I think Steve Reeves was natty and Reg Park was on something. Although it could have just been different philosophies and approaches to lifestyle, Reg is leaner and more defined. Reeves deserved the W here, he is genuinely more impressive.
I always said they didnt roid especially the infamous pics of Steve when he was like 19 because it simply wasnt possible but I dont know. I lift 2/3/4/5 for reps and do hypertrophy program, been lifting for 12 years and I have 4-pack at any given time. I dont look ANYTHING like these guys. My arms are like toothpicks despite lifting what I lift and Im specifically good at hypertrophy movements like bicep curls, I curl 30-35kg's for my working set.
Im willing to admit that Im shit genetic dead end with the worst muscle bellies and insertions and these guys are literal top 0,000000000000000001% genetically gifted gods among men. So I do accuse them of roiding or not? I mean I guess I still dont, but when peoplpe ask whether you need to roid to reach that physique the answer is generally yes. And 99,999999999999% of people who look like that, roid. So might as well say its roids.
What is the purpose of this post? Why did you decide to go out of your way and post that entire paragraph of nothing? No one's going to read it and those who do will just wonder why anyone would decide to post something like that
They did roid, but you could start by stopping powershitting and starting bodybuilding. Powershitting physiques always have big torsos and small limbs because compound movements. Do isolations.
>I curl 30-35kg's for my working set.
dumbbells? I hope this is bait, it's no wonder you've got small arms if you actually think your biceps are lifting 35kg dumbbells.
>no mention of mind muscle connection >no mention of tut >main focus is how much the weight is >wonders why he doesn’t look like a bodybuilder
Bro here hit this, nothing bad can happen since you’re already moronic
Kingmode
The true Golden Era of bodybuilding-mode.
I think Steve Reeves was natty and Reg Park was on something. Although it could have just been different philosophies and approaches to lifestyle, Reg is leaner and more defined. Reeves deserved the W here, he is genuinely more impressive.
could be, idk
one thing i know for sure tho and that is we no longer have those living conditions these guys had
Yeah, it's painful to accept. We can get it to a better point for the future gens anon.
Steve has a more impressive upper body (at least in this pic), but his legs are worse even though he's at a higher bf%.
If you had these physiques in 2024 reddit and fit would accuse you of roiding
I always said they didnt roid especially the infamous pics of Steve when he was like 19 because it simply wasnt possible but I dont know. I lift 2/3/4/5 for reps and do hypertrophy program, been lifting for 12 years and I have 4-pack at any given time. I dont look ANYTHING like these guys. My arms are like toothpicks despite lifting what I lift and Im specifically good at hypertrophy movements like bicep curls, I curl 30-35kg's for my working set.
Im willing to admit that Im shit genetic dead end with the worst muscle bellies and insertions and these guys are literal top 0,000000000000000001% genetically gifted gods among men. So I do accuse them of roiding or not? I mean I guess I still dont, but when peoplpe ask whether you need to roid to reach that physique the answer is generally yes. And 99,999999999999% of people who look like that, roid. So might as well say its roids.
What is the purpose of this post? Why did you decide to go out of your way and post that entire paragraph of nothing? No one's going to read it and those who do will just wonder why anyone would decide to post something like that
I read it and it sounds a lot like you read it, too.
>top 0,000000000000000001
They're 1/1000 at the most. Most people with these genetics will never realize their true form though
They did roid, but you could start by stopping powershitting and starting bodybuilding. Powershitting physiques always have big torsos and small limbs because compound movements. Do isolations.
>I curl 30-35kg's for my working set.
dumbbells? I hope this is bait, it's no wonder you've got small arms if you actually think your biceps are lifting 35kg dumbbells.
>no mention of mind muscle connection
>no mention of tut
>main focus is how much the weight is
>wonders why he doesn’t look like a bodybuilder
Bro here hit this, nothing bad can happen since you’re already moronic
Yeah cause these bodies ain't achievable for 99.9% of people natty
Because they DID roid.
You have to keep in mind that juicing didn't carry a stigma back then. That only happened in the 80s with the war on drugs.
Actually well-proportioned and artful physiques that aren't just disgusting mass monsters meant to arouse the hypermuscle fetishist judges.
ytie seething
Your favourite bodybuilders probably got buck broken by strange israeli millionaires in return for sponsorship deals and supplements.
Probably not, actually.
True
How the hell did Steve get those lats without pullups?