Primarily because relying on it too much sucks ass. If you're used to eating a ton of food volume that's low density to keep from feeling hungry then you're going to expand your stomach and if you for any reason can't stick with low density food for a day you're going to overeat way worse.
It is. I would rather just rely on letting my stomach shrink with high density foods in my diet than expanding it trying to eat 500 calories worth of cauliflower a day.
Underrated post. That's why omad is garbage in the long run if you're doing non keto (you shouldnt be doing other than seasonal/occasional keto anyways), because you're stretching shit out.
Yes it is. Basically just cut out added fats, sugar, cream, fatty meats and bread and you're good to go. For whatever reason people forgot that in early 00s. Look how skinny everyone were in the 90s. Now go check what pic related ate. Skinless chicken and salad. Aniston notably is fatphobic as in not eating fatty stuff and has maintined figure for three diecades.
disingenuous
it's more like this, an uncomfortable fact of losing weight that 4/5 Americans are unwilling to come to terms with
if you want to be thin you're going to be hungry, tired, and angry
fatsos seethe and cannot accept this
You are moronic. The veggies are twice are nearly twice the volume in that pic but just disregarding your autistic tunnel vision, meat is more filling over a long period of time than veggies anyway.
Eat a giant fricking salad and you'll feel full... for like an hour or two.
Yeah, no, that absolutely is not what 500 calories of meat looks like. I eat a 230g rump steak almost every day, and that alone is around 420 calories, and it only fills up, at most, 10% of my stomach. That's easily over 2,000 calories of meat in that pic. Plus, all that food is unchewed anyway, so it's not even a good representation to begin with. Whoever made this chart is moronic.
>can you gain 100g of weight eating less than 100g of food? or is the limit 1:1 for the most caloric foods?
No, you can't.
The digestion process is not 100% perfect. Absorption of nutrients has nothing to do with volume of food.
The actual answer is: depends on the food. For example different types of protein are absorbed differently. 100gr of beef protein is absorbed slower but more efficiently than, let's say bean protein (which is faster to absorb but if I remember correctly it's around 20% of actual protein absorption)
Why do mainstream media and moronic normies think saciety has anything to do with volume of food or filling up your stomach?
The stomach is not supposed to be all full of shit... if it is, it's not working as it should be.
>Why do mainstream media and moronic normies think saciety has anything to do with volume of food or filling up your stomach?
Volume has a huge effect on satiety. Your stomach has stretch receptors for a reason.
>caloric density bad
Fricking americans and their corporate controlled healthcare. Grains have the highest return on investment for food retailers. That's why it's pushed onto the populace as hard as it is.
>le satiety
this is where people frick up
it's not about being LE HECKIN FULL AND NOT EXPERIENCED LE HUNGERPAINS
I'd much rather eat my 2000kcals of nutritious cheese, eggs and meat for the BIOAVAILABLE protein, calcium and other shit.
Some days, I feel a little hungry sometimes, I live with that. I just make sure I have most of my food a few hours before bed, so I can sleep comfortably.
And before you start calling me a carnicuck or whatever, I eat more veggies than most vegans I know. I just don't go stuffing my face with sugary fruit like those morons do 24/7. Get fricked, spinach, carrots, onions (not the filtered word) and berries are all you need for fiber and vitamins, alongside the eggs and meat.
Thanks, I know
I chose them specifically because they are dense in nutrients, and then I structured my meals and recipes around that.
Peas and beans I wanted to mention, but they're too relied upon as pure protein sources for moronic vegans, thus giving them a bad rep in my eyes.
Luv me a split pea soup with lots of onion and some cubed beef, the fricking MACROS on that thing is absurd.
Is this why vegans are always feeling bloated and saying they need to eat more to stretch their stomachs? Just eat nutrient dense foods like meat, eggs and dairy and you will feel more satiated.
>Five of those bread slices alone are 500 calories >Together that is probably close to 6K calories with very little protein >That meat is probably around 2-4K calories depending on fat content and fricking full of protein
This is the dumbest fricking vegan propaganda. 4 ounces of chicken breast is like 120 calories. You can have 3/4s of a fricking pound of chicken breast compared to five slices of bread or four and half ounces of fricking pasta.
If you are making an argument for being vegan calories is the fricking dumbest. Lean meats cannot be beat in terms of satiety and nutrition per calorie.
That is also ignoring the fact that the human body requires more energy to break down protein than other foods and protein which is used for building muscle is also not going to make you any fatter and never factor in calorie wise.
That image seems moronic anyway, I could eat a shitload of carbs and never feel full. Wasted fricking calories tbh.
Not a keto/carnilard btw. They just don't do shit for me.
>Lean meats cannot be beat in terms of satiety and nutrition per calorie
Mogged by the humble potato
literal vegan propaganda crap
Eating a shit ton of veggies gives me a weird hungry but full feeling. I hate it.
because veggies aren't proper human food. only meat, eggs, fish, whole fruits, honey and dairy are. eat them as sides if you like them, that's literally it
also nothing is more satiating than lean meats, at an equal calorie amount. >w-where's your heckin' source ?
myself lol, try it yourself you homosexual why do you need a study to validate something you can experience at home?
yep I should've added that fruits were something occasionally harvested and most of the time plant based food was shitty
IIRC ingesting those seeds can give you severe intestine issues as they're not digested at alland can block your colon
Hot take: larger volumes of food in are harder to digest. You shouldn’t be cramming your entire gut full of leaves. Small meals with high nutrient density are far superior.
>grain and beans >less caloric that meat
Dishonest post. Also, there's no fricking way to fit 500 calories of veggies in your stomach. The whole point of green is their high fiber (fills you) and low dense caloric proprieties.
Not at all. I've never even swallowed a whole unchewed head of broccoli.
ngmi
Drink water with it moron
Mmmm cheese
Calorie density is absolutely the answer.
Unfortunate most are resistant to the idea.
Primarily because relying on it too much sucks ass. If you're used to eating a ton of food volume that's low density to keep from feeling hungry then you're going to expand your stomach and if you for any reason can't stick with low density food for a day you're going to overeat way worse.
Hmmm underrated post
> you're going to expand your stomach
I don’t think that’s true.
It is. I would rather just rely on letting my stomach shrink with high density foods in my diet than expanding it trying to eat 500 calories worth of cauliflower a day.
> It is.
The it’s not true for me, then.
you ever seen how competitive eaters train
they eat shit tons of cabbage or lettuce to expand their stomachs
Underrated post. That's why omad is garbage in the long run if you're doing non keto (you shouldnt be doing other than seasonal/occasional keto anyways), because you're stretching shit out.
100% lie and bullshit
I count calories everyday
half a loaf of bread is well over 500
I think they used shitty examples for grains. If you eat shit like plain rice, wheat berries, hulled barley, etc, it’s not really that dense
Bread is more dense than the other grains. Bread is about 1,200 calories a pound and rice is 500 calories a pound.
>Density
>by weight
Anon, you want to express calories per unit volume.
LOAFA
i've lost
500 calories of pasta is like 150g (dry)
Yes it is. Basically just cut out added fats, sugar, cream, fatty meats and bread and you're good to go. For whatever reason people forgot that in early 00s. Look how skinny everyone were in the 90s. Now go check what pic related ate. Skinless chicken and salad. Aniston notably is fatphobic as in not eating fatty stuff and has maintined figure for three diecades.
/oil chug/ gang
disingenuous
it's more like this, an uncomfortable fact of losing weight that 4/5 Americans are unwilling to come to terms with
if you want to be thin you're going to be hungry, tired, and angry
fatsos seethe and cannot accept this
Fat people have way larger stomachs as well. Over for those chaps.
>meat virtually the same as veggies
You are insane
You are moronic. The veggies are twice are nearly twice the volume in that pic but just disregarding your autistic tunnel vision, meat is more filling over a long period of time than veggies anyway.
Eat a giant fricking salad and you'll feel full... for like an hour or two.
are you blind it's like 5 cubes of beef vs 2 bell peppers a vine of tomatoes and half a fricking grape plant
Here, an actual unit of volume.
wtf is a cup
small dog
the measurement system used by everyone but americans
google 2 girls 1 cup to see the comparison
8oz
Who measures bread by the tablespoon??
Yeah, no, that absolutely is not what 500 calories of meat looks like. I eat a 230g rump steak almost every day, and that alone is around 420 calories, and it only fills up, at most, 10% of my stomach. That's easily over 2,000 calories of meat in that pic. Plus, all that food is unchewed anyway, so it's not even a good representation to begin with. Whoever made this chart is moronic.
Yes dude imma eat 2kg of raw veggies wise advice
Veganoid-cuckold bros.... we KEEP FRICKING WINNING!!!
dyel here, how do calories work?
can you gain 100g of weight eating less than 100g of food? or is the limit 1:1 for the most caloric foods?
>can you gain 100g of weight eating less than 100g of food? or is the limit 1:1 for the most caloric foods?
No, you can't.
The digestion process is not 100% perfect. Absorption of nutrients has nothing to do with volume of food.
The actual answer is: depends on the food. For example different types of protein are absorbed differently. 100gr of beef protein is absorbed slower but more efficiently than, let's say bean protein (which is faster to absorb but if I remember correctly it's around 20% of actual protein absorption)
Why do mainstream media and moronic normies think saciety has anything to do with volume of food or filling up your stomach?
The stomach is not supposed to be all full of shit... if it is, it's not working as it should be.
I hate people
>Why do mainstream media and moronic normies think saciety has anything to do with volume of food or filling up your stomach?
Volume has a huge effect on satiety. Your stomach has stretch receptors for a reason.
nuts is like less than the oil
so I should eat nothing but meat cheese and oil?
yes
just a reminder that if you think youve gotta drink oil youre a failure and ngmi
>caloric density bad
Fricking americans and their corporate controlled healthcare. Grains have the highest return on investment for food retailers. That's why it's pushed onto the populace as hard as it is.
This. israeliteed into oblivion.
Fast for three days. Now you are satiated with a serving of chicken breast and veggies. It’s just that simple.
This is why every meal I just mix whey protein with olive oil, ultimate bulking shake.
WAGMI
LMFAO
I’m thinking about those beans
>le satiety
this is where people frick up
it's not about being LE HECKIN FULL AND NOT EXPERIENCED LE HUNGERPAINS
I'd much rather eat my 2000kcals of nutritious cheese, eggs and meat for the BIOAVAILABLE protein, calcium and other shit.
Some days, I feel a little hungry sometimes, I live with that. I just make sure I have most of my food a few hours before bed, so I can sleep comfortably.
And before you start calling me a carnicuck or whatever, I eat more veggies than most vegans I know. I just don't go stuffing my face with sugary fruit like those morons do 24/7. Get fricked, spinach, carrots, onions (not the filtered word) and berries are all you need for fiber and vitamins, alongside the eggs and meat.
>spinach, carrots, onions (not the filtered word) and berries
My homie, that's absolutely top tier choices.
Beans and peas are great as well.
Frick broccoli and that gay ass other shit however.
Thanks, I know
I chose them specifically because they are dense in nutrients, and then I structured my meals and recipes around that.
Peas and beans I wanted to mention, but they're too relied upon as pure protein sources for moronic vegans, thus giving them a bad rep in my eyes.
Luv me a split pea soup with lots of onion and some cubed beef, the fricking MACROS on that thing is absurd.
I actually discovered a lowcal meal that can silence hunger
it sure is bud 🙂
Is this why vegans are always feeling bloated and saying they need to eat more to stretch their stomachs? Just eat nutrient dense foods like meat, eggs and dairy and you will feel more satiated.
It's important to learn how to be hungry. Once you master hunger you can master anything. Fast and pray.
>Five of those bread slices alone are 500 calories
>Together that is probably close to 6K calories with very little protein
>That meat is probably around 2-4K calories depending on fat content and fricking full of protein
This is the dumbest fricking vegan propaganda. 4 ounces of chicken breast is like 120 calories. You can have 3/4s of a fricking pound of chicken breast compared to five slices of bread or four and half ounces of fricking pasta.
If you are making an argument for being vegan calories is the fricking dumbest. Lean meats cannot be beat in terms of satiety and nutrition per calorie.
That is also ignoring the fact that the human body requires more energy to break down protein than other foods and protein which is used for building muscle is also not going to make you any fatter and never factor in calorie wise.
>Lean meats cannot be beat in terms of satiety and nutrition per calorie
Mogged by the humble potato
wtf is satiety and how do u measure it?
That image seems moronic anyway, I could eat a shitload of carbs and never feel full. Wasted fricking calories tbh.
Not a keto/carnilard btw. They just don't do shit for me.
this
literal vegan propaganda crap
because veggies aren't proper human food. only meat, eggs, fish, whole fruits, honey and dairy are. eat them as sides if you like them, that's literally it
>whole fruits
fruits that grow today are nothing like the fruits we evolved to eat
also nothing is more satiating than lean meats, at an equal calorie amount.
>w-where's your heckin' source ?
myself lol, try it yourself you homosexual why do you need a study to validate something you can experience at home?
yep I should've added that fruits were something occasionally harvested and most of the time plant based food was shitty
IIRC ingesting those seeds can give you severe intestine issues as they're not digested at alland can block your colon
>vegan propaganda
That which has been mogged via Biochemistry cannot be unmogged via schizophrenia.
Gonna go grab 3 cheeseburgers and a cola from a glass bottle right now, losers
Eating a shit ton of veggies gives me a weird hungry but full feeling. I hate it.
yeah also i should've mentioned:
it's not the fricking volume of food that makes you satiated but the hormones you produce while ingesting it
(Me)
(Me)
just so you don't confuse me with the other anon
Hot take: larger volumes of food in are harder to digest. You shouldn’t be cramming your entire gut full of leaves. Small meals with high nutrient density are far superior.
THAT'S RIGHT BOYS ITS TIME TO KICK OFF THIS BULK WITH THE OLDEST TRICK IN THE BOOK
OILMAXXING
>Not also oxygenmaxxing for peak flammability
ngmi
>grain and beans
>less caloric that meat
Dishonest post. Also, there's no fricking way to fit 500 calories of veggies in your stomach. The whole point of green is their high fiber (fills you) and low dense caloric proprieties.