Eating Raw Meat

Give me a based take. No salmonella gay shit. I just tried some raw beef after so long and was surprised at the flavorful taste.

I hear enough about salmonella and bacteria. But what about nutrients and hormones playing out? Much like raw eggs, raw meat feels like an energizing, revitalizing quick meal.

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    It’s good, the way God intended it to be eaten. Just make sure it’s high quality. Please don’t eat raw Walmart beef.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Surprised at that take. Are you experienced? How to spot danger when choosing meat? Some cuts can be thick.

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why would you want to eat raw meat? It taste better cooked.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe it's better raw. I am past caring about flavor. I'd rather live on raw eggs meat and watered grain if it means I can maximize performance.

      You mean like domestic meat or wild meat?

      Either. Of course I just had processed beef.

      https://i.imgur.com/BFATRGO.jpg

      You absorb less nutrients from raw meat than cooked meat. You also risk getting parasites like tapeworm, bacterial infections like salmonella or e. Coli, and listeria. Have fun with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal cramping, fever, and headache, while choking on rotting food your stomach is not designed to digest.

      > Absorb nutrients
      Okay. But how does heating something at high temperatures not kill, everything in it?

      > Tapeworm, salmonella
      Genuine concern here. I'll have to research in how to spot these if I make this a habit (unlikely).

      human brains grew when eating cooked meat. eat cooked meat.

      How do we know this? Once they figured fire lifr exoectation and overall security went up so they had the luxury to indulge in development. But you could be right. Cooked meat was magic.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >. But how does heating something at high temperatures not kill, everything in it?
        It kills everything living in it. You can't kill nutrients, they aren't alive.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          >You can't kill nutrients
          You cant kill them, but you can destroy many of them, and others can be leeched out of food by certain cooking processes.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            Cooking doesn't "destroy" protein. Unless you are cooking with the heat of the Sun.

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              Vitamins are nutrients too, anon.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Okay. But how does heating something at high temperatures not kill, everything in it?
        What do you think your stomach acid and other digestive enzymes are for? Your body doesn't give a shit if the fats, carbs and proteins are broken down a bit before you eat it, it just makes the job easier. It's part of why overly processed foods has lead to the fatass epidemic we see today.
        There's maybe some very slight benefits to eating things raw (mainly that you avoid eating burnt food which might be carcinogenic), but its completely outperformed by cooking things in a healthy way (ie not deep frying or overly preserving it like an idiot):
        >easier to absorb all the nutrients from the cooked food
        >kill various microbes to avoid disease
        >there's research a few complete nutrients can be direct-absorbed by the gut, but you can simply supplement these if it's such a huge concern

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Totally contrary to the fact that people who cannot tolerate pasteurized milk can drink raw milk without any issues.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            >people who cannot tolerate pasteurized milk
            You mean lactose intolerance? It still has lactose in it when raw.

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              The temperature point used for pasteurization denatures the proteins and kills naturally occurring enzymes that help with digestion.

              > lactose intolerance
              I guess so, I personally know a few people who claimed they were lactose intolerant but did not experience any gastric distress when I gave them raw milk.

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Gotta drink my raw milk contaminated with typhoid and fecal bacteria to get 0.1% more protein instead of just eating more food

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                Raw milk is great. Sure, maybe there's a higher risk of contamination, but I love that "cream on top" shit.

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              Lactobacillus (a bacteria found in yogurt and other dairy) compensates for the absence of the enzyme lactase.

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                >a bacteria

                A family of bacteria, I should say.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >how does heating something at high temperatures not kill everything in it?
        mfw i accidentally kill my macronutrients before i eat them and now they can't do their work building the little blocks inside my muscle fibers

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you've ever seen bots and warbles you'd never ever eat wild meat except maybe after the first frost.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        > How do we know this? Once they figured fire lifr exoectation and overall security went up so they had the luxury to indulge in development. But you could be right. Cooked meat was magic.
        Incorrect, on all accounts. Evidence for brain size increases corresponding to cooking food come from skeletal remains, not development. Cooked meat isn’t “magic”, it’s just easier to extract nutrients from and requires less chewing and digestion. Being able to get more nutrients out of your food while putting less energy into breaking it down means more calories can be spent in other places, namely your brain. At rest, the average person’s brain uses up about 20% of the calories you consume; cooked food was the catalyst allowing humans to get the caloric surplus needed to develop a large, complex brain. They’ve done the math and gorillas, for example, would literally not have enough time in the day to obtain and eat all the raw plants they’d need to get the calories to support similarly large brains.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          The brain runs on glucose (sugar), not fat and protein. Cooking plants is what made our brains bigger.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            Nah, it runs on glucose only if you force it to by feeding it. This has been proven multiple times and it pretty much is just common knowledge at this point, plenty of proof it is not required. Plant food is just harvest time fattening up for winter stuff. I mean good for you if you like it all the time, I don't care, but lets not make believe now. And no I don't care what archaic study link or chud article you may have, normie opinionation balm is simply irrelevant.

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Nah, it runs on glucose only if you force it to by feeding it.
              Yeah, imagine eating food to "force" your brain to function correctly.
              >And no I don't care what archaic study link or chud article you may have, normie opinionation balm is simply irrelevant.
              "Hurr durr I don't actually care about facts, I was just pretending before!"

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                The brain runs on glucose (sugar), not fat and protein. Cooking plants is what made our brains bigger.

                Nah, it runs on glucose only if you force it to by feeding it. This has been proven multiple times and it pretty much is just common knowledge at this point, plenty of proof it is not required. Plant food is just harvest time fattening up for winter stuff. I mean good for you if you like it all the time, I don't care, but lets not make believe now. And no I don't care what archaic study link or chud article you may have, normie opinionation balm is simply irrelevant.

                Do you guys know what Acetyl CoA is and the difference between glycolysis and the Krebbs cycle? Post brains midwits

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Doesn't know about ketone bodies because he doesn't know anything about biochemistry

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              Your brain only uses ketones when you starve it of glucose.

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It USeS GluCOSe
                It uses ATP made primarily from the ETC. This is true for every part of your body.
                Glycolysis creates a net of 2 ATP and is only required for acetyl CoA, which follows Krebbs cycle and produces NADH and FADH2, which are shuttles that produces 94% of ATP or energy for your dumbass to function

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                Permanent brain damage cope

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            Did you know your body can turn excess protein into glucose?

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              Yes. Did you know it only does this when you are starving your body of carbs and that the protein is taken from muscles where it would have gone if you had just eaten carbs?

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                Lol half the protein you eat already gets turned into carbs no matter what. It's crazy you think the body is so retarded that it uses the protein to build muscle then breaks down that muscle for carbs rather than using the amino acids in your bloodstream, you're just a lying subhuman trying to push an agenda.

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                >protein gets turned to carbs
                Holy shit you are retarded

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                Lol half the protein you eat already gets turned into carbs no matter what. It's crazy you think the body is so retarded that it uses the protein to build muscle then breaks down that muscle for carbs rather than using the amino acids in your bloodstream, you're just a lying subhuman trying to push an agenda.

                Pyruvate, lactate, and glycerol being combined to form sugars, using the catabolic energy from a protein, is not the same as a protein being turned into a carb

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's using the energy in the protein to remake the carb with the exact same byproducts of glycolysis.

                The protein ( energy ) is being turned into carb ( energy ). It's the biological equivalent of recharging a battery.

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    You mean like domestic meat or wild meat?

  4. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    You absorb less nutrients from raw meat than cooked meat. You also risk getting parasites like tapeworm, bacterial infections like salmonella or e. Coli, and listeria. Have fun with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal cramping, fever, and headache, while choking on rotting food your stomach is not designed to digest.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Our stomach is literally designed to digest rotten meat, we have the exact same stomach PH as vultures.

      Explain why raw meat would give you less nutrients than cooked.

      You have zero idea what you are talking about.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Our stomach is literally designed to digest rotten meat, we have the exact same stomach PH as vultures.
        Go eat some rotten meat then, Dr. Chud. Please fuck up your health immediately. I don't care at all.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Whole races subsist eating only raw meat, not sure why you are acting like humans die instantly from eating it

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            Some cultures do, but those same cultures also don't typically use indoor plumbing.

            I can respect a humanist effort to try to understand other cultures, but it seems like you're just trying to reject "western" science that is largely removed from culture.

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              Germans were eating raw meat up until the end of WW2, quite a few White men were. This doesn't have anything to do "western" science. It's garden gnomes trying to stop you from eating the supreme Aryan diet, raw animal products.

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It's garden gnomes trying to stop you from eating the supreme Aryan diet, raw animal products.
                Yes, of course. It was the garden gnomes who invented cooking and vegetables.

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                German still eat raw meat sometimes. Check out Mett.

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                Luv me mett. Buttered roll with mett and topped with raw onion. It's the best with it's subtle sweetness.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            Hope this lil bro doin well wherever he is. Goes hard, can I screenshot?

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            How "healthy" are they, btw? Do they live past 35?

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              Why would you WANT to?

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                Speaking only of writing:

                Tolstoy - 37
                Dostoevsky - 44
                Vonnegut - 45
                Orwell - 46

                The age the were when their most widely acclaimed novels were first published (in the case of Tolstoy it was the first part of War and Peace, not the entire work).

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah they do. Broadly speaking Inuits have a life expectancy of 70, but there's no data specifically about those Inuits who live in accordance with their traditional culture. I imagine they'd at least make it to 65

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Broadly speaking Inuits have a life expectancy of 70, but there's no data specifically about those Inuits who live in accordance with their traditional culture.

                Traditional diet Inuits were so unhealthy that adding Western food to their diets increased their life span.

                https://slate.com/technology/2014/08/does-fish-oil-prevent-heart-disease-original-danish-eskimo-diet-study-was-wrong.html

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Slate.com
                Lol, go to bed schizo

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                Here, have another.

                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12535749/

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                Ooooo yeah, see the thing about studies is that they are usually set out by people trying to prove and force an idea. Sometimes you find contrary studies on the same source.
                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18774134/
                If you wish to see things as they really are best to experiment for yourself chief. If I want I can send you meaningless links all day. Hundreds. Still means nothing.

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah studies are made to confirm personal bias. That's totally how science works. It's not you willfully misinterpreting the data. It's a conspiracy of scientists setting out to disprove you with a study you will never even bother to read.

                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35086441/

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/rjcNw6o.jpg

                So do eggs increase or lower my risk of diabetes? What does science say?

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                You could just read the study yourself. It literally tells you.

                >"The association between egg consumption and diabetes is inconclusive."

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition/article/higher-egg-consumption-associated-with-increased-risk-of-diabetes-in-chinese-adults-china-health-and-nutrition-survey/C86D80672A65B06F1220BC3691C18296

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              If you live to 5 you'll probably live past to 50 in any period in history.
              What do you people think kills 30 year olds? Back pain from sedentary lifestyles is the only age related ailment 30s get now

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                >What do you people think kills 30 year olds?

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                is he vaxed?

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Thinks pH, enzymes, and length of digestive tract are the same thing

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Tapeworm is the ultimate slim fast diet as long as you stop it in time.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Muh absorbing less nutrients.
      Point to a single mechanism that would actually support this claim. Anything that heat would do the the nutrients in meat (i.e. protein) will be done by stomach acid and further assisted by enzymes anyway. Heat doesn't affect the primary structure of proteins, so your body has to break it down either way into amino acids.
      The only way in which cooking affects nutritional value is by breaking down fiber, which is completely irrelevant to OP's question.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Heat doesn't affect the primary structure of proteins
        Holy shit imagine being this ignorant of nutritional biology and trying to school other people.
        Many forms of uncooked protein are tightly folded in on themselves. The food doesn't necessarily remain in the stomach long enough for acid to completely break down these folded protein structures, and instead these partially digested proteins are fermented by gut bacteria.
        https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9772141/
        >The true ileal digestibility of cooked and raw egg protein amounted to 90.9 +/- 0.8 and 51.3 +/- 9.8%, respectively

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Heat doesn't affect the primary structure of proteins,
        The primary structure isn't the only factor that affects digestibility. A tightly folded raw protein structure has a much smaller surface area exposed to stomach acid and peptase enzymes than a denatured unfolded protein.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      > tapeworm
      really unlikely nowadays and very easy to cure.
      > not designed to digest
      Slower to digest

  5. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    human brains grew when eating cooked meat. eat cooked meat.

  6. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >fire gave us a massive digestive advantage over other animals
    >can digest things insanely quick as a result
    >this excess of energy not being used to digest raw meat is instead stored as fat throughout the body, including the brain
    >our brains are literally bigger because our body's digestion is getting carried so hard by fire
    >and OP wants to abandon this advantage because of retarded pseudoscience shit
    Actually, now that I think about it, I don't get anything out of OP not being a retard. So carry on mate, give us a laugh.

  7. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Eating raw meat, organ, eggs for 2 years now after much experimentation. Don't season your food then see whether you still like it cooked. Raw tastes perfect as it is. Seasoning is just try to fix what you just ruined with heat. Pretty much the only things I still cook are buckwheat and select veggies

  8. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Cooking
    >Eliminates pathogens
    >Turns potentially toxic amines into amino acids
    >Tastes better

    Cook your meat.

  9. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I eat raw meat regularly. Not because it's ideal or anything but sometimes it's a great breakfast. I got the idea from carpaccio which is served frozen most of the time. It's winter a lot here so I store it outside. If you worry about parasites in sea food, frozen to -21 celsius or lower kills even the most stubborn fish tapeworm cysts. Slice some nice frozen thin slices and enjoy. I should also mention I actually mostly do this for liver and kidneys as they are very easy to cut frozen and contain lots of nutritious blood. I try and do steaks or roasts in the oven but have eaten raw thawed out muscle meat if I slept in a bit and need to hurry and it's really good. Also hunting I always cut off a nice slice of deer and eat it while the deer is warm as respect for the deer and I don't kknow if anything tastes as good as that.

  10. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anon, I got salmonella from eating improperly prepared raw beef. I was sick for a week but the best part it fixes my gut entirely, like frfr no cap, perfect shits every day since then.

  11. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Uncooked protein Is less available than cooked one, so you'll get less nutrients than from cooked meat

    It's fine to just eat it for the taste, but sear the outside, that will reduce almost all risk of food poisoning

  12. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Love me a nice little raw beef carpaccio sprinkled with some herbs, brittled walnut or chestnut, some balsamic or raspberry vinegar, and a drizzle of olive oil...Also find steak tartare quite nice.
    Maybe it's because I grew up in France, but never found raw meat to be that dangerous.

  13. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's not good for you
    We've been cooking meat since before we were humans
    We are who we are because we cook our food, not the other way around
    Also even if the meat is "high quality" you never know unless you hunt it yourself and eat it quickly after death, anything other than that and you risk getting sick
    Also the protein bioavailability in cooked meat is much better

  14. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Whats the point? It tastes worse than cooked and has more risks.

  15. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sakha
    *makes the generic modern pedophile scientist look like the retards they are in your path*

  16. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Drink it with kefir to kill salmonella.

  17. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    It eat raw beef quite regularly. Not as some IST retard or carnivore diet mong, but because it’s tasty and quick to make. I tend to make it like the Ethiopians do.

    I’ve given myself the shits only once from it, and it wasn’t severe enough to be a problem, more of a “oh that poop wasn’t the best”. This is after probably 100 portions.

    The problem is though is that it’s really really slow to digest. Like I can feel it in my stomach for a good couple of hours being broken down, and it takes longer to pass.

    This is why most raw beef dishes are either from thin or minced beef. If you eat chunks of raw beef you’ll keep on throwing chunks back up into your mouth until it’s chewed.

  18. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Raw meat reads like some facebook mom tier shit

  19. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    salmonela? I would be more worried about the transdimensional mind demons. enjoy hades.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *