For my high T brothers. Be mindful about your high T.
If your boss is low T he most likely will feel mogged by you even if you are kind with him).
And like a seething kid he will not like it.
>If your boss is low T he most likely will feel mogged by you even if you are kind with him).
not my problem
>and low density lipoprotein, increased cancer risk too
no evidence meat has anything to do with heart disease or cancer >Of 12 eligible trials, a single trial enrolling 48 835 women provided the most credible, though still low-certainty, evidence that diets lower in red meat may have little or no effect on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.95 to 1.03]), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.98 [CI, 0.91 to 1.06]), and cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.99 [CI, 0.94 to 1.05]). That trial also provided low- to very-low-certainty evidence that diets lower in red meat may have little or no effect on total cancer mortality (HR, 0.95 [CI, 0.89 to 1.01]) and the incidence of cancer, including colorectal cancer (HR, 1.04 [CI, 0.90 to 1.20]) and breast cancer (HR, 0.97 [0.90 to 1.04]).
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31569236/
I'm not vegan though. But if you think that eating red meat in moderation is a bad idea even though it's literally carcinogenic classed and any health organization recommends to consume in moderation exactly due to it being carcinogenic, also how all traditional diets for longevity have moderate consumption of red meat somehow (Mediterranean, Japanese etc) because they're part of a great conspiracy to take red meat from you, well you're a total fricking psycho.
>carcinogenic classed
based on zero evidence. in fact you have to deliberately ignore the best evidence to think it is carcinogenic >Most importantly for the IARC report, two major dietary intervention studies that should have contributed to the assessment of the claimed relationship of red meat and cancer were not considered. The first was a study of colon polyps, the precancerous growths that greatly increase the likelihood of developing colon cancer. Almost 1,900 subjects with a recent history of having a polyp removed were divided into a control group that ate their usual diet and a group following a diet characterized by significant decreases in total fat, red, and processed meat along with increases in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and legumes (Schatzkin et al., 2000). Participants were followed for 3 years and at the end of that time, the recurrence of colon polyps was identical in both diet groups. It is possible that the precancerous stage may not have been the proper time for dietary intervention. The Women’s Health Initiative, therefore, studied a low-fat diet, achieved in large part by reducing red- and processed-meat consumption, among almost 49,000 women (Beresford et al., 2006); about 30,000 followed their normal diets and almost 20,000 were assigned to low-fat diets. After 9 years, the rate of colon cancer was almost identical in the low-fat and control-diet groups. These studies strongly suggest that the observational studies are not supported by dietary intervention studies at either the precancerous or malignant tumor stages of colon cancer.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015455/
>and low density lipoprotein, increased cancer risk too
no evidence meat has anything to do with heart disease or cancer >Of 12 eligible trials, a single trial enrolling 48 835 women provided the most credible, though still low-certainty, evidence that diets lower in red meat may have little or no effect on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.95 to 1.03]), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.98 [CI, 0.91 to 1.06]), and cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.99 [CI, 0.94 to 1.05]). That trial also provided low- to very-low-certainty evidence that diets lower in red meat may have little or no effect on total cancer mortality (HR, 0.95 [CI, 0.89 to 1.01]) and the incidence of cancer, including colorectal cancer (HR, 1.04 [CI, 0.90 to 1.20]) and breast cancer (HR, 0.97 [0.90 to 1.04]).
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31569236/
red met being le carcinogenic is because fricking sodium nitrite they put in everything.
this is a practice from when we had no fridges today we could just use beet juice or something for the color.
sodium nitrite reacts with proteins to form nitrosamines which is one of the most cancerous chemicals known to man.
>carcinogenic classed
based on zero evidence. in fact you have to deliberately ignore the best evidence to think it is carcinogenic >Most importantly for the IARC report, two major dietary intervention studies that should have contributed to the assessment of the claimed relationship of red meat and cancer were not considered. The first was a study of colon polyps, the precancerous growths that greatly increase the likelihood of developing colon cancer. Almost 1,900 subjects with a recent history of having a polyp removed were divided into a control group that ate their usual diet and a group following a diet characterized by significant decreases in total fat, red, and processed meat along with increases in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and legumes (Schatzkin et al., 2000). Participants were followed for 3 years and at the end of that time, the recurrence of colon polyps was identical in both diet groups. It is possible that the precancerous stage may not have been the proper time for dietary intervention. The Women’s Health Initiative, therefore, studied a low-fat diet, achieved in large part by reducing red- and processed-meat consumption, among almost 49,000 women (Beresford et al., 2006); about 30,000 followed their normal diets and almost 20,000 were assigned to low-fat diets. After 9 years, the rate of colon cancer was almost identical in the low-fat and control-diet groups. These studies strongly suggest that the observational studies are not supported by dietary intervention studies at either the precancerous or malignant tumor stages of colon cancer.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015455/
machine shops have to constantly test their coolant for nitrite it reacts with amines in the coolant to form nitrosamines, then after that all machinists go to lunch end eat a fat slice of meat cheese
cheese (amines) meat (amines) baked together with fricking sodium nitrite.
and many people here in Germany eat this every day, sausage on bread, cooked sausages grilled sausages, Kassler, Currywurst, pepperoni pizza.
yeah like spinach but then they contain nitrate, sausage contains nitrite. nitrate≠nitrite
so we need at-least some bacteria that reduces the nitrate to nitrite this is why you should not reheat cooked spinach after it sat at room temperature for some time.
machine shops have to constantly test their coolant for nitrite it reacts with amines in the coolant to form nitrosamines, then after that all machinists go to lunch end eat a fat slice of meat cheese
cheese (amines) meat (amines) baked together with fricking sodium nitrite.
and many people here in Germany eat this every day, sausage on bread, cooked sausages grilled sausages, Kassler, Currywurst, pepperoni pizza.
>nitrosamines
Just add some vitamin c to avoid that.
I'm Greek and our diet traditionally does have a lot of fat and protein but red meat is not consumed too often. People were poor anyway and couldn't afford it.
>I almost wonder if smoking is good for you.
when you're dumb enough to cry "jews" anytime someone talks about dietetics science this doesn't surprise me. You should take up smoking anon, I'm sure the health organization israelites are just trying to trick you. You should also drink gasoline
No part of what you said is true. Sure, heavily processed meat is bad for you, along with every other processed food. But red meat is not carcinogenic.
Blue zones are fake BS made to sell books. Even if they are true, take a look at the average lifespan in those areas, it's below average - Okinawa has the shortest lifespan in Japan for example. Even if you believe the myth, surely you realise that you're rolling dice and odds are you will die young rather than live to over 100? A modern 711 diet in Tokyo has a higher average lifespan than an Okinawan beans and rice...
I personally loooove only meat, cheese, eggs. Whenever I eat bacon I knewow that I am a real woman on the inside. Now I do keto every day and next month get bottom surgery to be my true self. The only downside is losing all my hair. Thanks keto and reddit!
i never understood that, people tell you to eat less fats and cholesterol. which reduces your testosterone production, which means your metabolism goes down. so you are just gonna have a lower quality of life and probably die at the same age.
if people were worried about longevity they would do what shaolin monks do to live into their fricking 90s and 100s and still be spry as a fox, starve themselves almost to death and do low impact physical activity
> Resting and post-exercise cortisol increase during the first 3 weeks of a low-carbohydrate diet. Afterwards, resting cortisol appears to return to baseline, whilst post-exercise cortisol remains elevated. High-protein diets cause a large decrease in resting total testosterone (∼5.23 nmol/L).
Unironically you need more carb. Carbs lowers cortisol responses post workout(cortisol inhibits gains), and too high of protein drops test. Unironically the one of the best dietary macro profile is the simple 50% carbs, 25% protein, 25% fat.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35254136/
it doesnt regardless, but if you are actually lifting and staying shape if definitely wont effect you that way. i dont even do keto, but when I did do a modified keto with just no grains for 4 months, I had the most rock hard boners of my life. insane morning wood like I never even had in high school and im in my 30s.
For my high T brothers. Be mindful about your high T.
If your boss is low T he most likely will feel mogged by you even if you are kind with him).
And like a seething kid he will not like it.
Studies show a correlation between high cholesterol and vitamin D deficiency and low testosterone.
You will believe anything though if it means not admitting your lifestyle us unhealthy. At least most roiders admit they're risking their health to look good. Can't argue with schizos.
French paradox isn't a thing *within* France. They don't magically get healthier the more cheese and butter they guzzle. Go figure. Ever heard Teicholz talk about it? Taubes? Hyman?
>Studies show a correlation between high cholesterol and vitamin D deficiency and low testosterone >people with high cholesterol are fat bastards who don't go outside
Not really a surprise
>saturated fat used for over 30 hormones including estrogen and estradiol >ketolards and carnitards keep deluding themselves it all magically transforms to testosterone
Enjoy your moobs
what do i eat once or twice a week to marginally lower my testosterone?
I have just the thing for you
https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0882
t. gays
Why are you identifying yourself as gay
This, so much this! Updooted
thanks kind stranger 🙂
>If your boss is low T he most likely will feel mogged by you even if you are kind with him).
not my problem
In current globohomosexual times, weak manchildren can be bosses or teachers with power over you.
i meant its not my problem if they are low T and feel mogged. by me.
ill whip out my BWC and mog them more while I impregnate their wives.
seriously this is a neet website, do you really think any real chad cares about artificial constructs such as "bosses" they can blow me
Dick anon. I recommend you to eat dick.
What kind of butter
The buttery type of butter.
yellow. like real milk is yellow, real butter is yellow
raw and wriggling
Ghee
and low density lipoprotein, increased cancer risk too
>and low density lipoprotein, increased cancer risk too
no evidence meat has anything to do with heart disease or cancer
>Of 12 eligible trials, a single trial enrolling 48 835 women provided the most credible, though still low-certainty, evidence that diets lower in red meat may have little or no effect on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.95 to 1.03]), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.98 [CI, 0.91 to 1.06]), and cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.99 [CI, 0.94 to 1.05]). That trial also provided low- to very-low-certainty evidence that diets lower in red meat may have little or no effect on total cancer mortality (HR, 0.95 [CI, 0.89 to 1.01]) and the incidence of cancer, including colorectal cancer (HR, 1.04 [CI, 0.90 to 1.20]) and breast cancer (HR, 0.97 [0.90 to 1.04]).
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31569236/
Enjoy your mammal estrogen, b***h breasts.
I'm not vegan though. But if you think that eating red meat in moderation is a bad idea even though it's literally carcinogenic classed and any health organization recommends to consume in moderation exactly due to it being carcinogenic, also how all traditional diets for longevity have moderate consumption of red meat somehow (Mediterranean, Japanese etc) because they're part of a great conspiracy to take red meat from you, well you're a total fricking psycho.
Jesus man, help yourself to a few more full stops. They're free you know.
All them fruits give me so much energy, you wouldn't understand anon
Based knower
Cringe ketoredditor
Keto is for gays, cool kids use punctuation.
what fruits are you eating
>carcinogenic classed
based on zero evidence. in fact you have to deliberately ignore the best evidence to think it is carcinogenic
>Most importantly for the IARC report, two major dietary intervention studies that should have contributed to the assessment of the claimed relationship of red meat and cancer were not considered. The first was a study of colon polyps, the precancerous growths that greatly increase the likelihood of developing colon cancer. Almost 1,900 subjects with a recent history of having a polyp removed were divided into a control group that ate their usual diet and a group following a diet characterized by significant decreases in total fat, red, and processed meat along with increases in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and legumes (Schatzkin et al., 2000). Participants were followed for 3 years and at the end of that time, the recurrence of colon polyps was identical in both diet groups. It is possible that the precancerous stage may not have been the proper time for dietary intervention. The Women’s Health Initiative, therefore, studied a low-fat diet, achieved in large part by reducing red- and processed-meat consumption, among almost 49,000 women (Beresford et al., 2006); about 30,000 followed their normal diets and almost 20,000 were assigned to low-fat diets. After 9 years, the rate of colon cancer was almost identical in the low-fat and control-diet groups. These studies strongly suggest that the observational studies are not supported by dietary intervention studies at either the precancerous or malignant tumor stages of colon cancer.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7015455/
hi sv3rige
>muh health organisation
Lmfao the goodest goyim time to pay the carbon tax and eat your bugburger
red met being le carcinogenic is because fricking sodium nitrite they put in everything.
this is a practice from when we had no fridges today we could just use beet juice or something for the color.
sodium nitrite reacts with proteins to form nitrosamines which is one of the most cancerous chemicals known to man.
no human evidence
animal studies are not unanimous either
machine shops have to constantly test their coolant for nitrite it reacts with amines in the coolant to form nitrosamines, then after that all machinists go to lunch end eat a fat slice of meat cheese
cheese (amines) meat (amines) baked together with fricking sodium nitrite.
and many people here in Germany eat this every day, sausage on bread, cooked sausages grilled sausages, Kassler, Currywurst, pepperoni pizza.
Ironically beet juice is really high in nitrates as well
yeah like spinach but then they contain nitrate, sausage contains nitrite. nitrate≠nitrite
so we need at-least some bacteria that reduces the nitrate to nitrite this is why you should not reheat cooked spinach after it sat at room temperature for some time.
Its almost like synthetic versions of things might have different effects of the human body than their natural counterparts
>nitrosamines
Just add some vitamin c to avoid that.
33 cents have been deposited to your ID chip.
Eat grassfed beef and enriched omega 3 eggs and you will be fine. Everything is carcinogenic if you eat the industrial version.
>Trust the science
>Global warming is going to kill us all by 2010
>The only way to prevent this is to eat bugs and drive a Tesla
Forgot you also need to pay your carbon taxes or your children will die
>it's literally carcinogenic classed
That means it cures cancer.
Whenever an NGO tells you something is healthy you should do the complete opposite
Also, meds and japs both ate red meat
This is true. Longest lived Japanese eat the most animal protein.
I'm Greek and our diet traditionally does have a lot of fat and protein but red meat is not consumed too often. People were poor anyway and couldn't afford it.
>eating meat is bad!
Said by the same organization that claims being a troony is A-OK.
If someone just does the opposite of what the government and shill media say they will probably have excellent health.
I almost wonder if smoking is good for you.
>I almost wonder if smoking is good for you.
when you're dumb enough to cry "jews" anytime someone talks about dietetics science this doesn't surprise me. You should take up smoking anon, I'm sure the health organization israelites are just trying to trick you. You should also drink gasoline
>drink gasoline
just like abo Black folk
I smoke literally because I believe what you just said. I usually can smoke 5 cigarettes about 4 days a week. Doing it for my health.
you're dying at 60 bruv
No part of what you said is true. Sure, heavily processed meat is bad for you, along with every other processed food. But red meat is not carcinogenic.
Blue zones are fake BS made to sell books. Even if they are true, take a look at the average lifespan in those areas, it's below average - Okinawa has the shortest lifespan in Japan for example. Even if you believe the myth, surely you realise that you're rolling dice and odds are you will die young rather than live to over 100? A modern 711 diet in Tokyo has a higher average lifespan than an Okinawan beans and rice...
>Sure, heavily processed meat is bad for you, along with every other processed food. But red meat is not carcinogenic.
/thread
Processed meat isn't harmful unless you put harmful substances in it.
Ground beef is 'processed' but is totally safe. The nitrite thing is obviously fake and gay, too. Cured meats are fine.
Believe the government that is trying to kill you if you want.
You are more of a homosexual then OP.
Ketoschizo thread.
Holy Trifecta of fat and heart problems
Vaccinated?
Is margarine good for you?
I personally loooove only meat, cheese, eggs. Whenever I eat bacon I knewow that I am a real woman on the inside. Now I do keto every day and next month get bottom surgery to be my true self. The only downside is losing all my hair. Thanks keto and reddit!
Toxic, one of the worst things you could ever eat right after vegetables or nuts/seeds
Bamp
i never understood that, people tell you to eat less fats and cholesterol. which reduces your testosterone production, which means your metabolism goes down. so you are just gonna have a lower quality of life and probably die at the same age.
if people were worried about longevity they would do what shaolin monks do to live into their fricking 90s and 100s and still be spry as a fox, starve themselves almost to death and do low impact physical activity
Yeah and heart disease lol
Heart disease is caused by carbs and pfizer injections.
> Resting and post-exercise cortisol increase during the first 3 weeks of a low-carbohydrate diet. Afterwards, resting cortisol appears to return to baseline, whilst post-exercise cortisol remains elevated. High-protein diets cause a large decrease in resting total testosterone (∼5.23 nmol/L).
Unironically you need more carb. Carbs lowers cortisol responses post workout(cortisol inhibits gains), and too high of protein drops test. Unironically the one of the best dietary macro profile is the simple 50% carbs, 25% protein, 25% fat.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35254136/
>eat more carbs bro
Post any evidence to refute my point. Also post body while your at it
Thank you vegetable merchant.
>virgin fraud vs chad natty
Vegans are homosexuals, but at least they don’t claim to be natty when they blatantly fraud
Shawn Baker is lifetime natty.
>lifting more than a guy who is frauding
>natty
Lifetime natty is the dog whistle for knowing they are a fake natty. Nothing about him is natty
They're lifting the same weight and Shawn Baker does fewer reps.
He looks natty. His lifts are natty. You slander him because he eats meat and you're a soya fed homosexual.
there are so many jacked vegan influencers who claim natty though when they clearly aren't
If there's a even 1% chance this crap gives me erectile dysfunction I have to take it as an absolute certainty! My wiener is my favorite toy!
it doesnt regardless, but if you are actually lifting and staying shape if definitely wont effect you that way. i dont even do keto, but when I did do a modified keto with just no grains for 4 months, I had the most rock hard boners of my life. insane morning wood like I never even had in high school and im in my 30s.
Erectile dysfunction is basically a symptom of t2 diabetes. You can reverse it really easily with low carb diets
i really dont like eggs
I will eat pizza tonight.
For my high T brothers. Be mindful about your high T.
If your boss is low T he most likely will feel mogged by you even if you are kind with him).
And like a seething kid he will not like it.
Reminder that they stacked the committee with vegans and still couldn't even prove that cured meat was carcinogenic
>Cholesterol is the most common steroid
Right on time to drink my eggs.
Studies show a correlation between high cholesterol and vitamin D deficiency and low testosterone.
You will believe anything though if it means not admitting your lifestyle us unhealthy. At least most roiders admit they're risking their health to look good. Can't argue with schizos.
>studies
I don't believe them I just eat the highest quality local produce I can and if I feel good I continue to do so
French paradox isn't a thing *within* France. They don't magically get healthier the more cheese and butter they guzzle. Go figure. Ever heard Teicholz talk about it? Taubes? Hyman?
Why are vegans so antisemetic?
>Studies show a correlation between high cholesterol and vitamin D deficiency and low testosterone
>people with high cholesterol are fat bastards who don't go outside
Not really a surprise
ACK
These threads are the perfect bot test.
I think that beef rates bad. I prefer chicken pork and fish. Also eat ton of vegetables and some fruits. Drink milk, yogurt kefir and coffee too.
Ruminant meat is healthiest. Beef and lamb.
Any studies?
yes
Nothing hits better than medium-rare steak, long-grain rice, and veggies
homie that steak looks atrocious
his steak looks fine to me
get out
it's a good thing so many vegetarians and vegans exist
more meat on sale for me. the discounts would not happen otherwise
>saturated fat used for over 30 hormones including estrogen and estradiol
>ketolards and carnitards keep deluding themselves it all magically transforms to testosterone
Enjoy your moobs
more like clogged arteries and dying at 38 of a heart attack
As a vegetarian, I think people should eat whatever they want.
I scramble my morning eggs in the beef fats from the prior night. It's based and delicious.