It's because excess carbs are responsible for cancer, diabetes, fatty liver, schizophrenia, gyno, and numerous other health problems. Those world populations who follow a ketogenic diet have proven to have the best longevity
Studies on glycogen depletion actually show people who eat carbs lose their glycogen faster. This is a result of eating carbs raising insulin, which blocks fatty acid metabolism. Then the muscle has to run 100% on carbs which causes rapid glycogen depletion.
People do a lot of stupid things just because they are copying other people. It takes a long time for people to change habits in light of new information.
That's not why. >Those world populations who follow a ketogenic diet have proven to have the best longevity
Okay, name one.
The reason why he tells people to quit eating carbs is because elevated insulin levels cause hunger.
You're both wrong
Also the a sweet potato thing was basically mainly because the mainland basically stole all their food for the war effort. This "diet" that tards tried to make a big deal out of only existed for like 15 years and most of them returned to more varied diets as soon as they could.
I watched the first episode of that netflix vegan propaganda show on the supposed 'blue zones'. It was Okinawa. The vegan shill tried to get a woman to say eating potatoes made them live longer. It was a funny moment for anyone who knows what he was doing. She refused to say anything other than potatoes got them through a period of starvation. Clearly they don't revere potatoes like vegan mythology claims.
>What’s clear is that the real Okinawan longevity diet is an embarrassment to modern diet gurus. The diet was and is greasy and good, with the largest proportion of calories coming from pork and pork fat, and many additional calories from fish; those who reach old age eat more animal protein and fat than those who don’t.
https://nourishingtraditions.com/true-blue-zones-okinawa/
Same for Greek/Cretan diet, another blue zone. It's a high fat/high protein diet really (think Greek yogurt, copius amount of cheese) and actually the only times meat is consumed in moderation is through war and other tough times
Vegans lie about the Okinawan diet constantly. See:
https://i.imgur.com/ZAuXQDA.png
I watched the first episode of that netflix vegan propaganda show on the supposed 'blue zones'. It was Okinawa. The vegan shill tried to get a woman to say eating potatoes made them live longer. It was a funny moment for anyone who knows what he was doing. She refused to say anything other than potatoes got them through a period of starvation. Clearly they don't revere potatoes like vegan mythology claims.
>What’s clear is that the real Okinawan longevity diet is an embarrassment to modern diet gurus. The diet was and is greasy and good, with the largest proportion of calories coming from pork and pork fat, and many additional calories from fish; those who reach old age eat more animal protein and fat than those who don’t.
https://nourishingtraditions.com/true-blue-zones-okinawa/
>Those world populations who follow a ketogenic diet have proven to have the best longevity
Source: Your gaping butthole. Countries with the highest life spans are all Asian countries who consume a metric frick ton of rice and noodles. Blue Zones all consume a bunch of carbs including beans and whole grain bread. What your shining example of a keto country? Mongolia?
Their greatest issue is diet adherence, and no carbs makes it easier.
You can be more efficient with a few carbs, but if you open that door to the fatties that are his clients, they'll never stick to their carb amount.
Instead going no carb is slightly harder on the body than being optimal, but it's no big deal, and it's easier to stick to the diet.
because they need to stop shoveling fries pizza chips and ice cream into their fat gullets so he just says carbs
if his patients had a broccoli addiction they wouldnt be 600 lbs
Both are 300 something per 100 g when dry. This isn't extremely calorie dense, but not negligible either. Again, these are gluttons with stomachs stretched so much, they could reasonably eat something like 500 grams of rice with 300 grams of beans, that's 2500-3000 kcal.
>Both are 300 something per 100 g when dry.
Nobody eats either dry. Didn't read the rest of your post. Rice and beans are around 200 a cup cooked. They arent caloric.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Nobody eats either dry
You weigh it dry before cooking, low IQ Anon.
You'd think so. I had my blood tests done a couple months ago after losing nearly 50kg over the past two year. They came out pretty good, with my cholesterol being a bit higher than when I started out dieting, and my fat slob (though very nice) doctor had the gall to tell me I need to watch that.
Doctors are all suicidal. Smoking is more common in doctors than the average population. After witnessing so much human fragility first hand they internally come to the conclusion that you could die at any moment anyway and stop caring.
They also tend to overindulge due to positive feedback with their habits.
They have seen some shit, have to work long hours and get called in a short notice, might as well live a little and binge on half a dozen of donuts, some alcohol or cigs
I did the same binging when I had to work overtime for about a year, yet and all I did was deal with normies in the office, can’t imagine dealing with the gruesome depressing shit they see weekly
After seeing the sacrifices my FIL had to go through I understood why they tend to be unhealthy.
Their career is the longest and one of the most thankless, many don’t make it to the end unless you are willing to focus every moment of your time towards your education if you don’t have the luxury of having family or contacts inside, FIL had to juggle 3 jobs to sustain his education and the result was close to a decade of 4-5 hour sleep nights, shit food when out of the house, having to miss out on family time and of course tobacco and alcohol. All of it including the stress of the job resulted in aging 10 years and diabetes, only workaholics manage to get through the normie filter, and those tend to forego their health during their younger years.
Not for the rest of their life dumbass.
He means for the moment.
Because carbs==water retention
these people have to lose as much weight as possible in the shortest amount of time possible.
Which means no carbs. because you'll lose 10% of your body weight in the first month if you cut out carbs entirely simply by not having the sugar==electrolyte connection that causes water retention.
It's pretty moronic advice, all in all. You're talking to terminal degenerates that probably consumes half a kilogram of pure sugar per day as a baseline, if not a whole kilo. Good luck making them quit all carbs cold turkey. Might as well tell that to a heroin addict.
Notice that Dr Now is a fatfrick too, just not lmao tier like the absolute units he gives his shitty advice to. Bet he didn't live a single day without carbs himself. This is why you should never take advice from out of shape doctors. They don't know shit and every textbook advice is not actually grounded in reality.
>NO CARBS
or >well actually you can eat a small amount of carbs, like 50 grams of pasta for dinner. >you could even have a chocolate bar if you didn't eat carbs for lunch
these fat fricks don't have any self discipline so the second isn't gonna work
>no heroin, enjoy your deadly withdrawal
or >progressively smaller doses
Guess which actually works, then ask yourself what are the chances that a 600 lbs monster sticks to going down from a kilogram of sugar to no sugar.
heroin isn't the same as carbohydrates moron
If they can get through a couple weeks of zero carb then it is way easier
If you actually tried it you would know this like everyone saying this ITT
It is WAY easier, your cravings melt away. You don't want junk food at all. I am a huge junk food addict and for me I know its just what I gotta do. I can't let myself indulge at all because I'll blow the whole thing and balloon up.
Its easy when you eat no carbs. Its hard when you eat some carbs. I've tried both for long periods. Just my experience and seems like a pretty common sentiment in people who have actually tried it.
He has to say that because carb-eaters are deranged, if he told them to eat less carbs they'd probably keep gorging on rice and GMO fruit because they're "healthy". You don't tell a smoker that smoking one cigarette a week is ok, you tell them they need to quit forever. Same thing, really.
Carbs are addictive and if someone has become fat you can guarantee they are an addict. I am pretty sure he genuinely wants them to quit all carbs so their cravings go away.
Greatest chance of success for weight loss is on zero carb.
You can't get addicted to water. You can get addicted to alcohol.
You can't get addicted to protein or fat. You can get addicted to carbs.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Nothing I said was wrong
5 months ago
Anonymous
People with addictive personalities can't get addicted to everything. It's specifically things which raise dopamine, like sugar/carbs.
And with the obesity rates I would argue most people can get addicted to carbs.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Nothing I said was wrong
5 months ago
Anonymous
>And with the obesity rates I would argue most people can get addicted to carbs.
You could argue people can get addicted to junk food which would be more accurate. Nobody is out there binging on apples and whole grain bread
5 months ago
Anonymous
I binge on plain oats with nothing added to them.
Grains are fattening. They feed grains to animals to fatten them.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>I binge
Yeah well then your viewpoint is irrelevant idk what you want me to say
5 months ago
Anonymous
How so?
5 months ago
Anonymous
Did you me to respond to me?
5 months ago
Anonymous
>They feed grains to animals to fatten them
Yeah nothing else goes into that equation like the animals being immobile or them not having access to their natural high fiber diet or anything like that. But its typical you'd say that. People try to reduce things down to a single factor. Its just incoherent and wrong.
Cause it just frickin works
This has been known to work for centuries
modern "nutritionists" and "epidemiologists" think they've got it all figured out from their big useless grasping at straws food frequency questionnaires etc, but doctors from CENTURIES ago published literature about treating obesity with an all meat diet essentially.
Its laughable honestly
Now first thing before you start calling me all sorts of names, know I'm not going to stick around this thread to read your autistic screeching, and secondly no you do not have to eat this way to lose weight or accomplish any certain goal, but it frickin works. Indisputable. Ask anyone who has tried it for a meaningful amount of time. Thirdly, lick my balls.
fat unhealthy morons don't understand how to formulate an actual healthy, sustainable long-term diet so their "cheat code" is always to just massively cut down on carbs
my father has been doing the same thing for a decade and he's still obese and diabetic but every 2 years he can show us how he drops 40 lbs and we are supposed to be impressed
Most of his patients are at the very least pre-diabetic i imagine. Cutting down on carbs is the only way to stop constant insulin release, wich will overtime worsen the condition.
Everyone who is fat suffers from hyperinsulinemia. A lot of his patients surprisingly don't have diabetes. People who are able to grow that much adipose tissue can avoid type 2 diabetes.
You post this shit in every diet related thread? You didn't respond to me when I BTFO your moronic argument. Why do you keep spamming it if you know you're wrong?
I'm not rehashing because I don't feel like digging up the studies again, but it came down to insulin resistance which is caused by energy toxicity. So, excess calories > excess glucose > pancreas pumps out more insulin > cells become insulin resistant > hyperinsulinemia > Obesity/Cardiovascular disease/Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/Metabolic syndrome.
Most effective way to reverse insulin sensitivity? Lowered calorie intake, followed by exercise, and then ample sleep.
I don't care what this single (not reproduced) study on mice has to say, there are a million other studies (that you will ignore) that show positive results (lowered a1c, lowered cholesterol, lowered insulin resistance) with simple caloric restriction.
I did keto for a long time and lost weight. But it wasn't until I plateaued and started counting my calories that made me realize I was eating at a deficit the whole time. You don't realize it because you're eating super filling and satiating meals.
The best diet is one you can stick to. And the vast majority of people can't stick to keto for longer than a few months (if they're even doing it right to begin with).
I'm not rehashing because I don't feel like digging up the studies again, but it came down to insulin resistance which is caused by energy toxicity. So, excess calories > excess glucose > pancreas pumps out more insulin > cells become insulin resistant > hyperinsulinemia > Obesity/Cardiovascular disease/Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/Metabolic syndrome.
Most effective way to reverse insulin sensitivity? Lowered calorie intake, followed by exercise, and then ample sleep.
I don't care what this single (not reproduced) study on mice has to say, there are a million other studies (that you will ignore) that show positive results (lowered a1c, lowered cholesterol, lowered insulin resistance) with simple caloric restriction.
I did keto for a long time and lost weight. But it wasn't until I plateaued and started counting my calories that made me realize I was eating at a deficit the whole time. You don't realize it because you're eating super filling and satiating meals.
The best diet is one you can stick to. And the vast majority of people can't stick to keto for longer than a few months (if they're even doing it right to begin with).
It's because excess carbs are responsible for cancer, diabetes, fatty liver, schizophrenia, gyno, and numerous other health problems. Those world populations who follow a ketogenic diet have proven to have the best longevity
yeah that's why olympians don't eat carbs. damn you're fricking moronic lol
Studies on glycogen depletion actually show people who eat carbs lose their glycogen faster. This is a result of eating carbs raising insulin, which blocks fatty acid metabolism. Then the muscle has to run 100% on carbs which causes rapid glycogen depletion.
People do a lot of stupid things just because they are copying other people. It takes a long time for people to change habits in light of new information.
maybe if you only eat nothing but simple carbs
moxyte discord group raid
even if you believe in CICO carbs are bad just for the mere fact that they are so fricking tasty and you can easily eat a lot in a single setting.
That's not why.
>Those world populations who follow a ketogenic diet have proven to have the best longevity
Okay, name one.
The reason why he tells people to quit eating carbs is because elevated insulin levels cause hunger.
>Okinawans who eat primarily fish and only carb source is rice have the longest life spans on earth
Checkmate carbtard
>fish
That was different back then lad, now fish is full of plastic
a diet with rice is not carb free and also okinawans eat yams i'm pretty sure which is another carb moron
You're both wrong
Also the a sweet potato thing was basically mainly because the mainland basically stole all their food for the war effort. This "diet" that tards tried to make a big deal out of only existed for like 15 years and most of them returned to more varied diets as soon as they could.
I watched the first episode of that netflix vegan propaganda show on the supposed 'blue zones'. It was Okinawa. The vegan shill tried to get a woman to say eating potatoes made them live longer. It was a funny moment for anyone who knows what he was doing. She refused to say anything other than potatoes got them through a period of starvation. Clearly they don't revere potatoes like vegan mythology claims.
>What’s clear is that the real Okinawan longevity diet is an embarrassment to modern diet gurus. The diet was and is greasy and good, with the largest proportion of calories coming from pork and pork fat, and many additional calories from fish; those who reach old age eat more animal protein and fat than those who don’t.
https://nourishingtraditions.com/true-blue-zones-okinawa/
Same for Greek/Cretan diet, another blue zone. It's a high fat/high protein diet really (think Greek yogurt, copius amount of cheese) and actually the only times meat is consumed in moderation is through war and other tough times
>nourishing traditions
>people in ketosis who don'e eat any carbs have longest lifespans
>just look at those people who are not in ketosis and eat carbs
mental illness
Okinawans are famous for eating a shitload of sweet potatoes/yams actually but go off moron-kun
Vegans lie about the Okinawan diet constantly. See:
okinawa life expectancy isn't even that great by japanese standards. middle of the road prefecture,
>Okay, name one
Sardinia
>Sardinia
>Ketogenic
LMFAO we eat tons of carbs
The entirety of Asia disagrees
Its like you didn't even read his comment
the entirety of asia is the 3rd world
South Korea is first world with first world problems
>Those world populations who follow a ketogenic diet have proven to have the best longevity
Source: Your gaping butthole. Countries with the highest life spans are all Asian countries who consume a metric frick ton of rice and noodles. Blue Zones all consume a bunch of carbs including beans and whole grain bread. What your shining example of a keto country? Mongolia?
>Those world populations who follow a ketogenic diet have proven to have the best longevity
That's weird because there literally aren't any
carbs are just sugar
in any excess it just turns to fat
simple as
Guess what excess protein turns into anon?
Same shit with fat, though in a much lower ratio.
pee
Their greatest issue is diet adherence, and no carbs makes it easier.
You can be more efficient with a few carbs, but if you open that door to the fatties that are his clients, they'll never stick to their carb amount.
Instead going no carb is slightly harder on the body than being optimal, but it's no big deal, and it's easier to stick to the diet.
Because he's talking to some 400 lbs sack of shit that needs to be broken of their food addiction by force
because they need to stop shoveling fries pizza chips and ice cream into their fat gullets so he just says carbs
if his patients had a broccoli addiction they wouldnt be 600 lbs
>fries pizza chips and ice cream
All of them are mostly fats
>they need to stop shoveling fries pizza chips and ice cream into their fat gullets so he just says carbs
"No rice, no beans."
He's beyond any doubt telling them to stop eating all carbs.
Both are pretty caloric so I get it. Keep in mind these people would probably eat a kilogram of sugar covered rice or some shit if you let them.
>rice and beans are caloric
In what world
Both are 300 something per 100 g when dry. This isn't extremely calorie dense, but not negligible either. Again, these are gluttons with stomachs stretched so much, they could reasonably eat something like 500 grams of rice with 300 grams of beans, that's 2500-3000 kcal.
>Both are 300 something per 100 g when dry.
Nobody eats either dry. Didn't read the rest of your post. Rice and beans are around 200 a cup cooked. They arent caloric.
>Nobody eats either dry
You weigh it dry before cooking, low IQ Anon.
>Both are 300 something per 100 g when dry
Irrelevant
>500 grams of rice with 300 grams of beans, that's 2500-3000 kcal.
Nice try
>2500-3000 kcal for 500g rice plus 500g beans
Not even if pigs could fly
Its actually way more
You are actually lying because yoga re using dry weight and people do not eat dry beans and rice. Stop lying online.
Does water remove calories?
You missed the part where
>Nobody eats either dry.
They swell when you cook them. Stop trying to weasel your way out of being wrong.
See above. It swells the food, causing it take to more space and gain volune. The cooked weight is with the water included. You are objectively wrong.
Oh really?
Yes
>quora
We get it, you dont lift. You are still wrong
Post body
You got owned just admit defeat man
So you're admitting defeat?
Yes I accept your concession
i prefer quinoa
in fat people's world it means refried beans with cheese on top
Shouldn't he start with himself?
>Be the change you want to see
Why are most doctors so unfit? Shouldn't they know better?
You'd think so. I had my blood tests done a couple months ago after losing nearly 50kg over the past two year. They came out pretty good, with my cholesterol being a bit higher than when I started out dieting, and my fat slob (though very nice) doctor had the gall to tell me I need to watch that.
Doctors are all suicidal. Smoking is more common in doctors than the average population. After witnessing so much human fragility first hand they internally come to the conclusion that you could die at any moment anyway and stop caring.
>Smoking is more common in doctors than the average population
You made me google that ridiculous claim. Apparently it's true.
They also tend to overindulge due to positive feedback with their habits.
They have seen some shit, have to work long hours and get called in a short notice, might as well live a little and binge on half a dozen of donuts, some alcohol or cigs
I did the same binging when I had to work overtime for about a year, yet and all I did was deal with normies in the office, can’t imagine dealing with the gruesome depressing shit they see weekly
After seeing the sacrifices my FIL had to go through I understood why they tend to be unhealthy.
Their career is the longest and one of the most thankless, many don’t make it to the end unless you are willing to focus every moment of your time towards your education if you don’t have the luxury of having family or contacts inside, FIL had to juggle 3 jobs to sustain his education and the result was close to a decade of 4-5 hour sleep nights, shit food when out of the house, having to miss out on family time and of course tobacco and alcohol. All of it including the stress of the job resulted in aging 10 years and diabetes, only workaholics manage to get through the normie filter, and those tend to forego their health during their younger years.
Not for the rest of their life dumbass.
He means for the moment.
Because carbs==water retention
these people have to lose as much weight as possible in the shortest amount of time possible.
Which means no carbs. because you'll lose 10% of your body weight in the first month if you cut out carbs entirely simply by not having the sugar==electrolyte connection that causes water retention.
Why does Dr now tell type 2 diabetics that want to lose weight to avoid sugar? The question practically answers itself my guy.
Go read a book, Amerifat.
Top fricking kek.
>we looked at 16416 people who consume astronomical amounts of sugar and concluded that some of them didn't have diabetes yet
It's pretty moronic advice, all in all. You're talking to terminal degenerates that probably consumes half a kilogram of pure sugar per day as a baseline, if not a whole kilo. Good luck making them quit all carbs cold turkey. Might as well tell that to a heroin addict.
Notice that Dr Now is a fatfrick too, just not lmao tier like the absolute units he gives his shitty advice to. Bet he didn't live a single day without carbs himself. This is why you should never take advice from out of shape doctors. They don't know shit and every textbook advice is not actually grounded in reality.
>NO CARBS
or
>well actually you can eat a small amount of carbs, like 50 grams of pasta for dinner.
>you could even have a chocolate bar if you didn't eat carbs for lunch
these fat fricks don't have any self discipline so the second isn't gonna work
>no heroin, enjoy your deadly withdrawal
or
>progressively smaller doses
Guess which actually works, then ask yourself what are the chances that a 600 lbs monster sticks to going down from a kilogram of sugar to no sugar.
heroin isn't the same as carbohydrates moron
If they can get through a couple weeks of zero carb then it is way easier
If you actually tried it you would know this like everyone saying this ITT
It is WAY easier, your cravings melt away. You don't want junk food at all. I am a huge junk food addict and for me I know its just what I gotta do. I can't let myself indulge at all because I'll blow the whole thing and balloon up.
Its easy when you eat no carbs. Its hard when you eat some carbs. I've tried both for long periods. Just my experience and seems like a pretty common sentiment in people who have actually tried it.
We're talking about broken 600 lb monsters, moron, not regular people. How would you feel if you didn't have breakfast today?
How come there aren't any obese doctors telling people to carb the frick up?
He doesn’t actually except them to quit all carbs, he’s just hoping they will cut them down
He frequently says no carb/zero carb.
He has to say that because carb-eaters are deranged, if he told them to eat less carbs they'd probably keep gorging on rice and GMO fruit because they're "healthy". You don't tell a smoker that smoking one cigarette a week is ok, you tell them they need to quit forever. Same thing, really.
Carbs are addictive and if someone has become fat you can guarantee they are an addict. I am pretty sure he genuinely wants them to quit all carbs so their cravings go away.
Greatest chance of success for weight loss is on zero carb.
>Carbs are addictive
No they aren't. People have addictive personalities
You can't get addicted to water. You can get addicted to alcohol.
You can't get addicted to protein or fat. You can get addicted to carbs.
Nothing I said was wrong
People with addictive personalities can't get addicted to everything. It's specifically things which raise dopamine, like sugar/carbs.
And with the obesity rates I would argue most people can get addicted to carbs.
>And with the obesity rates I would argue most people can get addicted to carbs.
You could argue people can get addicted to junk food which would be more accurate. Nobody is out there binging on apples and whole grain bread
I binge on plain oats with nothing added to them.
Grains are fattening. They feed grains to animals to fatten them.
>I binge
Yeah well then your viewpoint is irrelevant idk what you want me to say
How so?
Did you me to respond to me?
>They feed grains to animals to fatten them
Yeah nothing else goes into that equation like the animals being immobile or them not having access to their natural high fiber diet or anything like that. But its typical you'd say that. People try to reduce things down to a single factor. Its just incoherent and wrong.
by far the worst poster on this board
>GMO fruit
like what?
inb4 selective breeding is "gmo"
Why would you take health advice from a bald sack of shit like him?
Cause it just frickin works
This has been known to work for centuries
modern "nutritionists" and "epidemiologists" think they've got it all figured out from their big useless grasping at straws food frequency questionnaires etc, but doctors from CENTURIES ago published literature about treating obesity with an all meat diet essentially.
Its laughable honestly
Now first thing before you start calling me all sorts of names, know I'm not going to stick around this thread to read your autistic screeching, and secondly no you do not have to eat this way to lose weight or accomplish any certain goal, but it frickin works. Indisputable. Ask anyone who has tried it for a meaningful amount of time. Thirdly, lick my balls.
I appreciate these threads keeping ketoschizo contained to one place
fat unhealthy morons don't understand how to formulate an actual healthy, sustainable long-term diet so their "cheat code" is always to just massively cut down on carbs
my father has been doing the same thing for a decade and he's still obese and diabetic but every 2 years he can show us how he drops 40 lbs and we are supposed to be impressed
I haven't even read the thread but I bet the grainheads and the carb-addicted lunatics are seething
Low-carb and keto diets are good shock therapy for obese pigs but bad for anyone who isn't a hambeast
How so?
photoshopped
Because he is talking to 600 lb people who deep fry chicken in their bed. Yes the bed they hold the fry daddy between their legs.
?si=CEtE5y0UboESIHgT
Most of his patients are at the very least pre-diabetic i imagine. Cutting down on carbs is the only way to stop constant insulin release, wich will overtime worsen the condition.
Everyone who is fat suffers from hyperinsulinemia. A lot of his patients surprisingly don't have diabetes. People who are able to grow that much adipose tissue can avoid type 2 diabetes.
Because the carb food sources the 600lbs fatfricks are eating are pizza and hotdogs, not blueberries.
It forces them to eat more protein and veggies.
Because fat people don't understand calories because they're too dumb.
Calories don't cause obesity.
You post this shit in every diet related thread? You didn't respond to me when I BTFO your moronic argument. Why do you keep spamming it if you know you're wrong?
I must not have seen your argument. Post it here.
I'm not rehashing because I don't feel like digging up the studies again, but it came down to insulin resistance which is caused by energy toxicity. So, excess calories > excess glucose > pancreas pumps out more insulin > cells become insulin resistant > hyperinsulinemia > Obesity/Cardiovascular disease/Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/Metabolic syndrome.
Most effective way to reverse insulin sensitivity? Lowered calorie intake, followed by exercise, and then ample sleep.
I don't care what this single (not reproduced) study on mice has to say, there are a million other studies (that you will ignore) that show positive results (lowered a1c, lowered cholesterol, lowered insulin resistance) with simple caloric restriction.
I did keto for a long time and lost weight. But it wasn't until I plateaued and started counting my calories that made me realize I was eating at a deficit the whole time. You don't realize it because you're eating super filling and satiating meals.
The best diet is one you can stick to. And the vast majority of people can't stick to keto for longer than a few months (if they're even doing it right to begin with).
>says nothing
>claims to btfo some argument
>refuses to explain
]
I was busy.