Men had like 600 - 700 ng/dl test back in 1960s, nothing special really.
The whole "muh men had 1500 test levels 50 years ago" meme is created by TRT and manosphere supplement shills and parroted by morons to make you insecure.
Men had like 600 - 700 ng/dl test back in 1960s, nothing special really.
The whole "muh men had 1500 test levels 50 years ago" meme is created by TRT and manosphere supplement shills and parroted by morons to make you insecure.
Also, high test would make you age LESS fast, not more fast.
Too bad because that's his conclusion
Meanwhile in reality people 50 years ago spent waaaaaaaaay more time outside because there was nothing fun to do indoors and nobody wore sunscreen so of course they aged faster
Gen Z is gonna age amazingly because none of them go outdoors
[...]
His conclusion is that both literal faster aging and superficial presentational factors contribute to the perception.
He even specifically mentions sunscreen as one of the most significant individual factors.
So does sunscreen have a significant effect after all? reddit has a hate boner for sunscreen, saying it either does nothing or "It just makes you look like a healthier version of your age, it doesn't make you look younger"
you can see literal side by sides of twins, one who wore sunscreen and one who didn't
sun damage fricks you up, it's just literal smoothbrains who don't see it happening immediately who think otherwise
sunscreen won't make you look younger, but it will slow you looking older
Sunscreen doesn't de-age you, it prevents the sun from aging you as much. Mind you, it isn't as good as just not going out in the sun. You might be surprised just how much of apparent age is simply a measure of skin quality (especially tightness/elasticity). That's how come people in vietnam who work outside their whole life can look 160 at 80.
There's a video does the rounds now and then showing a young-ish pilot experiencing high g force and sagging all her facial features. She literally appears to age a few decades in seconds. The sun fricks up your skin, causing it to wrinkle and sag. More sunscreen = less of that.
How old would a 40 year old look if they spent all the time after high school graduation inside their bedroom, curtains shut?
7 months ago
Anonymous
we'll find out in about 20 years
7 months ago
Anonymous
depends how they ate
7 months ago
Anonymous
What if they eat well
7 months ago
Anonymous
then they'll look terrible
7 months ago
Anonymous
ashy as frick because you're gonna be low vitamin d and malnourished with little to no bloodflow to the face
7 months ago
Anonymous
Probably pretty shit unless (1) they regularly took vitamin D supplements and (2) got 30+ minutes of exercise everyday
I went full NEET mode this year and my skin actually looked like a corpse's because I lacked the above 2 things
Skin damage is cumulative. Any time spent with unhealthy skin is damage that is going to age you. Basically to "agemaxx" or whatever you need to maximize the health of your skin on a day to day basis, minimize time outside, & use sunscreen whenever you do go out.
7 months ago
Anonymous
skin just needs microneedling, niacin, vitamin c and enough protein
gradate your sun exposure so your skin doesn't get a straight sear. no need for sunscreen
7 months ago
Anonymous
Im 39 and I regularly pass for 25.
If I have a hat on and you can't see my grey hair, i'll get carded.
Sunscreen doesn't de-age you, it prevents the sun from aging you as much. Mind you, it isn't as good as just not going out in the sun. You might be surprised just how much of apparent age is simply a measure of skin quality (especially tightness/elasticity). That's how come people in vietnam who work outside their whole life can look 160 at 80.
There's a video does the rounds now and then showing a young-ish pilot experiencing high g force and sagging all her facial features. She literally appears to age a few decades in seconds. The sun fricks up your skin, causing it to wrinkle and sag. More sunscreen = less of that.
moronic. Sunlight "filtered through" glass obviously doesn't "lack red". Which you would realise if you thought about it for a femtosecond as when looking through glass you can - you know - see red.
Even if it did (or more reasonably, filtered infra-red). That would be subtractive - fewer photons of a given energy level are getting through, be they red, blue, UV, whatever. So how would this filtered light have more "blue light" toxicity than normal sunlight, which contains all the same wavelengths and more. Answer is: this is a load of bollocks.
To the extent that blue light is harmful, it is to eyes not skin (hence why your computing devices now come with a nifty built-in blue light filter, which you should try if you haven't). UV is the light that damages skin, which just so happens to be the light which sunscreen is opaque to.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>To the extent that blue light is harmful, it is to eyes not skin (hence why your computing devices now come with a nifty built-in blue light filter, which you should try if you haven't).
Oh how little you know. The blue spectrum of light is not harmful to eyes. The blue wavelength is loosely correlated with wakefulness, and thus some people use blue light filters from help trick their minds into letting them get tired enough at night to sleep despite continuing to use devices late at night.
Personally, I hate the filters and find them to be stressful on my eyeballs. Less light via lower brightness with good contrast, or even partially translucent black filters, is orders of magnitude better. Negative 46% brightness ftw.
7 months ago
Anonymous
No sunlight and no artificial light chads stay winningest.
7 months ago
Anonymous
See
https://i.imgur.com/0P5ZhM5.jpg
>bro avoid the sun the thing that gives life to everything in this world
Why are you people so moronic
Stay losing moron
7 months ago
Anonymous
wow man it's like you never rolled your fricking window down.
7 months ago
Anonymous
UVA ages your skin more than pure UV, and it also penetrates through glass more easily.
Islam is the lightweight GOAT btw, frick KWAbib and BlowJob Pennis
you can see literal side by sides of twins, one who wore sunscreen and one who didn't
sun damage fricks you up, it's just literal smoothbrains who don't see it happening immediately who think otherwise
sunscreen won't make you look younger, but it will slow you looking older
What are you Black folk talking about? "wear heckin sunscreen" is like the most reddit position ever. Right up there with "trans rights" and "don't disobey the new world order"
sunscreen is for the beach or when it's literally high noon sun beating down on you.
problem is people started wearing sunscreen for even mild days - coz obviously why wouldn't you?
well reality is putting chemicals on your body in situations they weren't designed for instead leads to nasty side effects.
tl;dr - wear sunscreen at the beach and when playing sports. don't wear it otherwise.
I think this is an underappreciated answer. When we were kids we were outside from the morning until it got dark almost all summer. There wasn’t much to do inside the house besides watch tv. I’m sure being in the sun is part of it. I still think the average guy had more masculine faces back then. And while we’re at it, temperament too. Not in a modern ‘masculine’ means being an aggressive dickhead with a bad attitude kind of way but just more mature and serious
Too bad because that's his conclusion
Meanwhile in reality people 50 years ago spent waaaaaaaaay more time outside because there was nothing fun to do indoors and nobody wore sunscreen so of course they aged faster
Gen Z is gonna age amazingly because none of them go outdoors
His conclusion is that both literal faster aging and superficial presentational factors contribute to the perception.
He even specifically mentions sunscreen as one of the most significant individual factors.
1. There’s not way to verify if this info is correct
2. I still see people in their early 20s at my college who have thinning hair and aged faces, they are just dressed in contemporary fashion and have chubbier faces so I don’t see them as that odd.
Yes but to some ugly fat used up b***h that treats him like shit and maybe let him score once every 5-6 months at best until she spawned Subhuman Jr. that made the tweet. At which point you have to ask, is it really worth it?
this guy could have looked something around 25, if not for the >goofy ass too large suit >retro glasses >norwood scale 98932 >moustache >old photographic film
if this was shot on an iPhone, the guy wore todays fashion and had a zoomer instant ramen hairstyle he would have looked normal
Psychologists usually suggest its mostly due to older fashion sense being associated with being old combined with people often being deceived by a cherry picked example and confirmation bias.
Psychologists are moronic and so is anyone who thinks this. It's not a tiny or cherry-picked sample, there's countless fricking examples and it applies to all ages; the average 70 year old of today doesn't look much like the hunched-over, white-haired, wrinkly archetypal image.
But yeah, the cherry-picked thing is bullshit. There's millions of people who have been preserved through video. Watch random videos from the 80s and 90s and most adults of any given age will look older than today. There's several reasons for it. Pinning it all on fashion is just so depressingly, exhaustingly, thuddingly stupid.
They literally just had different style that we associate with being older. I know plenty of norwood 3 20 year olds. Slap a suit and some thick framed glasses on them and you'd say GEE WILIKERS this man looks 40!
Smoking
Wearing clothes of their era which we associate with old age
Putting zero effort into skin care
Spending more time outside
Shitty camera quality
High DHT (smoking)
People now have less testosterone
High test, same reason why women in older pictures all had way stronger jaws.
Men had like 600 - 700 ng/dl test back in 1960s, nothing special really.
The whole "muh men had 1500 test levels 50 years ago" meme is created by TRT and manosphere supplement shills and parroted by morons to make you insecure.
you sound fake and gay. test levels have been dropping due to all the gay bullshit in food and drinks
>posts a study of 14 asian guys
lmao you disingenuous little homosexual
occidentals are whites dipshit
Also, high test would make you age LESS fast, not more fast.
>high test would make you age LESS fast
No.
Nopes
Higher test makes you more masculine which the modern effeminate "male" misconstrues as looking old.
Hard work and exercise.
lindyman says it's because they drink more water.
The vsauce video on this subject is well worth the watch.
Only if the conclusion of the video is "Yes, they looked older." No "They just wore more mature clothes" nonsense
Too bad because that's his conclusion
Meanwhile in reality people 50 years ago spent waaaaaaaaay more time outside because there was nothing fun to do indoors and nobody wore sunscreen so of course they aged faster
Gen Z is gonna age amazingly because none of them go outdoors
So does sunscreen have a significant effect after all? reddit has a hate boner for sunscreen, saying it either does nothing or "It just makes you look like a healthier version of your age, it doesn't make you look younger"
you can see literal side by sides of twins, one who wore sunscreen and one who didn't
sun damage fricks you up, it's just literal smoothbrains who don't see it happening immediately who think otherwise
sunscreen won't make you look younger, but it will slow you looking older
How old would a 40 year old look if they spent all the time after high school graduation inside their bedroom, curtains shut?
we'll find out in about 20 years
depends how they ate
What if they eat well
then they'll look terrible
ashy as frick because you're gonna be low vitamin d and malnourished with little to no bloodflow to the face
Probably pretty shit unless (1) they regularly took vitamin D supplements and (2) got 30+ minutes of exercise everyday
I went full NEET mode this year and my skin actually looked like a corpse's because I lacked the above 2 things
Skin damage is cumulative. Any time spent with unhealthy skin is damage that is going to age you. Basically to "agemaxx" or whatever you need to maximize the health of your skin on a day to day basis, minimize time outside, & use sunscreen whenever you do go out.
skin just needs microneedling, niacin, vitamin c and enough protein
gradate your sun exposure so your skin doesn't get a straight sear. no need for sunscreen
Im 39 and I regularly pass for 25.
If I have a hat on and you can't see my grey hair, i'll get carded.
Sunscreen doesn't de-age you, it prevents the sun from aging you as much. Mind you, it isn't as good as just not going out in the sun. You might be surprised just how much of apparent age is simply a measure of skin quality (especially tightness/elasticity). That's how come people in vietnam who work outside their whole life can look 160 at 80.
There's a video does the rounds now and then showing a young-ish pilot experiencing high g force and sagging all her facial features. She literally appears to age a few decades in seconds. The sun fricks up your skin, causing it to wrinkle and sag. More sunscreen = less of that.
Disingenuous image
moronic. Sunlight "filtered through" glass obviously doesn't "lack red". Which you would realise if you thought about it for a femtosecond as when looking through glass you can - you know - see red.
Even if it did (or more reasonably, filtered infra-red). That would be subtractive - fewer photons of a given energy level are getting through, be they red, blue, UV, whatever. So how would this filtered light have more "blue light" toxicity than normal sunlight, which contains all the same wavelengths and more. Answer is: this is a load of bollocks.
To the extent that blue light is harmful, it is to eyes not skin (hence why your computing devices now come with a nifty built-in blue light filter, which you should try if you haven't). UV is the light that damages skin, which just so happens to be the light which sunscreen is opaque to.
>To the extent that blue light is harmful, it is to eyes not skin (hence why your computing devices now come with a nifty built-in blue light filter, which you should try if you haven't).
Oh how little you know. The blue spectrum of light is not harmful to eyes. The blue wavelength is loosely correlated with wakefulness, and thus some people use blue light filters from help trick their minds into letting them get tired enough at night to sleep despite continuing to use devices late at night.
Personally, I hate the filters and find them to be stressful on my eyeballs. Less light via lower brightness with good contrast, or even partially translucent black filters, is orders of magnitude better. Negative 46% brightness ftw.
No sunlight and no artificial light chads stay winningest.
See
Stay losing moron
wow man it's like you never rolled your fricking window down.
UVA ages your skin more than pure UV, and it also penetrates through glass more easily.
Islam is the lightweight GOAT btw, frick KWAbib and BlowJob Pennis
Left side: truckin'
Right side: suckin' and frickin'
What are you Black folk talking about? "wear heckin sunscreen" is like the most reddit position ever. Right up there with "trans rights" and "don't disobey the new world order"
I‘m so glad your kind of moron is gettibg filtered out of the gene pool because you don’t realize the importance of looksmaxxing.
sunscreen is for the beach or when it's literally high noon sun beating down on you.
problem is people started wearing sunscreen for even mild days - coz obviously why wouldn't you?
well reality is putting chemicals on your body in situations they weren't designed for instead leads to nasty side effects.
tl;dr - wear sunscreen at the beach and when playing sports. don't wear it otherwise.
Probably a lot of Gen Z will age well, but obesity is will make most of them age like shit.
I think this is an underappreciated answer. When we were kids we were outside from the morning until it got dark almost all summer. There wasn’t much to do inside the house besides watch tv. I’m sure being in the sun is part of it. I still think the average guy had more masculine faces back then. And while we’re at it, temperament too. Not in a modern ‘masculine’ means being an aggressive dickhead with a bad attitude kind of way but just more mature and serious
His conclusion is that both literal faster aging and superficial presentational factors contribute to the perception.
He even specifically mentions sunscreen as one of the most significant individual factors.
It has to be the clothes and hair.
This was Sid Vicious at 21 in the 1978.
Definitely looks like a 21 year old. Maybe even a little younger.
1. There’s not way to verify if this info is correct
2. I still see people in their early 20s at my college who have thinning hair and aged faces, they are just dressed in contemporary fashion and have chubbier faces so I don’t see them as that odd.
>that hairline at 21
Grim
He still "achieved" cooming inside a hole.
Yes but to some ugly fat used up b***h that treats him like shit and maybe let him score once every 5-6 months at best until she spawned Subhuman Jr. that made the tweet. At which point you have to ask, is it really worth it?
didnt matter.
back then you could look like shit and get girls because they were limited to the men in their small town
lead poisoning
leaded gasoline needs to make a comeback.
>bro avoid the sun the thing that gives life to everything in this world
Why are you people so moronic
it's an underground race of cave people spreading their propaganda
this guy could have looked something around 25, if not for the
>goofy ass too large suit
>retro glasses
>norwood scale 98932
>moustache
>old photographic film
if this was shot on an iPhone, the guy wore todays fashion and had a zoomer instant ramen hairstyle he would have looked normal
because they dressed better.
Psychologists usually suggest its mostly due to older fashion sense being associated with being old combined with people often being deceived by a cherry picked example and confirmation bias.
Psychologists are moronic and so is anyone who thinks this. It's not a tiny or cherry-picked sample, there's countless fricking examples and it applies to all ages; the average 70 year old of today doesn't look much like the hunched-over, white-haired, wrinkly archetypal image.
But yeah, the cherry-picked thing is bullshit. There's millions of people who have been preserved through video. Watch random videos from the 80s and 90s and most adults of any given age will look older than today. There's several reasons for it. Pinning it all on fashion is just so depressingly, exhaustingly, thuddingly stupid.
old people clothes, old people style, and leaner faces. Being fat makes you look younger despite making you look shitty
They literally just had different style that we associate with being older. I know plenty of norwood 3 20 year olds. Slap a suit and some thick framed glasses on them and you'd say GEE WILIKERS this man looks 40!
how are people norwood 3 at 20
bad luck
>t. was NW 3 at 20
smoking and alcohol
Just get fillers like all the hoes on ig do.
Stop caring about trying to look young. Care about looking handsome
Britons circa 1970 had to be the hardest aging people in human history
LONDON
O
N
D
O
N
This guy looks like shit and somehow he managed to score.
Because that’s how old people look today
In 1970, this man would be considered a teenager
malnourished Data
alex jones was right about the ~~*vampires*~~ among other things
Smoking
Wearing clothes of their era which we associate with old age
Putting zero effort into skin care
Spending more time outside
Shitty camera quality
Unregulated companies. Pumping poison into everything. Lead paint. Asbestos, whatever that fricked up plastic was that they recently fixed. Pesticides