What are the best compound lifts for rear delt activation?

Skip to content
# What are the best compound lifts for rear delt activation?

###

What are the best compound lifts for rear delt activation?

45?

Here's a hint, if you drive 30 MPH for two miles how long did your trip take?

30MPH for 2 Miles means 2/30 of an hour, aka 4 minutes.

15MPH for one Mile should take 1/15 of an hour, aka 4 minutes.

45MPH for one Mile should take 1/45 of an hour, aka 1 Minute 20 seconds.

So if u drove the first mile with 15MPH and then with 45MPH, you'd take 5 minutes and 20 seconds for the 2 miles instead of 4 Minutes for the entire road with 4 minutes.

Confusing.

It's not weird it's very obvious. You don't average speed "by distance", that is retarded. Your speed is the distance you traveled over the time you took to travel. You go one mile at 15 MPH, it took you four minutes. Traveling 45 MPH for the next mile does not make your average speed 30 MPH, it makes it 22.5 MPH. As

said you would have to instantaneously travel the second mile to average 30 MPH as implied by the fact that it's Einstein's car problem in spite of the fact that he would not have wasted his time trying to confuse midwits on Facebook

your mom died in her sleep last night because I compound lifted my dick into her ass

The confusion is that the definition of an average is (a + b +c +...)/n and so averaging the speeds means simply solving elementary algebra, but the notion of average speed as it is used in physics is a different concept. The question confuses people by making them interpret the literal meaning, (please average these speeds) instead of an assumed intent that it refers to the actual speed of the object in an interval of time between 2 points which is different.

continuation from here:

2m / 30 mph = 1h/15

1m/15mph = 1h/15

knowing what you actually wanted, we spent 4 minutes driving the first mile and we needed to cover 2 miles in in that 4 minutes, so the car can't ever cover that distance fast enough. It would need to teleport.

this seems entirely retarded. like this anon said

it's worded in a way that the common man will give you the LOGICAL answer for your stupid question.

Nobody would ask "hey, should we travel instantly from point B to point C to make this average miles per hour happen? I know thats impossible and not going to happen in real life but hehehehe answer me this question that wont happen in real life.

In short, they are trying to take logically aplicable common sense and be "clever" by saying something that is nonsensical and anybody right in the head will interpret it in another way.

Kinda like one of those....god I dont remember the exact details but

>go to the shop and buy milk if there is eggs then buy 6

and the autist buys 6 packs of milk because muh wording something something... while anybody sane would interpret that sentence normally.

IN SHORT FUCK OFF AUTISTS WITH YOUR RETARDED INTERPRETATION OF HUMAN SPEECH AND TRYING TO ACT CLEVER BECAUSE OF IT!

>"go to the shop and get milk and if they have eggs get a dozen"

*returns with a dozen milks*

>"why did you buy a dozen milks?"

>they had eggs

yes, the same autist would tell you that actually 45 is the wrong answer and the right answer is traveling at infinite speed

you can average speed by averaging speed, you can definitely use distance, speed/time is acceleration fucking retard,

distance/time/distance is odd very odd; time^-1????? tempo of what?

>30MPH for 2 Miles means 2/30 of an hour, aka 4 minutes.

>15MPH for one Mile should take 1/15 of an hour, aka 4 minutes.

so there is no answer to this question because its impossible

The answer to the question is that the car has to travel at infinite speed for the next mile. Whether or that is impossible is not known

>Whether or that is impossible is not known

something something e=mc2 something something you would need infinite energy to move at infinite speed

>you would need infinite energy to move at infinite speed

assuming spacetime is homogenous

>The question confuses people

yes, that is the point of a bait meme from facebook, to confuse stupid people

Re-read the question. They are just asking for an average SPEED for 2 miles, it is not asking for average time for 2 miles. So yes it is 45.

45+15=60

60/2 = 30

I made the same mistake until I reread it.

I see galaxy brain anon, and what exactly does SPEED measure again?

Speed = Distance/Time

The first mile was done in 15 mph, therefore it took 4 minutes to complete. We agree 1 hour is 60 minutes, therefore 60/15 = 4 minutes.

Now the question is asking for the AVERAGE SPEED for 2 miles to be 30mph.

There you need to do to the 2nd mile in 45mph. Since it is just the average between 2 miles. We can agree 2 means 2 right? Or are you going to throw SJW BLM shit about 2 doesn't mean 2?

45+15=60/2= 30 right?

So you do the first time mile slower then the second mile faster because if TARGET AVERAGE MPH for the distance is greater than the first mile right?

>I drove two miles in 5'20"

>if I did this over the course of an hour I would have covered 22.5 miles

>therefore my average speed was 30 miles per hour

dunning kruger

>units are meaningless

depends on if you average based on time or distance. on distance it would be on time you would go with

Correct answer: you can't go 30 miles per hour when you only drive 2 miles for less than ten minutes

The car would have to instantaneously travel the second mile.

Correct.

To average 30mph for two miles the journey would have to take 4 minutes.

Travelling 1 mile at 15mph has already taken 4 minutes.

It depends. What's the space-time curvature?

>doing compound lifts

>ever

>for any reason

Are you guys 12 years old? The only lifts you should be doing if you want to be strong and aesthetic is the ones where if you don’t reply to this post your mother will die in her sleep tonight

>mass replying

kys

Fuck

u mean

Lel gottem

(15+x)/2 = 30

15+x = 60

x = 45

True but the time doesn't add up to the same as in

. It's weird, Idk. You're right but OP's fucked our asses.

>True but the time doesn't add up

? The question doesn't mention time. It just mentions the average mph over 2 miles.

Velocity is a social construct of white supremacy

Face pulls are pretty good

1785 mph

(15 (first mile) + X + 58 * 0) / 60 = 30

>58 * 0

60 minutes in an hour retard

Source?

>trusting the lamestream media

I'm going to have to mark that one down as a ngmi and put it in your permanent record anon

Just use harmonic mean.

1/ (1/15 + 1/x) = 1/30

45mph ignoring acceleration; Vaverage=Vinitial+Vend; 60/2=15/2+X/2; X=45

i am ignoring time and acceleration as they are not relevant. its average velocity for the given distance, not time, do not take time into consideration, this is average velocity/mile.

This. I guess they don't teach reading comprehension in most STEM branches

Just do barbell rows or dumbells but flared elbows. Works most of the upper back too

ITT: American education

It's not our fault Communists would rather teach us that it's not weird for adults to touch children as long as they have the same gender identity

I'm American and I immediately knew what the answer was. We don't have a Communist problem we have an idiot problem.

Shut up, Communist.

>he doesn't realize that only idiots would be Communists, so solving the idiot problem solves the Communist problem

you're part of the problem, anon.

In order to average 30mph over a 2 mile trip, the car would need to reach the end within 4 minutes

Since the car is going 15 mph for 1 mile, it takes it 4 minutes to get to the halfway point.

In order to average 30 mph over the 2 mile trip, the car would need to teleport from the 1 mile to 2 mile point.

In the ashtray.

You fucking retards are overthinking this with time bullshit that the question doesn't ask for.

The question states that a 2-mile trip is taken and we know the first mile is at 15mph and if the second mile is travelled at 45mph the average speed will be mph. It's not fucking hard.

mph is a measure of speed, not distance. The fact that the first mile took 4 minutes and second took 1.3 minutes has no bearing on the question.

Furthermore, all the retards who think the car must teleport to meet a fantasy requirement of a 2 mile journey at 30 mph which would take 2 minutes are missing the fact that the questions asks for an AVERAGE of 30 mph not a constant.

t. physics major bsci grad

that's like, your opinion man

speed = distance / time gives an answer of 22.64 using the times in your answer.

You must be trolling.

i think you should call your alma mater and see if you can get a refund on that bsci

If a car averages 30mph over two miles, how long does that trip last, retard?

If not bait, seriously sue your college/University for fraud

>15 mph for 1 mile

>it took 1/15th of an hour

>30 mph for 2 miles

>it would take 1/15th of an hour

Since the car already took 1/15th of an hour to cross the first mile, there's no time left to cross the rest.

There are so much things as impossible problems. The answer is infinity. All of you can fuck off now

Pretty much any pulling exercise that permits maximum weight to be moved. I would say weighted pullups, cable rows, DB rows. They primary thing to focus on to emphasize delts is not tucking your elbows as much as you normally would for back work. I would flare the elbows somewhat

first mile is half the speed so the second would be double so 60?

It goes 4min in first mile also

It takes 4min to complete 2miles at 30mph average.

Not possible to solve.

Power cleans are sick for rear delts and traps

Or if you don't want to pull from the floor, try just barbell hips to shoulders

I never heard of those for rear delts. I need rear delt work but I hate doing little light dumbbell work. I'll put these in my routing and give them a go. Any one else used power cleans for rear delts?

For those who want a little more comprehensible answer rather than just sayin there wouldn't be enough time or you would need to teleport here's what i came up with. Because the average speed is based on time not distance and you are limited with 1 mile, as you speed up you also spend less time covering that 1 mile so it contributes to the average less and less and you can't get to the aimed number.

I was shocked by how confused I got over this seemingly simply question.

I ended up with 30x / (x + 1) as the equation for the average speed you will go, where x is the multiple of 15 that your second speed is (eg. 30mph x =2) . So if you put 30 = 30x / (x+1) and try to solve you will find x = x + 1, so yes infinity is the only answer.

>retards failing a 5th grade question

the absolute state of this board

45 mph btw

brainless on suicide watch, anon figured it out

BA in gender studies with mathematics minor here. Ill rework the problem into something more tangible

You need to get to work at 9 o'clock

Work is only 2 miles away

You plan on leaving at 8:56

To make it there you will need to drive an average of 30 mph

You realize that the first mile of the drive is uphill

This causes you to only drive 15mph, half of your goal

It's already 9:00 but you are only half way there

No amount of speeding up will get you to work on time now

Actually huge brain way of explaining the problem. Should I drop maths and join gender studies?

>BA in gender studies

b8

THANK YOU

This is actually incorrect, but I will give you a pass since you only have a math minor.

There is actually an amount of speeding up that will get you to work on time, however it is illegal and the cops will catch you. That is the paradox that Einstein was suggesting.

Obey traffic laws.

If you do the second mile at 45 then you're only averaging 22.5 mph, not 30

Your average speed in terms of time is different to your average speed in terms of distance

>30 miles per hour per hour

Yes its the second derivative

Right, the second derivative aka the acceleration. The average speed you are going is your acceleration, who knew

hmmm

You cannot see inside the boxes but you can feel inside them. 0 samples.

Or smell.

Dumb riddle

Call the person who tasked with such a worthless job a cocksucker and go home.

At least 3 samples tyo find out what boxes are what. Then unknown amount of samples from one box until you hit apples AND oranges from the same box.

Because you can't know if the box is apples and oranges or just apples or just oranges, until you find both in the same box. which lets you identify the other two as just apples and just oranges.

>Because you can't know if the box is apples and oranges or just apples or just oranges, until you find both in the same box

No each sample identifies that box as belonging to a two-box set. Three samples, one from each box, puts it in a certain set regardless of what you get.

>3 samples is enough

okay here is what you got

Apples form Box 1

Orange from box 2

Apple from Box 3

there is your 3 samples

Now tell me, which one is apples and oranges box. IS it box 1 or 3. Remember you already used your 3 samples.

Three. You point to the third box and get two samples, one apple and one orange. You point to the second box and you get an orange. You know the other box is apples.

I need the maximum number of samples breh. I'm out of money and training to increase my wagie. tfw no fruit

You need ONE sample from the box labeled "apples and oranges". You know every label is wrong, so that box can't have both types of fruit. If you got an orange, you know it contains only oranges. The box labeled apples must contain either only oranges or both oranges and apples, so if you already know the third box contains only oranges, the "apples" box must contain both oranges and apples and the "oranges" box must contain only apples.

Apply the same logic if you get an apple instead.

retards

>You know every label is wrong, so that box can't have both types of fruit.

ah yes another one of those retarded autism tests

>intentionally every box was made wrong

>no not wrong as in everything is mixed up, but intentionally the thing it says on the box, thats not what in it, trust me, we made sure that it ws wrong

>w-what whjy didnt we make sure it was the thing that it says on the box...w-w-ele...well......

fuck you autists. the only sane application is if the boxes are randomized and you don't know what the boxes can contain.

There will never be a scenario in real life where every box is exactly labled not to have the thing it says on it.

fucking autists fuck, I should squad a weight on your chest and drop it.

>I'll blame the riddle for the fact that I can't read

>I'l make up a riddle that contains a scenario that never appears in real life, like traveling from point B to C instantly through teleportation, or that each box has any item in it EXCEPT the item that it's labled on the box

>haha whats that, you don't like my riddles hehehe guess I'm too smart

I would legit punch you for being an autistic fuck, you disgust me and nobody thinks you are clever.

yes people who can't use common sense to adjust the incoming data to make sense in the context of this reality so it has outcomes and scenarios that make sense are autistic.

If you give a human a sentence that has some faults in it, the human will, give an interpretation of the retarded shit you said and choose the most sensible one.

An autist or a robot, a machine, will follow what you said to the letter and be unable to filter it through common sense, if you say retarded shit that can't possibly happen, it will run with that exact scenario.

Conclusion: Yes you are autistic.

>people who can't

Evidently the only one who can't do something here is you, who can't apply any sort of abstract thinking to even the simplest puzzles. Whining that some problem isn't rooted in "common sense" is such a brailet cope, do you think everything is limited to your narrow worldview? Do you believe the math that makes any modern technology possible was developed based on the pre-conceived limited notions of low IQ idiots such as yourself?

These are just silly puzzles whose purpose is to make you think a tiny bit outside the box but you're incapable of even that, so you must rage against people whose logical abilities are not completely nonexistent like yours. You're also incapable of thinking how these could possibly apply to real life, when there could be plenty of examples if you actually think about them - one of which posted in this very thread.

Here's another one for you to seethe over.

>I can't take a fictional scenario and simply read the words to figure out what the parameters of the problem are without applying my prejudices to it

>it's other people who have autism

>I prefer my incorrect interpretation and I'm going to double down on being a Karen in addition to illiterate

>I prefer my autistic made up scenario that doesn't happen in real life

Read

He perfectly illustrates how it can be applied to real life

Oh wow I'm retarded because I accidentally fell into a question's trap. Why do you have to be unpleasant.

1 sample from each box guarantees you get it right every time.

The only combination you can get is either: "A, A, O" or "A, O, O"

In the case of "A, A, O", the box you got the orange from is the one that contains only oranges.

And because ALL of the labels are wrong, that means the label that the orange box has (either A or A&O) will go to the box that DOESN'T have the label O. Then you just stick O on the orange box, and the last remaining label you stick on the last box.

The exact same process applies to "A, O, O" as well.

Nevermind I'm fucking retarded, here's the answer:

60mph whole 2nd mile. Car's avg speed says 30mph. Try it.

1 mile at 15mph = 4 minutes

1 mile at 60mph = 1 minute

It took 5 minutes to travel 2 miles = 24mph

Why arent you counting the travel time of the car while it was stationary and the guy was sleeping at home?

The travel speed was 0 and in over 16 hours the car didn't move an inch.

So your math is completely off!

1.5 MPH

Anyone who doesn't say 45 is a fucking idiot who think they're a lot smarter than they are.

Also fuck garden gnomes

Read the question again dumbass.

The question isn't "30 is the average of 15 and what other number"

Not that guy, but after reading OP a dozen times I fail to see how the question isn't just "30 is the average of 15 and what other number".

the car has to go infinitly fast to achive the 30mph average

I think this thread has shown how it takes all kinds of people to creatively interpret and answer a problem and you know what? It’s beautiful.

What a positive spin for such a shit thread. You must be having a good day.

So true, NASA should hire these stunning and brave individuals from all walks of life to creatively solve their engineering problem.