whats the point of cutting when you can just fast? you lose weigh quicker, lose less muscle, and its much less autistic than counting your calories, plus its cheaper
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
>Cutting: caloric deficit
>fasting: caloric deficit
Based moron
never in the history of the world has anybody ever used "cutting" to refer to a fast, we all fricking know what is meant when someone says cutting vs fasting
Fasting is just a form of cutting, dyel newbie
The thing you are asking is if fasting is better than a slight caloric deficit
Truth is you will lose more muscle fasting for prolonged time, anyone telling you otherwise is bullshitting you, but yeah just do it if you feel it's the better option
>Truth is you will lose more muscle fasting for prolonged time,
this has been debunked
>hurr durr deboonked!
back to plebbit with you
>a square has 3 sides
>this has been debunked
>REDDIT! REDDIT! REDDIT!
Proof?
Debunked by your favorite fasting shill YouTuber
I thought only redd it gays are this delusional lol
>lose less muscle,
It is literally practically impossible that you would hang onto more muscle by fasting than by cutting for a long time.
If in some wild variation of such an experiment fasting actually does retain slightly more muscle I would still not do it because it is fricking shit for your body, causes incredible stress and deficiencies and will age you very rapidly.
have a nice day.
this
you are so dumb it hurts. Do you not understand CICO?
>yuropoor education
So thoughtful of her to make me an incredibly high-protein dish
Likely that this is bait given OP's second post, but you get weak as frick fasting, sometimes to the point that you're not ready to do anything with weights at all
Just eat a little less and ensure you're still getting good protein in and you'll be fine
so just train with less weight, got it
Read the second part of the first line again, please
so dont be a woman or already weak as frick prior, got it
It goes beyond that. Weight training at all while on a longer fast like I see some people do here can take you straight to snap city even with weights you used to be able to easily handle.
Way I see it is, fasting is a great tool if you have a desk job or you're just a NEET at home looking to shed some weight quickly for whatever random reason. If you have a naturally active lifestyle (physical job, team sports or martial arts or whatever), then fasting will do you a lot more harm than good and you'll be a lot better off just eating a little less.
But if I fast, the cutting will last two weeks instead of two months. So what if I lose more muscle? Won't I have more time to bulk and re-gain that muscle?
The real question is whether that time gain for bulking will be enough to undo what you lost fasting.
Muscle protein synthesis mainly happen during sleep so you don't move and use energy when your body repair itself.
Fasting mainly start during the afternoon, thus your body, when it'll sleep, will be starving and eating at your fat deposits (that's the goal).
However, since it'll be constantly eating at the fats to maintain basic body functions, it'll take away energy and resources from the muscle protein synthesis 'routine', making it not as optimal as Cutting.
Cutting, in the other hand and if your last meal is at least 2 hours before going to sleep, will provide your body with enough energy and ressources do to a full and complete cycle of muscle protein synthesis.
If, by fasting, your goal is mainly to reduce your insulin, I'd recommend not fasting and adding 3 tbsp max of Apple Cider Vinegar to your last meal (mix it with fats or in 5dl water), it'll improve your insulin sensitivity and lower both your blood sugar and insulin resistance/levels
this is your brain on youtube videos and grocery store magazines
>Fasting mainly start during the afternoon
Nah it’s very rare that someone doesn’t fast during the morning and eats only dinner if he’s not a neet
No muscular person has ever fasted to get lean
>fasting spares muscle
post proofs
>fasting loses muscle faster than a traditional deficit
post proofs
of course no one willl, and just keep arguing out of their buttholes
Here you go
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24215592
Do you ever feel like putting your fingers through the screen and ripping the face off the person at the other end piece by piece because of something they have posted is so dumb?
Nah I’m not autistic. Also, i can read
>Fat mass was reduced (P < 0.001) by 3.6 ± 0.7 kg, and fat free mass did not change, versus controls
Do not pretend you don't understand what is wrong with your post. Alright I'm done here.
Nice bait bro