Yeah. I knew a guy at work who was like "oh man I'm doing OMAD!"
His 1 meal was dinner, we had a team happy hour at one point and he must have consumed like 4,000 calories for his one meal. Shockingly, he didn't lose any weight fasting!
RESEARCH SHOWS STOP FASTING, GET YOUR VACCINE, STOP HAVING CHILDREN, OWN NOTHING AND BE HAPPY
Yeah i dont care about mainstream news research.
Holy shit they literally wrote under the headline that eating less food will reduce weight but restricting food to narrow time windows will not
They tried to spoonfeed you headline skimmers but you're just too moronic
I don't even get why you gays still argue about this. I do IF simply because I don't like having breakfast and I find it easier to not overeat this way, I don't care if this makes me burn 50 less calories than if I ate the same amount but in 3 meals
IF, keto, carnivore, vegan, vegetarian are all useful tools to help manage calories but they are tools. You have to manage calories in the end. You just have to find one that works for you. IF works for me. I can bulk while IF too.
Well, obviously if you are fasting you still have to make sure not to go over your daily caloric limit and it's much easier to do with fewer meals.
OP is a homosexual, as usual.
OK now post the study and see how the defined "intermittent fasting"
Clue: it was normies who reported delaying breakfast as a meal, not people who strictly consumed all their calories within a 6-8 hour window.
Yup. Respondents to the study self-reported their meals as "small, medium or large" on an app. Their diet quality was not evaluated and it's not clear if they were educated as to what did or did not constitute "food".
There are so many normies who don't think of their 500kcal starbucks "coffee" as a meal.
>Briefly, the only eating behaviors assessed were meal timing (ie, when meals were consumed) and approximate meal size. For each eating occasion, participants first indicated the time using a 24‐hour wheel and then selected the type and estimated size of meal from a drop‐down menu (ie, small meal [<500 calories], medium [500–1000 calories], or large [>1000 calories])
Yup. Respondents to the study self-reported their meals as "small, medium or large" on an app. Their diet quality was not evaluated and it's not clear if they were educated as to what did or did not constitute "food".
There are so many normies who don't think of their 500kcal starbucks "coffee" as a meal.
Note that I am not saying that this possible shortcoming in data quality invalidates the study, and I am not shilling for IF, I'm skeptical of the benefits of IF myself, but this study has a lot of limitations.
Yup. Respondents to the study self-reported their meals as "small, medium or large" on an app. Their diet quality was not evaluated and it's not clear if they were educated as to what did or did not constitute "food".
There are so many normies who don't think of their 500kcal starbucks "coffee" as a meal.
>Respondents to the study self-reported their meals as "small, medium or large"
So this is the absolutely state of """""science?"""""
religion is literally a better system for diet and health than this.
For me intermittent fasting isn't a diet but more like a psychological trick
It's made me realize how often I would eat not because of hunger but because of boredom, and that's what was really stopping me from losing weight
The vast majority of these people probably stopped IF within 2 weeks
Bear in mind the best treatment for obesity doesn't work if you hate it and stop doing it
Ultimate fatfrick cope, it absolutely does, and it trains you to control your appetite. I am down to 11% body fat on OMAD and have been doing fasting for 7 years, I used to be 50 pounds heavier with no muscle. Now I am shredded, strong, and can run long distance without losing muscle
>Research suggest >Studies show
I hate these people, Intermittent fasting is a decent strategy if you eat low-mid calorie food that is also satiating. It won't help if you eat like shit during your eating window. See I didn't even have to "study" 50 undisciplined fatties for 3 weeks only to conclude that it may or may not work without any further explanation.
When I dirty bulked I did a 20:4 IF split and I'm positive it caused more of those calories to go into building muscle than storing fat. I still gained some fat, but my muscle growth was insane
The whole point of IF is to optimize hormones and make eating less complicated.
This doesn't mean you will lose if you still consume the calorie count of a Turkish oil wrestler.
These are the same guys who think that intermittent fasting means eat whatever you want as long as it's in X time frame
That's literally what it originally meant, until people found out it didn't work.
>it didn't work.
Wtf are you talking about?
Yeah. I knew a guy at work who was like "oh man I'm doing OMAD!"
His 1 meal was dinner, we had a team happy hour at one point and he must have consumed like 4,000 calories for his one meal. Shockingly, he didn't lose any weight fasting!
so you're telling me that if i eat 1 fewer meals a day, i won't lose weight? "science" was a mistake
No, look up what intermittent fasting is
Holy shit they literally wrote under the headline that eating less food will reduce weight but restricting food to narrow time windows will not
They tried to spoonfeed you headline skimmers but you're just too moronic
^
RESEARCH SHOWS STOP FASTING, GET YOUR VACCINE, STOP HAVING CHILDREN, OWN NOTHING AND BE HAPPY
Yeah i dont care about mainstream news research.
I don't even get why you gays still argue about this. I do IF simply because I don't like having breakfast and I find it easier to not overeat this way, I don't care if this makes me burn 50 less calories than if I ate the same amount but in 3 meals
Don't care. I do it for the health benefits
IF works if you do it correctly
Deboonked
IF, keto, carnivore, vegan, vegetarian are all useful tools to help manage calories but they are tools. You have to manage calories in the end. You just have to find one that works for you. IF works for me. I can bulk while IF too.
That's nice, works for me.
Well, obviously if you are fasting you still have to make sure not to go over your daily caloric limit and it's much easier to do with fewer meals.
OP is a homosexual, as usual.
IF might do literally nothing, but eating 2 meals a day is easier than eating 6
OK now post the study and see how the defined "intermittent fasting"
Clue: it was normies who reported delaying breakfast as a meal, not people who strictly consumed all their calories within a 6-8 hour window.
You're right. The mean interval was 12 hours.
Thats not a fast, thats sleeping
Yup. Respondents to the study self-reported their meals as "small, medium or large" on an app. Their diet quality was not evaluated and it's not clear if they were educated as to what did or did not constitute "food".
There are so many normies who don't think of their 500kcal starbucks "coffee" as a meal.
>Briefly, the only eating behaviors assessed were meal timing (ie, when meals were consumed) and approximate meal size. For each eating occasion, participants first indicated the time using a 24‐hour wheel and then selected the type and estimated size of meal from a drop‐down menu (ie, small meal [<500 calories], medium [500–1000 calories], or large [>1000 calories])
Note that I am not saying that this possible shortcoming in data quality invalidates the study, and I am not shilling for IF, I'm skeptical of the benefits of IF myself, but this study has a lot of limitations.
>estimated
why would you trust the average person (aka moron) with that?
>The mean interval was 12 hours.
>Respondents to the study self-reported their meals as "small, medium or large"
So this is the absolutely state of """""science?"""""
religion is literally a better system for diet and health than this.
Worse is the msm not pointing out the flaws.
>cico cultists can't figure out that putting down the fork for only a day doesn't get them out of the fat storing state
SAD!
What are you rambling on about
>rubes are moronic and frick things up by trying to make them easier
>that means it doesnt work
For me intermittent fasting isn't a diet but more like a psychological trick
It's made me realize how often I would eat not because of hunger but because of boredom, and that's what was really stopping me from losing weight
This.
I mostly snack during the night. If I actually did intermediate fasting I wouldn't.
The vast majority of these people probably stopped IF within 2 weeks
Bear in mind the best treatment for obesity doesn't work if you hate it and stop doing it
CICOmrades we just keep winning
Ultimate fatfrick cope, it absolutely does, and it trains you to control your appetite. I am down to 11% body fat on OMAD and have been doing fasting for 7 years, I used to be 50 pounds heavier with no muscle. Now I am shredded, strong, and can run long distance without losing muscle
>Research suggest
>Studies show
I hate these people, Intermittent fasting is a decent strategy if you eat low-mid calorie food that is also satiating. It won't help if you eat like shit during your eating window. See I didn't even have to "study" 50 undisciplined fatties for 3 weeks only to conclude that it may or may not work without any further explanation.
When I dirty bulked I did a 20:4 IF split and I'm positive it caused more of those calories to go into building muscle than storing fat. I still gained some fat, but my muscle growth was insane
Makes sense, spend less like with high insulin, put on less fat
The whole point of IF is to optimize hormones and make eating less complicated.
This doesn't mean you will lose if you still consume the calorie count of a Turkish oil wrestler.