>”why are there so many people at the stadium right now?”
>”because more people have entered the stadium than have left it. You see, the total number of people in the stadium is based on people in minus people out”
This is how CICOgays sound when they bring up their first grade math problem into every single discussion about fitness or diet
For as obvious as the shit is it's fricking incredible how everyone wants to try and skirt around it with homosexual fad diets.
Post pecker
Calories aren’t real
Counting calories is a fad diet
lol
lmao
>for all of human history: nobody was fat and nobody counted or even knew what a calorie was
>last 100 years: “you need to count calories!” “Calories make you fat!” “We blew this pop tart up in a bomb calorimeter to determine how much energy and nourishment it gives a human being!”
>Misses the obvious fact that it's only in the past 100 years where we've had enough food available, paired with sedentary lifestyles and jobs that eating 3k Calories a day is actually a genuine issue.
3k Calories is fine if you're on a farm, in a mine, or moving heavy shit. And that's if you could afford to eat 3k calories a day. However now there is such a large abundance of stupid bullshit to eat that you can go way over 3k without trying, and not do anything to even burn a fraction of those calories off.
People are eating that much because they are eating nutritionally deficient food that hormonally signals them to conserve fat. If you eat nutritional food that didn't signal fat conserving you would have to force yourself to eat that much, and even if you forced yourself your body would probably reject and excrete the extra food because there is no signal to deposit it as fat. The problem primarily is the composition of what people eat, it's completely natural to eat until satiation and such a thing should never be shamed, that's how you get eating disorders. If anything skinny people have more of an eating issue than fat people do, I know because I was aushwitz mode always hungry but just didn't care enough to eat, fat people are just normal people who eat goyschlop until satiation, skinny people tend to be eating the same thing except being hungry all the time, smart people eventually figure out that they can eat until satiation if they change what they're eating instead of worrying how much of it they eat, which is anti-nature and can give you an eating disorder.
You sound like a woman typing all those fricking paragraphs up. Didn't read lol
>was aushwitz
>because I didn't eat.
Oh, so you weren't at a caloric surplus? Honestly if you fricking gaytard specific food dieters would try counting calories even one time in your fricking life and had even a months worth of consistency with it you'd realize just how fricking stupid you are. But you won't, because you lack not only the willpower but probably the general intelligence to weigh out some fricking food. Stupid lazy fricks.
WAS keyword, I gained weight without counting a single calorie. Unironically, calorie counting is the gaytard specific food dieting, what is logical about doing something people have never have done to lose weight, using a measurement of energy the body doesn't use and has a huge margin of error, eating according to some arbitrary amount instead of to satiety, and having any mental concern beyond eating what your body craves and avoiding goyschlop? Seriously, which is the gaytard specific food dieting, the one that is biologically conducive or the moronic modern construct?
Eating to 'satiety' is how we've arrived at the current obesity epidemic. Back in the day no one ate until they were fricking stuffed at every meal. You had your rationed breakfast and went to work.
Please have a nice day.
>”back in the day”
>capitalist societies from 100 years ago
That’s not natural either homie
How about the majority of human history?
Fricking moron, kys.
And here in lies the problem with cico and the type of mindset you develop with it, why should you ever restrict the AMOUNT of food you eat instead of WHAT you eat as the BASE of your diet? Restricting the amount is in effect, purposefully subjecting yourself to famine, it's disordered eating, it's not the way your biologically designed. The only way restricting what you're eating could be similarly deleterious as restricting the amount is if you were restricting nourishing, essential foods like a fruitarian or vegan does, that's disordered eating since you're literally refusing what your body needs. But you can eat until satiation if you restrict three things, snacking (high meal frequency), sneed oil like fat, and carbs, with the understanding these things are by design, signals the body to conserve fat, which is evolutionarily adaptive to help you survive in the winter and famine. If you eat the right foods, ie animal fat and protein, as much as you want, your body will properly signal you to stop, and even if you go over, it'll be forceful, unappetizing, and it will come out your ass or some other way. If your body wanted the food, even to just gain fat, which like I said is evolutionarily adaptive to survive famine, you would get a signal for that. If you understand that, then you understand which foods you can eat to satiety and be lean, and which foods if you eat until satiety will make you fat. Note, you can restrict the fattening foods to avoid gaining weight, but it's not biologically conducive, and you will have a worse body composition because your body is in fat conserving mode. If we know that simply changing your hormonal profile with roids will make someone gain lean mass, I don't think it's so hard to believe that foods, which affect your hormonal profile, will have a similar effect. If you want to be lean, you should eat a diet conducive to being lean instead of one that signals your body to conserve fat.
Kys and die fat or auschwitz israelite
Ironic considering it's ((them)) who want you to continue eating goyschlop but in "moderation". Any sensible person eats according to nature and biology and not according to industrial funded constructs.
Belief in CICO is what caused the obesity epidemic.
People eating too much is what caused the obesity epidemic
People eating goyslop and seed oils and soda caused the obesity epidemic
I dare you to try to get fat eating nothing but animal products and fruit
Not really. Pic related shows a group that ate more calories lost more body fat.
See also pic related here:
Quantity of food measured by calories doesn't cause obesity. Insulin causes obesity.
ywnbaw
the obvious fact that it's only in the past 100 years where we've had enough food available
not true
Let me specify: The Working Class composed of Families of 4+ members. Happy now?
Got him
for all of human history: we eat food homie.
last 100 years: we create food in labs, now eat homie.
?si=081t5hxlNs48orXy
well that's not the song I was thinking of. there's one where he talks about feeding a b***h her own pussy. but I haven't listened to him in such a long time I forget what it's called.
?si=F_e3RO0GBEThv5JN
there it is, dood.
What is an industrialized society and its consequences
>for all of human history no one was fat.
Are you genuinely fricking moronic? Honestly, have a nice day so we can raise the average IQ.
obesity was very rare now its very common. stop being such a pedantic homosexual
>misses the obvious fact that only rich people were fat
unfortunately now every poorgay can afford 5k calories a day
how many calories are in a mammoth morons. go count your calories goyim
Shut the frick up israelite. You think they ate a whole fricking mammoth? This is why you need to have a nice day.
>kill piles of bison
>don't have obesity
>morons 150 years later think you were lean because you couldn't eat as many "calories" as you wanted
>implying they are all these bison
Didn't they kill them for sport and to deny natives food?
Yes they exterminated millions of bison just to get rid of a valuable food supply. A strong contradiction of the calorietard fantasy that everyone in the past was borderline starving.
Calories don't cause obesity. Sugar causes obesity.
That's not entirely false, but it's massively overblown because it fits modern day muh oppressed minorities ebil yt man narrative. It was for the skins, driven by the popularity of bison skin coats and, what a lot of historians seem to gloss over completely, the Industrial revolution. Those big factories usually had one engine to power all of their machines and distributed power through a series of belts. The industrial revolution was hitting its peak and needed a frickton of those belts to keep the machines turning. Those belts wore out too, so they would need to be replaced often. It turned out that bison hides made really good machine belts and there were a frickton of bison.
They also ground the bones to make fertilizer. You know that one picture they always show with the mountain of skulls to show how many bison were killed? This one here
. Why do you think they took the insane amount of time and labor to strip the flesh from literally thousands of very large animals and pile the skulls into a big skull mountain? Just for fun? Just because it would look cool? The way it's taught in school you'd think that was the case and it was a bunch of Captain Planet villains running around killing off entire herds because they just hate nature and all things good and just. The reality is that it was an over-exploited natural resource the same as clear cutting a forest for lumber. A folly and a tragedy, to be sure, but not a bunch of mustache twirling villains doing it on purpose because they're just so evil.
Yes. Yes they did.
Pre agriculture humans literally hunted thousands of species to extinction, their tribe would eat the entire animal and yet there was still no obesity, and everyone was lean fit and athletic. They didn’t have to count calories.
That's a bit of a myth. Mankind simply did not have the population or the scale of operations to do that.
about 100k
your move, dyel
You know what else used to be rare? Food surpluses, I'm not pedantic but you're a fricking moron who needs to jump off a cliff.
Lol, this has to be a trollpost, right? There's no way you're genuinely this moronic.
~~*very*~~ ~~*interesting*~~ ~~*post*~~ anon ~~*very*~~ ~~*interesting*~~ indeed
Yeah man lets eat 5000 calories in meat and eggs for 2 months and watch me get shredded
Ayy lmao moron
It’s pretty much impossible to eat 5000 cals of meat and eggs without calorie counting. The only reason modern people can eat 5k cals is cus they’re eating a bunch of empty goyslop that makes you hungrier
I love how CICO gays just make their religion some unfalsifiable truth. Like no matter how hard you disprove CICO they still somehow do the mental gymnastics to say “well… that’s still CICO!”
>It’s pretty much impossible
Slick pivot. Now address the point
>Calories aren’t real
That's like saying centimeters aren't real, moron. Calories are just a unit of measurement of energy. You don't believe in energy?
Epic Reddit moment, kind stranger
Cico is false but mass in mass out is true, your body doesn't use heat energy. There are three primary things that signal fat conserving/depositing, that's carbs, meal frequency, and sneed oil like fat. The reasons are that carbs and sneed oil like fat are in abundance during the summer, animals are fatter and will have a more sneed like fat composition, think of the difference between grain finished and grass finished fat as an example, or pork vs beef. These foods trigger fat gaining mode so that you survive the winter. The last thing is meal frequency, higher meal frequency triggers the body to conserve fat because that's the eating pattern during famine, you've resorted to eating small game and tubers/grains because you can't get the big game, otherwise it's normal to fast and feast. Tying it back to mass in mass out theory, these factors simply put your body into a state more conducive to conserving fat, it doesn't mean you will be fat unless you eat more mass that will be deposited as fat. On the other hand, if you eat more mass than your body needs while I'm fat burning mode it will simply excrete the excess I hypothesize. The most sensible thing to do then is to eat to satiation and tailor the composition of your diet to your goals. Do you want to be lean? Simply cut back carbs, cut back meal frequency, cut back sneed oil like fat, eat until satiation.
Are you fricking moronic? None of that is true, you just made all of that up.
I appreciate the effortpost anon
Making shit up.
Animals aren't fat in the summer. They gain weight only when their d3 level drop, which is fall.
No fat animals in hot climates, while the animals that live in arctics always fat.
Do you think that because a place is cold it... Gets less sun?
You Posted this in the other keto thread. Still 100% nonsense
The thing here, is that every American has 4x more of each of these foods than in the past. Yes, these are great foods, and healthy especially compared to Cheetos and Frozen pizza, but if you're eating any of these in the absolutely massive quantities that we see people do nowadays, the cholesterol, the fats, the microbes, the sugars, and the salts will absolutely destroy your body, as we see currently.
I think it's that people are eating bastardized versions of those food in large quantities.
Good
>Whole milk
>Sirloin steak
>Butter
>salt
>Eggs
Bad
>Heavy cream ~~*"coffee"*~~
>40% bacon grease burgers
>margarine
>Salt on every morsal of food you eat
>~~*Eggs*~~
>~~*eggs*~~
elaborate
eggs are white like israelites and good for you like the israelites
>as we see currently
People don't eat a lot of those tho. People have increased their vegetable oil, chicken, grain consumption and reduced their red meat. Dairy had mostly stayed the same but has declined lately
>thermodynamics isn't real
>calories aren't real
>t. landwhale lard addicted ambulocetus
>you are a closed system (you aren't)
>your body uses heat energy (it doesn't)
>if you go against my moronic beliefs you're fat (projecting fat ass)
nta can you clarify
>>your body uses heat energy (it doesn't)
he's moronic or trolling you (or both)
don't waste your time lmao
Calories are measured by combusting food in a bomb calorimeter, it's a measurement of heat energy. The way your body metabolizes food is not the same reaction as combusting food. What is generally true is mass in mass out though, as in, if your body absorbs more mass than it excretes, you will gain weight.
homie, why do you think the body absorbs oxygen through the lungs? Why do you think the body is able to produce heat? If there's no combustion happening inside of you, how a out you try to stop breathing for 4 hours and see what happens?
>Combustion: Hydrocarbons react with oxygen to yield CO2, H2O, and energy mainly in the form of heat
>Digestion: Your body takes hydrocarbons from food and oxygen from you lungs and subjects them to a series of chemical reactions that yields CO2, H2O, and energy mainly in the form of heat
You're right, these processes are completely incomparable.
>The way your body metabolizes food is not the same reaction as combusting food.
Explain the difference between the two processes then, to prove you have a proper understanding and aren't just a coping moron
>your body doesn't maintain a high temperature
I guess it makes sense ketards don't believe this because they're so cold from their thyroid being destroyed by their diet.
Do you shit out ash?
>>”because more people have entered the stadium than have left it. You see, the total number of people in the stadium is based on people in minus people out”
what's wrong with this? it's exactly how it works. of the stadium is over it's capacity you better shut the fricking door until people start leaving instead of forcing more people to enter
you aren't a closed sysem but you don't bring in energy that can be converted into fat into your system from any sources other than food. you can't possibly get fatter on air, sunlight or whatever the frick
>why are there so many people in the stadium?
>because more people have entered than exited
This is a homosexual response because it doesn’t answer the question. Just like people discussing diet; people want to know which foods are healthy, how hormones impact mood energy weight gain/loss etc, the effects of certain ingredients on the body, different things that effect energy output, meal timing, etcetcetc.
And then some homosexual comes along and says “well avksckahshually the only thing that matters is the number of calories you consume” like okay buddy shut the frick up
b***h just stop eating
just stop
close your mouth
I’m 172lbs 10% bodyfat lel
Sorry that I care about nutrition to a higher degree than “le… CALORIES”
No one said nutrition doesn't matter but there's no way the average land whale looses weight until they understand just how much garnage they're consuming. Sure, you grow up in a family that has well rounded meals and reasonable portions you never have to think about but if you're a fricking cow the only way you learn what reasonable portions are is by understanding the caloric content and macro nutrient levels of the foods you eat. Ffs.
no one believes you
there is not a single time you have wanted to talk about food for maintaining your current weight while being healthy and been told just CICO, maybe IIFYM but certainly not CICO.
You are a fatass making up a scenario where you're not in the wrong for eating too much and being told to stop.
post body
Yeah but then IST complains about fasting.
>which foods are healthy, how hormones impact mood energy weight gain/loss etc, the effects of certain ingredients on the body, different things that effect energy output, meal timing, etcetcetc.
that is such innecessary knowledge to have. just count calories if you wanna lose weight, that's all there is to it. as long as you eat like a normal person instead of just eating 2 big macs instead of 5 every day you're gonna be healthy and leaner
if you eat 2 big macs instead of 5 you're still gonna lose weight tho. just like if let 2 people come into the stadium for every 5 people that go out, it's gonna be emptier. worrying about what's healthy or not comes afterwards: you're equally fat if your stadium is full of black people or white people, but you've got a way bigger mess to deal with if it's full of Black folk
> that is such innecessary knowledge to have. just count calories if you wanna lose weight, that's all there is to it.
This is the core problem with CICO gays.
YOURE ALL FATASSES. Why are you all trying to lose weight? I try to optimize my diet for long term health and performance, which Le CICO isn’t going to cut it.
I try to lose weight for three and a half months a year, while I try to gain weight three and a half months a year. I count calories to that effect and by the end of the year I increase my lean body mass. A frickton of people do that and it works.
I also eat healthy instead of eating junk but that's secondary. First, cico, and under a certain caloric goal, micros.
It's easy as frick too. No idea why anyone would get tangles on such basic stuff. It's literally first grade math.
What an absolute cope and a strawman. We are talking strictly calories and weight gain/loss here. You can still get all your micronutrients on CICO with fruits, vegetables, multivitamins/supplements, eggs, meats, and fish. No one says those aren’t important, but in the grand scheme of weight gain or weight loss they only make up a small portion of the overall equation, like <10%. The calories and macro nutrients are the key.
That would be like trying to build a car, but instead of focusing on the big things first like the engine, fuel system, battery, etc. that’s going to make the car actually run, you spend your time getting caught up in the less significant details like the paint color, radio system, what rims you like, etc.. All that stuff comes AFTER you have a running car.
Again why the frick are you homosexuals all trying to lose weight? Is every CICO gay obese?
Believe it or not, not everyone is a 130 pound twink, some people who actually know what they are doing bulk properly and eventually need to burn off some excess bodyfat. Bodybuilders have been doing it that way for many years. It’s literally not that complicated of a topic to understand.
Holy frick they really need to get an age verification on this board to filter out dumbasses like you.
>just count calories if you wanna lose weight
In studies where one group counts calories and the other group doesn't, the group not counting calories loses more weight.
The belief that calorie counting cures obesity is unfounded.
it's not rocket science, Black person
>muh hormones
>muh insulin spike
stfu b***h just eat a lot of meat and fibrous carbs and your body won't even fricking allow you to overeat
Another example of CICO gays who need to lose weight. That’s all you CICO gays care about. Are you all obese?
>has never done a cut before
CICO means calories in calories out.
The CO part covers what you just said.
Dumb Black person.
bait used to be believable
Real talk, what is the non-israeli actual healthy salt intake?
You can have as much salt as you want as long as you drink enough water.
too much sodium depletes potassium, anon. you need potassium too
so bananas?
yeah, you can eat infinite salt if you eat infinite bananas and drink infinite water
bananas are really not as good for potassium as the consensus suggests
like, they have some, but they're not some holy chalice of potassium for all fo your dietary needs
theyre pretty average
Same with iron and most green vegetables. Overstated.
you eat the broccoli for the good poopoo and potassium
did somebody face transplant that moronic homie from happy gilmore, or whatever sandler movie, on billies face?
I sure hope so
practically unlimited as long as you dont have a potassium deficiency. doctors say to reduce salt because they want to create "patients for life"
As long as you aren’t eating an abundance of highly processed food and are drinking enough water, it’s basically impossible to eat an unhealthy amount of salt. Source: undergrad nutrition science class
You don't decide whether people enter a random stadium.
You do decide whether food enters your pie hole. There's no event going on for you to question, you simply keep shoving food in.
This analogy is false.
stadiums are meant to be full
your body is not a stadium fatass
Why are you israeli?
Based.
CICO is biology denial.
gaypost no I can see the highlighted groups because this is a shit screencap.
You can't use the archive?
I'm admittedly mobilegayging atm.
But to address another point if it was all the same macros then that means nutrition is bunk too which is, again, obvious horseshit.
Body composition is a result of hormones.
Calorietard influencers all inject hormones. They know they are lying. Maybe you will figure it out someday.
he weighs the same as a whole, this simply concentrated that weight in one place
See:
You are a biology-denier.
I'm sure hormones do play a role but to say CICO is bunk is moronic. I'll go tell all the success stories at my gym that their dieting and CICO is bunk and their cuts and bulks are all because of hormones.
CICO is literally just a sugar marketing hoax.
People in the past intuitively knew that sugar was fattening.
Calorietardation was invented to trick goys into thinking no food is fattening.
CICO works for me for both gaining and losing weight. I'm done arguing. Hope you choke on your hormone pills israelite.
how is injecting insulin locally comparable to eating? Insulin has 200 functions other than glucose control, and meat clowns end up insulin resistant without eating carbs through the intramyocellular lipid mechanism. Fat also kills pancreatic beta cells, and they proliferate optimally when challenged but not ovewhelmed by glucose, ie starches and not pure sugars only.
Carbs spike insulin.
So does protein
Not as much as carbs. Especially powdered or liquid carbs.
>20 posts ago: "UH DUDE I'M NOT EVEN TRYING TO LOSE WEIGHT STOP CALLING ME FAT AND TELLING ME TO EAT LESS IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LOSING WEIGHT"
>now: "CICO DOESN'T WORK I ATE LITERALLY NOTHING AND GAINED 100 POUNDS LOOK AT THE RATS LOOK!!!!"
lol
Not the same person also is it really inconceivable to you that some people on this board actually aren’t fat, and are just actually fit people and athletes that want to optimize their performance and health? Just because you’re obese doesn’t mean the rest of us are
Embarrassing gaslight attempt.
You are fat, and so heavily addicted to food that the idea of eating less is inconceivable to you, so you've got a million and one excuses about how it's not your fault.
>do cico
>be fat
>ignore cico
>be lean
Stay mad, calorietard.
post body (you won't)
>11 hours and 57 minutes ago
>no response
I am declaring this thread closed. There is no need to reply to this thread any further.
I mean from the picture to the right it looks like that guy has lost a frick ton of weight from the saggy skin so idk what this picture actually proves.
>do keto if you want to be dyel
Pic related on the right is a vegan.
Nope
Lol yes. Stay mad vegtard.
>picture
>words
if moronic meant keto, you'd understand, but you don't because you are
Here I created an updated version of this body comparison to post from now on.
Didn’t know keto causes severe anorexia. Thanks for letting me know
I think I'll use
Seems a little more accurate 😉
Stay mad, vegan.
Do you really not see the irony in posting that?
Explain it to me.
Vegans can't meme.
1000 hours in ms paint
Lmao that’s how I alway imagined ketoshizo head looks
Pic related on the right is a respected vegan doctor. Vegans pay money to hear his advice.
>Yeah I look like shit.. b-b-bbut what about GREGOR?
Pick related on the left is a respected carnivore doctor. morons pay money to hear his advice.
Seethe, vegan.
Left looks infinitely better than right.
left looks like dogshit
that is completely how they sound
moron, part of the reason why the average lifespan 1000 years ago was like 30 years is because people back then used to eat like morons. I mean yeah, if red meat and raw milk is all you have on hand, you're not going to die immediately, but you're not going to live for very long either
Everything always leads back to the age old muh people only lived to 30 back in the day argument. People still haven't figured how averages work how could they figure out human metabolism?
First, you do not understand averages. Second, those averages are heavily skewed towards infant death.
If you ate a diet of or whatever your deficit is
>2000 calories of protein
>2000 calories of carbs
>2000 calories of fat
Which one do you think would give you the best body composition?
> Strictly Protein
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_poisoning
> Strictly Carbs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_2_diabetes
> Strictly Fat
If you are already fat, then this is a fat fast, plain and simple. This is the winner.
If you are not fat, then you will look like a death camp victim after eating like this for long enough.
In other words, you gotta eat all of them. It's figuring out the right ratio that is the trick.
I remember I did a fat fast and noticed it got rid of stubborn body fat quicker
The holidays (starting from Thanksgiving really) rocked my regimen. I still lift but I need to get on a fast stat. I have not felt a single hunger pang, not even a single shift in my bowels for nearly two months now. Maybe I will do a fat fast myself. Thing is, while I am not averse to dietary fat, I have never eaten only fat before. Maybe now is the time to take the plunge.
And when I say "shift in my bowels" I mean in relation to hunger. My digestive system is working fine. I just feel full all the time.
wait what? so if you consume a high amount of fat it gets rid of body fat? how does that work?
It's the fat paradox. By not eating fats you're telling your body to store fat. So it's very hard to use and lose. By eating fats, you tell your body you have access to fats and you should burn dietary fat and reserve fat. Eating no fats causes the body to store sugars, carbohydrates, as fat. The worst thing you can do is not eat fat and eat an excessive amount of carbs and sugar i.e. the standard American diet.
Oh okay,that makes sense.
all of these options are fricking moronic
why cant you just eat like a non-schizo human?
>worlds oldest foods
>no fish, fruits, poultry, honey
why are ketards so dishonest?
Can't fault them for it when every fatass asks how to lose weight pretending they don't already know the fricking answer. If someone "genuinely" asked me what's 2 + 2? I'm gonna assume they're moronic and explains hit like they're 4 years old too.
People don't know how to lose weight. They actually fell for the calorie hoax.
nothing wrong with the ad.
i eat any amount of sugar i desire and i'm below 10% bf. carbs are not an enemy, overeating is the enemy. insulin resistance doesn't make you fat.
i am very lean. you on the other hand, are obese. because you eat too much, be it carbs or lard. you have no self control. you are a sinner.
Where's the bread?
I don't think the obeasts realize that having to count calories is a consequence of their own moronic behaviour. Does CICO work? Yeah. Do I count calories? No, because I didn't stuff my face to the point of becoming a hamplanet that can't tell if it's hungry or full.
The average American eats too much crap and in general too many calories relative to their activity. Most of us live on processed starch and sugar. Also remember the sugar industry bribed a bunch of people to say fat is bad and sugar is good, so we have corruption on top of everything else. And truthfully milk and eggs arent that fricking great. Their value is overstated and their industries also bribed government to shill for them and it changes year to year. Same with orange juice. Nutritionally its just liquid sugar, but they launched a whole ad campaign to make it the breakfast drink of America.
Eat fat to gain fat
Eat muscle to gain muscle
Eat energy (carbs) to gain energy
he also uses steroids
CICO has been validated in hundreds of studies
worlds oldest is not a measure of anything. Prostitution is the oldest profession but im not doing it rn. Also weve eaten tuber as long or longer than meat, also we arent primitives any more abd we can elevate ourselves using modern methods.
"We have access to too much food" is a psyop. If they blame overeating then they can ignore the disgustingly low food quality, endocrine disruptors in the environment, toxins in the food, sneed oils everywhere, etc. It's your fault for eating too much, goy.
HOLY FRICK PLEASE JUST EAT LIKE A NORMAL FRICKING HUMAN BEING ITS NOT THAT HARD.
Also OPs pic is totally wrong, we haven't been eating butter or fementing stuff until very recently in human history, the oldest foods in the world would be meat, fruits, nuts and wild vegetables, you know the shit we ate for 99% of our history?
Literally just fricking stay away from processed foods and stuff like corn-syrup, eat a good amount of protein from milk, fish eggs etc and then eat shit with lots of fiber so you stay full and don't over-eat and get fat.
ITS THAT FRICKING EASY.
CICO assumes that every human being equally efficient at converting food to energy. We are not. Some are better adapted to famine, while those who can't gain any weight would've died before reproducing in a pre-industrial world.
Did you know most of the mass your body expels is the CO2 from breathing? Where do you think that comes from? You breathe oxygen in, then oxidize fuel and the byproduct is CO2. Your body uses CO2 as a hormone to regulate blood oxygen level, then it gets expelled. In case you're moronic, CO2 is a heavier molecule than O2 is, so you are losing weight with every breath you take, if you are properly breathing. Unless you are a fat frick who can't put the fork down.