Bros, is this true?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Bros, is this true?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
>listening to a chink woman reading off a script
Clint Eastwood had his son at like 70 and he turned out fine
tfw when he puts his Eastwood in my Clint
>ywn be this handsome
Scott can't act for shit though.
Acting is a skill for israelites and women
>Clint is 6'4
>his son is 5'11
brutal
I'm 5'11'' my dad's 6'3'' and he had me at like 25 so twizzle that logic
>mogged by your own father
end it, anon
Height comes from your mother's side make sure she has tall brothers.
why would you go on the internet and tell lies? statistically it's the average of how far away from the norm both your parents are.
that's a gaussian curve though so there's still outliers, my dad is 6'4 and my mom 5'7, I'm 6'4.
Yes, although what they left out was women shouldn't be reproducing after the age of 25, in case of severe birth defects. I guarantee you most of the autistics here on IST had mother's in 29-34 range
Can confirm my mon was 27 when she had my sister and 30 when she had me and I unironically took a literal shit in a kids backpack once
>I unironically took a literal shit in a kids backpack once
You were just expressing yourself HWD king
>I unironically took a literal shit in a kids backpack once
Unironcally based
im a moronic virgin my mother had me at 39
I didnt. She was young.
my mom had me at 40 and i am pretty normal, most people say i seem like a normal guy
>i am pretty normal
he posts on IST
my friends in high school told me that i was the "least mentally ill" out of the group and most normal
> I have documents from the doctor that says I'm normal
>it has to be pointed out
kek
You're a nice enough guy, you're swole kinda guy. But then what happens when you get some sugar in you?
He probably gets a lil kooky
Were you her first child? The chance of complications and birth defects with having kids up to 40 is lower for women who have had kids previously, especially before 30.
and yet here you are
mom was 35
checks out
Ouch
My mother had me at 38.
Surprise baby.
Am I fricked?
Well, you are posting here, so yeah
Yep lol. Just autistic and a few mental problems
Mom had me with 20. Still /virgin/ and almost becoming a wizard
My mum had me when I was 24 I ended up with a lot of mental problems (Luckily no physical problems)
>My mum had me when I was 24
Yeah I can see how that would affect your mental health
Actually autism is strongest linked to having a father over age 45, but the risk already starts increasing past 30.
Children born to women age 25-30 have the least birth defects out of any age group. As women age past 30 the amount of birth defects rapidly increase (this is mitigated some if they have given birth previously), women giving birth under the age of 20 also have high rates of birth defects (but the type is different than those over 30).
Incels don’t have kids and want to believe that it will be okay if they are 40 and have a child with a 20 year old, but this is cope the child will likely be autistic and genetic trash just like their father. Actual people focused on having health children will generally start having children with a mother aged 20-30 and a father aged 25-30. Anything besides this is not optimal. Fortunately if you want many kids as long as your wife started having kids before 30, if she has her 7th kid at 40 it will be a lot less likely to have any birth defects than if it was her first child.
>Children born to women age 25-30 have the least birth defects
wrong and moronic, not to mention roastie cope
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4532312/
Incel cope
Your own study debunks your claim. It says factors associated with youth are the likely culprit for under 20. It doesn’t say 25-30 is the lowest and many other studies prove it.
For example: A 15 year old mother is half as likely to have a Down Syndrome baby as a 25 year old.
>Didn't read the study the post
>Muh Down Syndrome is the only birth defect.
Rostoid cope. Your study said it was almost certainly age related things like smoking etc. And if your theory is correct 18-20yo are prime as they are moving into their peak and the courting process takes time so 25-30 is to late to chase anyways. Checkmate roastbeefPrkm8
>Shitskin confirmed
Sorry, White people go through puberty later and live longer. This is why 25-30 is ideal, maybe for your "people" 20 is fine.
I'm not saying you chase after 25-30 year old girls moron, I am saying that if your wife gives birth at 25-30 this is ideal.
OK roastoid. Cope all you desire. Seethe all you require. I'm 100% European.
methinks the guy trying to optimize procreation when no woman wants anything to do with them is the actual incel
i want to add to this, the dad was probably an aspie to begin with. reproducing at 45. only autists do that shit by importing some 16 year old chink wife. because they couldn't get a normal wife themselves. factor in the age, means guaranteed lil aspies
Wrong. My mom was 23 and im 4th child.
yup
I dont mind if my kids turnout like me. I would love it in fact. My gf and I will probably have kids in a year or two at about 27-28.
>skyrim
kek
wanted to post this kek
maternal age has nothing to do with autism. Maternal age is correlated with chromosomal disorders, paternal age with mutations.
Mum had me at 38 but I was the 3rd child. Still fricked in the head.
My mom had me at like 39. That might explain why I'm crazy and moronic.
Yeah but you're on IST so of course you're an autist. That's just selection bias.
Mom was 35 and required in virtro to have me
going through the horrors of IVF only to produce a useless NEET. should have adopted tbh
>autistics here on IST had mother's in 29-34 range
Can confirm.
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20210224-1
Stop being moronic.
My mom had me at 21 while my dad was 33
Mine was 36 and I'm a NEET KV
Women can reproduce after 40 too. It's where autistic children come from.
t. autist, both parents were over 40
I can't believe this post made me reply
I’m pretty sure the genetic issues of having kids when your older is from older women. The likelihood of having a child with Down syndrome or a still birth increases exponentially for older women but I’ve never seen anything said about men.
Yes but the same goes for women
a 40 year old man has 5 day old sperm. a 40 year old woman has 40 year old eggs
This. If male sperm count and motility decreases slightly with age (along with libido and erection quality, which all combines to decrease fertility), the effects of aging on women's fertility are ten times as pronounced and effectively end viable motherhood decades before a man can stop being a father.
Even if its new, its from cells that have been dividing for 40 years. Surely copy errors would add up.
???
In that case 40 year olds all would have cancer?
You are in direct control over the calibur of your genetic material. The reason why that declines for most men after 40 is the general population does not believe this and stops being active after high school and lets their hedonism dictate their diet. But that is a low bar to surpass, and you are not leading a sedentary lifestyle, are you?
nah just something rosties are coping about. they have a real biological clock and they cope by trying to project it on to men as well. But men and women are not he same.
This. Women are notoriously known for bringing everyone down to their level or lower if they can't be at the top.
Esther Vilar is the biggest example of this. I do recommend her books btw.
Simpleton take.
Sperm count and quality go down after 35, but this doesn't effect all sperm universally, rather, it means that it's more likely that a single sperm will be defective.
Women give birth in their fifties, Douglas Adams didn't have kids until his forties and Polly Adams is doing better than her parents, at least.
Also, when most people read stuff like "double the risk of birth defects!" They rarely consider these statistics critically; they usually don't even know how, so as a result people make a big deal about a 1% increase that totals a 2% chance of birth defects.
moronic take. The chances of autism and moronation get in the mid double digits for women after 40.
We're talking about men itt
No, it isn't. My parents were both 41 when they had my sister, and she surpasses all my siblings in talent, intelligence, and looks. She's basically a female chad.
Is your sister single?
That's female cope because they fall off hard at 35. Men can make chad babies even at 70. Never let women take your power.
>not fricking raw and cummin inside tinder thots to spread your seed while you ghost each one of them
Are you Blacks even trying?
My man
my dad had me when he was over 40 and I'm a piece of shit loser. So sounds pretty accurate to me.
jaleel yeah
>presenting male preference for young women as something new
what
this lmao, it's literally the opposite
you misinterpreted the graph
so there was a 40% chance i'm gonna be born a downie? wew lad
At a guess I'd say no. There's been a concentrated effort to establish a male version of "the wall" for a while now. Reactives rarely rely on facts.
Serious reply because I'm doing my PhD on this shit.
Gamete quality (sperm and eggs) is negatively correlated with age, but general fitness can help to ameliorate the damage.
Especially for men, if we eat right and exercise, stay away from alcohol and cigarettes, we can produce healthy sperm into our 50s.
For women it is more difficult though, and after 30-35 the chances of producing a healthy oocyte drop drastically, even in healthy individuals.
By a healthy oocyte, do you mean one which produces offspring without chromosomal aberrations or is that definition of health more general?
Just in general; aged oocytes can have DNA damage from oxidative stress that increases offspring risk of many diseases. Maybe even accelerated aging in the offspring. This has already been proven in mice but with humans it's harder to confirm because of confounding factors.
nice creative writing piece
nah doesn't apply for men
men are either fertile or they aren't. it's that simple
You've got to be the most braindead fricking moron I've ever seen if you believe that. Were you raised by a medieval medicine woman or something?
>t. roastie
>t. moron
You have to be over the age of 18 to post here lol, graduate high school or crawl out of your third world country bro
>saying nothing
roastie moment
Good thing is that if you have quality lifestyle, your sperm even in 40s-50s might be better than 20s-30s if they are not so aware about their habits.
Does TRT offset this? I'm turning 30 next month and I'm nowhere near being in a position to have kids this decade.
it's not a real thing so trt will have no effect on chink fantasies
Apparently some spanish studies say otherwise
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1989-older-fathers-run-higher-risk-of-fetal-defects/
Oh good, I'm gonna have a downie kid, aren't I?
>globohomosexual studies
cringe
> I'm gonna have a downie kid, aren't I?
if you are a roastie then yes, you surely type like one
Its well known. Go watch some Edward Dutton.
a lot of people are coping hard as frick in this thread and dont want to look at facts. I am 33 my self an no where near in a postion to have kids. This shit is really bad news for men and you should be ware of hte shit cus its real.
kys roastie
dad had me at 48 and my mom was about 27. And he had my youngest brother who is the smartest in the family at 60
kek the memes are making women insane
sounds like momscience to me
It's just globohomosexual trash
>caliber of your genetic material is seriously degraded
No, that's what happens to women. You're projecting, lady.
Men literally have thousands to millions of sperm cells swimming to get into that one egg of yours, and we produce it on a daily basis. You, on the other hand, only have *one* egg, and that's once a month for a set period of time.
There's a reason men lose interest in a woman after they cum, and then can immediately turn around and turn a different woman. We're *made* to spread our seed. You on the other hand have a biological responsibility to produce the best offspring because of that one chance a month you have, which makes you seethe and be an uptight b***h for finding the best mate.
Your hypergamy is fricking you and letting tyrone frick you in the ass, lady. Which ironically won't get you any babies either.
I had an ex who told me I had to quit drinking before impregnating her because alcohol causes bad sperm or something
Women famously produce autistic kids if they have them later on, implying degraded eggs. Nobody mentions the fact that these women are generally getting pregnant by older men with degraded sperm. Older women who get pregnant by younger men have more modest rates of autistic kids. Both men and women should be reproducing between 25-30 to maximize stability and genetic quality, with a 5 year window on either side of that range to still be ok trading off a bit of one for more of the other. Younger than 20 and older than 35 is generally a bad idea.
Incels wont agree they want to keep believing that when they are 40 they will finally “make it” and have healthy children with an 18 year old.
They don’t want to deal with the fact that it was over for them since birth.
> Source: just trust me bro
so how come...
Because genes are a lot but they’re not everything.
Left is maid's baby - kid wasn't raised rich, realized he'd had to struggle to get anywhere.
Right is Kennedy baby - kid was raised rich, everything was given to him.
Daddy was raised by a former SS officer who drank himself to death and beat his kids post war.
Right was raised by Arnold right when he started his homosexual California politician phase. Left didn't have that influence around.
'While the largest portion of offspring of older fathers may not have any mental health conditions, the tripled risk with paternal aging for these relatively common conditions is of interest and concern'
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4457665/
Women having children after 35 is literally called geriatric pregnancy
https://www.healthline.com/health/pregnancy/geriatric-pregnancy
It's true lol, there is a male wall. Albeit later than women, but it still is there. Like another anon said, older women are also most of the time having kids with older men.
>Sperm is freshly produced
Technically yea but the genetic material is from age old genes that could have been affected during their 40 years of living on this earth. So the genome of those 'fresh' sperm is 40 years old. Percentage wise, you will have less genetically healthy sperm as you age basically. So if one of those unhealthy swimmers hit the egg, you get a moronic kid
Women just have a delayed form of this genetic splicing where they go through it every month.
If you think your cummies were as good as when you were 20 that's some major cope, reproduce now homosexual. Before you go bald
if you incels took 1 second to read about spermatogenesis and just basic research
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0506468103
Not really. A 60 year old man’s sperm is healthier than a 30 year old woman’s egg.
>people ITT acting like you a switch flips at 40 and all babies after that are moronic
It's a statistical trend, not a certainty, wtf have they been teaching you in school
"people" ITT were the kids who felt school didn't teach them what they "needed to know for real life"
Tell me how you know nothing about biology without telling me.
>reddit posting
Yes, and we've known this for thousands of years. In Plato's Republic it's mandated that both men and women not reproduce after the age of 30.
>Post-wall roastie is toastie that the wall doesn't apply to men
relevant timstamps:
58:06 Dutch Hunger Winter causing metabolic syndrome
1:08:22 anxiety levels dependent on fetal development, not genetics