It's not bullshit, it just makes it possible to compare weight among people with different heights. Not the chart's fault you use it to determine obesity without accounting for body fat percentage.
it is bullshit cause it skips numbers throughout the entire ~~*dataset*~~ for it to look pretty and ~~*symmetrical*~~ making it seem like weight and height are accounted for equally in bmi which it isn't considering it skips numbers.
If you noticed the chart goes by inches and 10lb increments. No numbers have been skipped. If you've done ANY kind of chart or graph reading you'd know this. Way to out yourself as someone who didn't go to college
The bmi instead of being continuous say 18-40 it skips numbers where it is convenient, jesus. to make the sections diagonally to make it seem proportional the x and y axis being.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
(You)
>for 6'3 it's 160 lbs
is this chart a psyop to create twinks wtf
Think about it. If you were 160 lean muscle you'd be the perfect ottermode. Sure you wouldn't be crazy strong, but unless you're on roids you're not going to be lean enough to get mires. Ottermode always beats out gymcel
5`9 healthy at 140 lbs kek
I am conviced this man is correct
>5'9 140 pounds looks like THAT!
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
This guy was 6'3 155, he looks like a holocaust survivor
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
He's also extremely dehydrated for his weigh in. But in any case, girls prefer this body which would be similar to #2 than most other body types
it is bullshit cause it skips numbers throughout the entire ~~*dataset*~~ for it to look pretty and ~~*symmetrical*~~ making it seem like weight and height are accounted for equally in bmi which it isn't considering it skips numbers.
The bmi instead of being continuous say 18-40 it skips numbers where it is convenient, jesus. to make the sections diagonally to make it seem proportional the x and y axis being.
Mathematical illiterates get off my FUCKING board. Go chud out and rope yourself, you're not a man if you can't understand such basic properties of quantitative relationships.
100kg isn't healthy anywhere on the chart, but since I know what you mean...
BMI assumes you have minimal exercise experience, the PE classes from highschool. Back then you wouldn't be skinny fat as you'd be eating properly and forced to exercise as a part of your circiculum. Skinnyfat is only a thing now because of the prevelance of processed foods and lack of exercise requirements.
Nowadays you can go off of BMI+bodyfat% if you want the most accurate health estimate but using BMI as a single metric is still accurate. The more you weigh the fatter you will be. It's just how the body works. Outside of steroids there is no way to be muscular without also being fat
[...]
Think about it. If you were 160 lean muscle you'd be the perfect ottermode. Sure you wouldn't be crazy strong, but unless you're on roids you're not going to be lean enough to get mires. Ottermode always beats out gymcel
> IST people still follow medieval health measurements founded by an accountant in which display all men which bodies hold a reasonable amount of muscle as overweight
(with completely lack of consideration of the ratio between bodyfat percentage and muscle or if you simply cheated your bmi for a couple of days)
>No 20BMI for 6'2"
Am I going to make it?
that would make the graph not look as pretty though. Just goes to show how bs this ~~*data*~~ is.
It's not bullshit, it just makes it possible to compare weight among people with different heights. Not the chart's fault you use it to determine obesity without accounting for body fat percentage.
it is bullshit cause it skips numbers throughout the entire ~~*dataset*~~ for it to look pretty and ~~*symmetrical*~~ making it seem like weight and height are accounted for equally in bmi which it isn't considering it skips numbers.
If you noticed the chart goes by inches and 10lb increments. No numbers have been skipped. If you've done ANY kind of chart or graph reading you'd know this. Way to out yourself as someone who didn't go to college
The bmi instead of being continuous say 18-40 it skips numbers where it is convenient, jesus. to make the sections diagonally to make it seem proportional the x and y axis being.
(You)
Think about it. If you were 160 lean muscle you'd be the perfect ottermode. Sure you wouldn't be crazy strong, but unless you're on roids you're not going to be lean enough to get mires. Ottermode always beats out gymcel
>5'9 140 pounds looks like THAT!
This guy was 6'3 155, he looks like a holocaust survivor
He's also extremely dehydrated for his weigh in. But in any case, girls prefer this body which would be similar to #2 than most other body types
women like 2 or 13 the most.
Mathematical illiterates get off my FUCKING board. Go chud out and rope yourself, you're not a man if you can't understand such basic properties of quantitative relationships.
You can always calculate it yourself or just estimate the range between 19BMI and 21BMI
>because the graph looks pretty the data is false
What?
BMI: infinifat
5"6 and 436 pounds.
what bmi am i? its not on the list
Have you considered donating yourself to the Mütter Museum?
>what bmi am i? its not on the list
pic related
Post body
Seems to go up a point every 10 libs.
63?
bro pls just stop eating
I-I'm not overweight, its the empirical data that is wrong
>for 6'3 it's 160 lbs
is this chart a psyop to create twinks wtf
5`9 healthy at 140 lbs kek
I am conviced this man is correct
"weight" as an indicator of health is so retarded. A 100kg skinnyfat is just a healthy as a 100kg athlete according to BMI, its fucking retarded.
100kg isn't healthy anywhere on the chart, but since I know what you mean...
BMI assumes you have minimal exercise experience, the PE classes from highschool. Back then you wouldn't be skinny fat as you'd be eating properly and forced to exercise as a part of your circiculum. Skinnyfat is only a thing now because of the prevelance of processed foods and lack of exercise requirements.
Nowadays you can go off of BMI+bodyfat% if you want the most accurate health estimate but using BMI as a single metric is still accurate. The more you weigh the fatter you will be. It's just how the body works. Outside of steroids there is no way to be muscular without also being fat
what an absolutely retarded post
I MOG YOU OP
>6'0"
>20 BMI = 150lbs
This has to be a fucking troll.
>lean ottermode is now skeleton mode
140lb at 5'11" is Auschwitz mode not otter mode
He's 140 at 5'11
It says he's 5'9"
2 inches. Same thing
Skelly and manlet cope
>Fatty cope
>5'11"
>140lbs
Is this some skeleton cope?
>193cm and 80kg
With 72kg i would probably look like the machinist
>172cm
>90kg
test
>life ends at 69 BMI
Maybe for a woman. For men it's 12% BF. BMI will usually fall below 25 at 12% BF natty so it certainly is important though.
No way you'll be anything above 20 with 12% bodyfat as a natty. You have roiders confusing your brain. 12% bodyfat is only obtainable at low BMIs
> IST people still follow medieval health measurements founded by an accountant in which display all men which bodies hold a reasonable amount of muscle as overweight
(with completely lack of consideration of the ratio between bodyfat percentage and muscle or if you simply cheated your bmi for a couple of days)
hopefully things will be better in 2024
inb4
>you can't be lean and muscular! y-you're roiding!
>no I won't post body!