Would this work?

I like higher rep high intensity workouts. The mind muscle connection is so much better, the pump is insane, and I just feel great absolutely obliterating the muscles.

I was thinking instead of doing some count for reps, mentally giving up before I'm truly at failure...I would instead just count sets. Every set would be high intensity and to failure. And when the weight feels light I just up it a bit. Is this a bad game plan?

Your muscles have no way of telling how much weight they are lifting, they aren't smart, they just know they are getting worked hard ya know what I mean?

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've been doing sets for time. Almost like a tabata style session for a few weeks now and I really like it. So far 40sec w/ 20 rest has been where I really feel like I'm getting the most bang for the buck. Just don't try and hammer out reps, focus on good form and steady effort.

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    intensity is weight. full stop.

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    As long as you reach failure, you're all good I think.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't that what most people do anyway? WHo stops at 10 reps just because thats what you had in mind before hand even if you feel like you can do a lot more? Unless you are on some powerlifting pogram doing submaximal stuff.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      95% of the people at the gym don’t even know what a RPE 10 rep to actual failure feels like

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    One thing I do for OHP which you might like, is I start at or a bit above my 3RM, do 3 reps of that, then drop the weight by 5lbs, do 3 reps, drop the weight by 5lbs again and do 3 reps, and continue this until I'm at absolute babby weight - typically 95lbs. Trying to get through it as quick as possible.
    I do this once a week and I think it has actually killed my gains, but it's fun. You could try something similar I guess.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why would a classic technique like pyramid sets that Arnold himself spoke highly of kill your gains

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        arnold was juiced to the gills, what works for roidtrannies doesn't necessarily work for natties

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          True but working a muscle is still working a muscle

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            right but doing that can frick with your recovery, no natty would be able to make proper gains long term if they say followed the routines of these bodybuilders that would exercise 2x a day

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah but nobody mentioned doing two a days

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm the anon who does those big dropsets, and I do two-a-days.

                Dropsets are low volume and don’t push any growth by themselves. Good to do at the end of a workout before a deloading week but other than that circumstance, ll it does is give you a pump and raise heart a bit to burn some extra calories but not high enough for cardio.

                3x10 35lbs = 3x15x35
                1050 total

                Dropset assuming you max out at 12 reps every time
                1x12 35lbs = 420
                1x12 25lbs = 300
                1x12 15lbs = 180
                900 total

                Dropsets are more time efficient but it doesn’t matter when you push your muscle to absolute fatigue and destroy your workload for the rest of the workout and if you do them too consistently the fatigue starts to carry into other workouts.

                TL;DR. Absolute fatigue bad except in see [...]. Picking reasonable weight with a reasonable rep scheme is almost always superior.

                I'm basically going
                3x155
                3x150
                3x145
                .
                .
                .
                3x95
                With practically no rest in between. I think it's pretty high volume.

                Why would a classic technique like pyramid sets that Arnold himself spoke highly of kill your gains

                I'm saying I suspect it does, because since starting doing them, I used to be able to do 140lbs for 10 reps and hit 165 for 2. Now I can only get 135 for 8 and 155 for 3 is pushing it.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Eat more protein, sleep more, you aren't doing your duty.

      • 11 months ago
        I hate w*men

        Dropsets are low volume and don’t push any growth by themselves. Good to do at the end of a workout before a deloading week but other than that circumstance, ll it does is give you a pump and raise heart a bit to burn some extra calories but not high enough for cardio.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          How are drop sets low volume? That literally makes no sense. The whole concept of drop sets is you are doing extra volume

          • 11 months ago
            I hate w*men

            3x10 35lbs = 3x15x35
            1050 total

            Dropset assuming you max out at 12 reps every time
            1x12 35lbs = 420
            1x12 25lbs = 300
            1x12 15lbs = 180
            900 total

            Dropsets are more time efficient but it doesn’t matter when you push your muscle to absolute fatigue and destroy your workload for the rest of the workout and if you do them too consistently the fatigue starts to carry into other workouts.

            TL;DR. Absolute fatigue bad except in see

            Dropsets are low volume and don’t push any growth by themselves. Good to do at the end of a workout before a deloading week but other than that circumstance, ll it does is give you a pump and raise heart a bit to burn some extra calories but not high enough for cardio.

            . Picking reasonable weight with a reasonable rep scheme is almost always superior.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              I guess so but the point of a drop set is to the normal three sets of whatever THEN you after you are cooked you keep going with less weight. That's a lot of extra volume.

              You don't just start dropping weight after set 1 from the start

              • 11 months ago
                I hate w*men

                > I guess so but the point of a drop set is to the normal three sets of whatever THEN you after you are cooked you keep going with less weight
                That’s what I said in my original post.

                > You don't just start dropping weight after set 1 from the start
                That’s what

                One thing I do for OHP which you might like, is I start at or a bit above my 3RM, do 3 reps of that, then drop the weight by 5lbs, do 3 reps, drop the weight by 5lbs again and do 3 reps, and continue this until I'm at absolute babby weight - typically 95lbs. Trying to get through it as quick as possible.
                I do this once a week and I think it has actually killed my gains, but it's fun. You could try something similar I guess.

                ’s post essentially is and why I responded to

                Why would a classic technique like pyramid sets that Arnold himself spoke highly of kill your gains

                with why it isn’t beneficial to do a dropset as the main set. Original dude literally said it killed his gains.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous
          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            So basically everything favors drops sets

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              yes

              You should post the study instead because I have no context to precisely decipher what this graph conveys

              there are multiple studies used in this graphic
              if you can't tell the results from the graphic, the actual studies aren't going to help you

              • 11 months ago
                I hate w*men

                >the actual studies aren't going to help you
                cool

          • 11 months ago
            I hate w*men

            You should post the study instead because I have no context to precisely decipher what this graph conveys

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine fricking her pussy and choking the shit out of her while she looks back at you with those big blue eyes and a beet red face while you have a vibrator planted firmly against her clit. She teeters on the edge of consciousness completely giving you control over her, until you both release in a powerful orgasm. You let go of her neck and share an intense and passionate kiss in the midst of climax. Finally, both spent you lay back on to the bed, cuddled in each other's arms and tell each other how much you love each other and whisper cute things in each other's ears before falling into a deep peaceful sleep together.

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    sex booba sex sex

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      SEEEEXXXOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    ngmi

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    post her feet plox

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Her feet are visible

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I mean soles obvi, toegays are cringe.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Feet gays are something else

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    it’s called programming anon, what do you want endurance or strength

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I want big muscles, that's all

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    this is some truly exceptional hornyposting, anon. I ain't even mad.

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Your muscles have no way of telling how much weight they are lifting, they aren't smart
    they do though
    Heavier weight = more force required

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not the muscle you're targeting though, you will recruit anything possible, including ligaments. Why not drop the weight a bit to really feel and blast the intended muscle?

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't over complicate it. 5 sets per exercise. 8-12 reps. Simple as

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You are setting a mental block when you are capable of more reps. Your body yearns for more pump, I can hear it call out

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        LOL. I'm basing things on hard science aka NCBI. Not "muh bro science!"

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          the "science" changes every month. It's written by nerds who want to get published. The bro's have known all along from intuition and real expierence

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >the "science" changes every month
            Not how it works

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              In two years they will say my method is superior, then what? I expect an apology. Until then I let the soul of maddog, rich piana and zyzz guide my squeeze.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Science is all I care about. That's all there is to it

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Okay Mr. Steinberg

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Who is this prostitute?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      first time using the internet?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I dont watch porn

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I found what works is having defined set/reps and then increasing the weight marginally if I successfully complete them all. Ex: 4 sets, 10/9/8/7 rep scheme. If I successfully complete all 4 go up by 2.5 or 5 lbs total on the exercise using micro plates. If not, continue to push through for additional reps at that weight until complete.

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    just lift lol

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      obviously I'm lifting. Lift up your attitude young man.

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why do b***hes always get those bogged ass lips? Perma duck face does not look good. Completely ruins her aesthetics.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *