>Trust the science

>Trust the science

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you have even a basic but solid understanding of statistics and the scientific method, this makes sense.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Literally what

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        One could be a study that has found a novel mechanism under in vitro condition while the other is an epidemiological study.
        Or, both could be the same type of study, but finding extraordinary results in both directions because the samples aren't actually completely random and representative of the population.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >If you have even a basic but solid understanding of statistics and the scientific method, this makes sense.

      Objectively false. Even a cursory understanding of the scientific method would tell you that if 2 studies show opposing results then one or both must have a flawed methodology. So no it doesn't "make sense."

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Brainlet take

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lets get a side profile anon

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lets get a side profile anon

      kek

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That is not science, that is a clickbait article.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Woman:
    Eat the eggs
    Man:
    Don’t eat the eggs

    LMAO

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >assuming gender
      Crungeu

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Can’t you read ?

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No one has any fucking idea how every tiny little part of the body and metabolism works in reference to the foods we eat, the sooner people grasp that, the better. Eat normal unprocessed foods, avoiding too much sugar and deep frying. That’s all it takes but everyone wants to obfuscate the issue to make it seem like only nth level wizards can grasp the intricacies of food, so people keep buying their slop/diabeetus meds/fad diet foods and programs

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    experiments can sometimes lead to different results
    especially in a field as complex as nutritional science

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is very little science being done anywhere in the world anymore. It's almost entirely a mixture of ideological activism and corporate grifting masquering as science. You cannot survive as a "researcher" anymore if you are neither an activist nor a grifter, you won't get any funding and you won't get published anywhere. That's how we end up with so many schizophrenic articles and why they can't replicate their own studies, because they are all either incompetent or fraudulent.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This. Science has regressed to anecdotal evidence and personal experiments being the most reliable sources of verifying claims. The destruction of real science is probably the worst thing about capitalism.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, you are gong to be very confused if you listen to clickbait journalism you retard

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >daily mail
    >science

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >trust the tabloids probably written by AI

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So did anyone here actually read the underlying papers, or are you all just here to comment on retard-bait headlines?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I’m here because I’m bored

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Rest day?

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Data is not scientific principle, it's just evidence. Why is it so hard for chuds to understand this did you pass middle shool

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://sci-fit.net/investigation-keto-scientists-companies/

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Trust the science, don't trust 'journalism'

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *