The ideal weight for a male who doesn't lift and is average height (5'10) is literally 135lbs. That's around 10% bodyfat. A 5'10 male who lifts and doesn't roid should be about 170lbs max at 10% bodyfat
People who grow up at around 10% have no issues staying there without entering le "starvation" mode.
I've been around 10% since I was a little kid because I didn't have time to eat while playing with the other kids outside (something zoomers will never ever experience) and I grew up to be 6'3 anyway.
A 5'10" man who lifts should be at 180lbs, 12% bodyfat.
A man has no reason to be below 12% bodyfat for sustainable health and aesthetics. A man has no reason to be above 15% bodyfat ever.
I've noticed lifetime natties at 5'10 often are around 180 and look massive
My theory is based on BMI, that most natties top out at around a 26 BMI at low bodyfat
That at around a lean 22 BMI you will look fit and around a lean 24 muscular.
whether people eat 1000 or 4000 calories a day, at some point you will achieve a limit on how many people can be on the earth since we can only produce so much food. The real question is how do we stop the increase in population?
>It doesn't matter how many horses you have pulling the carriage, eventually it doesn't matter and the horses can't pull it faster. We're condemned to never go faster than a horse.
He wasn't really a communist, just a dude who prioritized the planet and its resources over human life and was extremely unapologetic about it. He believed it'd be prudent to deport people from developed countries to developing countries in Africa where they would not consume the same amount of natural resources. He also believed democracy was a mistake and that a dictatorship would be the only way of fulfilling what he had in mind. Closest he got to a Communist was when he dedicated a book he wrote to the Bader-Meinhof terrorist group.
>He believed it'd be prudent to deport people from developed countries to developing countries in Africa where they would not consume the same amount of natural resources. >tfw no pentti tyrant forcing me to take my stake of Africa
he sounds based, but also very sick in the head at the same time. it makes great theory fiction, but nobody should adhere to this man's self-destructive lunacy
He never really had any political aspirations, both because his deep ecology ideas are very very fringe and because he didn't believe in the electoral system.
He just lived in a little cottage out in the woods with very few amenities, spending most of his time tending his property, outdoor activities like bird watching and writing.
There's, like, a video where a Finnish TV guy is asking him some questions about his Africa idea, and asks him if he's fine with doing nothing as the people there starve and die. He says yes, and then sequences into talking about how more people should be sent there to subsist on whatever they can find in Sub-Saharan Africa, and the TV dude almost cries.
Interest is the cause of this. Before there was no "growth market" but instead a market with a mission to keep the economy at a certain level. Always sticking to the slowest possible increase in wealth of the nation. The reason for the exchange to growth was mainly that there was war to be had and each nation wanted to become stronger than their counterparts. The ones driving the wars into fruition is another discussion really. Case and point, the interest economy really fricked us over with some questionable decisions along the way.
He's a moron
A bunch of woods in the middle of nowhere, big deal
And the idea that having nice things make us miserable is stupid. It is lefties like him who are making us miserable due to their social policies.
>Before there was no "growth market" but instead a market with a mission to keep the economy at a certain level. Always sticking to the slowest possible increase in wealth of the nation.
This has never been the policy of anyone anywhere beyond stone age primitives.
BMI means jackshit, accorrding to your shitty graphic I'm overweight at 1.85 weighting 88kg. Only a turbodyel with 0 muscle mass would take this graphic seriously.
I always feel like my arms are disproportionately small compared to my chest (since my torso's weirdly wide, as well as my chest) so that's why I want them bigger.
if he put said 100kg, alright, there's plenty of obeasts of every height that could be culled without losing any productive members of society.
Putting 60 into this statement, however, he's just an extremist midget with a platform
Is he a fricking child, who the frick is a grown adult and weighs less than 132 pounds?
The ideal weight for a male who doesn't lift and is average height (5'10) is literally 135lbs. That's around 10% bodyfat. A 5'10 male who lifts and doesn't roid should be about 170lbs max at 10% bodyfat
thats the ideal wight for a borderline midget
10% bodyfat isn't ideal for most people. Most people would have to be on a starvation diet to maintain 10% while not lifting.
fat fingers typed this
LARPing fingers typed this. Post body immediately. 10% bf automatically makes you one of the leanest dudes in most gyms.
Post body
People who grow up at around 10% have no issues staying there without entering le "starvation" mode.
I've been around 10% since I was a little kid because I didn't have time to eat while playing with the other kids outside (something zoomers will never ever experience) and I grew up to be 6'3 anyway.
A 5'10" man who lifts should be at 180lbs, 12% bodyfat.
A man has no reason to be below 12% bodyfat for sustainable health and aesthetics. A man has no reason to be above 15% bodyfat ever.
that's overweight bmi lol, inb4 etc
BMI doesn't matter when you're jacked, lanklet
Post body you deluded homosexual. This thread is full of DYELs trying to sound hard. Embarrassing
I've noticed lifetime natties at 5'10 often are around 180 and look massive
My theory is based on BMI, that most natties top out at around a 26 BMI at low bodyfat
That at around a lean 22 BMI you will look fit and around a lean 24 muscular.
Wtf, frick no. I'm 5'11" and was skelly mode at 155 lbs. A healthy weight for 5'10" is like 160 lbs.
Imagine being this fricking moronic. You're probably 5'7" bro.
>I have a perfectly healthy and normal weight. Anyone heavier than me is just a fatass.
Anything below 180 is twink mode
Be ashamed of yourself
I'm 6'5 (male height) and never below 215 even when I was a cardiogay
I was 160 with zero muscle mass and negligible fat when i was like 17 years old. 5’11 btw.
U are dumb.
Nah you were def skinny fat. Probably atleast 18% bodyfat. Def didn't have abs. Post body now and prove me wrong. I guarantee you're fat
Shoo shoo gains goblin
>nerd seethes at Chad for the 28,028,274,109,355,475,289th time in human history
Kek. Not only was he Finnish by nationality, he didn't finish growing
He wasn't that short.
My condolences
I'm 190cm if I weigh less than 80kg I'm useless
>sub 60kg
>woman/manlet
>auschwitz
Pick all of them. Im a fricking skeleton at 66kg.
whether people eat 1000 or 4000 calories a day, at some point you will achieve a limit on how many people can be on the earth since we can only produce so much food. The real question is how do we stop the increase in population?
>It doesn't matter how many horses you have pulling the carriage, eventually it doesn't matter and the horses can't pull it faster. We're condemned to never go faster than a horse.
No, the real question is "what is the limit." It is likely many times higher than the current population.
>complaining about people in the world weighing over 132 pounds
these communists really ought to be lined up and shot
He wasn't really a communist, just a dude who prioritized the planet and its resources over human life and was extremely unapologetic about it. He believed it'd be prudent to deport people from developed countries to developing countries in Africa where they would not consume the same amount of natural resources. He also believed democracy was a mistake and that a dictatorship would be the only way of fulfilling what he had in mind. Closest he got to a Communist was when he dedicated a book he wrote to the Bader-Meinhof terrorist group.
>He believed it'd be prudent to deport people from developed countries to developing countries in Africa where they would not consume the same amount of natural resources.
>tfw no pentti tyrant forcing me to take my stake of Africa
he sounds based, but also very sick in the head at the same time. it makes great theory fiction, but nobody should adhere to this man's self-destructive lunacy
He never really had any political aspirations, both because his deep ecology ideas are very very fringe and because he didn't believe in the electoral system.
He just lived in a little cottage out in the woods with very few amenities, spending most of his time tending his property, outdoor activities like bird watching and writing.
There's, like, a video where a Finnish TV guy is asking him some questions about his Africa idea, and asks him if he's fine with doing nothing as the people there starve and die. He says yes, and then sequences into talking about how more people should be sent there to subsist on whatever they can find in Sub-Saharan Africa, and the TV dude almost cries.
If you weight 60 kg you are either a little boy or a woman, not a man.
>muh BMI
Oh look, it's that shit doctors don't use anymore.
>he uses bmi
Yep found the turbo dyel
Oh hey I’ve heard of this guy, he’s based
Interest is the cause of this. Before there was no "growth market" but instead a market with a mission to keep the economy at a certain level. Always sticking to the slowest possible increase in wealth of the nation. The reason for the exchange to growth was mainly that there was war to be had and each nation wanted to become stronger than their counterparts. The ones driving the wars into fruition is another discussion really. Case and point, the interest economy really fricked us over with some questionable decisions along the way.
>some questionable decisions
You mean capitalism and it’s predecessors
>You mean capitalism and it’s predecessors
Mostly but not entirely.
He's a moron
A bunch of woods in the middle of nowhere, big deal
And the idea that having nice things make us miserable is stupid. It is lefties like him who are making us miserable due to their social policies.
>Before there was no "growth market" but instead a market with a mission to keep the economy at a certain level. Always sticking to the slowest possible increase in wealth of the nation.
This has never been the policy of anyone anywhere beyond stone age primitives.
BMI means jackshit, accorrding to your shitty graphic I'm overweight at 1.85 weighting 88kg. Only a turbodyel with 0 muscle mass would take this graphic seriously.
You're probably fat, post body
there you go ma midget, I´m
and exactly 100kg right now
6'5 200 is literally in the "healthy" range moron. Also you're overweight in that pic
I'm 225, dwarf, with abs. It's time to post your tiny skeleton
>imblying
that homosexual will never post body. lmfao
>Them biceps
Stuff of envy.
Really? Weighted chin ups and some straight bar curls
I always feel like my arms are disproportionately small compared to my chest (since my torso's weirdly wide, as well as my chest) so that's why I want them bigger.
BMI applies to the average person, not people who lift, you moron. at 185lbs id be around 5% BF
I could not weight 60kgs and still be alive.
How tall are you?
6'4"
at 190lbs I was ripped but skinny.
It must be exhausting to be that tall.
I met a guy today that's 6'7" it was weird to feel short.
if he put said 100kg, alright, there's plenty of obeasts of every height that could be culled without losing any productive members of society.
Putting 60 into this statement, however, he's just an extremist midget with a platform
I think he meant women not people