good but seed oils are bad when you say the bad thing in them is linoleic acid?
>doesn’t contain essential fatty acids like linoleic acid
see
>seed oils are better than no fat at all
>hurr this means that seed oils are better than animal fats durrrr
>hah chud incels owned durrrrp
I would frick her, if you understand what I mean
Yes, I understand you're a simp
>Seed oils are necessary for normal bodily function
post body
not fat enough, I prescribe adding 4x 1L heavy cream chugs daily until cute tummy grows
>starve a rat of any fat whatsoever
>give it a bit of a specific type of fat
>it gets better
>therefore that specific type of fat is essential
You don't see the massive gaping hole in logic here brother?
linoleic acid is actually good for you, but only a certain amount, and only when digested with omega 3 and omega 9, by it self and in high amounts it is bad for you, and they are in high amounts in seed oils and without omega 3 and 9.
additionally, poly unsaturated fats diminish testosterone and promote estrogen, and saturated fats promote testosterone and diminish estrogen.