There exists a theoretical scale where people can be rated on their attractiveness on a scale of 1 to 10. We could conceptualize and categorize what a 1 would look like, an 8, etc and find real world examples
How the overall population is distributed along this scale is another story. In a healthy society, those who are most attractive with the most genes would ideally make up the majority of the population, say 70% of the population was a 7/10 and above. In a country like the US, it's the opposite. 70% of the population is a 5/10 and below and maybe only 1% is at a true 9/10. In something like an African country, 95% of the population is at a 5/10 or below on the theoretical scale
The implications? A fatter, uglier, dumber populace that gets worse year over year and degrades into the lowest form of humanity conceivable
>open thread
BOOBA
>close + hide thread
I'm literally the ONLY guy ITT who could get that girl irl. Most of you social morons couldn't even string together a sentence without stuttering after every word. I'M the alpha male, I'M the one in charge. Come talk to me when I'm talking to her? I'd publicly embarrass you the second you interrupted my conversation. In fact most of you would probably come into our circle and just stand there, taking down "PUA" tips in that notebook you morons carry around with you. If you decided to speak (aka ask "how do you do it bro?") I'd not only shove you back (I'm 6ft 210 btw, you'd fall to the ground) I'd give you a lesson on manners simultaneously displaying alpha behavior to this girl. Boom. 2 birds with one stone. In fact it would probably go better if you did interrupt our conversation.
I am married with 3 kids
Whats your question? As long as we have alcohol ugly people will have sex and create babies
>I am married with 3 kids
That's like me saying "you're all a bunch of morons" and then you replying "I have downs syndrome".
>non-reproductive
Sorry, what was that?
Pasta time (yes, you read every word)
Having kids is so monumentally moronic and is only surpassed by incels' longing to have a family.
The "have a family" meme is literally pushed by fat middle aged boomers who are such losers that they seriously think completing the most basic evolutionary task is an "accomplishment". The funny thing is most of them have kids because they were too stupid to pull out. Yeah, your kids were accidents, quit acting like they were "miracles".
Having kids is so insanely moronic it makes sense why low-IQ people are the main child producers. Yeah, lemme just sentence myself to 3 consecutive years of sleepless nights followed by another 5 of making sure little timmy doesn't accidentally kill himself followed by 5 more years of literally never having a moment to yourself - all while your wife is getting fatter. Your life revolves around making sure you and her don't fight - which entails endless cleaning in your spare time and not being able to sit back and do whatever the frick you want because you'll be scared the wife will b***h at you. All just so you can have a miniature version of yourself that might turn into a lefty drug addict who obsesses over Black folk? Lmao yeah, have fun with that. 20% of Gen Z between 18-24 identify as LGBT by the way.
Tonight, I will do /whateverthefrickIwant/. What will you be doing? Sitting on the couch watching TV in peace IF YOURE LUCKY? Lmaooo yeah, hope it was worth it bro. What's funny is if this post was made on a Friday/Saturday night you'd literally have "parents" seething at me. Their weekends are spend in front of a fricking computer on IST instead of with their family hahahahaha so when they say "wahh I'll be with my family" Nah homie, you'll be on fricking IST because the only peace you get is when you lock yourself in the back room to quarantine yourself from them
Thanks for the tip rebbe.
Wow… israelites used to do this propaganda much more effectively
>he fell for the propaganda
Like I said, have fun in the retirement home alone.
>marriage stats and obesity rates are propaganda
>eats too much
>marries the wrong person
Clearly it’s monogamy that’s at fault here. Either way even if I married a random person it would still be better than being guaranteed to die alone with no one in the world to miss you.
>thinks people don't change
You've never been in a long-term relationship in your life lmao
Have fun sitting in the retirement home lmao.
>t. 6’2” 200 married young
Mental Illinois
Shelbeygay
that's nice anon i'm happy for you.
what are the implications of the OP having no idea how bell curve distributions happen
moron. Nothing I said reflects that at all, if I cared enough, I could make a bell curve with my numbers. The peak of the curve and the slope to the left would depict 70% of the population being 5/10 and below
>Nothing I said reflects that at all
You are talking about good looks is distributed in the population yeah? Isn't it a bell curve?
No. And there's no reason to believe attractiveness follows a bell curve.
Why is that? Intelligence and athletic talent does.
Built for BBC
Doesn't this hypothesis also correlate with median IQ's declining in recent decades?
Op you may want to look into "mutational load"
Vast majority of woman are below 7/10. 98-99% of women are 7/10 or lower. OP pic for example is no higher than a 7/10. She has a very plain and ordinary face that precludes her from being any higher than a 7/10 and her body is nothing special for a woman of her age. The only advantage she has over many other women is that many other women have a lot more body fat at this time.
8/10 is a very attractive woman who is in the top 1-2% of women.
9/10 is top of the line attractiveness due to prime genetics, almost unicorn genetics in terms of rarity.
>maybe only 1% is at a true 9/10
1% is way too high for that group. Realistically, maybe the top 0.0001% of women are 9/10.
10/10 is a perfect woman and by definition doesn't exist.
You are partially correct, but you have incel spite and delusion in your words. The OP girl is at least an 8 at the minimum on any objective scale. Nice natural breasts, very curvy hips, thick athletic thighs, big ass, beautiful feminine face. It's the same girl who has her legs up in the school bus pic
The 1 to 10 rating should be scaled to something that is conceivable in reality, not virgin fantasy
> The OP girl is at least an 8 at the minimum on any objective scale
7/10 at best to a person who knows what they're looking at and doesn't fall for posing and angle-maxing.
>Nice natural breasts
Is a 7/10 trait in a world not plagued with obesity
> very curvy hips
Average hips especially when you account for the way she's lying down. (makes the hips look rounder than they actually are)
>thick athletic thighs
They're quite average in size.
>athletic
Not at all. There is nothing about her thighs that would indicate anything regarding athleticism. Rather they just look like the thighs of a teenage girl who isn't fat and doesn't even play any sports.
>beautiful feminine face
She has a cute mousey face. But I wouldn't really call her face beautiful.
see
>a-average thighs not athletic at all, a-average face
Are you blind?
proves me right
>a mousey and plain face
>thighs are the normal size for a non-fat girl and fairly fatty (not athletic)
You simps are pathetic. She's a 7/10. Trying to pass a 7/10 as an 8/10 is really gay. Maybe she's out of your league because you're a 4/10 male, but she's something an average guy with a little bit of charm can get fairly easily.
What a pathetic waste of time to write this out on IST
jesus christ.
Actually factually incorrect people have gotten taller and more attractive and are continuing to do so.
Not for 90% of the population or non-white countries more specifically